Type O Negative "Profit Of Doom" SPV USA from the new Album Dead Again http://www.typeonegative.net http://www.spvusa.com

Googlewhacks for Fun and Profit- Jonathan Lansey We study the number of Internet search results returned from multi-word queries based on the number of results returned when each word is searched for individually. We derive a model to describe search result values for multi-word queries using the total number of pages indexed by Google and by applying the Zipf power law to the word per page distribution on the internet and Heaps' law for unique word counts. Based on data from 351 word pairs each with exactly one hit when searched for together, and a Zipf law coefficient determined in other studies, we approximate the Heaps' law coefficient for the indexed world wide web (about 8 billion pages) to be beta=.52. Previous studies used under 20,000 pages. We demonstrate the validity of our method by using a different set of word pairs and with word triplets. We demonstrate through examples how the model can be used to analyze automatically the relatedness of word pairs assigning each a value we call "Strength of Associativity." . We then use our model to compare the index sizes of competing search giants Yahoo and Google.

This clip is from the 15-part lecture series, "Milton Friedman Speaks" http://www.ideachannel.com/product_info.php?products_id=1137 Transcript available via FreedomChannel: http://freedomchannel.blogspot.com/2007/12/milton-friedman-on-slavery.html Summary: A student poses a series of question on based on Friedman's notion that people should pursue their own self-interest. The student points out that he'd read that Friedman had previously come out against disaster aid for victims of a flood in Pennsylvania. Friedman corrected the questioner and noted that he did not come out against private aid for flood victims but instead was against the Federal Government providing discounted flood insurance in advance to home purchasers which motivated people to build houses in areas where they otherwise would not have been able to obtain insurance privately. If not for the discounted insurance, it's likely many of the flooded houses would never have been built in the first place as it wouldn't have been in peoples self-interest. The student went on to note that it was recently reported that an old man in Ohio died when the electric company turned off his power when he'd failed to pay his electric bill. Was it moral for the company to act in it's own self-interest to do so? Friedman responded by asking what if the electric company never turned off the power for anyone? Who would pay the cost--the people who own or work at the electric company? It would be unjust to impose that responsibility on individuals who are running an honest business of providing electricity. Friedman suggests that the true responsibility lies on the mans neighbors and friends who were not charitable enough to allow him to meet the electric bills. Finally the student uses the example of Ford deciding not to install a $13 block of plastic which would prevent it's Pinto cars from exploding in a rear-end collision. Ford estimated such a move would cost 200 lives a year at a cost of $200,000 per life lost. They multiplied and found that it wasn't worth it to install the plastic block. He asked if a corporation seeking it's own self-interest was a good thing in this case? Friedman responded by asking, what if it cost $1 billion to save each life, should Ford have put in the block? It's simply not practical to put an infinite value on an individuals life. If it took $1 billion in resources to keep one individual safe, and acquiring those resources meant that a million people must starve, it's a bad deal. Friedman concludes that he doesn't know if the $200,000 number that Ford used was the right number to maximize the overall benefits, but at the end of the day the principle is that we can't simply protect ourselves from everything and impose that cost on others. Friedman posits that the question the student should be raising, is should Ford be required to attach the statement to the car, "we've made this car $13 cheaper, and therefore it is X% more risky for you to buy it". See also: Free to Choose - All 15 episodes streaming online for free http://www.ideachannel.tv A history of Free to Choose http://www.freetochoose.com

This clip is from the 15-part lecture series, "Milton Friedman Speaks" http://www.ideachannel.com/product_info.php?products_id=1137 Transcript available via FreedomChannel: http://freedomchannel.blogspot.com/2007/12/milton-friedman-on-slavery.html Summary: A student poses a series of question on based on Friedman's notion that people should pursue their own self-interest. The student points out that he'd read that Friedman had previously come out against disaster aid for victims of a flood in Pennsylvania. Friedman corrected the questioner and noted that he did not come out against private aid for flood victims but instead was against the Federal Government providing discounted flood insurance in advance to home purchasers which motivated people to build houses in areas where they otherwise would not have been able to obtain insurance privately. If not for the discounted insurance, it's likely many of the flooded houses would never have been built in the first place as it wouldn't have been in peoples self-interest. The student went on to note that it was recently reported that an old man in Ohio died when the electric company turned off his power when he'd failed to pay his electric bill. Was it moral for the company to act in it's own self-interest to do so? Friedman responded by asking what if the electric company never turned off the power for anyone? Who would pay the cost--the people who own or work at the electric company? It would be unjust to impose that responsibility on individuals who are running an honest business of providing electricity. Friedman suggests that the true responsibility lies on the mans neighbors and friends who were not charitable enough to allow him to meet the electric bills. Finally the student uses the example of Ford deciding not to install a $13 block of plastic which would prevent it's Pinto cars from exploding in a rear-end collision. Ford estimated such a move would cost 200 lives a year at a cost of $200,000 per life lost. They multiplied and found that it wasn't worth it to install the plastic block. He asked if a corporation seeking it's own self-interest was a good thing in this case? Friedman responded by asking, what if it cost $1 billion to save each life, should Ford have put in the block? It's simply not practical to put an infinite value on an individuals life. If it took $1 billion in resources to keep one individual safe, and acquiring those resources meant that a million people must starve, it's a bad deal. Friedman concludes that he doesn't know if the $200,000 number that Ford used was the right number to maximize the overall benefits, but at the end of the day the principle is that we can't simply protect ourselves from everything and impose that cost on others. Friedman posits that the question the student should be raising, is should Ford be required to attach the statement to the car, "we've made this car $13 cheaper, and therefore it is X% more risky for you to buy it". See also: Free to Choose - All 15 episodes streaming online for free http://www.ideachannel.tv A history of Free to Choose http://www.freetochoose.com

www.wideopenexposure.com Demo reel of soon to be released documentary.We are raising funds to finish production and go on a Spring 2009 cross Canada screening tour. Please help by pre-ordering your copy of the DVD. More info here: http://www.wideopenexposure.com/M4P.php

http://www.ted.com "I don't think we're going to make it," John Doerr proclaims, in an emotional talk about climate change and investment. Spurred on by his daughter, who demanded he fix the mess the world is heading for, he and his partners at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers embarked on a greentech world tour -- surveying the state of the art, from the ethanol revolution in Brazil to Wal-mart's (!) eco-concept store in Bentonville, Arkansas. KPCB is investing $200 million in green technologies to save the planet and make a profit to boot. But, Doerr fears, it may not be enough.

Watch more clips at http://www.theyoungturks.com

Like this video? Come see hundreds more at KrankTV.com! - the Net's biggest home for metal, death, grind, thrash, rapcore, heavy and hard rock music videos! If you like the hard stuff, come get hooked on KrankTV.com! Directors: Scott Sisti & Michael Saladino

September 17, 2008 the most radical intervention in private business in the central banks history. The US government has seized control of insurance giant American International Group in an unprecedented $85 billion bailout. The Federal Reserve made the deal on Tuesday (September 2008) to save AIG from collapse in what the New York Times describes as the most radical intervention in private business in the central banks history. The move comes as a series of financial crises has altered the landscape of Wall Street. We speak with investment banker turned journalist, Nomi Prins, and Michael Hudson, president of the Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends. Excerpt... Nomi Prins, former investment banker turned journalist. She used to run the European analytics group at Bear Stearns and is now a senior fellow at Demos. She is the author of two books: Other Peoples Money: The Corporate Mugging of America and Jacked: How Conservatives Are Picking Your Pocket. Michael Hudson, President of the Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, and author of Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire. He is the chief economic adviser to Rep. Dennis Kucinich. Government bailout, which means taxpayers stuck with the bill is the worst possible move, and it puts the class war back in business with a vengeance. Wall Street has been preparing for this for years, because every financial analyst knows that the debts cant be paid. And the question that Wall Street has, if youre going to take a gamble on bad debts that cant be paid, how are you going to come out a winner? And theres only one way of coming out a winner, and thats to make the government bail you out. This has been known for years, because its inherent almost in the mathematics of compound interest. Every banker I know knew that the loans they were making were going to go bad. They were trying to sell them to somebody else, ultimately expecting them to end up with some sovereign wealth fund. And now, you had at the beginning of the show, McCain saying that this is the result of fraud and incompetence. The government has now bailed them out. But by bailing them out—Wall Street was coming to terms with the bad debts. When Bear Stearns went under and when Lehman Brothers went under, this began to wipe away the bad debts. And when the debts exceed the ability to pay, theres only one thing any economy can do, and thats wipe them out. Instead, the government is trying to keep the fiction alive. And what Paulson did yesterday, in bailing out AIG, was to try to lock in whoever is the next president not only to further bailouts of Wall Street, ostensibly to protect the public money, but to make it impossible to write down the debts of the four million homeowners that are expected to default this year, impossible to write down the debts of companies that have issued junk bonds, impossible for the country to get rid of this excess of debts that cant be repaid. And youre having really a war now of creditors against debtors. And this is what Wall Street has been preparing for. It needed an emergency to do it. Its really not an emergency at all. This has been building up for many years. Everybody expected it. And breathlessly now, the Secretary of Treasury has done it. These are the people who sang, Theres no money for Social Security. Were going to have to privatize it. Were going to have to turn over your Social Security to Bear Stearns, to AIG—to the very people who have shown how theyre mismanaging money. Imagine if the Republican program had gone through and Social Security had been privatized and these were the jokers who were managing your Social Security. Theyd stick you with the losses.

Be My Friend - http://www.myspace.com/psychtruth Science of Profit, Corporate Takeover of Science, Wake Up America #2 What influence has corporations and big Pharma had on science and government regulations via the FDA, NIH and CDC? Big money and conflicts of interest have changed the face of science and health care in America. Science's Worst Enemy: Corporate Funding, Discover Magazine http://discovermagazine.com/2007/oct/sciences-worst-enemy-private-funding Visit Radhia's Website at http://www.advancedhealthinstitute.com/ http://www.aimmd.com/ Visit Peter McCarthy's website http://www.lifeenergyholisticcenter.com/ Visit Texas Health Freedom Coalition http://www.texashealthfreedom.com/ Peter McCarthy is the Chief Executive Officer and Wellness Director of Life Energy Holistic Partners, Inc. and holds the degree of Doctor of Naturopathy from Trinity College of Natural Health. He is a Nationally Board Certified Traditional Naturopath and is a member of the Advisory Committee of the American Naturopathic Certification Board. Radhia Gleis is certified in Clinical Nutrition, C.C.N. She is also a Certified BioNutritional Analyst. She has a Ph.D. in pastoral counseling and a M.Ed. in nutrition. She is a professional member of the International and American Association of Clinical Nutritionists, (I.A.A.C.N), and the American Naturopathic Medical Association (A.N.M.A.) and specialized in complementary and alternative medicine. Music by John Richter http://www.injoysolutions.com This video was produced by Psychetruth http://www.myspace.com/psychtruth http://www.youtube.com/psychetruth http://psychetruth.blogspot.com/ Psychetruth is empowered by TubeMogul http://www.tubemogul.com © Copyright 2008 AHI Productions. All Rights Reserved. Distributed by Tubemogul.

banking money currency illuminati brokers war finance slavery depression inflation dollar usd euro gold silver debt fiat WTC 911 2012 central banking conspiracy video on the takeover of currency from nations by private individuals for profit. JFK warning rfid chip buy sell mark of the beast corporation fiat debt money currency usa federal reserve credit cash - from http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

TBN, Joel Osteen, Paul Crouch, Jan Crouch, Benny Hinn, his wife, Rick Warren, Creflo Dollar, Eddie Long, T.D. Jakes, Kim Clement, Paula White, Kenneth Copeland, Jesse Duplantis, and Rodney Howard Browne appear in the video and teach false doctrine. Beware of these ravenous wolves. NOTE: Each of these short clips are excerpts from much longer broadcasts. No clip is longer than 30 seconds, whereas the original broadcasts are in lengths of 30+ minutes. Nothing I have used was more than 20% of the original PUBLIC broadcasts. Hence, this is perfectly legal under the Fair Use Act.

Profit generally is the making of gain in business activity for the benefit of the owners of the business. The word comes from Latin meaning "to make progress," is defined in two different ways, one for economics and one for accounting. The equipment and integrated security systems used to detain Olympic protesters will remain long after the Olympics, to be used, many fear, on China's own population in almost daily crackdowns on both domestic and international protesters who have had to contend with a brand new surveillance system that China set up ahead of the games. This includes 300,000 security cameras and an estimated 100,000 security officers on duty in Beijing. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of this surveillance boom are US hedge funds and corporations, including Cisco, General Electric, Honeywell and L1. There is an incredible operation going on in China to use the latest, what's now called homeland security technology—networked surveillance cameras, biometric identification cards, facial recognition software—networking all of these cameras and running the software through it as a way to control an increasingly rebellious population. There's an incredible statistic from 2005 that there were 87,000 mass incidents, which means protests and riots, across the country. So it is already being used as a way to control the population and also to keep an eye on what in China is called the floating population, the migrant population, who are displaced by mega projects, who travel to cities like Beijing and Guangzhou and Shenzhen looking for work. This is a mobile population that is right now 130 million people. And this technology is used to keep track of those people, because in a sort of Maoist time in China, you had—where people stayed in their communities, you had networks of control and surveillance that were really about people snitching on their neighbors. When people are moving across long distances, the technology is replacing that. So "Police State 2.0" is really about upgrading the surveillance system, with the help of US companies like Cisco, General Electric, Honeywell, IBM, Google, Yahoo. We have heard about this. But in terms of building the surveillance state, one company to really watch is L1. They are doing the fingerprinting and iris scanning in the United States, and they've been selling this software to Chinese companies that are embedding it in their Golden Shield network.

Safaricom profits

http://www.informedtrades.com/ A lesson on how to incorporate technical analysis in identifying support and resistance and incorporating this into setting your stop loss when trading the stock, futures, and forex markets. In our last lesson we learned about the Average True Range (ATR) and how traders use this to get an idea of the volatility in the market so they can incorporate this into their stop levels. In today's lesson we are going to add an additional factor that most traders consider important when setting stops, support and resistance. As we have learned in previous lessons many traders will use technical analysis to determine where support and resistance is in the market, and look for trading opportunities based on what that chart analysis tells them. In addition to using technical analysis to find support and resistance levels in which trades can be entered, many successful traders also use this method of analysis to determine where their stops should be placed. One of the most popular methods which we have touched on in previous lessons where many traders use support and resistance in their trading is when trading ranges in the market. Many traders favor ranges, as they provide traders with the ability to enter trades with tight stop losses and much larger potential returns. The reasoning here is that traders can enter a trade just below resistance or just above support in the range, place their stop just outside that level and then their profit target at the other end of the range. Generally the distance between the stop level is much shorter than the distance between the other end of the range, providing traders with a great opportunity for a relatively low risk and potentially high reward trade. Chart Example This is also another example of using tech levels (the bottom and top of the range) to place trades and set stops. Often times however as many traders are employing this type of strategy, the market will jump up or down above/below the resistance/support level stopping traders out of trades before quickly reversing and moving in the favor of the traders original entry price. Because of this traders are faced with the delema of how far to place there stop outside of the range that they are trading, so that they can be in a position where they are protected but are less likely to be stopped out on market spikes. One way that this can be done is by incorporating the ATR. Although the example above shows 1 ATR as the level at which the stop is placed outside of the range. That number could be a percentage such as 50% of the ATR or any other multiple of the ATR such as 2 ATR's outside the range, depending on the traders timeframe, profit target, and strategy. To finish off this example we now have several components which make up a basic strategies for placing stops based on technical levels and can now analyze the feasibility of one of the trades here to see if it fits all of our criteria.

Please include in the comments what items you would like me to put in the next merch log.

A clip from the first ever Equitymaster WebSummit. The guest for the summit was Ajit Dayal.

Iraq war veteran and the youngest U.S. Congressional candidate, Michael Prysner, has spoken out against the American-led invasion of Iraq.

Opponents of the war in Iraq say that the US invaded the country's for its oil. Oil is Iraq's most precious resource, and it is now finally within reach. Some of the world's biggest companies are set to go back into Iraq, with new contracts expected to be announced shortly. However many Iraqis are suspicious of such plans and worry the country's oil wealth will go to foreigners. Al Jazeera's Nicole Johnston reports.

November 14, 2008 Darrel Issa (R-CA) Domestic Policy Committee meeting with Kashkari

http://therealnews.com/c.php?c=08081YT Barry Kay: Polling is a business; the interest of pollsters is not to educate the public

Why does capitalism go into crisis? In this video I attempt to summarize the basic ideas behind the theory of the falling rate of profit, often considered the corner-stone of crisis theory. Full Text can be read at: http://kapitalism101.wordpress.com/the-falling-rate-of-profit/

This is part 2 of an ongoing series and for the record this is Staring Barney Barnwell More moonshine,Possom,Wilard the deer,new wife stories. Get your full copy at moonshiners.com

Small tip for you to start small business in China. You can do it? Yiwu City is a China's largest commodities trading city and has a massive permanent fair. Is located 60 miles south of the city of Hangzhou - the capital of Zhejiang Province. A large proportion of the world's products come out of companies based in Yiwu

http://www.turbomembership.com/index.shtml?aff_id=53954 What will you do if you're given the chance to own a franchise to one of the most successful line of information products in the Internet today? What will you do if you're given exclusive access to a non-stop factory of innovative eBooks, programs and scripts that you could sell for profit any time of the day, any day of the week? What will you do if you're given everything... EVERYTHING... that you would ever need to successfully run this franchise and make some gigantic earnings in the process? What will you do if someone gives you a Business on a Silver Plate? Would you say No?? Nah.... I am asking these questions because they are what John Delavera is offering in his latest brainchild: the chance to have your own business with full technical, inventory and coaching support at a price that is lower than two pairs of jeans at Walmart. Aptly named the TURBOmembership, John Delavera is pulling out all the stops on his latest endeavor and he wants you to ride with him. He is offering you the chance to own and sell his highly acclaimed TURBO line of products for a 95% profit, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. He will also give you new, exclusive products every month from his virtual assembly line of cutting edge concepts and ideas. And you will be able to earn from all of these through a complete business module that would be provided for you, including a web hosting subscription, website design, an excellent autoresponder service, marketing materials, and most importantly, the tutorship from one of the best minds in the industry, John Delavera himself. In every attempt to make money on the Internet, an online entrepreneur is bound to commit one or all of these common but fatal mistakes: * Thinking that product creation is a cinch and it can be done overnight. * Thinking further that he could churn out countless products at a profitable rate. * Believing that what he knows is enough to guarantee his success. * Choosing more affordable services for his business at the expense of quality. * Being confident that an effective marketing strategy doesn't have to cost a dime. The truth of the matter is that Internet marketing requires a lot of skills, a lot of dedication, and sadly, a lot of monetary investment, whether you accept that fact or not. This is how the online moneymaking game is played. Thankfully, the rules are about to change, and you're cordially invited for the ride. John Delavera, the father of the highly acclaimed and widely received TURBO line of products which include the JVManager, the Buy Me A Beer and Buy Me A Product programs, the Dynamic Pricing Generator, several blockbuster eBooks, and the long running Turbozine newsletter, is offering you something that has never been offered in the history of online commerce. * * * EVERYTHING * * * Everything that you'll ever need to run a successful business on the World Wide Web, including access to his super sellable items, a persistent factory of information products that would create exclusive goods just for you, a web hosting service including website design and support, an excellent autoresponder system for your follow-ups, and many, many, many more. But most important of all, John Delavera is offering himself to be your mentor and your friend, by committing himself to support you every step of the way. With all honesty, this is an opportunity that could define your success and eventually change your life. You've heard others promise the same thing before, but not with this amount of veracity. So, are you ready to make that change that would finally put an end to your commercial burdens and hitch you a ride on that highway to online prosperity? Check it today and see the difference that EVERYTHING can make: http://www.turbomembership.com/index.shtml?aff_id=53954