(Redirected from Universal gravitational constant)According to the
law of universal gravitation, the attractive
force between two bodies is proportional to the product of their
masses and
inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
:
The
constant of proportionality is called
, the 'gravitational constant', the ''universal gravitational constant'', ''Newton's constant'', and colloquially ''Big G''. The gravitational constant is a
physical constant which appears in
Newton's law of universal gravitation and in
Einstein's theory of
general relativity.
The gravitational constant is perhaps the most difficult physical constant to measure. In
SI units, the 2006
CODATA recommended value of the gravitational constant is
:
[1]
::
::
Another authoritative estimate is given by the
International Astronomical Union (see Standish, 1995).
In
Natural units, of which
Planck units are perhaps the best example, ''G'' and other physical constants such as ''c'' (the
speed of light) may be set equal to 1. In galactic scales, where distances are measured in (kilo-)
parsecs, velocities in kilometers per second and masses in solar units, it is useful to express ''G'' as :
:
When considering forces of
fundamental particles, the gravitational force can appear extremely weak compared with other
fundamental forces. For example, the gravitational force between an
electron and
proton 1 meter apart is approximately 10
-67 newton, while the
electromagnetic force between the same two particles still 1 meter apart is approximately 10
-28 newton. Both these forces are weak when compared with the forces we are able to experience directly, but the electromagnetic force in this example is some 39 orders of magnitude (i.e. 10
39) greater than the force of gravity — which is even greater than the ratio between the mass of a human and the mass of the Solar System.
Measurement of the gravitational constant
The gravitational constant appears in
Newton's law of universal gravitation, but it was not measured until 1798 — 71 years after Newton's death — by
Henry Cavendish (''Philosophical Transactions''
1798). Cavendish measured
implicitly, using a
torsion balance invented by Rev. geologist
John Michell. He used a horizontal torsion beam with lead balls whose inertia (in relation to the torsion constant) he could tell by timing the beam's oscillation. Their faint attraction to other balls placed alongside the beam was detectable by the deflection it caused. However, it is worth mentioning that the aim of Cavendish was not to measure the gravitational constant but rather to measure the mass and density relative to water of the Earth through the precise knowledge of the gravitational interaction.
The accuracy of the measured value of
has increased only modestly since the original experiment of Cavendish.
is quite difficult to measure, as gravity is much weaker than other fundamental forces, and an experimental apparatus cannot be separated from the gravitational influence of other bodies. Furthermore, gravity has no established relation to other fundamental forces, so it does not appear possible to measure it indirectly. A recent review (Gillies, 1997) shows that published values of
have varied rather broadly, and some recent measurements of high precision are, in fact, mutually exclusive.
[2]
The ''GM'' product
The
product is the
standard gravitational parameter , according to the case also called the geocentric or heliocentric gravitational constant, among others. This gives a convenient simplification of various gravity-related formulas. Also, for the Earth and the Sun, the value of the product is known more accurately than each factor. (As a result, the accuracy to which the masses of the Earth and the Sun are known correspond to the accuracy to which
is known.)
In calculations of gravitational force in the solar system, it is the products which appear, so computations are more accurate using the standard gravitational parameters directly (or, correspondingly, using values for the masses and the gravitational constant which ''correspond'', i.e., result in an accurate product, though not very accurate individually). In other words, because
appear together, there really is no need to substitute values for each; rather use the more accurate measurement of their product,
, in place of
.
:
(for earth)
Also, calculations in
celestial mechanics can be carried out using the unit of solar mass rather than the standard SI unit kilogram. In this case we use the
Gaussian gravitational constant which is
, where
:
: and
::
is the
astronomical unit
::
is the
mean solar day
::
is the
solar mass.
If instead of mean solar day we use the
sidereal year as our time unit, the value is very close to
.
The dimensions of ''G''
The dimensions assigned to the gravitational constant (length cubed, divided by mass and by time squared) are those needed to make gravitational equations 'come out right'. However, these dimensions have fundamental significance in terms of
Planck units: when expressed in SI units, the gravitational constant is dimensionally and numerically equal to the cube of the
Planck length divided by the
Planck mass and by the square of
Planck time.
Recent measurement
In the January 5, 2007 issue of ''
Science'' (page 74), the report "Atom Interferometer Measurement of the Newtonian Constant of Gravity" (J. B. Fixler, G. T. Foster, J. M. McGuirk, and M. A. Kasevich) describes a new measurement of the gravitational constant. According to the abstract: "Here, we report a value of G = 6.693 x 10
–11 cubic meters per kilogram second squared, with a standard error of the mean of ±0.027 x 10
–11 and a systematic error of ±0.021 x 10
–11 cubic meters per kilogram second squared.".
[3]
See also
★
Cavendish experiment
★
Standard gravity
★
Planck units
★
Dirac large numbers hypothesis
★
Accelerating Universe
★
References
1. http://www.physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bg
2. http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0034-4885/60/2/001
3. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/315/5808/74?rss=1%5D%5B%5BREPORTS%5D
★ George T. Gillies. "The Newtonian gravitational constant: recent measurements and related studies". ''Reports on Progress in Physics'', 60:151-225, 1997. ''(A lengthy, detailed review. See Figure 1 and Table 2 in particular. Available online:
PDF)''
★ E. Myles Standish. "Report of the IAU WGAS Sub-group on Numerical Standards". In ''Highlights of Astronomy'', I. Appenzeller, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. ''(Complete report available online:
PostScript. Tables from the report also available:
Astrodynamic Constants and Parameters)''
★ Jens H. Gundlach and Stephen M. Merkowitz. "Measurement of Newton's Constant Using a Torsion Balance with Angular Acceleration Feedback". ''Physical Review Letters'', 85(14):2869-2872, 2000. ''(Also available online:
PDF link broken, as of 2007-09-08)''
★
CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2002, Peter J. Mohr and Barry N. Taylor, , , Reviews of Modern Physics, January 2005 Section Q (pp. 42–47) describes the mutually inconsistent measurement experiments from which the CODATA value for ''G'' was derived.
External links
★
CODATA Internationally recommended values of the Fundamental Physical Constants ''(at
The NIST References on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty)''
★
The Controversy over Newton's Gravitational Constant — additional commentary on measurement problems
★
The Antikythera Calculator (Italian and English versions)
★
The Gravitational Constant