Discover

The 'Trifunctional Hypothesis' is a controversial conjecture proposed by French mythographer Georges Dumézil. The hypothesis states that Indo-European religion has societies and religions divided into three similar roles: warriors, priests, and farmers.

Contents

Three Way Division

Historical Examples

Criticism and Controversy

References

Further reading

See also

Three Way Division

Dumézil divided the Proto-Indo-European idea of sovereignty into two distinct and complementary parts. One part was formal, juridical, and priestly, but rooted in this world. The other powerful, unpredictable, and also priestly, but rooted in the ''other'', the supernatural and spiritual world. Finally, there was a third group, who were ruled by the other two, whose role was productivity: herding, farming, and crafts.
The heart of the hypothesis is that both the society and the mythology are so divided. Each social group has its own god or family of gods to represent it, and that the function of both the group in its society and the function of the god or gods in the pantheon match. A recent alternate name for the hypothesis is ''function theory'' (but 'do not' confuse sociological ''function theory'' with the completely separate mathematical subject with the same name).

Historical Examples

Dumézil believed that this tripartite division resulted in the arrangement of

★ Brahmin, Kshatriya and commoner castes in India

★ Priests, Kings and peasants in Europe
Dumézil argued that this dual sovereignty was expressed by pairs of gods such as

★ Mitra and Varuna in Vedic India

★ Dius Fidius and Jupiter Summanus in Rome

★ Tyr and Odin in Norse mythology in Scandinavia
Medieval feudal society (an historic example not noted by Dumézil) was divided into:

★ Oratores (those who pray), Bellatores (those who fight), and Laboratores (workers)
Alternatively the roles can be represented by quasi-historical hero-figures, such as

★ Romulus and Numa in Rome
They can also be represented by distinct religious confraternities, such as the

★ Flamens, Salii, and Luperci in Rome

★ Brahmins and Gandharva in India.

Criticism and Controversy

The 'Trifunctional Hypothesis' was published first in 1929 Georges Dumézil's book ''Flamen-Brahman'', and was repeated later in ''Mitra-Varuna''.^[1] It was immediately controversial.
Dumézil's trifunctional hypothesis has received a great deal of criticism, both before and since his death in 1986. Some commentators consider it as much a form of mythology as the myths which he studied. Others point out that the tripartite division may be more of an artifact of Dumézil's own way of understanding mythologies and societies rather than an organizing principle used in the societies themselves.
Critics of the tripartite system point out that there is no evidence that persons in these societies recognized an explicitly three-way division either of their gods or of their society, and that when there is written or mythological evidence, the caste or pantheon division is usually not three-way. For example the Norse gods were explicitly divided into two groups, the Aesir and the Vanir, not three. If the critics are correct, then the ''trifunctional hypothesis'' would be an example of a selection effect.

References

1. According to Jean Boissel, the first description of Indo-European trifunctionalism was by Gobineau, not by Dumézil. Bruce Lincoln 1999:268. Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship

Further reading

★ Arvidsson, Stefan. Aryan Idols. The Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science. Chicago. 2006

★ Lincoln, Bruce. Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship (2000)

★ Littleton, C. S. ''The New Comparative Mythology''. 3rd ed. Berkeley 1982.

★ Puhvel, Jaan. ''Comparative Mythology.'' Baltimore 1987.

See also

★ caste

★ Comparative mythology

★ Georges Dumézil

★ Proto-Indo-Europeans

★ mythography

★ Proto-Indo-European religion

★ Selection effect

★ Social class