SIGN (LINGUISTICS)
There are many models of the 'linguistic sign' (see also sign (semiotics)). A classic model is the one by the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. According to him, language is made up of signs and every sign has 'two sides':
★ the 'signifier' (French ''signifiant'')
: the "shape" of a word, i.e. the sequence of letters or phonemes
: e.g. C-A-T
★ the 'signified' (French ''signifié'')
: the concept or object that appears in our minds when we hear or read the signifier
: e.g. a small domesticated feline
(The signified is not to be confused with the 'referent'. The former is a 'mental concept', the latter the 'actual object' in the world)
According to Saussure, the relation between the signifier and the signified is 'arbitrary', i.e. there is no direct connection between the shape and the concept (cf. Bussmann 1996: 434). For instance, there is no reason why the letters C-A-T (or the sound of these phonemes) produce exactly the image of the small, domesticated animal with fur, four legs and a tail in our minds. It is a result of 'convention': speakers of the same language group have agreed (and learned) that these letters or sounds evoke a certain image.
Compare an aerial drawing of London (field of potential signifieds) with a grid (field of signifiers) placed on it. The grid is arbitrary. Its structure (however motivated) divides the drawing into areas (which can then be referred to). The division of the drawing is arbitrary. A square 'EC1' is an inseparable fusion of grid and area of drawing i.e. is a sign - just like two sides of the same sheet of paper - which refers to 'real' land. EC1 does not have to refer to the particular part of London it does. Drawing + grid = map = language.
The 'concept of arbitrariness' of linguistic signs is relativized in word formation, e.g. in compounds such as ''living room'' or in onomatopoeic expressions (onomatopoeia) such as ''miaow'' or ''crash'' (cf. Bussmann 1996: 32).
----
'References'
★ Bussmann, Hadumod (1996), ''Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics'', London: Routledge.
★ Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916), "Nature of the Linguistics Sign", in: Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye (Ed.), ''Cours de linguistique générale'', McGraw Hill Education. ISBN 0-07-016524-6.
See also: Cours de linguistique générale, Structuralism, Semiotics, Sign (semiotics)
★ the 'signifier' (French ''signifiant'')
: the "shape" of a word, i.e. the sequence of letters or phonemes
: e.g. C-A-T
★ the 'signified' (French ''signifié'')
: the concept or object that appears in our minds when we hear or read the signifier
: e.g. a small domesticated feline
(The signified is not to be confused with the 'referent'. The former is a 'mental concept', the latter the 'actual object' in the world)
According to Saussure, the relation between the signifier and the signified is 'arbitrary', i.e. there is no direct connection between the shape and the concept (cf. Bussmann 1996: 434). For instance, there is no reason why the letters C-A-T (or the sound of these phonemes) produce exactly the image of the small, domesticated animal with fur, four legs and a tail in our minds. It is a result of 'convention': speakers of the same language group have agreed (and learned) that these letters or sounds evoke a certain image.
Compare an aerial drawing of London (field of potential signifieds) with a grid (field of signifiers) placed on it. The grid is arbitrary. Its structure (however motivated) divides the drawing into areas (which can then be referred to). The division of the drawing is arbitrary. A square 'EC1' is an inseparable fusion of grid and area of drawing i.e. is a sign - just like two sides of the same sheet of paper - which refers to 'real' land. EC1 does not have to refer to the particular part of London it does. Drawing + grid = map = language.
The 'concept of arbitrariness' of linguistic signs is relativized in word formation, e.g. in compounds such as ''living room'' or in onomatopoeic expressions (onomatopoeia) such as ''miaow'' or ''crash'' (cf. Bussmann 1996: 32).
----
'References'
★ Bussmann, Hadumod (1996), ''Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics'', London: Routledge.
★ Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916), "Nature of the Linguistics Sign", in: Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye (Ed.), ''Cours de linguistique générale'', McGraw Hill Education. ISBN 0-07-016524-6.
See also: Cours de linguistique générale, Structuralism, Semiotics, Sign (semiotics)
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español