(Redirected from Sanskrit grammarians)
The
Sanskrit grammatical tradition of '' is one of the six
Vedanga disciplines. It has its roots in late
Vedic India, and includes the famous work, (ca.
5th century BC).
The impetus for linguistic analysis and grammar in India originates in the need to be able to obtain a strict interpretation for the
Vedic texts.
The work of the very early Indian grammarians have been lost; for example, the work of
Sakatayana (ca. 8th c. BC) is known only from cryptic references by
Yaska (ca. 7th c. BC) and
Panini. One of the views of Sakatayana that was to prove controversial in coming centuries was that most nouns are etymologically derivable from verbs.
In his monumental work on
etymology, ''Nirukta'', Yaska supported this claim based on the large number of nouns that were derived from verbs through a derivation process that became known as ''krit-pratyaya'';
this relates to the nature of the
root morphemes.
Yaska also provided the seeds for another debate, whether textual meaning inheres in the word (Yaska's view) or in the sentence (see Panini, and later grammarians such as
Prabhakara or
Bhartrihari). This debate continued into the 14th and 15th c. AD, and is relevant even today perhaps, with the debate on the
Dynamic Turn in Semantics, which says that meaning in language is dynamically created and it may not be possible to
compose the meaning from those of the words
The word and the world: India's contribution to the study of language, Bimal Krishna Matilal, , , Oxford, 1990, Chapter 8 deals with the compositionality vs holistic debate in linguistics. .
school
A few centuries after
Yaska, extensive analysis of the processes of
phonology,
morphology and
syntax, the '', laid down the basis for centuries of commentaries and expositions by following Sanskrit grammarians. approach was amazingly formal; his
production rules for deriving complex structures and sentences represent modern
finite state machines. Indeed many of the developments in
Indian Mathematics, especially the
place value notational system may have originated from analysis.
Panini's grammar consists of four parts:
★
Śivasūtra:
phonology (notations for phonemes specified in 14 lines)
★
:
morphology (construction rules for complexes)
★
: list of roots (classes of
verbal roots)
★
: lists classes of primitive
nominal stems
Commentators on Panini and some of their views:
★
KÄtyÄyana (linguist and mathematician, c. 300 BC): that the word-meaning relation is ''siddha'', i.e. given and non-decomposable, an idea that the Sanskriticist
Ferdinand de Saussure called ''arbitrary''. Word meanings refer to universals that are inherent in the word itself (close to a
nominalist position).
★
Patanjali (linguist and yoga sutras, c. 200 BC) - author of
Mahabhashya. The notion of ''shabdapramânah'' - that the evidentiary value of words is inherent in them, and not derived externally. Not to be confused with the founder of the
Yoga system.
★ The
Nyaya school, close to the
realist position (as in
Plato). Considers the word-meaning relation as created through human convention. Sentence meaning is principally determined by the main noun.
uddyotkara,
Vachaspati (sound-universals or phonemes)
★ The
Mimamsa school. E.g. sentence meaning relies mostly on the verb (corresponds to the modern notion of linguistic
head).
Kumarila Bhatta (7th c.),
prabhakara (7th c. AD).
★
Bhartrihari (c. 5th c. AD) that meaning is determined by larger contextual units than the word alone (holism).
★ The
Buddhist school, including
Nagarjuna (logic/philosophy, c. 150 AD)
Dignaga (semantics and logic, c.5th c. AD),
Dharmakirti.
Predecessors referred to in Ashtadhyayi include
Sakatayana, and
Gargya.
Early Modern Indian linguists who revived Panini's school include
Bhattoji Dikshita and
Varadaraja.
Medieval Accounts
The earliest external historical accounts of Indian grammatical tradition is from Chinese
Buddhist pilgrims to India from the
7th century
[1].
★
Xuanzang (602-664)
★
I Ching (634-713)
★
Fazang (643-712)
The ''Indica'' of
Al-Biruni (973-1048), dating to ca.
1030 contains detailed descriptions of all branches of Hindu science.
Similar to the Chinese Buddhists,
Tibetan Buddhism aroused interest in India among its followers.
Taranatha (born 1573) in his treatise of the history of Buddhism in India (completed around
1608) speaks about Panini and provides some information about grammars, but not in the manner of a person familiar with their content.
Modern Sanskrit grammarians
Beginning of Western scholarship
★
Jean Francois Pons
★
Henry Thomas Colebrooke
★
August Wilhelm von Schlegel
★
Wilhelm von Humboldt
★
Dimitrios Galanos
19th century
★
Ramakrishna Gopal Bhandarkar
★
Franz Kielhorn
★
William Dwight Whitney
★
Bruno Liebich
★
Otto Boehtlingk
★
Georg Bühler
★
Franz Bopp
★
Jacob Wackernagel, ''
Altindische Grammatik''
20th century to present
★
Bernhard Geiger
★
Leonard Bloomfield
★
Paul Thieme
★
Louis Renou
★
Herman Buiskool
★
Bimal Krishna Matilal
★
Johannes Bronkhorst
★
George Cardona
★
Madhav Deshpande
★
SD Joshi
★
Paul Kiparsky
★
Frits Staal
★
Michael Witzel
★
Kshetresa Chandra Chattopadhyaya
★
Vagish Shastri
References
1. Frits Staal, ''A Reader on the Sanskrit Grammarians'', Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1972), reprint by Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi (1985), ISBN 81-208-0029-X.
★ Coward, Harold G., and K. Kunjunni Raja, eds., ''The Philosophy of the Grammarians'', Volume V of Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, ed. Karl Potter, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.