Member Login
Username:Password:
or Sign up here
Discover

RUBBER-TYRED METRO

(Redirected from Rubber-tired metro)
Bogie from an MP 89 Paris Métro rolling stock

An MP 73 Paris Métro rolling stock


Central rail-guided rubber-tyred rolling stock serial 5000, Sapporo City Transportation Bureau, Japan. Built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries Rolling Stock Company

'Rubber-tyred metro' is a form of rail transport, but using some road technology: the vehicles have wheels with rubber tyres (tires), but using a set of two parallel concrete (e.g. Montreal Metro, Lille Metro, Toulouse Metro, most part of Santiago Metro), H-Shape hot rolled steel (e.g. Paris Métro, Mexico City Metro, the non-underground section of Santiago Metro), or flat steel (e.g. Sapporo) rollways, each the width of a tyre. As on a railway, the driver does not have to steer, because the system relies on a redundant traditional railway system (steel wheels with flanges on steel tracks). However the Sapporo system uses a central guide rail only [1].
Most rubber-tyred trains are purpose-built and designed for the system on which they operate.
Guided buses are sometimes referred to as 'trams on tyres', and compared to rubber-tyred metros. See also Rubber-tyred trams and Bombardier Guided Light Transit.
On some systems (e.g., Paris, Montreal, Mexico City) there is a regular railway track between the rollways and the vehicles also have railway wheels with larger (taller) than normal flanges, but these are normally at some distance above the rails and are used only in the case of a flat tyre and at switches/points and crossings. In Paris these rails were also used to enable mixed traffic with rubber-tyred and steel-wheeled trains using the same track, particularly during conversion from normal railway track. Other systems (e.g. Lille and Toulouse) have other sorts of flat tyre compensation and switching methods.
The vehicle is electric, with power supplied by one, or both, of the guide bars, which thus also serves as the third rail (the current is not picked up through the horizontal wheels, but through a separate lateral pickup shoe). The return current passes through a return shoe to one, or both of the rails, or to the other guide bar, depending on the type of system (as in the case of Lille and Toulouse where there is no conventional track between the guide bars) (VAL)

Contents
Advantages and disadvantages
History
List of rubber-tyred metro systems
Under construction
Planned
References
External links

Advantages and disadvantages


Sapporo Subway guide rail and steel rollways

The advantages of rubber-tyred metro systems include a very quiet ride in the open air (as perceived by people outside the train), an extremely smooth ride with usually no jostling around, faster acceleration, shorter breaking distances, and the ability to climb or descend steeper slopes (~gradient 13%) than would be feasible with conventional rail tracks. This ability to climb or descend allowed Montreal's Line 4 to pass under the Saint Lawrence River within a relatively short distance.
However, there are strong disadvantages as well. Rubber tyres have considerably more friction than the optimal combination of steel wheel on rail, thus leading to more energy consumption; another by-product of this friction is a loud roar from the tires which can make conversation difficult in enclosed tunnels. They also rapidly lose their traction advantage under inclement weather (especially snow and ice). Furthermore, it is a more complex technology, using proprietary components, and sharing little standardisation with steel-wheeled systems. Weight advantages are minimal, because the traditional steel wheels and rails are still a part of the system as a safety backup, and are also needed for switching purposes. So, in effect, there are two systems running in parallel. This is more expensive to build, install and maintain.
There is another one in regard to the dissipation of heat: eventually all traction energy consumed by the train — except the electric energy regenerated back into the substation during electrodynamic braking — will end up in losses (mostly heat). Especially in frequently operated tunnels (typical metro operation) this is a widespread problem, necessitating ventilation of the tunnels. By using rubber tyres with their higher energy demand, this problem is even aggravated. Another disadvantage is cost: Rubber tyres have higher wear rates and therefore need more frequent replacement. Although a steel wheels set is more expensive than a pair of tyres, the frequency of their respective replacements makes rubber tyres the more expensive option. And in addition many rubber tyres for guidance will be needed, too.

History


During the World War II German occupation of Paris, the Metro system was used to capacity, with relatively little maintenance performed. At the end of the war, the system was so worn out that thought was given as to how to renovate the system. Rubber-tyred metro technology was first applied to the Paris Métro, developed by Michelin, who provided the tyres and guidance system, in collaboration with Renault, who provided the vehicles. Starting in 1951, an experimental vehicle operated on a test track between Porte des Lilas and Pré Saint Gervais, a section of line not open to the public. Line 11 Châtelet - Mairie des Lilas was the first line to be converted, in 1956, chosen because of its steep grades. This was followed by Line 1 Château de Vincennes - Pont de Neuilly in 1964, and Line 4 Porte d'Orléans - Porte de Clignancourt in 1967, converted because they had the heaviest traffic load of all Paris Métro lines. Finally, Line 6 Charles de Gaulle - Étoile - Nation was converted in 1974 to cut down noise on its many elevated sections. Because of the high cost of converting existing rail-based lines, this is no longer done in Paris, nor elsewhere; now rubber-tyred metros are used in new systems or lines only, including the new Paris Métro Line 14.
The first completely rubber-tyred metro system was built in Montreal, Canada; see Montréal Metro. A few more recent rubber-tyred systems have used automated, driverless trains; one of the first such systems, developed by Matra, opened in 1983 in Lille, and others have since been built in Toulouse and Rennes the first automated rubber-tyred system opened in Kobe (Japan) in February 1981. It is the Portliner linking Sanomiya railway station with Port Island. (Automated driverless systems are not exclusively rubber-tyred; many have since been built using conventional rail technology, such as London's Docklands Light Railway and Vancouver's SkyTrain.) Most monorail manufacturers prefer rubber tyres.

List of rubber-tyred metro systems


'MR-63' rolling stock in Montreal metro

'MPL-85' rolling stock in Lyon métro


CountryCity/RegionSystemTechnology
CanadaMontrealMontreal MetroMichelin
ChileSantiagoSantiago Metro (Lines 1, 2 and 5)Michelin
FranceLaonPoma 2000Cable-driven
LilleLille MetroVAL 206, 208
LyonLyon Metro (Lines A, B, and D)Michelin
MarseilleMarseille MetroMichelin
ParisParis Métro (Lines 1, 4, 6, 11, and 14)Michelin
Paris (Orly)OrlyvalVAL 206
RennesRennes MetroVAL
ToulouseToulouse MetroVAL
ItalyTurinMetrotorinoVAL 208
JapanKobeKobe New Transit
Port Island LineKawasaki
HiroshimaHiroshima Rapid Transit
Astram LineKawasaki / Mitsubishi / Niigata Transys
SapporoSapporo SubwayKawasaki
TokyoYurikamomeMitsubishi / Niigata Transys / Nippon-Sharyo / Tokyu
MexicoMexico CityMexico City MetroMichelin
SingaporeN/ALight Rapid TransitBombardier / Mitsubishi
Republic of ChinaTaipei, TaiwanTaipei Rapid Transit System (Muzha Line)VAL 256
(will be replaced by Bombardier's CITYFLO 650 in 2009)
United StatesChicago, Illinois (O'Hare)Airport Transit SystemVAL 256

Under construction

CountryCity/RegionSystem
SwitzerlandLausanneLausanne Metro Line m2 (2008)
Republic of ChinaTaipei, TaiwanTaipei Rapid Transit System (Neihu Line) (2009)

Planned

CountryCity/RegionSystem
Hong KongHong Kong IslandMTR South Island Line
Republic of KoreaUijeongbu one line, name not yet announced (2011)
MacauN/AMacau Light Transit System
TurkeyIstanbulthree lines, name not yet announced
Ankaraone line, name not yet announced

References



★ Bindi, A. & Lefeuvre, D. (1990). ''Le Métro de Paris: Histoire d'hier à demain,'' Rennes: Ouest-France. ISBN 2-7373-0204-8. (''French'')

★ Gaillard, M. (1991). ''Du Madeleine-Bastille à Météor: Histoire des transports Parisiens,'' Amiens: Martelle. ISBN 2-87890-013-8. (''French'')

Marc Dufour's "The principle behind the rubber-tired metro". (''English'')

External links



TRUCK (bogie)

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.