In
mathematics, 'ring theory' is the study of
rings,
algebraic structures in which addition and multiplication are defined and have similar properties to those familiar from the
integers. Ring theory studies the structure of rings, their
representations, or, in different language,
modules, special classes of rings (
group rings,
division rings,
universal enveloping algebras), as well as an array of properties that proved to be of interest both within the theory itself and for its applications, such as
homological properties and
polynomial identities.
Commutative rings are much better understood than noncommutative ones. Due to its intimate connections with
algebraic geometry and
algebraic number theory, which provide many natural examples of commutative rings, their theory, which is considered to be part of
commutative algebra and
field theory rather than of general ring theory, is quite different in flavour from the theory of their noncommutative counterparts. A fairly recent trend, started in the 1980s with the development of
noncommutative geometry and with the discovery of
quantum groups, attempts to turn the situation around and build the theory of certain classes noncommutative rings in a geometric fashion as if they were rings of functions on (non-existent) 'noncommutative spaces'.
Please refer to the
glossary of ring theory for the definitions of terms used throughout ring theory.
History
The study of rings originated from the theory of
polynomial rings and the theory of
algebraic integers. Furthermore, the appearance of
hypercomplex numbers in the mid-nineteenth century undercut the pre-eminence of
fields in mathematical analysis.
Richard Dedekind introduced the concept of a ring.
The term ''ring (Zahlring)'' was coined by
David Hilbert in the article ''Die Theorie der algebraischen Zahlkörper,'' Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker Vereinigung, Vol. 4, 1897.
The first axiomatic definition of a ring was given by
Adolf Fraenkel in an essay in ''
Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik'' (A. L. Crelle), vol. 145, 1914.
In 1921,
Emmy Noether gave the first axiomatic foundation of the theory of
commutative rings in her monumental paper ''Ideal Theory in Rings''.
Elementary introduction
Definition
Formally, a ring is an
Abelian group (''R'', +), together with a second
binary operation ★ such that for all ''a'', ''b'' and ''c'' in ''R'',
:
:
:
also, if there exists a ''multiplicative identity'' in the ring, that is, an element ''e'' such that for all ''a'' in ''R'',
:
then it is said to be a ''ring with unity''. The number 1 is a common example of a unity.
It is simple to show that any ring in which 1 = 0 must have just one element; any such ring is called a 'zero ring'.
Rings that sit inside other rings are called
subrings. Maps between rings which respect the ring operations are called
ring homomorphisms. Rings, together with ring homomorphisms, form a
category. Closely related is the notion of
ideals, certain subsets of rings which arise as
kernels of homomorphisms and can serve to define
factor rings. Basic facts about ideals, homomorphisms and factor rings are recorded in the
isomorphism theorems and in the
Chinese remainder theorem.
A ring is called ''commutative'' if its multiplication is
commutative. Commutative rings resemble familiar number systems, and various definitions for commutative rings are designed to recover properties known from the
integers. Commutative rings are also important in
algebraic geometry. In commutative ring theory, numbers are often replaced by ideals, and the definition of
prime ideal tries to capture the essence of
prime numbers.
Integral domains, non-trivial commutative rings where no two non-zero elements multiply to give zero, generalize another property of the integers and serve as the proper realm to study divisibility.
Principal ideal domains are integral domains in which every ideal can be generated by a single element, another property shared by the integers.
Euclidean domains are integral domains in which the
Euclidean algorithm can be carried out. Important examples of commutative rings can be constructed as rings of
polynomials and their factor rings. Summary:
Euclidean domain =>
principal ideal domain =>
unique factorization domain =>
integral domain =>
Commutative ring.
Non-commutative rings resemble rings of
matrices in many respects. Following the model of
algebraic geometry, attempts have been made recently at defining
non-commutative geometry based on non-commutative rings.
Non-commutative rings and
associative algebras (rings that are also
vector spaces) are often studied via their
categories of modules. A
module over a ring is an Abelian
group that the ring acts on as a ring of
endomorphisms, very much akin to the way
fields (integral domains in which every non-zero element is invertible) act on vector spaces. Examples of non-commutative rings are given by rings of square
matrices or more generally by rings of endomorphisms of Abelian groups or modules, and by
monoid rings.
Some useful theorems
★
Artin-Wedderburn theorem
Generalizations
Any ring can be seen as a
preadditive category with a single object. It is therefore natural to consider arbitrary preadditive categories to be generalizations of rings. And indeed, many definitions and theorems originally given for rings can be translated to this more general context.
Additive functors between preadditive categories generalize the concept of ring homomorphism, and ideals in additive categories can be defined as sets of
morphisms closed under addition and under composition with arbitrary morphisms.
References
★
History of ring theory at the MacTutor Archive
★
Rings, Fields and Groups, R.B.J.T. Allenby, , , Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991, ISBN 0-340-54440-6
★
Atiyah M. F.,
Macdonald, I. G., ''Introduction to commutative algebra''. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Don Mills, Ont. 1969 ix+128 pp.
★
Groups, rings and fields: Algebra through practice, Book 3, T.S. Blyth and E.F. Robertson, , , Cambridge university Press, 1985, ISBN 0-521-27288-2
★ Faith, Carl, ''Rings and things and a fine array of twentieth century associative algebra''. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 65. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. xxxiv+422 pp. ISBN 0-8218-0993-8
★ Goodearl, K. R., Warfield, R. B., Jr., ''An introduction to noncommutative Noetherian rings''. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989. xviii+303 pp. ISBN 0-521-36086-2
★ Herstein, I. N., ''Noncommutative rings''. Reprint of the 1968 original. With an afterword by Lance W. Small. Carus Mathematical Monographs, 15. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1994. xii+202 pp. ISBN 0-88385-015-X
★
Nathan Jacobson, ''Structure of rings''. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Vol. 37. Revised edition American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I. 1964 ix+299 pp.
★
Nathan Jacobson, ''The Theory of Rings''. American Mathematical Society Mathematical Surveys, vol. I. American Mathematical Society, New York, 1943. vi+150 pp.
★ Lam, T. Y., ''A first course in noncommutative rings''. Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 131. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. xx+385 pp. ISBN 0-387-95183-0
★ Lam, T. Y., ''Exercises in classical ring theory''. Second edition. Problem Books in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. xx+359 pp. ISBN 0-387-00500-5
★ Lam, T. Y., ''Lectures on modules and rings''. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 189. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. xxiv+557 pp. ISBN 0-387-98428-3
★ McConnell, J. C.; Robson, J. C. ''Noncommutative Noetherian rings''. Revised edition. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 30. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001. xx+636 pp. ISBN 0-8218-2169-5
★ Pierce, Richard S., ''Associative algebras''. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 88. Studies in the History of Modern Science, 9. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982. xii+436 pp. ISBN 0-387-90693-2
★ Rowen, Louis H., ''Ring theory''. Vol. I, II. Pure and Applied Mathematics, 127, 128. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. ISBN 0-12-599841-4, ISBN 0-12-599842-2