The 'European Revolutions of 1848', known in some countries as the 'Spring of Nations' or the 'Year of Revolution', appeared to be a
revolutionary wave which erupted in
Sicily and then, further triggered by the
revolutions of 1848 in France, soon spread to the rest of
Europe and as far afield as
Brazil. These European revolutions were the violent consequences of such a wide variety of causes that it is difficult to view them as resulting from any kind of movement or coherent social phenomenon. Changes had been taking place in Europe in the first half of the
19th century. In
politics, both
bourgeois reformers and
radical politicians were seeking change in their nations' governments. In society, technological change was creating new ways of life for the working classes, a popular press extended political awareness, and new values and ideas such as
liberalism,
nationalism and
socialism began to spring up. The straw that broke the camel's back was a series of
economic downturns and crop failures that left the peasants and the poor working classes
starving.
In
Brazil, the rhetoric surrounding the
Praieira revolt took cues from European events, as did its thorough repression. The
United Kingdom, the
Kingdom of the Netherlands, the
Russian, and
Ottoman Empires were the only major European states to go without a national revolution over this period. Russia's ability to remain generally stable was because of its revolutionary group's inability to communicate between each other. An exception to this were the
Kingdom of Poland and the Province of Lithuania (annexed lands of
Grand Duchy of Lithuania), where uprisings took place in 1830-31 (
November Uprising), 1846 (
Kraków Uprising) and in 1863-65 (
January Uprising). Similarly, while there were no uprisings in the
Ottoman Empire as such, there were in some of its
vassal states.

Chartist meeting on Kennington Common in 1848.
In the United Kingdom, the middle classes had been pacified by general enfranchisement in the
Reform Act 1832, with the consequent agitations, violence, and petitions of the
Chartist movement that came to a head with the petition to Parliament of 1848. The repeal of the protectionist agricultural tariffs - called the "
Corn Laws" - in 1846, had defused some proletarian fervor. Elsewhere in the United Kingdom, revolution was far from the minds of those in
Ireland, struggling and dying through the
Potato Famine (the exception being
William Smith O'Brien's debacle in
County Tipperary). The
United States saw the
Seneca Falls Convention and the birth of
feminism, as well as the election of President
Zachary Taylor, whose death in 1850 likely spared the country an early
civil war.
Switzerland was also spared, having been through a
civil war the previous year. However, the introduction of the
Swiss Federal Constitution in 1848 was a revolution in itself, laying the foundation of Swiss society as it is today.
Although the revolutions were put down quickly, in their span there was horrific violence on all sides, with tens of thousands tortured and killed. Most obvious, immediate political effects of the revolutions were quickly reversed; nonetheless the long-term reverberations were far-reaching.
Alexis de Tocqueville remarked in his ''Recollections'' that "society was cut in two: those who had nothing united in common envy, and those who had anything united in common terror."
Before 1848
Large swathes of the
nobility were discontented with
royal absolutism or near-absolutism. In 1846 there had been an
uprising of
Polish nobility in Austrian
Galicia, which was only countered when peasants, in turn, rose up against the nobles.
[1] Alongside of this, in
Greater Poland breakout
uprising against
Russia prepared by democrats.
Next the
middle classes began to get agitated. Whatever aspirations
Karl Marx and his followers may have had as laid out in ''
The Communist Manifesto'' (published in German
February 1,
1848), the workers had little solidarity, and practically no organization. Both the lower middle classes and the working classes wanted liberal reform, and finally a group with some organization pushed for it. While much of the impetus was from the middle classes, much of the cannon fodder came from the lower. The revolts first erupted in the cities.
The poor
French rural areas had
grown fast, spilling population into the cities. The "respectable" classes feared the working poor, who had shown their muscle in 1789, and the uneducated, teeming masses seemed a fertile breeding ground of vice. Workers toiled from 13 to 15 hours per day, living in squalid, disease-ridden
slums. Traditional artisans felt the pressure of industrialization, having lost their
guilds. "Dangerous" writers such as Marx became popular.
Secret societies sprang up.
The situation in the German states was similar.
Prussia had quickly industrialized. Worker
living standards had dropped; alcohol consumption had gone up in the 1840s.
Feudalism was inarguably horrible for the poor , but the worker saw little gain from the new socio-economic system of
capitalism and the accompanying social change.
The rural areas
Rural growth had of course led to food shortages,
land pressure, and
migration, both within Europe and out from Europe (for example, to the
United States).
Population concentration led to disease, specifically,
cholera, which at the time had not been tied to water supplies. The
Great Irish Famine exploded in 1845 and had migrated to the rest of the continent; there were poor harvests in 1846. But some lived relatively well.
Aristocratic wealth (and corresponding power) was synonymous with
the ownership of land. Owning land at this time was practically synonymous with having
peasants under one's control, often duty-bound to labor for their masters. In a problem mirroring that of
slavery in the United States, a principal aristocratic problem was controlling one's sometimes-dangerous source of wealth. Their grievances exploded in 1848.
The early rumblings
Until 1789 (the
French Revolution), no one had earnestly contested the rule of
kings on
the Continent. In 1815, after
Napoleon, a close semblance of the ''
Ancien Régime'' was restored at the
Congress of Vienna. This was no sooner established when the monarchies, the
church, and the aristocracy were again threatened. There had been revolutions or civil wars in
England (1640s-1650s),
France (1789 and after),
Ireland (1798), and the born-of-revolution
United States, which seceded in 1776 from Great Britain, as well as
Mexico, having split from Spain. A revolution against the
Netherlands produced the seceding country of
Belgium in 1830, a year that also saw
another revolution in France. Unrest was in the air.
"Dangerous" ideas kept upwelling, despite forceful and often violent efforts of established powers to keep them down: ''
democracy'', ''
liberalism'', ''
nationalism'', and ''
socialism''.
In short, ''democracy'' meant universal male
suffrage. ''Liberalism'' fundamentally meant consent of the governed and the restriction of church and
state power,
republican government,
freedom of the press and the individual. ''Nationalism'' believed in uniting people bound by (some mix of) common
languages,
culture,
religion, shared
history, and of course immediate
geography; there were also
irredentist movements. At this time, what are now
Germany and
Italy were collections of small states. ''Socialism'' was a then-fuzzy term with no solid definition, meaning different things to different people, but it roughly meant more rights for workers in a typically
collectivist system.
Legacy
:''. . . We have been beaten and humiliated . . . scattered, imprisoned, disarmed and gagged. The fate of European democracy has slipped from our hands.''
Pierre Joseph Proudhon[2]
Ten years after the 1848 Revolutions, little had visibly changed, and many
historians consider the revolutions a failure.
On the other hand, both Germany and Italy were unified in somewhat over 20 years, and there were a few immediate successes for some revolutionary movements, notably in the Habsburg lands.
Austria and
Prussia eliminated feudalism by
1850, improving the lot of the peasants. European middle classes made political and economic gains over the next twenty years; France retained universal male suffrage. Russia would later free the
serfs on
February 19,
1861. The Habsburgs finally had to give the Hungarians more
self-determination in the ''
Ausgleich'' of 1867, although this in itself resulted only in the rule of autocratic
Magyars in Hungary instead of autocratic Germans.
But in 1848, the revolutionaries were
idealistic and divided by the multiplicity of aims for which they fought -- social, economic, liberal, and national. Conservative forces exploited these divisions, and revolutionaries suffered from mediocre leadership. Middle-class revolutionaries feared the lower classes, evidencing different ideas; counter-revolutions exploited the gaps. As some reforms were enacted and the economy improved, some revolutionaries lost heart. When the Habsburgs lightened the burden of feudalism, many peasants lost heart; similar failures occurred elsewhere. International support likewise lacked.
Autocratic Russia did not support such revolutions at home, but actively helped the Austro-Hungarian Empire in her war with a restive Hungarian splinter group. Both Britain and Russia opposed Prussia's plans on Schleswig-Holstein, tarnishing their view among Germany's liberal nationalists.
The net result in the German states and France was more autocratic systems, despite reforms such as universal male suffrage in France, and strong social class systems remained in both. What reforms were enacted seemed like sops thrown to quell dissent, while privilege remained untouched. Nationalistic dreams also failed in 1848.
The Italian and German movements did provide an important impetus. Germany was unified under the iron hand of
Bismarck in
1871 after Germany's
1870 war with France; Italy was unified in
1861.
Some disaffected German bourgeois liberals (the ''
Forty-Eighters'', many
atheists and
freethinkers) migrated to the United States after 1848, taking their money, intellectual talents, and skills out of Germany. 1848 was a watershed year for Europe, after which things were never again the same.
See also
★
May Uprising in Dresden
★
Roman Republic (19th century)
★ ''
The Communist Manifesto'', published in 1848
★
History of Baden
★
Revolutions of 1989 ''("Autumn of Nations")''
Notes
1. Robert Bideleux and Ian Jeffries, ''A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change'', Routledge, 1998. ISBN 0-415-1611-8. p. 295–296.
2. Breunig, Charles (1977), The Age of Revolution and Reaction, 1789 - 1850 (ISBN 0-393-09143-0)
References
★ Breunig, Charles (1977), ''The Age of Revolution and Reaction, 1789 - 1850'' (ISBN 0-393-09143-0)
★ Jones, Peter (1981), ''The 1848 Revolutions (Seminar Studies in History)'' (ISBN 0-582-06106-7)
★ Robertson, Priscilla (1952), ''Revolutions of 1848: A Social History'' (ISBN 0-691-00756-X)
★
Encyclopedia of 1848 Revolutions
★
Civil Liberties gained by the revolutions