Discover

'''Red tape''' is a derisive term for excessive regulation or rigid conformity to formal rules that is considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinders or prevents action or decision-making. It is usually applied to government, but can also be applied to other organizations like corporations.
Red tape generally includes the filling out of seemingly unnecessary paperwork, obtaining of unnecessary licenses, having multiple people or committees approve a decision and various low-level rules that make conducting affairs one's slower and/or more difficult.

Contents

Origins

Red tape reduction

See also

External links

Books

References

Origins

The origins of the term are obscure, but it alludes to the 17th and 18th century English practice of binding documents and official papers with red tape and were popularized in the writings of Thomas Carlyle protesting against official inertia with expressions like "Little other than a red tape Talking-machine, and unhappy Bag of Parliamentary Eloquence." To this day most barristers' briefs are tied in a pink coloured ribbon known as red tape.
Traditionally, Vatican official documents were also bound in red cloth tape.
Another origin tale circulated is that all American Civil War veterans' records were bound in red tape, and the difficulty in accessing them led to the current use of the term, but there is evidence that the term was in use in its modern sense sometime before this.^[1]
Although grief over red tape is often seen as a right-wing conviction, Karl Marx wrote about the phenomenon of changing from one person in control of a complete task, to having multiple people each with specialties in specific tasks. He saw this occurring as society shifts from a Seigneurial system to a capitalist system. Although Marx drew different conclusions about this trend, it is often this abstraction among workers that is the source of red tape. This interpretation would explain why it is often perceived that the presence of red tape is increasing.

Red tape reduction

Because of this perception of increasing bureaucracy, the "cutting of red tape" is a popular electoral and policy promise.
Globally, governments have passed legislation and made procedural changes which claim to reduce red tape or reduce administrative burden. In March 2007, the European Council promised to reduce the administrative burden on European Business by 25% by 2012. "We need to slash red tape. As I said very often, what our companies, namely small and medium-sized companies (SMEs), need is not red tape, it's red carpet for their investment," European Commission (EC) President Jose Manuel Barroso told a news conference.
A good example is the August 2006 Australian Government's response to the report of its Business Red Tape Taskforce. The report made recommendations across a wide range of sectors, including health and aged care, labour market regulation, consumer regulation, environmental and building regulation, financial, tax and superannuation regulation, and trade. It also made a number of important recommendations to address the underlying causes of over-regulation.
The Australian Government adopted six principles of good regulatory process set out in the report. The principles are:

★ establishing a case for action;

★ examining alternatives to regulation;

★ adopting the option that generates the greatest net benefit to the community;

★ providing effective guidance to relevant regulators and affected stakeholders;

★ reviewing regularly to ensure the regulation remains relevant and effective; and

★ consulting effectively with stakeholders at all stages of the regulatory cycle.
The Australian Government's Office of Regulation Review will be strengthened and reoriented, becoming the Office of Best Practice Regulation.
In Canada, a Federal Parliamentary Committee recommended a Red Tape Reduction Commission. The Ontario Progressive Conservative Party government created a permanent Red Tape Commission that must review all new regulations.
In the United States, a number of legislatures have pondered or passed ''Red Tape Reduction Act''s including California and Missouri. The New York Governor's Office of Regulation Reform is a good example of US State Government response to concerns about red tape.
The U.S federal government passed the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Paperwork Reduction Act to address the problem.
Some object to government campaigns against red tape seeing them as covert programs of pro-corporate deregulation. Institutions like the British Trade Union Congress and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives consider red tape as being rules that protect the environment, watch over the worker safety and health, and prevent corruption.
Likewise, in CS Lewis's ''That Hideous Strength'', the National Institute for Controlled Experiments engages in a popularist campaign for the reduction of Red Tape. However, they are in fact stripping away the political safeguards that are designed to protect the populace from fascism.

See also

★ Bureaucracy

External links

★ Australian Taskforce on Reducing the Regulatory Burdens on Business – Rethinking Regulation

★ Instruction creep

★ Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies

★ 10-Point Plan for Regulatory Reform in Ontario

★ Regulatory Affairs Resources

★ Unravelling the Red Tape Myths - UK

Books

★ Barry Bozeman (2000)''Bureaucracy and Red Tape'' Prentice-Hall Publishing.

★ OECD (2006) 'Cutting red tape; national strategies for administrative simplification' OECD Editions, Paris.

References

1. This tale is mentioned and may originate from Episode 9 of the 3rd season of The West Wing

BARTLET

You know, after the Civil War, veterans had to come to D.C. to get their
pensions? They had
to visit the office personally. They waited for a clerk to look through all
the Civil War
records until their papers were found. You know what their papers were bound
with?

TOBY

No.

BARTLET

Red tape. That's where it comes from.