:''For nativism as a political force, see
Nativism''.
In the field of
psychology, 'nativism' is the view that certain skills or abilities are 'native' or hard wired into the
brain at
birth. This is in contrast to the 'blank slate' or
tabula rasa view which states that the brain has little innate ability and almost everything is learned through interaction with the environment.
When understood as an
interdisciplinary field in their own right, nativist approaches are referred to collectively as 'nativist theorizing'.
Nativism is most associated with the work of
Jerry Fodor,
Noam Chomsky, and
Steven Pinker, who argue that we are born with certain
cognitive modules (specialised genetically inherited psychological abilities) that allow us to learn and acquire certain skills (such as
language). They argue that many such abilities would otherwise be greatly impaired without this genetic contribution. For example, children demonstrate a facility with acquiring spoken language but require intense training to learn to read and write. In ''
The Blank Slate'', Pinker cites this as evidence that humans have an inborn facility with speech acquisition (but not with literacy acquisition).
David Reimer, a boy unsuccessfully raised as a girl, also serves as a nativist case in point.
Psychologist
Annette Karmiloff-Smith has put forward a theory known as the
representational redescription or RR model of development which argues against such strict nativism and which proposes that the brain may become modular through experience within certain domains (such as social interaction or
visual perception) rather than modules being genetically pre-specified.
In the
United Kingdom,
Stephen Laurence of the
University of Sheffield initiated an interdisciplinary nativist theorizing project, entitled ''Innateness and the Structure of the Mind'', which ran from 2001 to 2004 and was funded by the
Arts & Humanities Research Board (AHRB).
[1]
See Also
★
Domain specificity
★
Evolutionary psychology
★
Nature versus nurture
★
Universal grammar