'Petty treason' or 'petit treason' was, in
English common law, any betrayal of a superior by a subordinate. It differed from the better-known
high treason in that high treason can only be committed against the Sovereign, and the legal defence of
benefit of clergy was available for petty treason until 1496 (it was never available for high treason). In the
United Kingdom petty treason ceased to be a distinct offence from
murder in
1828. It has also been abolished in other countries.
Petty treason was essentially an aggravated form of murder. It consisted of:
# a wife killing her husband,
# a man (whether a priest or not) killing his
prelate, or
# a servant killing his master or mistress.
The element of betrayal is the reason why this crime was considered worse than an ordinary murder; medieval and post-medieval society rested on a framework in which each person had his or her appointed place and such murders were seen as threatening this framework. Many people had somebody subordinate to them and feared the consequences if the murder of superiors was not punished harshly. While the penalty for murder was simply
hanging, a man convicted of treason was
hanged, drawn and quartered.
The most common form of petty treason was a wife murdering her husband and, up until the abolition of this form of punishment, husband-murderers were
burned at the stake. The law offered a modicum of mercy to women who were to be executed in this fashion: the executioner was equipped with a cord passed around the victim's throat and, standing outside of the fire, would pull it tight, strangling her before the flames could reach her. In a few instances, things went wrong, with the cord burning through and the victim burning alive; the ensuing scandals were part of what led to the abolition of this punishment and its substitution by hanging in
1790.
Apart from the difference in punishment, the
common law defence of
provocation, by which a verdict of murder could be reduced to
manslaughter, was not available in treason trials.
However, the rules of evidence in treason trials were more strict than in murder trials, making it easier to be acquitted. (''See the
Treason Act 1695 for full details.'')
External links
★ http://www.h-net.msu.edu/~law/threads/pettreas.html