In the theory of firm's
capital structure and financing decisions, the 'Pecking Order Theory' or 'Pecking Order Model' was developed by
Stewart C. Myers in
1984. It states that companies
prioritize their sources of financing (from
internal financing to
equity) according to the law of least effort, or of least resistance, preferring to raise equity as a financing means “of last resort”. Hence, internal funds are used first, and when that is depleted,
debt is issued, and when it is not sensible to issue any more debt, equity is issued. This theory maintains that businesses adhere to a
hierarchy of financing sources and prefer internal financing when available, and debt is preferred over equity if external financing is required.
Evidence
Tests of the 'Pecking Order Theory' have not been able to show that it is of first order importance in determining firm's
capital structure; however, several
authors have also been able to find that there are instances where it is a good
approximation to reality. On the one hand, Fama and French
[1], and also Myers and Shyam-Sunder
[2] find that some features of the data are better explained by the Pecking Order than by the
Trade-Off Theory. Goyal and Frank for example show, among other things, that the Pecking Order theory fails where it should hold, that is, for small firms where
information asymmetry is presumably an important problem.
[3]
See Also
★
Corporate Finance
★
Trade-Off Theory
★
Capital Structure
★
Market timing hypothesis
References
1. "Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt", Review of Financial Studies 2002. http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/1/1
2. "Testing static trade-off against pecking order models of capital structure", Journal of financial Economics 1999.http://www.inomics.com/cgi/repec?handle=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4722
3. "Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure", Journal of Financial Economics,2003 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=243138