'Panini' (
IAST: ,
Devanāgarī: पाणिनि; a
patronymic meaning "descendant of
Pani") was an
ancient Indian grammarian from
Gandhara (traditionally
520–
460 BC, but estimates range from the
7th to
4th centuries BC
[1]).
He is known for his
Sanskrit grammar, particularly for his formulation of the 3,959 rules of
Sanskrit morphology in the grammar known as '
Ashtadhyayi' (meaning "eight chapters"), the foundational text of the grammatical branch of the
Vedanga, the auxiliary scholarly disciplines of
Vedic religion.
The Ashtadhyayi is the earliest known grammar of
Sanskrit (though scholars agree it likely built on earlier works), and the earliest known work on
descriptive linguistics,
generative linguistics, and together with the work of his immediate predecessors (
Nirukta,
Nighantu,
Pratishakyas) stands at the beginning of the
history of linguistics itself.
Panini's comprehensive and scientific theory of grammar is conventionally taken to mark the end of the period of
Vedic Sanskrit, by definition introducing
Classical Sanskrit.
Date and context
Nothing definite is known about Panini's life, not even the century he lived in (he lived almost certainly after the 7th and before the 4th century BC). According to tradition, he was born in
Shalatula, a town beside the
Indus River, in
Gandhara, which is in the modern day the
Attock District of
Pakistan's
Punjab province, located between
Rawalpindi and
Peshawar.
The traditional date for his lifetime is 520–460 BC. His grammar defines
Classical Sanskrit, so that Panini per definition lived at the end of the
Vedic period: he notes a few special rules, marked ''chandasi'' ("in the hymns") to account for forms in the Vedic scriptures that had fallen out of use in the spoken language of his time, indicating that
Vedic Sanskrit was already archaic, but still a comprehensible dialect.
An important hint for the dating of Panini is the occurrence of the word '' (in 4.1.49, either "
Greek woman", or "
Greek script"). There would have been no first-hand knowledge of Greeks in Gandhara before the conquests of
Alexander the Great in the
330s BC[2], but it is likely that the name was known via
Old Persian ''
yauna'', so that may well have lived as early as the time of
Darius the Great (ruled
521 BC–
485/6 BC).
It is not certain whether Panini used writing for the composition of his work, though it is generally agreed that he did use a form of writing, based on references to words such as "script" and "scribe" in his ''Ashtadhyayi''.
[3] It is believed that a work of such complexity would have been very difficult to compile without written notes, though some have argued that he might have composed it with the help of a group of students whose memories served him as 'notepads'. Writing first reappears in India (since the
Indus script) in the form of the
script from ca. the
6th century BC, though these early instances of the Brāhmī script are from
Tamil Nadu in
southern India, quite distant from Gandhara in northwestern India. Since Gandhara was under
Persian rule in the 6th century BC, it would also be possible that he used the
Aramaic alphabet (from a variant of which the Brāhmī script is likely a descendant).
While Panini's work is purely grammatical and lexicographic, cultural and geographical inferences can be drawn from the vocabulary he uses in examples, and from his references to fellow grammarians.
Deities referred to in his work include
Vasudeva (4.3.98). The concept of
dharma is attested in his example sentence (4.4.41) ''dharmam carati'' "he observes the law".
The Ashtadhyayi
The Ashtadhyayi is the central part of Panini's grammar, and by far the most complex. It takes material from the lexical lists (
Dhatupatha,
Ganapatha) as input and describes algorithms to be applied to them for the generation of well-formed words. It is highly systematised and technical. Inherent in its generative approach are the concepts of the
phoneme, the
morpheme and the
root, only recognized by Western linguists some two millennia later. His rules have a reputation for perfection — that is, they are claimed to describe Sanskrit morphology fully, without any redundancy. A consequence of his grammar's focus on brevity is its highly unintuitive structure, reminiscent of contemporary "
machine language" (as opposed to "human readable"
programming languages). His sophisticated logical rules and technique have been widely influential in ancient and modern linguistics.
The Ashtadhyayi consists of 3,959 sutras (''sutrani'') or rules, distributed among eight chapters, which are each subdivided into four sections or padas (''padani'').
From example words in the text, and from a few rules depending on the context of the discourse, additional information as to the geographical, cultural and historical context of Panini can be discerned.
The rules
The first two sutras are as follows:
:1.1.1 ''
:1.1.2 ''
In these sutras, the capital letters are special meta-linguistic symbols; they are called ''IT'' markers (see below). The '' and '' refer to
Shiva Sutras 4 ("''ai'', ''au'', ''") and 3 ("''e'', ''o'', ''"), respectively, where the same markers occur, forming what is known as the ''pratyahara''s '', ''. They denote the list of phonemes {''ai'', ''au''} and {''e'', ''o''} respectively. The ''T'' appearing in both sutras is also an ''IT'' marker: It is defined in sutra 1.1.70 as indicating that the preceding phoneme is ''not'' representing a list, but a single phoneme, encompassing all supra-segmental features such as accent and nasality. For further example, '' and '' represent {''} and {''} respectively.
'Therefore', the two sutras consist of a term, followed by a list of phonemes; the final interpretation of the two sutras above is thus:
:1.1.1: the technical term ''
'' denotes the phonemes {'', ''ai'', ''au''}.
:1.1.2: the technical term ''
'' denotes the phonemes {''a'', ''e'', ''o''}.
At this point, one can see they are definitions of terminology: '' and '' are the terms for the full and the lengthened
ablaut grades, respectively.
List of IT markers
★ '''' nominal desinence
★ ''''
★
★ '' strong case endings
★
★ '' elision
★
★ '' active marker
★ ''''
★
★ '' elision
★
★ '' ''-stems
★
★
★ ''
★
★
★ ''
★
★
★ ''
★
★ '' (7.1.37)
★ ''''
★ ''''
★
★ ''
★
★ '' elision
★ '''' Desiderative
★ ''''
★ ''''
★ ''''
★
★ '' Causative
★
★ '' -stems
★
★
★ ''
★
★
★ ''
★
★
★ ''
★
★ '' verbal desinence
★
★ '' Aorist
★
★ '' Precative
★ ''''
★ '''' class of verbal stems (1.1.20)
★ '''' (1.4.7)
Auxiliary texts
Panini's Ashtadhyayi has three associated texts. The '
Shiva Sutras' are a brief but highly organized list of phonemes. The 'Dhatupatha' and 'Ganapatha' are lexical lists, the former of verbal roots sorted by present class, the latter a list of nominal stems grouped by common properties.
Shiva Sutras
Main articles: Shiva Sutras
The '''Shiva Sutras''' describe a phonemic notational system in the fourteen initial lines preceding the Ashtadhyayi. The notational system introduces different clusters of phonemes that serve special roles in the
morphology of Sanskrit, and are referred to throughout the text. Each cluster, called a ''pratyāhara'' ends with a dummy sound called an ''anubandha'' (the so called''IT'' index), which acts as
a symbolic referent for the list. Within the main text, these clusters, referred through the anubandhas, are related to various grammatical functions.
Dhatupatha
The 'Dhatupatha' (''dhatupatha'') is a lexicon of
Sanskrit verbal
roots subservient to the Ashtadhyayi. It is organized by the ten present classes of Sanskrit, i.e. the roots are grouped by the form of their stem in the present tense.
The ten present classes of Sanskrit are:
:1. '' (root-
full grade thematic presents)
:2. '' (root presents)
:3. '' (reduplicated presents)
:4. '' (''ya'' thematic presents)
:5. '' (''nu'' presents)
:6. '' (root-
zero grade thematic presents)
:7. '' (''n''-infix presents)
:8. '' (''no'' presents)
:9. '' (''ni'' presents)
:10. '' (''aya'' presents, causatives)
Most of these classes are directly inherited from
Proto-Indo-European. The small number of class 8 verbs are a secondary group derived from class 5 roots, and class 10 is a special case, in that any verb can form class 10 presents, then assuming causative meaning. The roots specifically listed as belonging to class 10 are those for which any other form has fallen out of use (causative
deponents, so to speak).
Ganapatha
The 'Ganapatha' ('') is a list of groups of primitive nominal stems used by the Ashtadhyayi.
Commentary
After Panini, the
("great commentary") of
Patañjali on the Ashtadhyayi is one of the three most famous works in Sanskrit grammar. It was with
Patañjali that Indian linguistic science reached its definite form. The system thus established is extremely detailed as to
shiksha (
phonology, including accent) and
vyakarana (
morphology). Syntax is scarcely touched, but
nirukta (
etymology) is discussed, and these etymologies naturally lead to
semantic explanations. People interpret his work to be a defense of Panini, whose Sūtras are elaborated meaningfully. He also attacks
Katyayana rather severely. But the main contributions of
Patañjali lies in the treatment of the principles of grammar enunciated by him.
Editions
★
Otto Böhtlingk, ''Panini's Grammatik'' 1887, reprint 1998 ISBN 3875481984
★ Katre, Sumitra M., ''Astadhyayi of Panini'', Austin: University of Texas Press, 1987. Reprint Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1989. ISBN 0292703945
Panini and modern linguistics
Panini, and the later Indian linguist
Bhartrihari, had a significant influence on many of the foundational ideas proposed by
Ferdinand de Saussure, professor of
Sanskrit, who is widely considered the father of modern
structural linguistics.
Noam Chomsky has always acknowledged his debt to Panini for his modern notion of an explicit
generative grammar.
[4] In
Optimality Theory, the hypothesis about the relation between specific and general constraints is known as "Panini's Theorem on Constraint Ranking". Paninian grammars have also been devised for non-Sanskrit languages. His work was the forerunner to modern
formal language theory (
mathematical linguistics) and
formal grammar, and a precursor to computing.
[5]
Panini's use of metarules,
transformations, and
recursion together make his grammar as rigorous as a modern
Turing machine. The
Backus-Naur form (
Panini-Backus form) or BNF grammars used to describe modern
programming languages have significant similarities to Panini grammar rules.
References
1. Panini lived after Gautama Buddha, so that early estimates depend on an early estimate for the lifetime of Buddha.
2. "Aside from the more abstract considerations of long-distance artistic or philosophical influence, the concrete evidence we have for direct contact between Greeks and Indians is largely limited to the period between the third century BCE and first century CE.", 'Hellenistic India' by Rachel R. Mairs, University of Cambridge
3. Hartmut Scharfe (2002). ''Education in Ancient India''.
4. ...happy to receive the honour in the land where his subject had its origin. "The first generative grammar in the modern sense was Panini's grammar", http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1825/18250150.htm
5. 2000.
★ 2000.
★ Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (2004): Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
★ T.R.N. Rao.
''Panini-backus form of languages''. 1998.
See also
★
Sanskrit grammarians
★
Pingala
★
Sanskrit
★
★
Text in transliteration (on Wikisource)
★
External links
★
The system of Panini
★
Ganakastadhyayi, a software on Sanskrit grammar, based on Panini's Sutras
★
Indian Logic and Ontology: A Survey of Contemporary Studies
★ Forizs, L.
Panini, Nagarjuna and Whitehead - The Relevance of Whitehead for Contemporary Buddhist Philosophy
★ Video interview with Partha Niyogi on computers and Panini's grammar
Designing Intelligence: Language Acquisition as a Model for Teaching Computers to Learn