Discover

'Northwest Germanic' is a proposed grouping of the Germanic dialects. It does not challenge the late 19th-century tri-partite division of the Germanic dialects into North Germanic, West Germanic and East Germanic, but proposes additionally that North and West Germanic remained as a subgroup after the southward migration of the East Germanic tribes, only splitting into North and West Germanic later. However, it challenges the widely accepted mid 20th-century proposals to assume the existence ''by 250 BC'' of five general groups to be distinguishable: ''North Germanic'' in Southern Scandinavia excluding Jutland; ''North Sea Germanic'' along the middle Rhine and Jutland; ''Rhine-Weser'' Germanic; ''Elbe Germanic''; and ''East Germanic''^[1], since the Northwest Germanic proposals are strongly tied to runic inscriptions dated ''from AD 200 onwards''. Whether this subgroup constituted a unified proto-languagage, or simply represents a group of dialects that remained in contact and close geographical proximity is a matter of debate. The date by which such a grouping must have dissolved - in that innovations ceased to be shared - is also contentious, though it seems unlikely to have persisted after 500 AD, by which time the Anglo-Saxons had migrated to England and the Elbe Germanic tribes had settled in Southern Germany.
This grouping was proposed by Hugo Kuhn as an alternative to the older view of a ''Gotho-Nordic'' versus West Germanic division. The evidence for it is constituted by a range of common linguistic innovations in phonology, morphology, word formation and lexis in North and West Germanic, though in fact there is considerable debate about which innovations are significant. An additional problem is that Gothic, which provides almost the sole evidence of the East Germanic dialects, is attested much earlier than the other Germanic languages, with the exception of a few runic inscriptions.
Among the common innovations cited as evidence for Northwest Germanic are:

★ Proto Germanic /z/ > /r/ (e.g. Gothic ''dius''; ON ''dȳr'', OHG ''tior'', OE ''dēor'', "wild animal")

★ The use of /ē²/ in the preterite of Class VII strong verbs in North and West Germanic, while Gothic uses reduplication (e.g. Gothic ''haihait''; ON, OE ''hēt'', preterite of the Gmc verb ''
★ haitan'' "to be called")
Common innovations in North Germanic and Gothic, which therefore challenge the Northwest Germanic hypothesis, include:

★ Proto Germanic /jj/, /ww/ > /ddj/, /ggw/ (e.g. Gothic ''triggwa'', ON ''tryggva'', OHG ''triuwe'', "loyalty", see Holtzmann's Law)
However, as long as Northwest Germanic is not regarded as proto-language, it is possible to harmonize these two hypotheses. An early close relationship between Nordic and Gothic dialects does not exclude a later similar relationship between remaining North and West Germanic groups, once the Gothic migration had started in the 2nd or 3rd century.
There are also common innovations in Old High German and Gothic, which would appear to challenge both the Northwest Germanic and the Gotho-Nordic groupings. However, these are taken to be the result of the known cultural contacts across the Alps in the 5th and 6th centuries, reflected in the Christian loanwords from Gothic into Old High German.

Contents

Sources

Sources

★ E.H. Antonsen, ''Runes and Germanic Linguistics'' (Mouton, 2002)

★ H.L. Kufner, "The grouping and separation of the Germanic languages" in F. van Coetsem (ed.), ''Toward a Grammar of Proto Germanic'' (Niemeyer, 1972)

★ H. Kuhn, "Zur Giedering der germanischen Sprachen", in ''Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum'' 86 (1955), 1-47.

★ H.F. Nielsen, ''The Germanic Languages. Origins and Early Dialectal Interrelations'' (University of Alabama Press, 1989)