(Redirected from Nonduality)The term 'nondual' is a literal translation of the
Sanskrit term ''
advaita'', (meaning not two). That is, things remain distinct while not being separate. The term can refer to a
belief,
condition,
theory,
practice, or
quality.
Various usages
Nondualism may be viewed as the ''understanding or belief'' that
dualism or
dichotomy are illusory
phenomena. Examples of dualisms include
self/
other,
mind/
body,
male/
female,
good/evil, /,
dualism/nondualism and many others. It is accessible as a belief, theory, condition, as part of a tradition, as a practice, or as the quality of union with reality.
A nondual
philosophical or
religious ''perspective'' or ''theory'' maintains that there is no fundamental distinction between mind and
matter, or that the entire
phenomenological world is an
illusion (with
reality being described variously as the Void, the Is,
Emptiness, the mind of
God, Atman or Brahman).
Nontheism provides related conceptual and philosophical information.
Many traditions (generally originating in
Asia) state that the true ''condition'' or ''nature of reality'' is non-dualistic, and that these dichotomies are either unreal or (at best) inaccurate conveniences. While attitudes towards the experience of duality and self may vary, nondual traditions converge on the view that the
ego, or sense of personal being, doer-ship and control, is ultimately said to be an
illusion. As such many nondual traditions have significant overlap with
mysticism.
Nondualism may also be viewed as a ''practice'', namely the practice of self-inquiry into one's own being as set forth by
Ramana Maharshi, which is intended to lead a person to realize the nondual nature of existence.
Nondualism can refer to one of two types of ''quality''. One is the quality of union with reality, God, the Absolute. This quality is knowable and can be gained spontaneously and via practice of inquiry. A second quality is absolute by nature, or to put it in words, "conceptual absence of 'neither Yes nor No'," as
Wei Wu Wei wrote. This latter quality is beyond the quality of union. It may be viewed as unknowable.
Accessibility is not relevant to the second quality mentioned in the paragraph above, since, according to that quality, an essential part of its gaining includes the realisation that the entire apparent existence of the individual who would gain access to understanding nondualism is in fact merely illusional. Achieving the second of these qualities therefore implies the extinguishing of the ego-sense that was seeking it:
:"What is the significance of the statement 'No one can get enlightenment"? ... Enlightenment is the ''annihilation'' of the 'one' who 'wants' enlightenment. If there is enlightenment ... it means that the 'one' [ie individual ego] who had earlier wanted enlightenment has been annihilated. So no 'one' can achieve enlightenment, and therefore no 'one' can enjoy enlightenment. [...] if you get [a] million dollars then there will be someone [an ego-sense] to enjoy that million dollars. But if you go after enlightenment and enlightenment happens, there will be no 'one' [ie, no individual ego-sense] to enjoy enlightenment."
[1]
Nondualism versus monism
The Western philosophical concept
monism is similar to nondualism. Some forms of
monism hold that all
phenomena are actually of the same
substance. Other forms of
monism including attributive monism and idealism are similar concepts to nondualism. Nondualism proper holds that different phenomena are inseparable or that there is no hard line between them, but that they are not the same. The distinction between these two types of views is considered critical in
Zen,
Madhyamika, and
Dzogchen, all of which are nondualisms proper. Some later philosophical approaches also attempt to undermine traditional dichotomies, with the view they are fundamentally invalid or inaccurate. For example, one typical form of
deconstruction is the critique of binary oppositions within a text while
problematization questions the context or situation in which concepts such as dualisms occur.
Nondual realization
To the Nondualist, reality is ultimately neither physical nor mental. Instead, it is an
ineffable state or realization. This ultimate reality can be called "
Spirit" (
Sri Aurobindo), "
Brahman" (
Shankara), "
God", "
Shunyata" (Emptiness), "The All" (
Plotinus), "The Self" (
Ramana Maharshi), "
The Dao" (
Lao Zi), "The Absolute" (
Schelling) or simply "The Nondual" (
F. H. Bradley).
Ram Dass calls it the "third plane"—any phrase will be insufficient, he maintains, so any phrase will do. The proposition of
Sri Aurobindo has been described as
Integral advaita.
It should be pointed out that technically, there can be no such thing as a nondual
perspective or
theory or
experience, only a ''
realization'' of
Oneness or nonduality. One cannot accurately claim to ''experience'' nonduality, because the concept of experience depends on the
subject-object distinction, which is a
duality. The subject experiences an object, which is something separate from the subject. This is incompatible with a truly nondual realization. Thus, technically, there cannot truly be an accurate verbal account of this union, only words that insufficiently point to the realization.
Ken Wilber comments
[2] that nondual traditions:
:''"...are more interested in pointing out the Nondual state of Suchness, which is not a discreet state of awareness but the ground or empty condition of ''all states''... [They] have an enormous number of these 'pointing out instructions', where they simply point out what is ''already'' happening in your awareness, anyway. Every experience you have is ''already'' nondual, whether you realize it or not. So it is ''not'' necessary for you to change your state of consciousness in order to discover this nonduality. Any state of consciousness you have will do just fine, because nonduality is fully present in each state... recognition is the point. Recognition of what always already is the case. Change of state is useless, a distraction... subject and object are actually one and you simply need to recognize this... you already have everything in consciousness that is required. You are looking right at the answer... but you don't recognize [it]. Someone comes along and points [it] out, and you slap your head and say, Yes I was looking right at it..."''
Nisargadatta Maharaj, when asked how to tell when someone is approaching this understanding, commented:
[3]
:''"Even then it is a concept again. But I give you a criterion by which one can sort of judge something. When a stage is reached that one feels deeply that whatever is being done is happening and one has not got anything to do with it, then it becomes such a deep conviction that whatever is happening is not happening really. And that whatever seems to be happening is also an illusion. That may be final. In other words, totally apart from whatever seems to be happening, when one stops thinking that one is living, and gets the feeling that one is being lived, that whatever one is doing one is not doing but one is made to do, then that is a sort of criterion."''
Further comprehensive definitions of the nondual world view are given in the articles on
Ramesh Balsekar and
Nisargadatta Maharaj.
Nondual religious and spiritual traditions
Advaita
Advaita (Sanskrit ''a'', not; ''dvaita'', dual) is a nondual tradition from
India, with
Advaita Vedanta, a branch of
Hinduism, as its philosophical arm. The theory was first consolidated by Sri
Adi Shankaracharya in the 8th century AD. Adherents to this theory of the nature of the soul (
Brahman) are known as
Smarthas.
According to
Ramana Maharshi, the ''jnani'' (one who has realised the Self) sees no individual ego, and does not regard himself (or anyone else) as a "doer" of actions. The state of recognition is called ''
jnana'' which means "knowledge" or "wisdom" referring to the idea that in this state of being, one is constantly aware of the Self.
Bob Adamson (Melbourne, Australia), once a student of
Nisargadatta Maharaj, who belonged to the Navanath Sampradaya lineage, says that a 'Jnani' is the 'knowing presence' which abides with all (of us) yet this knowing is ''seemingly'' covered over by identification with the 'minds content'.
Ramesh Balsekar comments that it is in order for phenomenae to occur, that the illusion of personal existence and doer-ship (ego) is present:
: ''"Consciousness-at-rest is not aware of Itself. It becomes aware of Itself only when this sudden feeling, I-am, arises, the impersonal sense of being aware. And that is when Consciousness-at-rest becomes Consciousness-in-movement, Potential energy becomes actual energy. They are not two. Nothing separate comes out of Potential energy... That moment that science calls the Big Bang, the mystic calls the sudden arising of awareness..."''
However, teachers like Adamson point to the fact that the content of the mind is known, recognized by a presence or awareness that is independent of the mind's content. Adamson teaches that we form an identity based on the content of the mind (feelings, sensations, hopes, dreams, thoughts), however our true identity or nature is that which observes all of these things - the seer, the witness or the Self.
Buddhism
All schools of Buddhism teach No-Self (
Pali anatta,
Sanskrit anatman). No-Self in Buddhism is the Non-Duality of Subject and Object, which is very explicitly stated by the Buddha in verses such as “In seeing, there is just seeing. No seer and nothing seen. In hearing, there is just hearing. No hearer and nothing heard.”. Non-Duality in Buddhism does not constitute merging with a supreme Brahman, but realising that the duality of a self/subject/agent/watcher/doer in relation to the object/world is an illusion.
In the
Mahayana Buddhist canon, the
Diamond Sutra presents an accessible nondual view of "self" and "beings", while the
Heart Sutra asserts
shunyata — the "emptiness" of all "things" and simultaneously the "thingness" of all "emptiness". The
Lotus Sutra's parable of the Burning House implies that all talk of Duality or Non-Duality by Buddhas and Bodhisattvas is merely Skillful Means (Sanskrit
upaya kausala) meant to lead the deluded to a much higher truth. The fullest philosophical exposition is the
Madhyamaka; by contrast many laconic pronouncements are delivered as
koans. Advanced views and practices are found in the
Mahamudra and
Maha Ati, which emphasize the vividness and spaciousness of nondual awareness.
Mahayana Buddhism, in particular, tempers the view of nonduality (wisdom) with respect for the experience of duality (compassion) — ordinary dualistic experience, populated with selves and others (sentient beings), is tended with care, always "now". This approach is itself regarded as a means to disperse the confusions of duality (i.e. as a path). In
Theravada, that respect is expressed cautiously as non-harming, while in the
Vajrayana, it is expressed boldly as enjoyment (especially in
tantra).
Dzogchen is a relatively esoteric (to date) tradition concerned with the "natural state", and emphasizing direct experience. This tradition is found in the
Nyingma tradition of
Tibetan Buddhism, where it is classified as the highest of this lineage's
nine yanas, or vehicles of practice. Similar teachings are also found in the non-Buddhist
Bön tradition. In Dzogchen, the primordial state, the state of nondual awareness, is called ''
rigpa''.
The
Dzogchen practitioner realizes that appearance and emptiness are inseparable. One must transcend dualistic thoughts to perceive the true nature of one's pure mind. This primordial nature is clear light, unproduced and unchanging, free from all defilements. One's ordinary mind is caught up in dualistic conceptions, but the pure mind is unafflicted by delusions. Through meditation, the
Dzogchen practitioner experiences that thoughts have no substance. Mental phenomena arise and fall in the mind, but fundamentally they are empty. The practioner then considers where the mind itself resides. The mind can not exist in the ever-changing external phenomena and through careful examination one realizes that the mind is emptiness. All dualistic conceptions disappear with this understanding.
[4]
Zen is a non-dual tradition. It can be considered a religion, a philosophy, or simply a practice depending on one's perspective. It has also been described as a way of life, work, and an art form. Zen practitioners deny the usefulness of such labels, calling them, "The finger pointing at the moon."
Tozan, one of the founders of
Soto Zen in China, had a teaching known as the Five Ranks of the Real and the Ideal, which points out the necessity of not getting caught in a dualism between duality and non-duality, and describes the stages of further transcendance. Naturally, many in the Zen schools became bogged down in this text, so that later masters, notably
Dogen Zenji
[5], were quite scathing about such errors.
Christianity
The God of traditional
Christianity is absolute and infinite. The
devil or adversary is an opposing character, but is subordinate to God. The Christian faith thus does not consider the duality of good and evil to be two equal and opposing forces. Mystical Christianity can be entirely non-dual, as in the teachings of
Meister Eckhart or
St. John of the Cross, among others.
Gnosticism
Since its beginning,
Gnosticism has been characterized by many dualisms and dualities, including the
doctrine of a separate God and
Manichaean (good/evil) dualism. The discovery in 1945 of the
Gospel of Thomas, however, has led some scholars to believe that Jesus' original teaching may have been one accurately characterized as nondualism.
[6]
The
Gospel of Philip, another of the
Apocryphal books, also conveys nondualism:
:''"Light and Darkness, life and death, right and left, are brothers of one another. They are inseparable. Because of this neither are the good good, nor evil evil, nor is life life, nor death death. For this reason each one will dissolve into its earliest origin. But those who are exalted above the world are indissoluble, eternal."''
[7]
Although some may claim
Gnosticism to be a dualistic world-view, it ultimately is not because of its firm belief in one true ineffable God.
Sufism
Sufism (Arabic تصوف taṣawwuf, meaning "Mysticism") is a mystical tradition of
Islam. There are a number of different Sufi orders that follow the teachings of particular spiritual masters, but the bond that unites all Sufis is the concept of ego annihilation (removal of the subject/object dichotomy between humankind and the divine) through various spiritual exercises and a persistent, ever-increasing longing for union with the divine. "The goal," as
Reza Aslan writes, "is to create an inseparable union between the individual and the Divine."
The central doctrine of
Sufism, sometimes called
Wahdat-ul-Wujood or Wahdat al-Wujud or Unity of Being, is the Sufi understanding of Tawhid (the oneness of God; absolute monotheism). Put very simply, for Sufis, Tawhid implies that all phenomena are manifestations of a single reality, or Wujud (being), which is indeed al-Haq (Truth, God). The essence of Being/Truth/God is devoid of every form and quality, and hence unmanifest, yet it is inseparable from every form and phenomenon, either material or spiritual. It is often understood to imply that every phenomenon is an aspect of Truth and at the same time attribution of existence to it is false. The chief aim of all Sufis then is to let go of all notions of
duality (and therefore of the individual self also), and realize the divine unity which is considered to be the truth.
Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi, (1207-1273), one of the most famous Sufi masters and poets, has written that what humans perceive as duality is in fact a veil, masking the reality of the Oneness of existence. "All desires, preferences, affections, and loves people have for all sorts of things," he writes, are veils. He continues: "When one passes beyond this world and sees that Sovereign (God) without these 'veils,' then one will realize that all those things were 'veils' and 'coverings' and that what they were seeking was in reality that One." The veils, or rather, duality, exists for a purpose, however, Rumi contends. If God as the divine, singular essence of all existence were to be made fully manifest to us, he counsels, we would not be able to bear it and would immediately cease to exist as individuals.
Taoism
Taoism's ''wu wei'' (Chinese ''wu'', not; ''wei'', doing) is a term with various translations (e.g. inaction, non-action, nothing doing, without ado) and interpretations designed to distinguish it from passivity. From a nondual perspective, it refers to activity that does not imply an ''"I"''. The concept of
Yin and Yang, often mistakenly conceived of as a symbol of dualism, is actually meant to convey the notion that all apparent opposites are complementary parts of a non-dual whole.
Known Individuals and Nondualism
For further study this is a list of known individual thinkers, philosophers, writers, artists and so on, who's works express a notable degree of nondualism. It should be noted that not all individuals in this list would necessarily identify themselves as nondual. Nor should the grouping of these names make the reader assume that those listed necessarily agree with one another or support each others work. They come from different religious, political and cultural traditions and these differences ought to be considered while reading.
Ancient and Medieval Western philosophers
★
Plotinus
★
Parmenides
★
Hildegard of Bingen
★
Mechthild of Magdeburg
★
Meister Eckhart
★
John of the Cross
★
Teresa of Avila
Modern Western philosophers
★
Baruch Spinoza
★
Friedrich Schelling
★
Georg Hegel
★
Ralph Waldo Emerson
★
F. H. Bradley
★
William James[ Sciousness and Consciousness: William James and the Prime Reality of Non-Dual Experience, , J., Bricklin, Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 2003 ]
Asian Philosophers and Teachers
★
Nagarjuna
★
Shankaracharya
★
Ramana Maharshi
★
Nisargadatta Maharaj
★
Ramesh Balsekar
★
Jiddu Krishnamurti
★
Lao Tzu
★
Gaudapada
★
Yajnavalkya
★
Bhartrhari
★
Meher Baba
★
Chuang Tzu
★
Swami Vivekananda
★
Ramakrishna
★
H. W. L. Poonja
★
Rajneesh
Authors and musicians
★
Herman Melville
★
Richard Bach
★
Stuart Davis
★
Kahlil Gibran
★
Alan Watts
★
Neale Donald Walsch
Contemporary Teachers
★
Adi Da
★
Adyashanti
★
Eckhart Tolle
★
Ken Wilber
★
Byron Katie
★
Gangaji
Notes
1. Ramesh Balsekar, ''Who cares?'', p. 11; italics and quotation marks as in original
2. Brief History of Everything, pp. 237-238
3. ''The Ultimate Medicine'', p.101
4. Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism, , John, Powers, Snow Lion Publications, 1995,
5. Dogen's Kana Shobogenzo koan collection
6. The Gospel of Thomas: A Guidebook for Spiritual Practice, , Ronald, Miller, , ,
7. The Gospel of Philip
References (Literature)
★ Watson, Burton (Trans.) (1968). ''The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu''. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-03147-5.
★ Godman, David (Ed.) (1985). ''Be As You Are: The Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi''. London: Arkana. ISBN 0-14-019062-7.
★ Trungpa, Chögyam (1987). ''Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism''. Boston: Shambhala Publications. ISBN 0-87773-050-4.
★ Castaneda, Carlos (1987). ''The Power of Silence''. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-671-50067-8.
★ Kongtrül, Jamgön (1992). ''Cloudless Sky: The Mahamudra Path of The Tibetan Buddhist Kagyü School''. Boston: Shambhala Publications. ISBN 0-87773-694-4.
★ Norbu, Namkhai (1993). ''The Crystal and the Way of Light: Sutra, Tantra and Dzogchen''. London: Arkana. ISBN 0-14-019314-6.
★ Klein, Anne Carolyn (1995). ''Meeting the Great Bliss Queen: Buddhists, Feminists, and the Art of the Self''. Boston, Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-7306-7.
★ HH The Dalai Lama (2000). ''Dzogchen: The Heart Essence of the Great Perfection''. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications. ISBN 1-55939-157-X.
★ Baleskar, Ramesh (1999). ''Who cares?''
★ Hawkins, David R. (October 2006). ''Discovery of the Presence of God: Devotional Nonduality''. Sedona, Arizona: Veritas Publishing. ISBN 0-9715007-6-2 (Softcover); ISBN 0-9715007-7-0 (Hardcover)
★ Katz, Jerry (Ed.) (2007). ''One: Essential Writings on Nonduality''. Boulder, CO: Sentient Publications. ISBN 1591810531.
External links