'Nicolae Iorga' (his name may also be rendered as 'Nicolas Jorga' in foreign works;
January 17,
1871,
Botoşani –
November 27,
1940,
Strejnic,
Prahova County) was a
Romanian historian, university professor,
literary critic, memorialist, playwright, poet, and politician. He served as a member of
Parliament, as President of the post-
World-War-I National Assembly, as minister, and (1931-32) as
Prime Minister. He was co-founder (in
1910) of the
Democratic Nationalist Party and was ultimately assassinated by
fascist Iron Guard (legionnaire)
commandos.
Life
Iorga attended
University of IaÅŸi (notably studying under
A. D. Xenopol), where he graduated ''
Magna Cum Laude'' after completing his undergraduate studies in a single year. He went on to study in
Paris,
Berlin, and
Leipzig, obtaining his
doctorate in 1893. A prolific author, he is estimated to have written 1,250 published volumes and 25,000 articles. He traveled extensively throughout Europe, and his written works in many languages bear out the claim that he could read, write, and speak virtually all of the major modern European languages.
Upon receiving his doctorate in 1893, Iorga became a member of the
Romanian Academy, becoming a full member in 1911. From 1902 to 1906 he was the editor of the nationalist ''
Sămănătorul'' review, moving on in 1906 to found the newspaper ''
Neamul românesc''. For the rest of his life, even while serving in Parliament or as a minister, he was a daily contributor to that paper.
As part of a group of
professors,
physicians,
soldiers, etc., he helped bring
Scouting to Romania.
The co-founder, with Iorga, of the Democratic Nationalist Party was
A.C. Cuza, a violent
anti-Semite who split off in 1920 to found the ''National Democratic Christian Party'', soon to be the
National Christian Union, a precursor of Romanian Fascist groups such as the Iron Guard. Iorga shared Cuza's anti-Semitism, but was not as systematically anti-democratic as Cuza. In 1925, Iorga was briefly a member and honorary president of
Iuliu Maniu's
National Romanian Party, but left it, declaring it not to be a peasant organization but, according to A.L. Easterman, "a party of small-town lawyers promoting their own petty interests." He returned to his more customary role as a "One Man Opposition". (Easterman 1942, 271)
After General
Ion Antonescu came to power upon the abdication of
Carol II (
September 7,
1940), Iorga was almost alone in publishing any defense of Carol. On the front page of ''Neamul românesc'' on
September 9 he wrote that "It is an elementary duty of honour to recall the love with which he was summoned, at one time by the entire nation and to recognise the great efforts he made as our ruler to strengthen and develop our country." (Easterman 1942, 269) On
September 15, writing of Maniu's role in helping to bring down Carol, he compared him to
Robespierre as a politician who "…stands for morality above all else … cannot have committed any sin … can prove to everyone at all times that he has never made a mistake … cold, dominant, and cruel." He also attacked the Iron Guard as "corrupters of the nation". (Easterman 1942, 271–272)
Months later, on
November 27,
1940, Iorga was assassinated by a group of Iron Guard commandos. The Iron Guard considered Iorga responsible for the 1938 death of their charismatic leader,
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu: after Iorga (in his capacity as a minister) had backed the claim that Codreanu had
slandered him (Nagy-Talavera, X.4), Codreanu was arrested and imprisoned, then was shot, putatively during an attempted prison escape. After the earthquake of 1940, when Iorga had to leave his damaged home in
Vălenii de Munte for another residence in
Sinaia, a group of legionnaire commandos from
Bucharest took him from his house to the Strejnicu forest near Bucharest, tortured him, shot him in the back, stuffed a copy of the
September 9 ''Neamul românesc'' in his mouth, desecrated his body, and left it by the side of a road. (Easterman 1942, 272)
In recent years, apologists for the Iron Guard have claimed that the assassination was performed not on the orders of the fascist leadership, but under the command of
Soviet leader
Joseph Stalin. However, this alternative is generally rejected by historians, especially since the Soviets have not been shown to have had consistent reason for such a move (if Iorga was indeed a vocal opponent of the cession of
Bessarabia, Northern
Bukovina and
Hertza region to the Soviet state, so was the larger part of Romanian society).
Works
Historiography
Iorga's scientific activities partly reflect his lifelong beliefs. As a moderate
nationalist and an advocate of peasant traditionalism (as exemplified by his association with ''
Sămănătorul''), Iorga became interested in tracing the history of the rural domains in old
Wallachia and
Moldavia. Thus, faced with the lack of sources related to Romanian events during the
Dark Ages, and attempting to depict the process of transition from
Roman Dacia to a
Romance-speaking people (''see
Origin of Romanians''), Iorga directed his efforts towards investigating the preservation of
Roman customs by the peasantry. He spoke of peasant
polities that would have survived to the
Middle Ages, giving them the working title of ''Romanii populare'' (roughly: "People's Roman-like polities").
Iorga claimed that the ''Romanii'' would have served as the basis for relations between
Hospodars (deemed ''peasant-
voivodes'') and the people (a development that was meant to cut off the medieval states from foreign influences). It got him into a polemic with
modernist figure
Eugen Lovinescu and Lovinescu's ''
Sburătorul'' group. Lovinescu pointed out the persistence of external points of reference in early Romanian culture, and the latter's repeated attempts at being integrated in the wider, European, sphere (notably, with the indication that hospodars would usually dress according to Western fashions).
However, Iorga was by no means an advocate of Romanian preeminence and absolute originality. He was an internationally-acclaimed
byzantinist (and the very first one in Romania), connecting the Romanian space with the
Byzantine Empire and the Southeastern European sphere in general. His work ''
Byzantium after Byzantium'' (1935) deals with the strong links established between the Empire and the two principalities in today's Romania. It depicts the developments after the
Fall of Constantinople (1453), with the hospodars assuming the role of protectors of
Eastern Orthodoxy (notably, by becoming the main patrons of
Mount Athos), the perpetuation of Byzantine ceremonial customs, and the massive
immigration of Byzantine clerks and intellectuals. Iorga moved away from the negative view most Romanian historians had taken of the
Phanariotes.
In ample studies that dealt with Southeastern Europe in general, Nicolae Iorga contributed to the history of social and economical Byzantine structures, and investigated the role later
Crusades (those of the 1300s and 1400s) played in shaping a common European identity. His other major field of work concentrated on the
Ottoman Empire, with Iorga pointing out a reflection of ''Byzantium after Byzantium'' in Turkish ideology: he established that Eastern Orthodox institutions would have been given a new purpose after the conquest, since the new
overlord was tolerant of them and the last years of Byzantine rule hade seen a forced union with
Roman Catholicism (as the step taken by Emperors to ensure Western support for the besieged state). He also argued that the
Sultans would have openly continued several essential Imperial policies.
Iorga wrote volumes on the history of virtually all Southeastern European peoples (including
Armenians).
Other
Iorga also wrote
poetry (a single volume was ever published) and plays (such as ''Doamna lui Ieremia'' and ''ÃŽnvierea lui Åžtefan cel Mare'').
References
★
Easterman, A.L., ''King Carol, Hitler, and Lupescu'', London: Victor Gollancz Ltd. (1942).
★
Nicholas M. Nagy-Talavera, ''
The Green Shirts and the Others: A History of Fascism in Hungary and Rumania'', 1970, ISBN 0-8179-1851-5, ISBN 973-9432-11-5