:''This article is concerned with architectural aspects of
modernism; for the most recent developments in architecture, see
Contemporary architecture.''
'Modern architecture', not to be confused with 'contemporary architecture', is a term given to a number of building styles with similar characteristics, primarily the simplification of form and the elimination of
ornament. The style was conceived early in the 20th century. Modern Architecture was adopted by many influential architects and architectural educators, however very few "Modern buildings" were built in the first half of the century. It gained popularity after the
Second World War and became the dominant architectural style for institutional and corporate buildings for three decades.
The exact characteristics and origins of Modern architecture are still open to interpretation and debate.
Origins
Some historians see the evolution of Modern architecture as a social matter, closely tied to the project of
Modernity and thus
the Enlightenment. The Modern style developed, in their opinion, as a result of social and political revolutions.
Others see Modern architecture as primarily driven by technological and engineering developments, and it is true that the availability of new building materials such as
iron,
steel,
concrete and
glass drove the invention of new building techniques as part of the
Industrial Revolution. In
1796,
Shrewsbury mill owner Charles Bage first used his ‘
fireproof’ design, which relied on cast iron and brick with flag stone floors. Such construction greatly strengthened the structure of mills, which enabled them to accommodate much bigger machines. Due to poor knowledge of iron's properties as a construction material, a number of early mills collapsed. It was not until the early 1830s that
Eaton Hodgkinson introduced the
section beam, leading to widespread use of iron construction, this kind of austere
industrial architecture utterly transformed the landscape of northern Britain, leading to the description, "Dark satanic mills" of places like
Manchester and parts of
West Yorkshire.
The Crystal Palace by
Joseph Paxton at the
Great Exhibition of
1851 was an early example of iron and glass construction; possibly the best example is the development of the tall steel skyscraper in
Chicago around
1890 by
William Le Baron Jenney and
Louis Sullivan. Early structures to employ concrete as the chief means of architectural expression (rather than for purely utilitarian structure) include
Frank Lloyd Wright's
Unity Temple, built in
1906 near Chicago, and
Rudolf Steiner's
Second Goetheanum, built from
1926 near
Basel,
Switzerland.
Other historians regard Modernism as a matter of taste, a reaction against
eclecticism and the lavish stylistic excesses of
Victorian Era and
Edwardian Art Nouveau.
Whatever the cause, around
1900 a number of architects around the world began developing new architectural solutions to integrate traditional precedents (
Gothic, for instance) with new technological possibilities. The work of
Louis Sullivan and
Frank Lloyd Wright in Chicago,
Victor Horta in Brussels,
Antoni Gaudi in Barcelona,
Otto Wagner in Vienna and
Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Glasgow, among many others, can be seen as a common struggle between old and new.
Modernism as dominant style
By the
1920s the most important figures in Modern architecture had established their reputations. The big three are commonly recognized as
Le Corbusier in France, and
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and
Walter Gropius in Germany. Mies van der Rohe and Gropius were both directors of the
Bauhaus, one of a number of European schools and associations concerned with reconciling craft tradition and industrial technology.
Frank Lloyd Wright's career parallels and influences the work of the European modernists, particularly via the
Wasmuth Portfolio, but he refused to be categorized with them. Wright was a major influence on both Gropius and van der Rohe, however, as well as on the whole of
organic architecture.
In
1932 came the important
MOMA exhibition, the International Exhibition of Modern Architecture, curated by
Philip Johnson. Johnson and collaborator
Henry-Russell Hitchcock drew together many distinct threads and trends, identified them as stylistically similar and having a common purpose, and consolidated them into the
International Style.
This was an important turning point. With
World War II the important figures of the
Bauhaus fled to the United States, to Chicago, to the
Harvard Graduate School of Design, and to
Black Mountain College. While Modern architectural design never became a dominant style in single-dwelling residential buildings, in institutional and commercial architecture Modernism became the pre-eminent, and in the schools (for leaders of the profession) the only acceptable, design solution from about 1932 to about 1984.
Architects who worked in the
international style wanted to break with architectural tradition and design simple, unornamented buildings. The most commonly used materials are glass for the facade, steel for exterior support, and concrete for the floors and interior supports; floor plans were functional and logical. The style became most evident in the design of skyscrapers. Perhaps its most famous manifestations include the
United Nations headquarters (Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer, Sir Howard Robertson), the
Seagram Building (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe), and
Lever House (
Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill), all in New York. A prominent residential example is the
Lovell House (
Richard Neutra) in Los Angeles.
Detractors of the international style claim that its stark, uncompromisingly rectangular geometry is dehumanising. Le Corbusier once described buildings as "machines for living", but people are not machines and it was suggested that they do not want to live in machines. Even Philip Johnson admitted he was "bored with the box." Since the early 1980s many architects have deliberately sought to move away from rectilinear designs, towards more eclectic styles. During the middle of the century, some architects began experimenting in organic forms that they felt were more human and accessible. Mid-century modernism, or organic modernism, was very popular, due to its democratic and playful nature.
Alvar Aalto and
Eero Saarinen were two of the most prolific architects and designers in this movement, which has influenced contemporary modernism.
Although there is debate as to when and why the decline of the modern movement occurred, criticism of Modern architecture began in the 1960s on the grounds that it was universal, sterile, elitist and lacked meaning. Its approach had become ossified in a "style" that threatened to degenerate into a set of mannerisms.
Siegfried Giedion in the 1961 introduction to his evolving text, ''Space, Time and Architecture'' (first written in 1941), could begin "At the moment a certain confusion exists in contemporary architecture, as in painting; a kind of pause, even a kind of exhaustion." At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a 1961 symposium discussed the question "Modern Architecture: Death or Metamorphosis?" In New York, the ''coup d'état'' appeared to materialize in controversy around the
Pan Am Building that loomed over
Grand Central Station, taking advantage of the modernist real estate concept of "
air rights",
[1] In criticism by
Ada Louise Huxtable and
Douglas Haskell it was seen to "sever" the Park Avenue streetscape and "tarnish" the reputations of its consortium of architects:
Walter Gropius,
Pietro Belluschi and the builders
Emery Roth & Sons. The rise of
postmodernism was attributed to disenchantment with Modern architecture. By the 1980s, postmodern architecture appeared triumphant over modernism, including the temple of the Light of the World, a futuristic design for its time
Guadalajara Jalisco La Luz del Mundo Sede International; however, postmodern aesthetics lacked traction and by the mid-1990s, a neo-modern (or hypermodern) architecture had once again established international pre-eminence. As part of this revival, much of the criticism of the modernists has been revisited, refuted, and re-evaluated; and a modernistic idiom once again dominates in institutional and commercial contemporary 'practice,' but must now compete with the revival of traditional architectural design in commercial and institutional architecture; residential design continues to be dominated by a traditional aesthetic.
Characteristics
Modern architecture is usually characterized by:
★ a rejection of historical styles as a source of architectural form (historicism)
★ an adoption of the principle that the materials and functional requirements determine the result
★ an adoption of the machine aesthetic
★ a rejection of ornament
★ a simplification of form and elimination of "unnecessary detail"
★ an adoption of expressed structure
★ Form follows function
Preserving Modern Architecture
Although relatively young, great works of Modern architecture may be lost because of demolition, neglect, or insensitive alterations. While awareness of the plight of endangered Modern buildings is growing, the threats continue. Non-profit groups such as the
World Monuments Fund and
Docomomo International are working to safeguard and document imperiled Modern architecture. In 2006, the World Monuments Fund launched Modernism at Risk, an advocacy and conservation program.
External links
★ Lotta Living
Bulletin Board for fans of Mid-Century Modern Architecture
★
Graphic and chronological vision of modern architecture through its houses.
★
Famous architects - Biographies of well-known architects, almost all of the Modern Movement.
★
Architecture and Modernism
★
World Monuments Fund Modernism at Risk