MOBILE DEVELOPMENT

This page lists the known relative differences between the most popular 'mobile platform development options' for handheld devices such as a PDA or mobile phones. It is not intended to be an absolute guide to the various mobile development platforms, instead it is to help guide developers in choosing a mobile platform for development on Information appliances. More detail on the subject can be found at the Mobile software article.

Contents

Mobile development comparison

Application development

Capabilities

Breadth

Evaluation criteria

Resources

See also

External links

Mobile development comparison

	Overview
Java ME	Ideal for a portable solution, if the Java ME platform provides the needed functionality. Good for vertical applications that must be portable. Device-specific libraries exist for many devices and are commonly used for games, making them non-portable.
Symbian	Very powerful for general purpose development. The Symbian based S60 platform is strongly supported by Nokia with some support from other device manufacturers. In Japan NTT DoCoMo's Symbian based MOAP platform is also well supported by a number of manufacturers (Fujitsu, Nokia, Mitsubishi and Sharp amongst others). It should be noted, however, that MOAP is not an open development platform. Another Symbian based platform, UIQ, is less well supported (principally by Sony Ericsson). Currently large device deployments in Europe and Japan, with little penetration in the US market.
Python	Ideal for initial prototyping and concept testing when functionality falls outside Java ME.
.NET Compact Framework	Ideal for deployment on homogeneous Pocket-PC devices. However not cross plattform and limited to Microsoft devices.
BREW	Ideal for deploying applications for deployment on CDMA-based networks (also supports GPRS/GSM models) with a deployed Brew Content Platform especially if OTA app deployment is desired. Little penetration in Europe.
Pocket PC and Microsoft Smartphone	Ideal for enterprise applications with an existing PC infrastructure and options for significant development investment. However not cross plattform and limited to Microsoft devices.
Palm OS	Significant player with strong enterprise following in the important US market. PalmOS makes up the lions share of revenues for most consumer focused developers.
Flash Lite	Ideal for Graphics-heavy options with a market that can support the Flash Lite player.
Microbrowser Based	Ideal for lightweight functionality, a web-interface for an existing application with no latency concerns, or a widely varying platform base

Application development

	Foundation	Learning Curve	Debuggers available	Emulator available	Integrated Development Environment available	Cross-Platform Deployment	Installer Packaging Options	Development Tool Cost
Symbian	C++	Difficult (unusual C++ APIs, poor debugger support, and Symbian 9 breaks binary compatibility)	Good on latest version.	Free Emulator	Many choices	Compile per target	SIS deployment	Varies (free tools available)
Java ME	Java	Average	Excellent	Free Emulator, Sun Java Wireless Toolkit, mpowerplayer	Eclipse, NetBeans Mobility Pack	Average (many VM implementations have device specific bugs necessitating separate builds)	Jad/Jar packaging; PRC files under Palm OS	Free
Python	Python	Excellent	Average	Add-on to Nokia Emulator	Several, including plugins for Eclipse	Interpreted language available natively only on Nokia Series60 (and desktops) though there are ports to other mobile platforms, including PalmOS	Sis deployment with py2sis or can use Python Runtime	Free
Flash Lite	ActionScript	Average	Good	Bundled with IDE	Macromedia Flash MX2004/8 / Eclipse	Excellent (Bundled - Top 5 mobile manufacturers, limited handset model support as of 3/06, best web compatibility)	SIS / CAB deployment or OTA/IR/Bluetooth SWF files	Varies (Free but limited with MTASC)
.NET Compact Framework	C#, VB.NET	Average	Excellent	Bundled with IDE	Visual Studio 2005, 2003	only Windows Mobile	CAB files	Free (but only basic tools)
Microbrowser Based	XHTML (WAP 2.0), WML (WAP 1.2)	Varies by Server-side scripting language	Good	Many	Many	Excellent	N/A	Free
BREW	C (the APIs are provided in C with a C++ style interface)	Difficult (but easier, and less featureful, than Symbian)	Debugger support for the native ARM target code now available via ARM RVDS 3.0. ($6k) Can use Visual Studio to debug the x86 testing code.	No Emulator for the target ARM code, has a simulator for the x86 testing code.	Visual Studio 6.0, Visual Studio 2003 .net, Visual Studio 2005	Compile for the specific BREW version available on the handset.	OTA	Related Dev Fees Typically Required for Brew App Certification - VeriSign annual fee for becoming a certified developer. Realview ARM compiler for BREW (The free GNU C/C++ is also available, but with limited function and support). TRUE BREW testing fee for distributing the application.
Pocket PC	C, C++	Average (excellent for Win32 developers)	Excellent	Bundled with IDE	Visual Studio 2005	only Windows Mobile	CAB files	Requires Visual Studio Standard or better
Palm OS	C, C++	Excellent	Average	OS 1.0 - 4.1: Free Emulator provided by PalmSource (Access); OS 5.0: - 5.4 Device-specific Simulators provided by Palm (palmOne)	Palm OS Development System (Eclipse), CodeWarrior	Palm OS handhelds, or Windows Mobile with StyleTap emulator	PRC Files, PalmSource Installer (.psi)	Free (POSE or GCC for Palm OS), or commercial (CodeWarrior), or various commercial rapid-development frameworks

Capabilities

	Symbian	Java ME	Python	Flash Lite	.Net Compact	Microbrowser Based	BREW	Pocket PC	Palm OS
Graphical Interface	2D, 3D Graphics (newer phones), Many Widgets, Visual Form-Based GUI Builder	2D, 3D graphics, Many widgets, Visual Form-Based GUI Builder	2D Graphics access, some simple widgets	2D graphics, Many widgets	2D graphics, Many widgets, Visual Form-Based GUI Builder	Basic XHTML-forms (applies to XHTML-MP, CHTML browsers). Basic forms for WML 1.1 (WAP 1.1).	2D graphics, 3D graphics (not available on all phones), limited widgets, no visual form-based GUI builder. uiOne (not available on most phones in the market)	2D, 3D Graphics, Many Widgets, limited visual GUI builder (dialogs only)	2D, 3D Graphics, Many Widgets, Visual GUI builder
Functionality	No restrictions	Varies by handset - dependent on available included JSR's. No high-resolution pictures, No Cell ID, limited file access	Partial through API: High resolution pictures, Cell ID	Partial through API	Limited audio access	Isolated to browser	Powerful API access; specifics may vary slightly due to Operator application certification restrictions	No restrictions	No restrictions
Phone Data Access	Full	Varies by handset - dependent on available JSR 75, the PDA Optional Packages.	Partial through API: Calendar, Contact List	None	Full	None	Full	Full	Full
Runtime Speed	Best (Compiled language)	Average due to Java bytecode	Below Average due to Interpreted language	Below Average due to Interpreted language	Average	Average	Best (Compiled language)	Best (Compiled language)	Best (Compiled language)
Crippled Providers	None known	None known	None known	Not usually - Dependent on operator	None known	Dependent on data access plan	Need a handset & application specific signature to run any application on a retail phone. Test signatures only work on phones with BREW debug mode enabled.	None known	None known

Breadth

	Symbian	Java ME	Python	Flash Lite	.Net Compact	Microbrowser Based	BREW	Pocket PC	Palm OS
Developer Community and Support	Extensive	Extensive	Recent, growing	Extensive	MSDN	Extensive	Limited at http://brewforums.qualcomm.com	MSDN	Extensive, largest developer network
Market penetration	Deployed on a large number of high end devices, including handsets by Nokia, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi and Sony Ericsson amongst others.	Extensive (also the basis of the Danger Sidekick Platform)	Average	Average	Average	Extensive	High in Japan (KDDI). Was deployed via KTF in Korea, though Korea is now promoting its own hybrid BREW/JAVA-like technology "WIPI". Average in the U.S. (Verizon) and low in other countries, though there is growing presence in South America and China.	Extensive within Europe and a growing market within the US.	Shares the US smartphone market with Blackberry
Distribution and Licensing	SymbianSigned for 3rd Edition (OS 9?)	None (Java Signed?)	None	None	Unknown	None - Server Based Code	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown

Evaluation criteria

# Any undetermined cells are marked "undetermined" to indicate a request for help from someone with the appropriate knowledge.
# ''Learning Curve'' is an approximation of how difficult it would be for a developer with reasonable proficiency in the ''Foundation'' language to both construct a Hello world ''on the mobile platform'', as well as relative ease of accessing advanced mobile features. By nature, this will be the most difficult to keep a on, and is not intended to be a debate on the relative quality of C# vs. Java.
# ''Debuggers'' must be capable of
#
★ Settable Breakpoints
#
★ Step-through execution
# ''Mobile Integrated Development Environment'' evaluation is based on the availability of
#
★ Autocomplete
#
★ Syntax highlighting
#
★ Refactoring
#
★ Debugging
# ''Emulator'' is based on availability and integration with development emulation options
# ''Low-Level Access'' includes the capability of accessing various forms of mobile device functionality
#
★ Full-resolution digital photos
#
★ Video capture
#
★ Cell Tower ID
#
★ File access
# ''Crippled Providers'' is when mobile device carriers restrict hardware functionality
#
★ Restricting loading of new applications
#
★ Disabling or limiting Bluetooth access

Resources

Please see the linked pages for resources for the specific development platforms

See also

★ J2ME

★ BREW

★ Symbian

★ Mobile software

★ Mobile Marketing

★ WAP

★ Adobe Flash Lite

External links

Please only post non-official links if it is to a cross-comparison or rollup of information.

★ Sun JavaME page

★ Official Flash Lite information

★ Java ME performance data

★ Consolidated list of tools