:''For the painting by Peter Paul Rubens, see "
Massacre of the Innocents (Rubens)".''
The 'Massacre of the Innocents' is an episode of
infanticide by
Herod the Great, attested to in the
Gospel of , but not mentioned in the other
gospels nor in most of the early
apocrypha.
Matthew relates that King Herod ordered the execution of all young male children in the village of
Bethlehem, so as to avoid the loss of his throne to a newborn "
King of the Jews" whose birth had been related to him by the
Magi.
Many scholars portray this and other nativity stories as creative
hagiography rather than history
[1]. Others, however, conclude that it really happened.
Church tradition
The episode
According to Matthew, when
the Magi (popularly known as the "Three Wise Men") sought out the
birth of Jesus, they first visited Herod the Great to ask if he knew the correct location. On hearing the Magi ask for ''He that is born
King of the Jews'', Herod, the Roman
client king in Judea, feeling that his throne was in jeopardy, asked the Magi to find the child and return to tell him so that he may worship him, with the hidden intention of killing the identified child immediately. When the Magi, warned in dreams of the king's true intentions, returned home by a different route to avoid being forced to betray the child, Herod ordered the slaughter of all male children who were ''two years old and under.''
[2] Fortunately for them, according to Matthew,
Joseph,
Mary and
Jesus had
fled to Egypt after they had been warned by an
angel.
The scale of the event
The passage specifically describes this event as happening in Bethlehem, which would probably have been a small village, and the surrounding rural areas. The Byzantine liturgy had 14,000 Holy Innocents and an early Syrian list of saints states that there were 64,000. The ''Catholic Encyclopedia'' states that these numbers were probably inflated, and that for a town of that size probably only between six and twenty children would have been killed.
The prophecy of Jeremiah
According to the gospel of Matthew, the massacre fulfilled a verse of
Jeremiah (31:15), interpreted as a prophecy of this event: "''Thus says the Lord: A voice is heard in Ramah, lamentation and bitter weeping. Rachel is weeping for her children.''"
Most modern Jews do not interpret the quotation as a prophecy at all, but as a poetic description of the
Babylonian exile. This is reflected in the next verse, , in which God asks "Rachel" to stop crying, because her people "shall come again from the land of the enemy."
Although the quotation in Matthew is from Jeremiah, the
Old Syriac Sinaiticus referred to
Isaiah. Some
textual critics conclude that the mistake occurred in the original manuscript, and was corrected in later copies.
History
Currently there exists no historical or archaeological evidence of this event having actually happened aside from the account by Matthew in the Bible. The Jewish historian
Josephus (c. 37-c.100) who wrote about the period, makes no mention of it. Matthew's nativity story, including the Massacre of the Innocents, is intended to show Jesus to be the prophesied Messiah, fulfilling the prophecy of Jeremiah 31:15 and likening Jesus to
Moses.
[3] The Massacre of the Innocents is not mentioned in the other gospels nor in the early apocrypha except for the
Protoevangelium of James 22.
[4] Many scholars conclude that the account was invented to glorify Jesus.
[5] Some scholars have also suggested that the event was written into Matthew's account to mirror the story from Exodus regarding the killing of the Hebrew first born by Pharaoh. This was meant to show that Jesus was to be a new Moses, and would have readily been understood in this way by a Jewish audience.
Defending the massacre's authenticity
Some scholars and Christian supporters defend the massacre as something that Herod was cruel enough to do and small enough to pass without remark outside the Gospel of Matthew.
Josephus records Herod's execution of two of his sons and his wife Mariamne because he believed they posed a threat.
[6] The execution of the two sons, whom Josephus describes as ''young men'', has been represented by Robert Eisenman as the original that inspired the account in Matthew, since his two sons were the Jewish children that Herod believed had sought to replace him.
Josephus records several examples of Herod’s willingness to commit such acts to protect his power against perceived threats, but suggests that not all such acts were recorded, as he summarizes that Herod “never stopped avenging and punishing every day those who had chosen to be of the party of his enemies.”
[7] "Such a massacre," it has been observed, "is indeed quite in keeping with the character of Herod, who did not hesitate to put to death any who might be a threat to his power."
[8]
The ''Catholic Encyclopedia'' speculates about the reason Josephus did not include an account of the slaughter: "…St. Matthew's positive statement is not contradicted by the mere silence of Josephus; for the latter follows
Nicholas of Damascus, to whom, as a courtier, Herod was a hero." It also cites Maas: "Cruel as the slaughter may appear to us, it disappears among the cruelties of Herod. It cannot, then, surprise us that history does not speak of it".
[9]
Extra-biblical references
Assumption of Moses
Assumption of Moses 6:2-6:
: ''An insolent king will succeed [the
Hasmonean priests]… he will slay all the young.''
This passage from the
Assumption of Moses, dating to the first century, has been interpreted as a reference to the massacre of the innocents. E. Stauffer wrote, “Therefore the paragraph about the murder of ‘the young’ can only be pointing to a massacre of children en masse in the Pharaonic manner.”
[10]
Macrobius
In the fourth century, the Roman philosopher
Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius gave the following comment in his ''Saturnalia'':
When Augustus heard that Herod king of the Jews had ordered all the boys in Syria under the age of two years to be put to death and that the king's son was among those killed, he said, "I'd rather be Herod's sow than Herod’s son."'' ― Macrobius, ''The Saturnalia'', trans. Percival Davies (New York 1969), p. 171.''
It was probably a pun in Greek: ''hus'' being pig and ''huios'' meaning son. Macrobius places the massacre in a Syrian province and combines it with the separate killing of one of Herod's sons. However, since Herod, as a nominal adherent to Judaism, would not eat pork, his pigs were safe, unlike his sons.
In art

Rubens' ''Massacre of the Innocents''
Medieval
mystery plays recounted Biblical events, including Herod's slaughter of the innocents. One in particular, ''The Pageant of the Shearmen and Tailors'', performed in Coventry, England, included a haunting song about the episode, now known as the
Coventry Carol.
The theme of the "Massacre of the Innocents" has provided artists of many nationalities with opportunities to compose complicated depictions of massed bodies in violent action. Artists of the Renaissance took inspiration for their "Massacres" from Roman reliefs of the battle of the
Lapiths and
Centaurs to the extent that they showed the figures heroically nude
[Getty Collection]. The horrific subject matter of the Massacre of the Innocents also provided a comparison of ancient brutalities with early modern ones during the period of religious wars that followed the Reformation.
Three artists of three distinct European ethnicies figure into this early seventeenth century fascination with the topic as Catholics and Protestants slaughtered each other. First, Italian painter
Guido Reni's early (1611) ''Massacre of the Innocents'', in an unusual vertical format, is at Bologna
[Reni's painting at the Web Gallery of Art]. Second, Flemish painter
Peter Paul Rubens painted the theme more than once. One version, now in Munich, was engraved and reproduced as a painting as far away as colonial Peru
[The ''Massacre of the Innocents'' in Cuzco Cathedral is clearly influenced by Rubens. See ''CODART Courant'', Dec 2003, p12. (2.5 MB pdf download)]. Another, his grand ''
Massacre of the Innocents'' is now at the
Art Gallery of Ontario in
Toronto. Third and finally, from 1632 through 1634, French painter
Nicolas Poussin painted ''The Massacre of the Innocents'' at the height of the Thirty Years' War.
In the famous novel ''The Fall'' by
Albert Camus, this incident is argued by the main character to be the reason why Jesus chose to let himself be crucified — as he escaped the punishment intended for him while many others died, he felt responsible and died in guilt.
Feast days
The commemoration of the massacre of these "Holy Innocents" — considered by some Christians as the first
martyrs for Christ
[ Feast of the Holy Innocents, Encyclopædia Britannica.] — first appears as a feast of the western church in the
Leonine Sacramentary, dating from about
485. The feast is also called 'Childermas, Children's Mass' or 'Holy Innocents' Day', and is celebrated on different dates by different traditions: the Syrians and Chaldeans commemorate them on
December 27; the
Roman Catholic Church (using red vestments on this day since
1961, and violet or red with older missals), the
Church of England and the
Lutheran Church commemorate the slaughtered children on
December 28; and the
Eastern Orthodox Church commemorates them on
December 29 (using the
Julian calendar).
In
Spain and
Ibero-America,
December 28 is a day for
pranks, equivalent to
April Fool's Day in many countries. Pranks are known as ''inocentadas'' and their victims are called ''inocentes'', or alternatively, the pranksters are the "inocentes" and the victims should not be angry at them, since they could not have committed any "sin". Various Catholic countries have a tradition (no longer widely observed) of role reversal between children and their adult educators, plausibly a christinianized version of the Roman annual feast of the
Saturnalia (when even slaves played 'masters' for a day). In some cultures it is said to be an unlucky day, when no new project should be started.
Notes
1. Paul L. Maier, "Herod and the Infants of Bethlehem", in ''Chronos, Kairos, Christos II'', Mercer University Press (1998), page 171
2. That criterion probably actually refers to people under just 12 months old, as the likely Hebrew origin of the phrase would refer to people who haven't ''started'' their second year.
3. Harris, Stephen L. Understanding the Bible, 2nd Ed. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985. p. 274
4. Protoevangelium of James at newadvent.org.
5. Robert Eisenman, ''James The Brother of Jesus'', 1997, I.3 "Romans, Herodians and Jewish sects" discusses Mariamne, the last representative of the Maccabean line, by whom Herod had two sons, whom he put to death. "Here Herod really did kill all the Jewish children who sought to replace him, as Matthew 2:17 would have it, but these were rather his own children with Maccabean blood!" (p. 49); see also E. P. Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus, pp. 87-88.
6. Josephus, ''The Jewish War'' I.535–7 and ''Jewish Antiquities'' 16.121–7, 356.
7. Josephus, ''Antiquities'' 15.2.
8. Francis Wright Beare, ''The Gospel According to Matthew'', Camelot Press, Southampton, 1981.
9. Maas, "Life of Christ" (1897), 38 (note); the author shows, as others have done, that the number of children slain may not have been very great.
10. E. Stauffer, ''Jesus and His Story'' (London: SCM, 1960), p. 39.
References
★
Albright, W.F. and C.S. Mann. "Matthew." ''
The Anchor Bible Series.'' New York: Doubleday & Company, 1971.
★ Clarke, Howard W. ''The Gospel of Matthew and its Readers: A Historical Introduction to the First Gospel.'' Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.
★ Robert Eisenman, 1997. ''James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls'' (Viking/Penguin)
★ Goulder, M.D. ''Midrash and Lection in Matthew''. London: SPCK, 1974.
★ Jones, Alexander. ''The Gospel According to St. Matthew.'' London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1965.
★
Schweizer, Eduard. ''The Good News According to Matthew.'' Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1975
External links
★
Holy Innocents in ''
Catholic Encyclopedia''
★
Images of the "Massacre of the Innocents"