(Redirected from Marxists)
'Marxism' is both the theory and the political practice (that is, the ''
praxis'') derived from the work of
Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels. Any political practice or theory that is based on an interpretation of the works of Marx and Engels may be called Marxism; this includes different forms of politics and thought such as those of
Communist Parties and
Communist states, as well as academic research across many fields. And while there are many theoretical and practical differences among the various forms of Marxism, most forms of Marxism share:
★ an attention to the material conditions of people's lives, and
social relations among people
★ a belief that people's
consciousness of the conditions of their lives reflects these material conditions and relations
★ an understanding of
class in terms of differing
economic relations of production, and as a particular position within such relations
★ an understanding of material conditions and social relations as historically malleable
★ a view of
history according to which
class struggle, the evolving conflict between classes with opposing interests, structures each historical period and drives historical change
★ a sympathy for the
working class or
proletariat
★ and a belief that the ultimate interests of workers best match those of humanity in general.
The main points of contention among Marxists are the degree to which they are committed to a workers'
revolution as the means of achieving human
emancipation and
enlightenment, and the actual mechanism through which such a revolution might occur and succeed. Marxism is correctly but not exhaustively described as a variety of
Socialism being by far the variety for which there is the most historical experience both as a revolutionary movement and as the basis of actual governments. Some kinds of Marxists, however, such as
Trotskyists, argue that no actual state has ever fully realized Marxist principles.
Classical Marxism
Classical Marxism refers to the body of theory directly expounded by
Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels. The term "Classical Marxism" is often used to distinguish between "Marxism" as it is broadly understood and "what Marx believed", which is not necessarily the same thing. For example, shortly before he died in 1883, Marx wrote a letter to the French workers' leader
Jules Guesde and to his own son-in-law
Paul Lafargue, both of whom claimed to represent Marxist principles, in which he accused them of "revolutionary phrase-mongering" and of denying the value of reformist struggles.
[1] Paraphrasing Marx: "If that is Marxism, then I am not a Marxist". As the American Marx scholar
Hal Draper remarked, "there are few thinkers in modern history whose thought has been so badly misrepresented, by Marxists and anti-Marxists alike."
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

Karl Marx - Co-founder of Marxism (with Engels)
'Karl Heinrich Marx' (
May 5,
1818,
Trier, then part of
Prussian Rhineland –
March 14,
1883,
London) was an immensely influential German
philosopher,
political economist, and
socialist revolutionary. Marx addressed a wide variety of issues, including
alienation and exploitation of the worker, the capitalist mode of production, and
historical materialism. He is most famous, however, for his analysis of history in terms of class struggles, as summed up in the opening line of the introduction to the Communist Manifesto: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." The influence of his ideas, already popular during his life, was greatly broadened by the victory of the
Russian
Bolsheviks in the
October Revolution of 1917. Indeed, there are few parts of the world which were not significantly touched by Marxian ideas in the course of the 20th century.
'Friedrich Engels' (
November 28,
1820,
Wuppertal –
August 5,
1895,
London) was a 19th century
German
political philosopher. He developed
communist theory alongside Marx.
The two first met in person in September 1844. They discovered that they had similar views on
philosophy and on
capitalism and decided to work together, producing a number of works including ''Die heilige Familie'' (''
The Holy Family''). After the French authorities deported Marx from
France in January 1845, Engels and Marx decided to move to
Belgium, which then permitted greater
freedom of expression than some other countries in
Europe. Engels and Marx returned to
Brussels in January 1846, where they set up the Communist Correspondence Committee.
In 1847 Engels and Marx began writing a pamphlet together, based on Engels' ''The Principles of Communism''. They completed the 12,000-word pamphlet in six weeks, writing it in such a manner as to make communism understandable to a wide audience, and published it as ''
The Communist Manifesto'' in February 1848. In March, Belgium expelled both Engels and Marx. They moved to
Cologne, where they began to publish a radical newspaper, the ''
Neue Rheinische Zeitung''. By 1849, both Engels and Marx had to leave Germany and moved to London. The Prussian authorities applied pressure on the British government to expel the two men, but
Prime Minister Lord John Russell refused. With only the money that Engels could raise, the Marx family lived in extreme poverty.
After Marx's
death in 1883, Engels devoted much of the rest of his life to editing and translating Marx's writings. However, he also contributed significantly to
feminist theory, seeing for instance the concept of
monogamous marriage as having arisen because of the domination of man over women. In this sense, he ties communist theory to the family, arguing that men have dominated women just as the capitalist class has dominated workers. Engels died in London in 1895.
Early influences
Classical Marxism was influenced by a number of different thinkers. These thinkers can be divided roughly into 3 groups:
★ 'German Philosophers' including:
Immanuel Kant,
Georg Hegel,
Ludwig Feuerbach
★ 'English and Scottish Political Economists' including:
Adam Smith &
David Ricardo
★ 'French Social Theorists' including:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau;
Charles Fourier;
Henri de Saint-Simon;
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon; Flora Tristan;
Louis Blanc
Other influences include:
★ Antique materialism, e.g.
Epicurus,
Lucretius
★
Giambattista Vico
★
Lewis Morgan
Main ideas
The main ideas to come out of Marx and Engels' collective works include:
★ '
means of production:' The means of production are a combination of the
means of labor and the
subject of labor used by workers to make products. The ''means of labor'' include machines, tools, equipment, infrastructure, and "all those things with the aid of which man acts upon the subject of labor, and transforms it".
[2] The ''subject of labor'' includes raw materials and materials directly taken from nature. Means of production by themselves produce nothing --
labor power is needed for production to take place.
★ '
mode of production:' The mode of production is a specific combination of
productive forces (including the
means of production and
labour power) and social and technical
relations of production (including the property, power and control relations governing society's productive assets, often codified in law; cooperative work relations and forms of association; relations between people and the objects of their work, and the relations between social classes).
★ 'base and
superstructure:' Marx and Engels use the “base-structure” metaphor to explain the idea that the totality of relations among people with regard to “the social production of their existence” forms the economic basis, on which arises a superstructure of political and legal institutions. To the base corresponds the social consciousness which includes religious, philosophical, and other main ideas. The base conditions both, the superstructure and the social consciousness. A conflict between the development of material productive forces and the relations of production causes social revolutions, and the resulting change in the economic basis will sooner or later lead to the transformation of the superstructure.
[3] For Marx, though, this relationship is not a one way process - it is reflexive; the base determines the superstructure in the first instance and remains the foundation of a form of social organisation which then can act again upon both parts of the base-structure metaphor. The relationship between superstructure and base is considered to be a dialectical one, not a distinction between actual entities "in the world".
★ '
class consciousness:' Class consciousness refers to the self-awareness of a
social class and its capacity to act in its own rational interests.
★ '
ideology:' Without offering a general definition for ''ideology''
[4], Marx on several instances has used the term to designate the production of images of social reality. According to Engels, “ideology is a process accomplished by the so-called thinker consciously, it is true, but with a false consciousness. The real motive forces impelling him remain unknown to him; otherwise it simply would not be an ideological process. Hence he imagines false or seeming motive forces”.
[5] Because the ruling class controls the society's means of production, the superstructure of society, as well as its ruling ideas, will be determined according to what is in the ruling class's best interests. As Marx said famously in ''The German Ideology'', “the ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force”.
[6] Therefore the ideology of a society is of enormous importance since it confuses the alienated groups and can create
false consciousness such as commodity fetishism (perceiving labor as capital ~ a degradation of human life).
★ '
historical materialism:' Historical materialism was first articulated by Marx, although he himself never used the term. It looks for the causes of developments and changes in human societies in the way in which humans collectively make the means to life, thus giving an emphasis, through economic analysis, to everything that co-exists with the economic base of society (e.g. social classes, political structures, ideologies).
★ '
political economy:' The term "political economy" originally meant the study of the conditions under which production was organized in the nation-states of the new-born capitalist system. Political economy, then, studies the mechanism of human activity in organizing material, and the mechanism of distributing the surplus or deficit that is the result of that activity. Political economy studies the means of production, specifically capital, and how this manifests itself in economic activity.
★ '
exploitation:' Marx refers to the exploitation of an entire segment or class of society by another. He sees it as being an inherent feature and key element of capitalism and free markets. The profit gained by the capitalist is the difference between the value of the product made by the worker and the actual wage that the worker receives; in other words, capitalism functions on the basis of paying workers less than the full value of their labour, in order to enable the capitalist class to turn a profit.
★ '
alienation:' Marx refers to the alienation of people from aspects of their "human nature" (Gattungswesen, usually translated as 'species-essence' or 'species-being'). Alienation describes objective features of a person's situation in capitalism - it isn't necessary for them to believe or feel that they are alienated. He believes that alienation is a systematic result of capitalism.
Class
Marx believed that the identity of a social class is derived from its relationship to the means of production (as opposed to the notion that class is determined by wealth alone, i.e., lower class, middle class, upper class).
Marx describes several
social classes in capitalist societies, including primarily:
★ 'the
proletariat:' "those individuals who sell their
labour power, (and therefore add value to the products), and who, in the capitalist mode of production, do not own the means of production". According to Marx, the capitalist mode of production establishes the conditions that enable the
bourgeoisie to
exploit the proletariat due to the fact that the worker's labour power generates an
added value greater than the worker's
salary.
★ 'the
bourgeoisie:' those who "own the means of production" and buy labour power from the proletariat, who are recompensed by a salary, thus
exploiting the proletariat.
The bourgeoisie may be further subdivided into the very wealthy bourgeoisie and the
petit bourgeoisie. The petit bourgeoisie are those who employ labour, but may also work themselves. These may be small proprietors, land-holding peasants, or trade workers. Marx predicted that the petit bourgeoisie would eventually be destroyed by the constant reinvention of the means of production and the result of this would be the forced movement of the vast majority of the petit bourgeoisie to the proletariat.
Marx also identified various other classes such as the
★ 'the
lumpenproletariat:', criminals, vagabonds, beggars, etc. People that have no stake in the economic system and will sell themselves to the highest bidder.
★ 'the
Landlords:', as a class of people that were historically important, of which several still retain some of their wealth and power.
★ 'the
Peasantry and
Farmers:', this class he saw as disorganized and incapable of carrying out change. He also believed that this class would disappear, with most becoming proletariat but some becoming landowners.
Marx's theory of history
The Marxist theory of historical materialism understands society as fundamentally determined by the ''material conditions'' at any given time - this means the relationships which people enter into with one another in order to fulfill their basic needs, for instance to feed and clothe themselves and their families.
[7]. In general Marx and Engels identified five successive stages of the development of these material conditions in Western Europe.
[8]
The ''First Stage'' was called
Primitive Communism hunters and gatherers with no private property. This stage begins with the dawn of humanity to the establishment of city-states.
The ''Second Stage'' is
Slave Society, considered to be the beginning of "class society" where
private property appears.
(Private property, it should be noted, in the terminology of Marx's time, for Marx, and for Marxists today, does not mean the possessions of a person, but the ownership of ''productive'' property or property which produces a profit for the owner, such as corporate ownership, share ownership, land ownership, and, in the case of slave society, slave ownership, since the slaves worked the land, mines and other means of producing the material means of existence.)
The slave owning class "own" the land and slaves, which are the means of producing wealth, whilst everyone else has very little or nothing; mainly the slave class, slaves who work for no money. Slave society collapsed when it exhausted itself. The need to keep conquering more slaves created huge problems, such as maintaining the vast empire that resulted, and slave society (the Roman Empire) found itself in a dead end, and was eventually overrun by what it called "barbarians".
The ''Third Stage'' is
Feudalism, where there are many classes such as kings, lords, and serfs, some little more than slaves. A merchant class develops. Out of the merchants' riches a capitalist class emerges within this feudal society, but the old feudal kings and lords cannot accept the new technological changes the capitalists want. The capitalists are driven by the profit motive, but are eventually prevented from developing further profits by feudal society where, for instance, the serfs are tied to the land and cannot become industrial workers and wage earners. Marx says ''Then begins an epoch of social revolution'' (The French Revolution of 1789, Cromwell in Britain, etc) since the political organization of society (or the ''property relations'') is preventing the development of the capitalists' productive forces.
[9]
The ''Fourth Stage'' is
capitalism. Here the profit motive rules, and people, freed from serfdom, work for the capitalists for wages and the capitalist class are free to spread their
laissez-faire practices around the world. Laws are made to protect wealth and the wealthy. But, according to Marx, capitalism, like slave society and feudalism, also has failings, inner contradictions, which will lead to revolution. The working class to which the capitalist class gave birth, is the "grave digger" of capitalism. The worker is not paid the full value of what he or she produces. The rest is surplus value - the capitalist's profit, what Marx calls the "unpaid labour of the working class." The capitalists are forced by competition to drive down the wages of the working class to increase their profits. Marx believed that capitalism always leads to monopolies and leads the people to poverty; the fewer the restrictions on the free market, (e.g. from the state and trade unions) the sooner it finds itself in crisis.
The ''Fifth Stage'' (yet to be attained) is
Communism, although Lenin, basing himself on a thorough study of the writings of Marx and Engels, divided this into two stages: first socialism, and then later, once the last vestiges of the old capitalist ways have withered away, communism (
Lenin: The State and revolution).
In the first part of this stage, socialist society arises from a
self conscious movement of the vast majority, and thus a socialist society is the government of the vast majority over their own lives:
Now the productive forces are truly free to develop, but in a democratically planned way, without the vast waste of anarchic capitalist society, its wars and destruction of the planet. The first acts of the workers in the socialist society, after placing the
means of production into collective ownership, is to destroy the "old state machinery.” Hence the bourgeoisie's parliamentary democracy ceases to exist, and fiat and credit money are abolished. Instead the state is ruled through the
dictatorship of the proletariat with the
commune to replace the parliament.
The commune, modeled after the
Paris Commune has a completely different political character from the parliament. Marx explains that it holds legislative-executive power and is subservient only to the workers themselves:
Fiat money and credit whose values were determined by anarchic market forces are abolished. Instead
labour vouchers are used as the means of exchange. Each worker is paid
according to the amount of labor performed, as well as the difficulty and intensity of that labor. All goods are priced according the amount of labor required to produce them, which the individual worker can buy with his labour voucher.
Soon after socialism is established society leaps forward, and everyone has plenty of personal possessions, but no one can exploit another person for private gain through the ownership of vast monopolies, etc. Classes are thus abolished, and class society ended. Eventually the state will "wither away" and become obsolete, as people administer their own lives without the need for governments. Thus, communism is established, which Marx describes as:
Few applications of historical materialism, the philosophical system used by Marxism to explain the past progressions of human society and predict the nature of communism, account for a stage beyond communism, but Marx suggests that what has ended is only the "prehistory"
[10] of human society, for now, for the first time, humans will be no longer be at the mercy of productive forces (e.g. the free market) which act independently of their control. Instead human beings can plan for the needs of society and the preservation of planet, inclusively, democratically, by the vast majority, who now own and control the means of production collectively. By implication, then, only now does the real history of human society begin.
Marxist schools of thought
Western Marxism
Western Marxism is a term used to describe a wide variety of
Marxist theoreticians based in
Western and
Central Europe (and more recently
North America), in contrast with
philosophy in the Soviet Union, the
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia or
the People's Republic of China.
Structural Marxism
Structural Marxism is an approach to Marxism based on
structuralism, primarily associated with the work of the French theorist
Louis Althusser and his students. It was influential in France during the late 1960s and 1970s, and also came to influence philosophers, political theorists and sociologists outside of France during the 1970s.
Neo-Marxism
Neo-Marxism is a school of Marxism that began in the 20th century and hearkened back to the early writings of
Marx, before the influence of
Engels, which focused on
dialectical idealism rather than
dialectical materialism. It thus rejected economic determinism being instead far more
libertarian. Neo-Marxism adds
Max Weber's broader understanding of
social inequality, such as
status and
power, to orthodox Marxist thought.
The Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School is a school of
neo-Marxist social theory,
social research, and
philosophy. The grouping emerged at the
Institute for Social Research (''Institut für Sozialforschung'') of the
University of Frankfurt am Main in Germany. The term "Frankfurt School" is an informal term used to designate the thinkers affiliated with the Institute for Social Research or influenced by them: it is not the title of any institution, and the main thinkers of the Frankfurt School did not use the term to describe themselves.
The Frankfurt School gathered together dissident
Marxists, severe critics of
capitalism who believed that some of
Marx's alleged followers had come to parrot a narrow selection of Marx's ideas, usually in defense of orthodox
Communist or
Social-Democratic parties. Influenced especially by the failure of working-class revolutions in Western Europe after
World War I and by the rise of
Nazism in an economically, technologically, and culturally advanced nation (Germany), they took up the task of choosing what parts of Marx's thought might serve to clarify social conditions which Marx himself had never seen. They drew on other schools of thought to fill in Marx's perceived omissions.
Max Weber exerted a major influence, as did
Sigmund Freud (as in
Herbert Marcuse's
Freudo-Marxist synthesis in the 1954 work ''Eros and Civilization''). Their emphasis on the "critical" component of theory was derived significantly from their attempt to overcome the limits of
positivism, crude
materialism, and
phenomenology by returning to
Kant's
critical philosophy and its successors in German
idealism, principally
Hegel's philosophy, with its emphasis on
negation and
contradiction as inherent properties of
reality.
Cultural Marxism
Cultural Marxism is a form of Marxism that adds an analysis of the role of the media, art, theatre, film and other cultural institutions in a society, often with an added emphasis on race and gender in addition to class. As a form of political analysis, Cultural Marxism gained strength in the 1920s, and was the model used by the
Frankfurt School; and later by another group of intellectuals at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham, England.
Analytical Marxism
Analytical Marxism refers to a style of thinking about Marxism that was prominent amongst English-speaking philosophers and social scientists during the 1980s. It was mainly associated with the
September Group of academics, so called because they have biennial meetings in varying locations every other September to discuss common interests. The group also dubbed itself "Non-Bullshit Marxism" (Cohen 2000a). It was characterized, in the words of
David Miller, by "clear and rigorous thinking about questions that are usually blanketed by ideological fog". (Miller 1996)
Marxist humanism
Marxist humanism is a branch of Marxism that primarily focuses on
Marx's earlier writings, especially the ''
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844'' in which Marx exposes his
theory of alienation, as opposed to his later works, which are considered to be concerned more with his structural conception of
capitalist society. It was opposed by
Louis Althusser's "
antihumanism", who qualified it as a
revisionist movement.
Marxist humanists contend that ‘Marxism’ developed lopsided because Marx’s early works were unknown until after the orthodox ideas were in vogue — the Manuscripts of 1844 were published only in 1932 — and it is necessary to understand Marx’s philosophical foundations to understand his latter works properly.
Key Western Marxists
Georg Lukács
Georg Lukács (
April 13,
1885 –
June 4,
1971) was a
Hungarian Marxist philosopher and
literary critic in the tradition of
Western Marxism. His main work ''History and Class Consciousness'' (written between 1919 and 1922 and first published in 1923), initiated the current of thought that came to be known as Western Marxism. The book is notable for contributing to debates concerning Marxism and its relation to
sociology,
politics and
philosophy, and for reconstructing
Marx's theory of alienation before many of the works of the
Young Marx had been published. Lukács's work elaborates and expands upon Marxist theories such as
ideology,
false consciousness,
reification and
class consciousness.
Karl Korsch
Karl Korsch (
August 15,
1886 -
October 21,
1961) was born in Tostedt, near
Hamburg, to the family of a middle-ranking bank official.
In his later work, he rejected orthodox (classical) Marxism as historically outmoded, wanting to adapt Marxism to a new historical situation. He wrote in his ''Ten Theses'' (1950) that "the first step in re-establishing a revolutionary theory and practice consists in breaking with that Marxism which claims to monopolize revolutionary initiative as well as theoretical and practical direction" and that "today, all attempts to re-establish the Marxist doctrine as a whole in its original function as a theory of the working classes social revolution are reactionary utopias."
[11]
Korsch was especially concerned that Marxist theory was losing its precision and validity - in the words of the day, becoming "vulgarized" - within the upper echelons of the various socialist organizations. His masterwork, ''Marxism and Philosophy'' is an attempt to re-establish the historic character of Marxism as the heir to
Hegel.
Antonio Gramsci
Antonio Gramsci (
January 22,
1891 –
April 27,
1937) was an
Italian writer,
politician and
political theorist. He was a founding member and onetime leader of the
Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci can be seen as one of the most important Marxist thinkers of the twentieth century, and in particular a key thinker in the development of
Western Marxism. He wrote more than 30 notebooks and 3000 pages of history and analysis during his imprisonment. These writings, known as the ''Prison Notebooks'', contain Gramsci's tracing of
Italian history and
nationalism, as well as some ideas in
Marxist theory,
critical theory and educational theory associated with his name, such as:
★
Cultural hegemony as a means of maintaining the
state in a
capitalist society.
★ The need for popular workers'
education to encourage development of intellectuals from the
working class.
★ The distinction between political society (the police, the army, legal system, etc.) which dominates directly and coercively, and
civil society (the family, the education system, trade unions, etc.) where leadership is constituted through ideology or by means of consent.
★ 'Absolute
historicism'.
★ The critique of
economic determinism.
★ The critique of
philosophical materialism.
Louis Althusser
Louis Althusser (
October 16,
1918 -
October 23,
1990) was a
Marxist philosopher. His arguments were a response to multiple threats to the ideological foundations of orthodox Communism. These included both the influence of
empiricism which was beginning to influence
Marxist sociology and economics, and growing interest in humanistic and democratic socialist orientations which were beginning to cause division in the European Communist Parties. Althusser is commonly referred to as a
Structural Marxist, although his relationship to other schools of French
structuralism is not a simple affiliation.
His essay ''Marxism and Humanism'' is a strong statement of anti-
humanism in Marxist theory, condemning ideas like "human potential" and "species-being," which are often put forth by Marxists, as outgrowths of a
bourgeois ideology of "humanity." His essay ''Contradiction and Overdetermination'' borrows the concept of
overdetermination from
psychoanalysis, in order to replace the idea of "contradiction" with a more complex model of multiple
causality in political situations (an idea closely related to
Antonio Gramsci's concept of
hegemony).
Althusser is also widely known as a theorist of
ideology, and his best-known essay is ''Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Toward an Investigation''.
[12] The essay establishes the concept of ideology, also based on
Gramsci's theory of
hegemony. Whereas hegemony is ultimately determined entirely by political forces, ideology draws on
Freud's and
Lacan's concepts of the unconscious and mirror-phase respectively, and describes the structures and systems that allow us to meaningfully have a concept of the self.
Herbert Marcuse
Herbert Marcuse (
July 19,
1898 –
July 29,
1979) was a prominent
German-
American philosopher and
sociologist of
Jewish descent, and a member of the
Frankfurt School.
Marcuse's critiques of
capitalist society (especially his 1955 synthesis of
Marx and
Freud, ''
Eros and Civilization'', and his 1964 book ''
One-Dimensional Man'') resonated with the concerns of the leftist student movement in the 1960s. Because of his willingness to speak at student protests, Marcuse soon became known as "the father of the
New Left," a term he disliked and rejected.
E.P. Thompson, Christopher Hill and Eric Hobsbawm
British Marxism deviated sharply from French (especially Althusserian) Marxism and, like the Frankfurt School, developed an attention to cultural experience and an emphasis on human agency while growing increasingly distant from determinist views of materialism. A circle of historians inside the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) formed the Communist Party Historians Group in 1946. They shared a common interest in 'history from below' and class structure in early capitalist society. Important members of the group included
E.P. Thompson,
Eric Hobsbawm,
Christopher Hill and
Raphael Samuel.
While some members of the group (most notably E.P. Thompson) left the CPGB after the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, the common points of British Marxist historiography continued in their works. They placed a great emphasis on the subjective determination of history. E. P. Thompson famously engaged Althusser in The Poverty of Theory, arguing that Althusser's theory overdetermined history, and left no space for historical revolt by the oppressed.
Post Marxism
Post-Marxism represents the theoretical work of
philosophers and
social theorists who have built their theories upon those of Marx and Marxists but exceeded the limits of those theories in ways that puts them outside of Marxism. It begins with the basic tenets of Marxism but moves away from the Mode of Production as the starting point for analysis and includes factors other than class, such as gender, ethnicity etc, and a reflexive relationship between the base and superstructure.
Marxist Feminism
Marxist feminism is a sub-type of
feminist theory which focuses on the dismantling of
capitalism as a way to liberate women. Marxist feminism states that capitalism, which gives rise to economic inequality, dependence, political confusion and ultimately unhealthy social relations between men and women, is the root of women's oppression.
According to
Marxist theory, in capitalist societies the individual is shaped by class relations; that is, people's capacities, needs and interests are seen to be determined by the mode of production that characterises the society they inhabit. Marxist feminists see gender inequality as determined ultimately by the capitalist mode of production. Gender oppression is class oppression and women's subordination is seen as a form of class oppression which is maintained (like
racism) because it serves the interests of capital and the
ruling class. Marxist feminists have extended traditional Marxist analysis by looking at domestic labour as well as wage work in order to support their position.
Marxism as a political practice
Since Marx's death in 1883, various groups around the world have appealed to Marxism as the theoretical basis for their politics and policies, which have often proved to be dramatically different and conflicting. One of the first major political splits occurred between the advocates of 'reformism', who argued that the transition to socialism could occur within existing
bourgeois parliamentarian frameworks, and
communists, who argued that the transition to a socialist society required a revolution and the dissolution of the capitalist state. The 'reformist' tendency, later known as
social democracy, came to be dominant in most of the parties affiliated to the
Second International and these parties supported their own governments in the First World War. This issue caused the communists to break away, forming their own parties which became members of the
Third International.
The following countries had governments at some point in the twentieth century who at least nominally adhered to Marxism:
Albania,
Afghanistan,
Angola,
Benin,
Bulgaria,
Chile,
China,
Republic of Congo,
Cuba,
Czechoslovakia,
East Germany,
Ethiopia,
Grenada,
Hungary,
Laos,
Moldova,
Mongolia,
Mozambique,
Nepal,
Nicaragua,
North Korea,
Poland,
Romania,
Russia, the
USSR and
its republics,
South Yemen,
Yugoslavia,
Venezuela,
Vietnam. In addition, the Indian states of
Kerala and
West Bengal have had Marxist governments. Some of these governments such as in
Venezuela,
Nicaragua,
Chile,
Moldova and parts of
India have been democratic in nature and maintained regular
multiparty elections, while most governments claiming to be Marxist in nature have established one-party governments.
Marxist political parties and movements have significantly declined since the fall of the Soviet Union, with some exceptions, perhaps most notably
Nepal.
History
The 1917
October Revolution, led by
Vladimir Lenin, was the first large scale attempt to put Marxist ideas about a workers' state into practice. The new government faced counter-revolution, civil war and foreign intervention. Many, both inside and outside the revolution, worried that the revolution came too early in Russia's economic development. Consequently, the major Socialist Party in the UK decried the revolution as anti-Marxist within twenty-four hours, according to
Jonathan Wolff. Lenin consistently explained "this elementary truth of marxism, that the victory of socialism requires the joint efforts of workers in a number of advanced countries" (Lenin, Sochineniya (Works), 5th ed Vol XLIV p418.) It could not be developed in Russia in isolation, he argued, but needed to be spread internationally. The 1917 October Revolution did help inspire a revolutionary wave over the years that followed, with the development of Communist Parties worldwide, but without success in the vital advanced capitalist countries of Western Europe. Socialist revolution in
Germany and other western countries failed, leaving the
Soviet Union on its own. An intense period of debate and stopgap solutions ensued,
war communism and the
New Economic Policy (NEP). Lenin died and
Joseph Stalin gradually assumed control, eliminating rivals and consolidating power as the Soviet Union faced the horrible challenges of the 1930s and its global crisis-tendencies. Amidst the geopolitical threats which defined the period and included the probability of invasion, he instituted a ruthless program of
industrialisation which, while successful, was executed at great cost in human suffering, including millions of deaths, along with long-term environmental devastation.
Modern followers of
Leon Trotsky maintain that as predicted by Lenin, Trotsky, and others already in the 1920s, Stalin's "socialism in one country" was unable to maintain itself, and according to some Marxist critics, the
USSR ceased to show the characteristics of a socialist state long before its formal dissolution.
Following
World War II, Marxist ideology, often with Soviet military backing, spawned a rise in revolutionary communist parties all over the world. Some of these parties were eventually able to gain power, and establish their own version of a Marxist state. Such nations included the
People's Republic of China,
Vietnam,
Romania,
East Germany,
Albania,
Cambodia,
Ethiopia,
South Yemen,
Yugoslavia,
Cuba, and others. In some cases, these nations did not get along. The most notable examples were rifts that occurred between the Soviet Union and China, as well as Soviet Union and Yugoslavia (in 1948), whose leaders disagreed on certain elements of Marxism and how it should be implemented into society.
Many of these self-proclaimed Marxist nations (often styled
People's Republics) eventually became authoritarian states, with stagnating economies. This caused some debate about whether or not these nations were in fact led by "true Marxists". Critics of Marxism speculated that perhaps Marxist ideology itself was to blame for the nations' various problems. Followers of the currents within Marxism which opposed Stalin, principally cohered around
Leon Trotsky, tended to locate the failure at the level of the failure of
world revolution: for communism to have succeeded, they argue, it needed to encompass all the international trading relationships that capitalism had previously developed.
The Chinese experience seems to be unique. Rather than falling under a single family's self-serving and dynastic interpretation of Marxism as happened in North Korea and before 1989 in Eastern Europe, the Chinese government - after the end of the struggles over the Mao legacy in 1980 and the ascent of Deng Xiaoping - seems to have solved the succession crises that have plagued self-proclaimed Leninist governments since the death of Lenin himself. Key to this success is another Leninism which is a NEP (
New Economic Policy) writ very large; Lenin's own NEP of the 1920s was the "permission" given to markets including speculation to operate by the Party which retained final control. The Russian experience in
Perestroika was that markets under socialism were so opaque as to be both inefficient and corrupt but especially after China's application to join the
WTO this does not seem to apply universally.
The death of "Marxism" in China has been prematurely announced but since the Hong Kong handover in 1997, the Beijing leadership has clearly retained final say over both commercial and political affairs. Questions remain however as to whether the Chinese Party has opened its markets to such a degree as to be no longer classified as a true Marxist party. A sort of tacit consent, and a desire in China's case to escape the chaos of pre-1949 memory, probably plays a role.
In 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed and the new Russian state ceased to identify itself with Marxism. Other nations around the world followed suit. Since then, radical Marxism or Communism has generally ceased to be a prominent political force in global politics, and has largely been replaced by more moderate versions of democratic socialism—or, more commonly, by aggressively neoliberal capitalism. Marxism has also had to engage with the rise in the
Environmental movement. A merging of Marxism,
socialism,
ecology and
environmentalism has been achieved, and is often referred to as
Eco-socialism.
Social Democracy
Social democracy is a
political ideology that emerged in the late 19th and early 20th century. Many parties in the second half of the 19th century described themselves as social democratic, such as the British
Social Democratic Federation, and the
Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. In most cases these were revolutionary socialist or Marxist groups, who were not only seeking to introduce socialism, but also democracy in un-democratic countries.
The modern social democratic current came into being through a break within the socialist movement in the early 20th century, between two groups holding different views on the ideas of
Karl Marx. Many related movements, including
pacifism,
anarchism, and
syndicalism, arose at the same time (often by splitting from the main socialist movement, but also by emerging of new theories.) and had various quite different objections to Marxism. The social democrats, who were the majority of socialists at this time, did not reject Marxism (and in fact claimed to uphold it), but wanted to ''reform'' it in certain ways and tone down their criticism of capitalism. They argued that socialism should be achieved through evolution rather than revolution. Such views were strongly opposed by the revolutionary socialists, who argued that any attempt to reform capitalism was doomed to fail, because the reformers would be gradually corrupted and eventually turn into capitalists themselves.
Despite their differences, the reformist and revolutionary branches of socialism remained united until the outbreak of
World War I. The war proved to be the final straw that pushed the tensions between them to breaking point. The reformist socialists supported their respective national governments in the war, a fact that was seen by the revolutionary socialists as outright treason against the
working class (Since it betrayed the principle that the workers of all nations should unite in overthrowing capitalism, and the fact that usually the lowest classes are the ones sent into the war to fight, and die, putting the cause at the side). Bitter arguments ensued within socialist parties, as for example between
Eduard Bernstein (reformist socialist) and
Rosa Luxemburg (revolutionary socialist) within the
Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). Eventually, after the
Russian Revolution of 1917, most of the world's socialist parties fractured. The reformist socialists kept the name "Social democrats", while the revolutionary socialists began calling themselves "Communists", and soon formed the modern
Communist movement. (See also
Comintern)
Since the 1920s, doctrinal differences have been constantly growing between social democrats and Communists (who themselves are not unified on the way to achieve socialism), and Social Democracy is mostly used as a specifically Central European label for
Labour Parties since then, especially in Germany and the Netherlands and especially since the 1959
Godesberg Program of the German SPD that rejected the praxis of class struggle altogether.
Socialism
Although there are still many Marxist revolutionary
social movements and
political parties around the world, since the
collapse of the Soviet Union and its satellite states, very few countries have governments which describe themselves as Marxist. Although socialistic parties are in power in some Western nations, they long ago distanced themselves from their direct link to Marx and his ideas.
As of 2005,
Laos,
Vietnam,
Cuba, and the
People's Republic of China - and to a certain extent
Venezuela had governments in power which describe themselves as
socialist in the Marxist sense. However, the
private sector comprised more than 50% of the
mainland Chinese economy by this time and the Vietnamese government had also partially liberalised its economy. The Laotian and Cuban states maintained strong control over the means of production.
Alexander Lukashenko president of
Belarus, has been quoted as saying that his agrarian policy could be termed as Communist. He has also frequently referred to the economy as being '
market socialism'. Lukashenko is also an unapologetic admirer of the Soviet Union.
North Korea is another contemporary socialist state, though the official ideology of the
Korean Workers' Party (originally led by
Kim Il-sung and currently chaired by his son,
Kim Jong-il),
Juche, does not follow doctrinaire
Marxism-Leninism as had been espoused by the leadership of the Soviet Union.
Libya is often thought of as a socialist state; it maintained ties with the Soviet Union and other Eastern bloc and Communist states during the Cold War. Colonel
Muammar al-Qaddafi, the leader of Libya, describes the state's official ideology as
Islamic socialism, and has labeled it a
third way between capitalism and communism.
In the
United Kingdom, the governing
Labour Party describes itself as a socialist political party and is a member of the socialist organisation,
Socialist International. The Party was set up by
trade-unionists,
revolutionary and reformist socialists such as the
Social Democratic Federation and the socialist
Fabian Society.
Communism
Main articles: Communist state
A number of states have declared an allegiance to the principles of Marxism and have been ruled by self-described Communist Parties, either as a
single-party state or a single list, which includes formally several parties, as was the case in the
German Democratic Republic. Due to the dominance of the Communist Party in their governments, these states are often called "communist states" by Western political scientists. However, they have described themselves as "socialist", reserving the term "communism" for a future classless society, in which the state would no longer be necessary (on this understanding of communism, "communist state" would be an
oxymoron) — for instance, the
USSR was the Union of Soviet ''Socialist'' Republics. Many Marxists contend that, historically, there has never been any communist country.
Communist governments have historically been characterized by state ownership of productive resources in a
planned economy and sweeping campaigns of economic restructuring such as
nationalization of industry and
land reform (often focusing on
collective farming or state farms.) While they promote collective
ownership of the means of production, Communist governments have been characterized by a strong state apparatus in which decisions are made by the ruling Communist Party. Dissident 'authentic' communists have characterized the Soviet model as
state socialism or
state capitalism.
Marxism-Leninism
Main articles: Marxism-Leninism,
Leninism
Marxism-Leninism, strictly speaking, refers to the version of Marxism developed by
Vladimir Lenin known as
Leninism. However, in various contexts, different (and sometimes opposing) political groups have used the term "Marxism-Leninism" to describe the ideologies that they claimed to be upholding. The core ideological features of Marxism-Leninism are those of Marxism and Leninism, viz. belief in the necessity of a violent overthrow of
capitalism through
communist revolution, to be followed by a
dictatorship of the proletariat as the first stage of moving towards
communism, and the need for a
vanguard party to lead the
proletariat in this effort. It involves subscribing to the teachings and legacy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (Marxism), and that of Lenin, as carried forward by
Joseph Stalin. Those who view themselves as Marxist-Leninists, however, vary with regards to the leaders and thinkers that they choose to uphold as progressive (and to what extent).
Maoists tend to downplay the importance of all other thinkers in favour of
Mao Zedong, whereas
Hoxhaites repudiate Mao.
Leninism holds that
capitalism can only be overthrown by revolutionary means; that is, any attempts to ''reform'' capitalism from within, such as
Fabianism and non-revolutionary forms of
democratic socialism, are doomed to fail. The goal of a Leninist party is to orchestrate the overthrow the existing government by force and seize power on behalf of the proletariat, and then implement a
dictatorship of the proletariat. The party must then use the powers of government to educate the proletariat, so as to remove the various modes of
false consciousness the
bourgeois have instilled in them in order to make them more docile and easier to exploit economically, such as
religion and
nationalism.
The dictatorship of the proletariat refers to the absolute power of the working class. It is governed by a system of proletarian
direct democracy, in which workers hold political power through local councils known as
soviets ''(see
soviet democracy)''.
Trotskyism
Trotskyism is the theory of Marxism as advocated by
Leon Trotsky. Trotsky considered himself a
Bolshevik-
Leninist, arguing for the establishment of a
vanguard party. He considered himself an advocate of
orthodox Marxism. His politics differed sharply from those of
Stalin or
Mao, most importantly in declaring the need for an international "
permanent revolution". Numerous groups around the world continue to describe themselves as Trotskyist and see themselves as standing in this tradition, although they have diverse interpretations of the conclusions to be drawn from this.
Trotsky advocated
proletarian revolution as set out in his theory of "
permanent revolution", and he argued that in countries where the
bourgeois-
democratic revolution had not triumphed already (in other words, in places that had not yet implemented a capitalist democracy, such as Russia before 1917), it was necessary that the proletariat make it permanent by carrying out the tasks of the social revolution (the "socialist" or "communist" revolution) at the same time, in an uninterrupted process. Trotsky believed that a new socialist state would not be able to hold out against the pressures of a hostile capitalist world unless socialist revolutions quickly took hold in other countries as well.
On the
political spectrum of Marxism, Trotskyists are considered to be on the left. They supported democratic rights in the USSR, opposed political deals with the imperialist powers, and advocated a spreading of the revolution throughout Europe and the East.
Trotsky developed the theory that the Russian workers' state had become a "
bureaucratically degenerated workers' state". Capitalist rule had not been restored, and nationalized industry and economic planning, instituted under Lenin, were still in effect. However, the state was controlled by a bureaucratic caste with interests hostile to those of the working class. Trotsky defended the Soviet Union against attack from imperialist powers and against internal
counter-revolution, but called for a
political revolution within the USSR to restore socialist democracy. He argued that if the working class did not take power away from the Stalinist bureaucracy, the bureaucracy would restore capitalism in order to enrich itself. In the view of many Trotskyists, this is exactly what has happened since the beginning of
Glasnost and
Perestroika in the USSR. Some argue that the adoption of
market socialism by the
People's Republic of China has also led to capitalist counter-revolution.
Maoism
Maoism or ''Mao Zedong Thought'' (
Chinese: 毛泽东思想,
pinyin: Máo Zédōng Sīxiǎng), is a variant of
Marxism-Leninism derived from the teachings of the
Chinese communist leader
Mao Zedong (
Wade-Giles transliteration: "Mao Tse-tung").
The term "Mao Zedong Thought" has always been the preferred term by the
Communist Party of China, and the word "Maoism" has never been used in its English-language publications except
pejoratively. Likewise, Maoist groups outside China have usually called themselves
Marxist-Leninist rather than Maoist, a reflection of Mao's view that he did not change, but only developed, Marxism-Leninism. However, some Maoist groups, believing Mao's theories to have been sufficiently substantial additions to the basics of the
Marxist , call themselves "Marxist-Leninist-Maoist" (MLM) or simply "Maoist."
In the People's Republic of China, Mao Zedong Thought is part of the official doctrine of the
Communist Party of China, but since the 1978 beginning of
Deng Xiaoping's
market economy-oriented reforms, the concept of "
socialism with Chinese characteristics" has come to the forefront of Chinese politics,
Chinese economic reform has taken hold, and the official definition and role of Mao's original
ideology in the PRC has been radically altered and reduced (see ''
History of China'').
Unlike the earlier forms of
Marxism-Leninism in which the urban
proletariat was seen as the main source of revolution, and the countryside was largely ignored, Mao focused on the peasantry as the main revolutionary force which, he said, could be ''led'' by the proletariat and its
vanguard, the
Communist Party of China. The model for this was of course the Chinese communist rural Protracted People's War of the 1920s and 1930s, which eventually brought the
Communist Party of China to power. Furthermore, unlike other forms of Marxism-Leninism in which large-scale industrial development was seen as a positive force, Maoism made all-round rural development the priority. Mao felt that this strategy made sense during the early stages of socialism in a country in which most of the people were peasants.
Unlike most other political ideologies, including other
socialist and Marxist ones, Maoism contains an integral
military doctrine and explicitly connects its political ideology with
military strategy. In Maoist thought, "political power comes from the barrel of the gun" (one of Mao's quotes), and the
peasantry can be mobilized to undertake a "
people's war" of armed struggle involving
guerrilla warfare in three stages.
Other
Some
libertarian members of the ''
laissez-faire'' and
individualist schools of thought believe the actions and principles of modern capitalist states or
big governments can be understood as "Marxist". This point of view ignores the overall vision and general intent of Marx and Engels' ''
Communist Manifesto'', for qualitative change to the economic system, and focuses on a few steps that Marx and Engels believed would occur, as workers emancipated themselves from the capitalist system, such as "Free education for all children in public schools". A few such reforms have been implemented — not by Marxists but in the forms of
Keynesianism, the
welfare state,
new liberalism,
social democracy and other changes within the capitalist system, in most capitalist states.
To Marxists these reforms represent responses to political pressures from working-class political parties and unions, themselves responding to perceived abuses of the capitalist system. Further, in this view, many of these reforms reflect efforts to "save" or "improve" capitalism (without abolishing it) by coordinating economic actors and dealing with
market failures. Further, although Marxism does see a role for a socialist "vanguard" government in representing the proletariat through a revolutionary period of indeterminate length, it sees an eventual lightening of that burden, a "
withering away of the state."
Disputing these claims
Many academics dispute the claim that the above political movements are Marxist. Communist governments have historically been characterized by state ownership of productive resources in a
planned economy and sweeping campaigns of economic restructuring such as
nationalization of industry and
land reform (often focusing on
collective farming or state farms.) While they promote collective
ownership of the means of production, Communist governments have been characterized by a strong state apparatus in which decisions are made by the ruling Communist Party. Dissident communists have characterized the Soviet model as
state socialism or
state capitalism. Further, critics have often claimed that a Stalinist or Maoist system of government creates a
new ruling class, usually called the
nomenklatura.
However Marx defined "communism" as a classless, egalitarian and stateless society. Indeed, to Marx, the notion of a socialist state would have seemed oxymoronical, as he defined socialism as the phase reached when class society and the state had already been abolished. Once socialism had been established, society would develop new socialist relations over the course of several generations, reaching the stage known as communism when bourgeois relations had been abandoned. Such a development has yet to occur in any historical self-claimed Socialist state. Often it results in the creation of two distinct classes: those who are in government and therefore have power, and those who are not in government and do not have power — thus inspiring the term "
State capitalism". These statist regimes have generally followed a
command economy model without making a transition to this hypothetical final stage.
Criticisms
Criticisms of Marxism are many and varied. They concern both the theory itself, and its later interpretations and implementations.
Criticisms of Marxism have come from the political Left as well as the political Right.
Democratic socialists and
social democrats reject the idea that socialism can be accomplished only through
class conflict and violent revolution. Many
Anarchists reject the need for a
transitory state phase and
some anarchists even reject socialism entirely. Some thinkers have rejected the fundamentals of Marxist theory, such as
historical materialism and the
labour theory of value, and gone on to criticize capitalism - and advocate socialism - using other arguments. Some contemporary supporters of Marxism argue that many aspects of Marxist thought are viable, but that the corpus also fails to deal effectively with certain aspects of economic, political or social theory.
Notes
1. See in particular MIA introduction at "The Programme of the Parti Ouvrier"
2. Institute of Economics of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. (1957). xiii.
3. See Marx: ''A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy'' (1859), Preface, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1977, with some notes by R. Rojas,
and Engels: ''Anti-Dühring'' (1877), Introduction General
4. Joseph McCarney:
''Ideology and False Consciousness'', April 2005
5. Engels: Letter to Franz Mehring, (London July 14, 1893), transl. by Donna Torr, in ''Marx and Engels Correspondence'', International Publishers 1968
6. Karl Marx, ''The German Ideology'', [1]
7. See in particular Marx and Engels, ''The German Ideology''
8. Marx makes no claim to have produced a master key to history. Historical materialism is not "an historico-philosophic theory of the marche generale imposed by fate upon every people, whatever the historic circumstances in which it finds itself". (Marx, Karl, Letter to editor of the Russian paper Otetchestvennye Zapiskym, 1877) His ideas, he explains, are based on a concrete study of the actual conditions that pertained in Europe.
9. Marx, ''Preface of A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy'' Marx, ''Early writings'', Penguin, 1975, p425-6
10. Marx, ''Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy'' Marx, ''Early writings'', Penguin, 1975, p426
11. Karl Korsch (1950) Ten Theses on Marxism Today
12. ''Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Toward an Investigation'' is available in several English volumes including ''Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays''
References
★
The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, Avineri, Shlomo, , , Cambridge University Press, 1968,
★
Main Currents in Marxism, Kolakowski, Leszek, , , , ,
★
Marxism: An Autopsy, Parkes, Henry Bamford, , , Houghton Mifflin, 1939,
★
An Outline of the History of Economic Thought, , E, Screpanti, , 1993,
★
Marxism: Philosophy and Economics, Sowell, Thomas, , , William Morrow, 1985, ISBN 0-688-06426-4
★
Marxism After Marx, McLellan, David, , , Palgrave Macmillan, 2007,
See also
Other articles about Marxism
★
Analytical Marxism
★
Anti-Revisionist
★
Austromarxism
★
Communism
★
Contributors to marxist theory
★
Council communism
★
Criticisms of communism
★
Cultural Marxism
★
Dialectical materialism
★
Dictatorship of the proletariat
★
Economic determinism
★
False consciousness
★
Historical materialism
★
Legal Naturalism
★
Liberalism
★
Marxian economics
★
Marxist film theory
★
Marxist historiography
★
Marxist humanism
★
Marxist literary criticism
★
Marxist philosophy
★
Marxist philosophy of nature
★
Marx's theory of alienation
★
Neo-Marxism
★
Post-Marxism
★
Western Marxism
See also
★
Anarchism
★
Anarchism and Marxism
★
Antagonistic contradiction
★
Crisis theory
★
Critical theory
★
Communist state
★
Communist party
★
Communitarianism
★
Eco-socialism
★
Freiwirtschaft
★
Historicism
★
Lewis H. Morgan
★
Labor theory of value
★
Luxemburgism
★
Materialism
★
Marxist revisionism
★
Monthly Review
★
Political economy
★
Political philosophy
★
Producerism
★
Rethinking Marxism
★
Social-conflict theory
★
Social evolutionism
★
Socialism
Further reading
★ The
London Philosophy Study Guide offers many suggestions on what to read, depending on the student's familiarity with the subject:
Marxism
External links
General resources
★
Marxists Internet Archive
★
Marxmail.org
★
A Marxism FAQ - under construction
★
Libertarian Communist Library Marxism archive
★
The Last Superpower - discussion on Marxism
★
Marxism Page
★
Marxist.net Marxist Resources from the
Committee for a Workers' International
★
Marxism FAQ
★
Marx Myths & Legends
★
Extensive bibliography
Introductory articles
★
Introductory article by Michael A. Lebowitz
★
History of Economic Thought: Marxian School
★
Modern Variants of Marxian political economy
Marxist websites
★
GegenStandpunkt journal of Marxist political economy
★
In Defence of Marxism website of the International Marxist Tendency
★
MRZine a project of the Monthly Review Foundation
★
Pathfinder Press online Marxist bookstore
★
Rethinking Marxism a journal of economics, society, and culture
★
Socialist Project issues, events, theory, and debate
★
Solidarity Economy Marxist theory, analysis, and debate
Specific topics
★
Debating Marxism Michael Albert (ParEcon) vs. Alan Maass (Marxism)
★
''Marx on India and the Colonial Question'' from the
Anti-Caste Information Page
Critiques of Marxism
★
''Main Currents of Marxism. Volume I: The Founders, Volume II: The Golden Age, Volume III: The Breakdown'' critique by
Leszek Kołakowski
★
''The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume II: The High Tide of Prophecy (Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath)'' critique by
Karl Popper
★
"Madisonian Democracy and Marxist Analysis: Ryder on the Constitution" by Sterling Harwood (in Chrisopher B. Gray, ed., ''Philosophical Essays on the United States Constitution: A Collection of Bicentennial Essays'' Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1989)
★
Liberalism, Marxism and The State, by Ralph Raico
★
A Farewell to Marx: An Outline and Appraisal of His Theories, by David Conway
★
Marx Lite, by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
★
Marxist Dreams and Soviet Realities, by Ralph Raico
★
Marxism, by David L. Prychitko
★
Marxism As Pseudo-science, by Ernest Van Den Haag
★
Lecture XXXV "A Philosophy of Life" includes a critique by
Sigmund Freud