The 'Marchantiophyta' are a division of
bryophyte plants commonly referred to as 'hepatics' or 'liverworts'. Like other bryophytes, they have a gametophyte-dominant life cycle, in which cells of the plant carry only a single set of genetic information.
It is estimated that there are 6000 to 8000 species of liverworts. Some of the more familiar species grow as a flattened leafless
thallus, but most species are leafy with a form very much like a flattened
moss. Leafy species can most reliably be distinguished from the apparently similar mosses by their single-celled
rhizoids. Other differences are not universal for all mosses and all liverworts, but the occurrence of leaves arranged in three ranks, the presence of deep lobes or segmented leaves, or a lack of clearly differentiated stem and leaves all point to the plant being a liverwort.
Liverworts are typically small, usually from 2-20 mm wide with individual plants less than 10 cm long, and are therefore often overlooked. However, certain species may cover large patches of ground, rocks, trees or any other reasonably firm substrate on which they occur. They are distributed globally in almost every available habitat, most often in humid locations although there are desert and arctic species as well. Some species can be a nuisance in shady green-houses.
Physical characteristics
Description
Most liverworts are typically small, usually from 2-20 mm wide with individual plants less than 10 cm long;
[1] they are therefore often overlooked. The most familiar liverworts consist of a prostrate, flattened, ribbon-like or branching structure called a
thallus (plant body); these liverworts are termed ''thallose liverworts''. However, most liverworts produce flattened stems with overlapping scales or leaves in three or more ranks, the middle rank being conspicously different from the outer ranks; these are called ''
leafy liverworts'' or ''scale liverworts''.
[2][3] (''See the
gallery below for examples.'')
Liverworts can most reliably be distinguished from the apparently similar
mosses by their single celled
rhizoids.
[4] Other differences are not universal for all mosses and all liverworts,
3 but the lack of clearly differentiated stem and leaves in thallose species, or in leafy species the presence of deeply lobed or segmented leaves, and the presence of leaves arranged in three ranks all point to the plant being a liverwort.
[5][6] In addition, 90% of liverworts contain
oil bodies in at least some of their cells, and these cellular structures are absent from most other bryophytes and from all vascular plants.
[7] However, the overall physical similarity of some mosses and leafy liverworts means that confirmation of the identification of some groups can only be performed with certainty with the aid of
microscopy or an experienced bryologist.
Liverworts have a
gametophyte-dominant life cycle, with the
sporophyte dependent on the gametophyte.
7 That is, the plant's cells are
haploid for the majority of its life cycle. Cells in a typical liverwort plant each contain only a single set of genetic information. This contrasts sharply with the pattern exhibited by nearly all animals and by most other plants. In the more familiar
seed plants, the haploid generation is represented only by the tiny
pollen and the
ovule, whilst the
diploid generation is the familiar tree or other plant.
[8] Another unusual feature of the liverwort life cycle is that sporophytes (i.e. the
diploid body) are very short-lived, withering away not long after it releases its spores.
[9] Even in other
bryophytes, the sporophyte is long persistent and disperses spores over an extended period.
Life cycle

Life cycle of a typical liverwort
The life of a liverwort starts from the germination of a haploid
spore to produce a
protonema, which is either a mass of thread-like filaments or else a flattened thallus.
[10][11] The protonema is a transitory stage in the life of a liverwort, from which will grow the mature gametophore ("
gamete-bearer") plant that produces the sex organs. The male organs are known as
antheridia (''singular:'' antheridium) and produce the sperm cells. Clusters of antheridia are enclosed by a protective layer of cells called the 'perigonium' (''plural:'' perigonia). As in other land plants, the female organs are known as
archegonia (''singular:'' archegonium) and are protected by the thin surrounding 'perichaetum' (''plural:'' perichaeta).
3 Each archegonium has a slender hollow tube, the "neck", down which the sperm swim to reach the egg cell.
Liverwort species may be either
dioicous or
monoicous. In dioicious liverworts, female and male sex organs are borne on different and separate gametophyte plants. In monoicious liverworts, the two kinds of reproductive structures are borne on different branches of the same plant.
[12] In either case, the sperm must swim from the antheridia where they are produced to the archegonium where the eggs are held. The
sperm of liverworts is ''biflagellate'', i.e. they have two tail-like
flagellae that aid in propulsion.
[13] Their journey is further assisted either by the splashing of raindrops or the presence of a thin layer of water covering the plants. Without water, the journey from antheridium to archegonium cannot occur.
In the presence of such water, sperm from the antheridia swim to the archegonia and
fertilisation occurs, leading to the production of a diploid sporophyte. After fertilisation, the immature
sporophyte within the archegonium develops three distinct regions: (1) a 'foot', which both anchors the sporophyte in place and receives nutrients from its "mother" plant, (2) a spherical or ellipsoidal 'capsule', inside which the spores will be produced for dispersing to new locations, and (3) a 'seta' (stalk) which lies between the other two regions and connects them.
13 When the sporophyte has developed all three regions, the seta elongates, pushing its way out of the archegonium and rupturing it. While the foot remains anchored within the parent plant, the capsule is forced out by the seta and is extended away from the plant and into the air. Within the capsule, cells divide to produce both
elater cells and spore-producing cells. The elaters are spring-like, and will push open the wall of the capsule to scatter themselves when the capsule bursts. The spore-producing cells will undergo
meiosis to form haploid
spores to disperse, upon which point the life cycle can start again.
Ecology
Today, liverworts can be found in many ecosystems across the planet except the sea and excessively dry environments, or those exposed to high levels of direct solar radiation.
[14] As with most groups of living plants, they are most common (both in numbers and species) in moist tropical areas.
[15] Liverworts are more commonly found in moderate to deep shade, though desert species may tolerate direct sunlight and periods of total dessication.
Classification
Relationship to other plants
Traditionally, the liverworts were grouped together with other
bryophytes (
mosses and
hornworts) in the Division Bryophyta, within which the liverworts made up the class 'Hepaticae' (also called Marchantiopsida).
[16]3 However, since this grouping makes the Bryophyta
paraphyletic, the liverworts are now usually given their own division.
[17] The use of the division name Bryophyta ''sensu latu'' is still found in the literature, but more frequently the
Bryophyta now is used in a restricted sense to include only the mosses.

Two hypotheses on the phylogeny of land plants
Another reason that liverworts are now classified separately is that liverworts appear to have diverged from all other
embryophyte plants near the beginning of their
evolution. The strongest line of supporting evidence is that liverworts are the only living group of land plants that do not have
stomata on the
sporophyte generation.
[18] The earliest
fossils believed to be liverworts are
compression fossils of ''
Pallaviciniites'' from the Upper
Devonian of
New York.
[19] These fossils resemble modern species in the
Metzgeriales.
[20] Another Devonian fossil called ''
Protosalvinia'' also looks like a liverwort, but its relationship to other plants is still uncertain, so it may not belong to the Marchantiophyta.
Internal classification
Bryologists classify liverworts in the division 'Marchantiophyta'. This divisional name is based on the name of the most universally recognized liverwort genus ''
Marchantia''.
[21] In addition to this
taxon-based name, the liverworts are often called 'Hepaticophyta'. This name is derived from their common Latin name as Latin was the language in which botanists published their descriptions of species. This name has led to some confusion, partly because it appears to be a taxon-based name derived from the
genus ''
Hepatica'' which is actually a
flowering plant of the buttercup family
Ranunculaceae. In addition, the name Hepaticophyta is frequently misspelled in textbooks as 'Hepatophyta', which only adds to the confusion.
The Marchantiophyta is subdivided into two classes. The 'Jungermanniopsida' includes primarily the two
orders Metzgeriales (simple thalloids) and
Jungermanniales (leafy liverworts), as well as a smaller order
Haplomitriales. The 'Marchantiopsida' includes primarily the orders
Marchantiales (complex-thallus liverworts) and
Sphaerocarpales (bottle hepatics), as well as the problematic genus ''
Monoclea'', which is sometimes placed in its own order Monocleales.
[22]
It is estimated that there are 6000 to 8000 species of liverworts, at least 85% of which belong to the leafy group.
[23]
Economic importance
In ancient times, it was believed that liverworts cured diseases of the
liver, hence the name.
[24] In
Old English, the word liverwort literally means ''liver plant''.
[25] This probably stemed from the superficial appearance of some thalloid liverworts (which resemble a liver in outline), and led to the common name of the group as ''hepatics'', from the
Latin word ''hēpaticus'' for "belonging to the liver". An unrelated flowering plant, ''
Hepatica'', is sometimes also referred to as liverwort because it was once also used in treating diseases of the liver. This archaic relationship of plant form to function was based in the
"Doctrine of Signatures".
[26]
Liverworts have little direct economic importance today. Their greatest impact is indirect, though the reduction of erosion along streambanks, their collection and retention of water in tropical forests, and the formation of
soil crusts in deserts and polar regions. However, a few species are used by humans directly. The species ''
Riccia fluitans'' and ''
Monosolenium tenerum'' are aquatic thallose liverworts sold for use in
aquaria. Their thin, slender branches float on the water's surface and provide habitat for both small invertebrates and the fish that feed on them.
Media
A small collection of images showing liverwort structure and diversity:
See also
★
Bryophyte
★
Embryophyte
References
1. Schuster, Rudolf M. ''The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America'', volume I, pages 243-244. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1966).
2. Kashyap, Shiv Ram. ''Liverworts of the Western Himalayas and the Panjab Plain'', volume I, page 1. (New Delhi: The Chronica Botanica, 1929)
3. Schofield, W. B. ''Introduction to Bryology'', pages 135-140. (New York: Macmillan, 1985). ISBN 0-02-949660-8.
4. Nehira, Kunito. "Spore Germination, Protonemata Development and Sporeling Development", page 347 ''in'' Rudolf M. Schuster (Ed.), ''New Manual of Bryology'', volume I. (Nichinan, Miyazaki, Japan: The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 1983). ISBN 4-938163-3045.
5. Allison, K. W. & John Child. ''The Liverworts of New Zealand'', pages 13-14. (Dunedin: University of Otago Press, 1975).
6. Conard, Henry S. and Paul L. Redfearn, Jr. ''How to Know the Mosses and Liverworts'', revised ed., pages 12-23. (Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown Co., 1979) ISBN 0-697-04768-7
7. Harold C. Bold, C. J. Alexopoulos, and T. Delevoryas. ''Morphology of Plants and Fungi'', 5th ed., page 189. (New York: Harper-Collins, 1987). ISBN 0-06-040838-1.
8. Fosket, Donald E. ''Plant Growth and Development: A Molecular Approach'', page 27. (San Diego: Academic Press, 1994). ISBN 0-12-262430-0.
9. Hicks, Marie L. ''Guide to the Liverworts of North Carolina'', page 10. (Durham: Duke University Press, 1992). ISBN 0-8223-1175-5.
10. Nehira, Kunito. "Spore Germination, Protonemata Development and Sporeling Development", pages 358-374 ''in'' Rudolf M. Schuster (Ed.), ''New Manual of Bryology'', volume I. (Nichinan, Miyazaki, Japan: The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 1983). ISBN 4-938163-3045.
11. Chopra, R. N. & P. K. Kumra. ''Biology of Bryophytes'', pages 1-38. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988). ISBN 0-470-21359-0.
12. Malcolm, Bill & Nancy Malcolm. ''Mosses and Other Bryophytes: An Illustrated Glossary'', pages 6 & 128. (New Zealand: Micro-Optics Press, 2000). ISBN 0-473-06730-7.
13. Campbell, Douglas H. ''The Structure and Development of Mosses and Ferns'', pages 73-74. (London: The Macmillan Co., 1918)
14. Schuster, Rudolf M. ''The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America'', volume I, pages 243-249. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1966).
15. Pócs, Tamás. "Tropical Forest Bryophytes", page 59 ''in'' A. J. E. Smith (Ed.) ''Bryophyte Ecology''. (London: Chapman and Hall, 1982). ISBN 0-412-22340-6.
16. Crandall-Stotler, Barbara. & Stotler, Raymond E. "Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta". page 36-38 ''in'' A. Jonathan Shaw & Bernard Goffinet (Eds.), ''Bryophyte Biology''. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:2000). ISBN 0-521-66097-1
17. Goffinet, Bernard. "Origin and phylogenetic relationships of bryophytes". pages 124-149 ''in'' A. Jonathan Shaw & Bernard Goffinet (Eds.), ''Bryophyte Biology''. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:2000). ISBN 0-521-66097-1
18. Kenrick, Paul & Peter R. Crane. ''The Origin and Early Diversification of Land Plants: A Cladistic Study'', page 59. (Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1997). ISBN 1-56098-730-8.
19. Taylor, Thomas N. & Edith L. Taylor. ''The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants'', page 139. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993). ISBN 0-13-651589-4.
20. Oostendorp, Cora. ''The Bryophytes of the Palaeozoic and the Mesozoic'', pages 70-71. (''Bryophytum Bibliotheca'', Band 34, 1987). ISBN 3-443-62006-X.
21. Crandall-Stotler, Barbara. & Stotler, Raymond E. "Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta". page 63 ''in'' A. Jonathan Shaw & Bernard Goffinet (Eds.), ''Bryophyte Biology''. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:2000). ISBN 0-521-66097-1
22. Schuster, Rudolf M. ''The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America'', volume VI, page 26. (Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History, 1992). ISBN 0-914-86821-7.
23. Crandall-Stotler, Barbara. & Stotler, Raymond E. "Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta". page 21 ''in'' A. Jonathan Shaw & Bernard Goffinet (Eds.), ''Bryophyte Biology''. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:2000). ISBN 0-521-66097-1.
24. Dittmer, Howard J. ''Phylogeny and Form in the Plant Kingdom'', page 286. (Toronto: D. Van Nostrand Co., 1964)
25. Raven, P. H., R. F. Evert, & S. E. Eichhorn. ''Biology of Plants'', 7th ed., page 351. (New York: W. H. Freeman, 2005). ISBN 0-7167-1007-2.
26. Stern, Kingsley R. ''Introductory Plant Biology'', 5th ed., page 338. (Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers, 1991) ISBN 0-697-09947-4.
External links
★
Picture Gallery of Mosses & Liverworts
★
Liverwort structure in pictures
★
Liverwort classification scheme
★
LiToL: Assembling the Liverwort Tree of Life (note: for 500,000 million years ago read "480 million years ago".)
★
Inter-relationships of Mosses, Liverworts, and Hornworts
★
Moss-Liverwort connection
★
Additional information on Liverworts
★
Liverworts