In
regression analysis, 'least squares', also known as 'ordinary least squares' analysis, is a method for
linear regression that determines the values of unknown quantities in a statistical model by minimizing the sum of the
residuals (the difference between the predicted and observed values) squared. This method was first described by
Carl Friedrich Gauss at the turn of the
19th century. Today, this method is available in most statistical software packages. The least-squares approach to regression analysis has been shown to be optimal in the sense that it satisfies the
Gauss-Markov theorem.
A related method is the '
least mean squares' (LMS) method. It occurs when the number of measured data is 1 and the
gradient descent method is used to minimize the squared residual. LMS is known to minimize the expectation of the squared residual, with the smallest number of operations per iteration). However, it requires a large number of iterations to converge.
Furthermore, many other types of optimization problems can be expressed in a least squares form, by either minimizing
energy or maximizing
entropy.
History
Context
The method of least squares grew out of the fields of
astronomy and
geodesy as scientists and mathematicians sought to provide solutions to the challenges of navigating the Earth's oceans during the
Age of Exploration. The accurate description of the behavior of celestial bodies was key to enabling ships to sail in open seas where before sailors had to rely on land sightings to determine the positions of their ships.
The method was the culmination of several realizations that took place during the course of the 18th Century
[ The History of Statistics, , Stephen, Stigler, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, , stigler ]:
★ The combination of different observations taken under the ''same'' conditions as opposed to simply trying one's best to observe and record a single observation accurately. This approach was notably used by
Tobias Mayer while studying the
librations of the moon.
★ The combination of different observations as being the best estimate of the true value; errors decrease with aggregation rather than increase, perhaps first expressed by
Roger Cotes.
★ The combination of different observations taken under ''different'' conditions as notably performed by
Roger Joseph Boscovich in his work on the shape of the earth and
Pierre-Simon Laplace in his work in explaining the differences in motion of
Jupiter and
Saturn.
★ The development of a criterion that can be evaluated to determine when the solution with the minimum error has been achieved, developed by Laplace in his Method of Situation.
The method itself
In
1795,
Carl Friedrich Gauss, at the age of 18, is credited with developing the fundamentals of the basis for least-squares analysis. However, as with many of his discoveries, he did not publish them. The strength of his method was demonstrated in 1801, when it was used to predict the future location of the newly discovered asteroid
Ceres.
On
January 1st,
1801, the Italian astronomer
Giuseppe Piazzi had discovered the asteroid Ceres and had been able to track its path for 40 days before it was lost in the glare of the sun. Based on this data, it was desired to determine the location of Ceres after it emerged from behind the sun without solving the complicated
Kepler's nonlinear equations of planetary motion. The only predictions that successfully allowed the Hungarian astronomer
Franz Xaver von Zach to relocate Ceres were those performed by the 24-year-old Gauss using least-squares analysis.
However, Gauss did not publish the method until
1809, when it appeared in volume two of his work on celestial mechanics, ''Theoria Motus Corporum Coelestium in sectionibus conicis solem ambientium''.
The idea of least-squares analysis was independently formulated by the Frenchman
Adrien-Marie Legendre in
1805 and the American
Robert Adrain in
1808.
In
1829, Gauss was able to state that the least-squares approach to regression analysis is optimal in the sense that in a linear model where the errors have a mean of zero, are uncorrelated, and have equal variances, the best linear unbiased estimators of the coefficients is the least-squares estimators. This result is known as the
Gauss-Markov theorem.
Problem statement
The objective consists of adjusting a model function to best fit a data set. The chosen model function has adjustable parameters. The data set consist of n points
with
. The model function has the form
, where
is the dependent variable,
are the independent variables, and
are the model adjustable parameters. We wish to find the parameter values such that the model best fits the data according to a defined error criterion. The least sum square method minimizes the sum square error equation
with respect to the adjustable parameters
.
For an example, the data is height measurements over a surface. We choose to model the data by a plane with parameters for plane mean height, plane tip angle, and plane tilt angle. The model equation is then
, the independent variables are
, and the adjustable parameters are
.
Solving the least squares problem
Least square optimization problems can be divided into linear and non-linear problems. The linear problem has a closed form solution. The optimization problem is said to be a linear optimization problem if the first order partial derivatives of ''S'' with respect to the parameters
results in a set of equations that is linear in the parameter variables. The general, non-linear, unconstrained
optimization problem has no closed form solution. In this case recursive methods, such as
Newton's method, combined with the
gradient descent method, or specialized methods for least squares analysis, such as the
Gauss-Newton algorithm or the
Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm can be used.
Least squares and regression analysis
In
regression analysis, one replaces the relation
:
by
:
where the noise term ε is a
random variable with mean zero. Note that we are assuming that the
values are exact, and all the errors are in the
values. Again, we distinguish between
linear regression, in which case the function ''f'' is linear in the parameters to be determined (e.g., ''f''(''x'') = ''ax''
2 + ''bx'' + ''c''), and
nonlinear regression. As before, linear regression is much simpler than nonlinear regression. (It is tempting to think that the reason for the name ''linear regression'' is that the graph of the function ''f''(''x'') = ''ax'' + ''b'' is a line. But fitting a curve like ''f''(''x'') = ''ax''
2 + ''bx'' + ''c'' when estimating ''a'', ''b'', and ''c'' by least squares, is an instance of ''linear'' regression because the vector of least-square estimates of ''a'', ''b'', and ''c'' is a
linear transformation of the vector whose components are ''f''(''x''
''i'') + ε
''i''.
Parameter estimates
By recognizing that the
regression model is a system of linear equations we can express the model using data matrix 'X', ''target'' vector 'Y' and parameter vector
. The ''i''th row of 'X' and 'Y' will contain the ''x'' and ''y'' value for the ''i''th data sample. Then the model can be written as
:
which when using pure matrix notation becomes
:
where ε is normally distributed with expected value 0 (i.e., a column vector of 0s) and variance σ
2 ''I''
''n'', where ''I
n'' is the ''n''×''n'' identity matrix.
The
least-squares estimator for
is
:
(where ''X''
T is the transpose of ''X'') and the sum of squares of residuals is
:
One of the properties of least-squares is that the matrix
is the orthogonal projection of ''Y'' onto the column space of ''X''.
The fact that the matrix ''X''(''X''
T''X'')
−1''X''
T is a
symmetric idempotent matrix is incessantly relied on in proofs of theorems. The linearity of
as a function of the vector ''Y'', expressed above by saying
:
is the reason why this is called "linear" regression. Nonlinear regression uses nonlinear methods of estimation.
The matrix ''I
n'' − ''X'' (''X''
T ''X'')
−1 ''X''
T that appears above is a symmetric idempotent matrix of rank ''n'' − 2. Here is an example of the use of that fact in the theory of linear regression. The finite-dimensional
spectral theorem of
linear algebra says that any real symmetric matrix ''M'' can be diagonalized by an
orthogonal matrix ''G'', i.e., the matrix ''G''′''MG'' is a diagonal matrix. If the matrix ''M'' is also idempotent, then the diagonal entries in ''G''′''MG'' must be idempotent numbers. Only two real numbers are idempotent: 0 and 1. So ''I''
''n'' − ''X''(''X''
T''X'')
-1''X''
T, after diagonalization, has ''n'' − 2 1s and two 0s on the diagonal. That is most of the work in showing that the sum of squares of residuals has a
chi-square distribution with ''n''−2 degrees of freedom.
Regression parameters can also be estimated by
Bayesian methods. This has the advantages that
★
confidence intervals can be produced for parameter estimates without the use of asymptotic approximations,
★ prior information can be incorporated into the analysis.
Suppose that in the linear regression
:
we know from domain knowledge that alpha can only take one of the values {−1, +1} but we do not know which. We can build this information into the analysis by choosing a prior for alpha which is a discrete distribution with a probability of 0.5 on −1 and 0.5 on +1. The posterior for alpha will also be a discrete distribution on {−1, +1}, but the probability weights will change to reflect the evidence from the data.
In modern computer applications, the actual value of
is calculated using the
QR decomposition or slightly more fancy methods when
is near singular. The code for the
MATLAB function is an excellent example of a robust method.
Summarizing the data
We sum the observations, the squares of the ''X''s and the products ''XY'' to obtain the following quantities.
:
:
:
:
Estimating beta (the slope)
We use the summary statistics above to calculate
, the estimate of β.
:
Estimating alpha (the intercept)
We use the estimate of β and the other statistics to estimate α by:
:
A consequence of this estimate is that the regression line will always pass through the "center"
.
Limitations
Least squares estimation for linear models is notoriously non-robust to
outliers. If the distribution of the outliers is skewed, the estimates can be biased. In the presence of any outliers, the least squares estimates are inefficient and can be extremely so. When outliers occur in the data, methods of
robust regression are more appropriate.
References
★
★ Stigler, S.M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA and London, England.
See also
★
Isotonic regression
★
Least mean squares filter
★
Least-squares estimation of linear regression coefficients
★
Linear least squares
★
Linear regression
★
Segmented regression
★
Measurement uncertainty
★
Moving least squares
★
Recursive least squares
★
Regression analysis
★
Robust regression
★
Root mean square
★
Total least squares or
errors-in-variables model
★
Weighted least squares
External links
★
MIT Linear Algebra Lecture on Least Squares at Google Video, from MIT OpenCourseWare
★ http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/least_squares.html
★
Zunzun.com - Online curve and surface fitting
★ http://www.orbitals.com/self/least/least.htm
★
★
Module for Least Squares Polynomials
★
★
Derivation of quadratic least squares