Member Login
Username:Password:
or Sign up here
Discover

KRAMERS-KRONIG RELATION

(Redirected from Kramers-Kronig relations)
The Kramers-Kronig relations are mathematical properties which connect the real and imaginary parts of any complex function analytic in the upper half plane. These relations are often used to relate the real and imaginary parts of response functions in physical systems because causality implies the analyticity condition is satisfied and conversely.[1] The relation is named in honor of Ralph Kronig[2] and Hendrik Anthony Kramers.[3]

Contents
Definition
Derivation
Physical Interpretation and Alternate Form
See Also
Reference

Definition


For a function chi(omega) = chi_1(omega) + i chi_2(omega) analytic in the upper half plane which vanishes as |omega|
ightarrow infty, the Kramers-Kronig relations are given by
:chi_1(omega) = {1 over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{-infty}^{infty} domega' {chi_2(omega') over omega' - omega}
and
:chi_2(omega) = -{1 over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{-infty}^{infty} domega' {chi_1(omega') over omega' - omega},
where mathcal{P} denotes the Cauchy principal value. We see that the real and imaginary parts of such a function are not independent, so that the full function can be reconstructed given just one of its parts.

Derivation


The proof begins with an application of the residue theorem for complex integration. Given any analytic function chi(omega) in the upper half plane, consider the integral
: oint domega' {chi(omega') over omega'-omega} = 0 .
The contour encloses the upper half plane at infinity, the real axis and a hump over the pole at omega = omega' leaving no poles inside, and so the integral vanishes. We decompose the integral into its contributions along each of the three contour segments. The segment at infinity vanishes since we assume chi(omega) vanishes as we take |omega|
ightarrow infty. We are left with the segment along the real axis and the half-circle:
:mathcal{P} int limits_{-infty}^infty domega' {chi(omega') over omega'-omega} - i pi chi(omega) = 0.
Rearranging, we arrive at the compact form of the Kramers-Kronig relations,
:chi(omega) = {1 over i pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{-infty}^infty domega' {chi(omega') over omega'-omega} .
The single i in the denominator hints at the connection between the real and imaginary components. Finally, split chi(omega) and the equation into their real and imaginary parts to obtain the forms quoted above.

Physical Interpretation and Alternate Form


We can apply the Kramers-Kronig formalism to response functions. In physics, the response function chi(t-t') describes how some property P(t) of a physical system responds to an applied force F(t'). For example, P(t) could be the angle of a pendulum and F(t) the applied force of a motor driving the pendulum motion. The response chi(t-t') must be zero for t since a system cannot respond to a force before it is applied. It can be shown that this causality condition implies the Fourier transform chi(omega) is analytic in the upper half plane. Additionally, if we subject a system to high frequency oscillatory forcing, there will be no time for the system to respond before the forcing has switched direction, and so chi(omega) vanishes as omega becomes large. From these physical considerations, we see that chi(omega) satisfies conditions needed for the Kramers-Kronig relations to apply.
The Kramers-Kronig relations have a physical interpretation. The imaginary of part of a response function describes how a system dissipates energy, since it is out of phase with the driving force. The Kramers-Kronig relations imply that observing the dissipative response of a system is sufficient to determine its in-phase (reactive) response, and vice versa.
The formulas above are not useful for reconstructing physical responses, as the integrals run from -infty to infty, implying we know the response at negative frequencies. Fortunately, in most systems, the positive frequency-response determines the negative-frequency response because chi(omega) is the Fourier transform of a real quantity chi(t-t'), so chi(-omega) = chi^
★ (omega). This means chi_1(omega) is even and chi_2(omega) is odd.
Using these properties, we can collapse the integration ranges to [0,infty). Consider the first relation giving the real part chi_1(omega). Transform the integral into one of definite parity by multiplying the numerator and denominator of the integrand by omega' + omega and separating:
: chi_1(omega) = {1 over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{-infty}^infty domega' {omega' chi_2(omega') over omega'^2 - omega^2} + {omega over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{-infty}^infty domega' {chi_2(omega') over omega'^2 - omega^2} .
Since chi_2(omega) is odd, the second integral vanishes, and we are left with
:chi_1(omega) = {2 over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{0}^{infty} domega' {omega' chi_2(omega') over omega'^2 - omega^2}.
The same derivation for the imaginary part gives
:chi_2(omega) = -{2 over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{0}^{infty} domega' {omega chi_1(omega') over omega'^2 - omega^2} = -{2 omega over pi} mathcal{P} int limits_{0}^{infty} domega' {chi_1(omega') over omega'^2 - omega^2}.
These are the Kramers-Kronig relations useful for physical response functions.

See Also



Hilbert transform

Reference


1. John S. Toll, ''Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations'', Physical Review, vol. ''104'', pp. 1760 - 1770 (1956).
2. R. de L. Kronig, ''On the theory of the dispersion of X-rays,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. '12', pp. 547-557 (1926).
3. H.A. Kramers, ''La diffusion de la lumiere par les atomes,'' Atti Cong. Intern. Fisica, (Transactions of Volta Centenary Congress) Como, vol. '2', p. 545-557 (1927) .


★ Mansoor Sheik-Bahae: ''Nonlinear Optics Basics. Kramers-Kronig Relations in Nonlinear Optics'', in: Robert D. Guenther (Ed.): ''Encyclopedia of Modern Optics'', Academic Press, Amsterdam 2005, ISBN 0-12-227600-0

★ J. D. Jackson, ''Classical Electrodynamics'', 2nd edition, Wiley, New York (1975), Sec. 7.10, ISBN 0-471-43132-X.

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.