Discover

(Redirected from Know-Nothing movement)

The 'Know Nothing' movement was a nativist American political movement of the 1850s. It was empowered by popular fears that the country was being overwhelmed by Irish Catholic immigrants, who were often regarded as hostile to American values and controlled by the Pope in Rome. Mainly active from 1854–56, it strove to curb immigration and naturalization, though its efforts met with little success. There were few prominent leaders, and the largely middle-class and Protestant membership fragmented over the issue of slavery, most often joining the Republican Party by the time of the 1860 presidential election.^[1][2]
The movement originated in New York in 1843 as the American Republican Party. It spread to other states as the 'Native American Party' and became a national party in 1845. In 1855 it renamed itself the 'American Party'. The origin of the "Know Nothing" term was in the semi-secret organization of the party. When a member was asked about its activities, he was supposed to reply, "I know nothing."

Contents

History

Usage of term

Platform

Fictional portrayals

See also

Notes

Bibliography

Primary Sources

External links

History

The immigration of large numbers of Irish and German Catholics to the U.S. in the 1830–60 period made religious differences between Catholics and Protestants a political issue. The tensions reflected European battles between Catholics and Protestants, but were much less intense. Violence occasionally erupted over elections. Many of the anti-Catholics were themselves immigrants. The biggest fear was that Catholics would undermine American democracy by creating a political network controlled by the Pope in Rome through Catholic bishops and priests. They argued that the strong allegiance of Roman Catholics to the Pope ran counter to democratic values.
Although Catholics asserted they were politically independent of priests, Protestants alleged that Pope Pius IX had put down the failed liberal Revolutions of 1848 and was an opponent of liberty, democracy and Protestantism. These concerns encouraged conspiracy theories regarding the Pope's purported plans to subjugate the United States through a continuing influx of Catholics controlled by Irish bishops obedient to and personally selected by the Pope. In 1849, an oath-bound secret society, The Order of the Star Spangled Banner, was created by Charles Allen in New York City. It became the nucleus of some units of the American Party.
Fear of Catholic immigration led to a dissatisfaction with the dominant party, the Democrats, whose membership included many Irish-American Catholics. Activists formed secret groups, coordinating their votes and throwing their weight behind candidates sympathetic to their cause. When asked about these secret organizations, members supposedly were to reply "I know nothing," which led to their popularly being called ''Know Nothings''. This movement won elections in major cities from Chicago to Boston in 1855, and carried the Massachusetts legislature and governorship.
In spring 1854, the Know Nothings carried Boston, Salem, and other New England cities. They swept the state of Massachusetts in the fall 1854 elections — their biggest victory. The Whig candidate in Philadelphia was editor Robert Conrad, soon revealed as a Know Nothing; he promised to crack down on crime, close saloons on Sundays, and to appoint only native-born Americans to office. He won by a landslide. In Washington, D.C., Know-Nothing candidate John T. Towers defeated incumbent Mayor John Walker Maury, causing opposition of such proportion that the Democrats, Whigs, and Freesoilers in the capital united as the "Anti-Know-Nothing Party." In New York, in a four-way race, the Know Nothing candidate ran third with 26 percent. After the fall 1854 elections, they claimed to have exerted decisive influence in Maine, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and California, but historians are unsure due to the secrecy, as all parties were in turmoil and the anti-slavery and prohibition issues overlapped with nativism in complex and confusing ways. They did elect the Mayor of San Francisco, Stephen P. Webb and J. Neely Johnson as Govennor. They were still an unofficial movement with no centralized organization. The results of the 1854 elections were so favorable to the Know Nothings that they formed officially as a political party called the 'American Party', and attracted many members of the now nearly-defunct Whig party, as well as a significant number of Democrats and prohibitionists. Membership in the American Party increased dramatically, from 50,000 to over one million in a matter of months in that year, it is estimated. The same member might also split tickets to vote for Democrats or Republicans, for party loyalty was in confusion. Simultaneously the new Republican party emerged as a dominant power in many northern states. Very few prominent politicians joined the party, and very few party leaders had a subsequent career in politics. The major exceptions were Schuyler Colfax in Indiana and Henry Wilson in Massachusetts, both of whom became Republicans and were elected Vice President.
A historian of the party concludes:
In 1854, members of the American Party allegedly stole and destroyed the block of granite contributed by Pope Pius IX for the Washington Monument. They also took over the monument's building society and controlled it for four years. What little progress occurred in their tenure had to be undone and remade. For the full story, see ''Washington Monument: History''.
In California in 1854 Sam Roberts founded a Know-Nothing chapter in San Francisco. The group was formed in opposition to Chinese and Chilean immigrants as well as Irish who had come to work in gold mines.
In spring 1855, Levi Boone was elected Mayor of Chicago for the Know Nothings. He barred all immigrants from city jobs. Statewide, however, Republican Abraham Lincoln blocked the party from any successes. Ohio was the only state where the party gained strength in 1855. Their Ohio success seems to have come from winning over immigrants, especially German Lutherans and Scottish Presbyterians who feared Catholicism. In Alabama, the Know Nothings were a mix of former Whigs, malcontented Democrats, and other political outsiders who favored state aid to build more railroads. In the tempestuous 1855 campaign, the Democrats won by convincing state voters that Alabama Know Nothings would not protect slavery from Northern abolitionists.
The party declined rapidly in the North in 1855–56. In the Election of 1856, it was bitterly divided over slavery. One faction supported the ticket of presidential nominee Millard Fillmore and vice-presidential nominee Andrew Jackson Donelson, who won 23% of the popular vote and Maryland's 8 electoral votes. Fillmore did not win enough votes in Pennsylvania to block Democrat James Buchanan from the White House. Most of the anti-slavery members of the American Party joined the Republican Party after the controversial Dred Scott ruling occurred. The pro-slavery wing of the American Party remained strong on the local and state levels in a few southern states, but by the Election of 1860, they were no longer a serious national political movement.^[3]
Some historians argue that in the South the Know Nothings were fundamentally different from their northern counterparts, and were motivated less by nativism or anti-Catholicism than by conservative Unionism (preserving the Union of states rather than labor unions); southern Know Nothings were mostly old Whigs who were worried about both the pro-slavery extremism of the Democrats and the emergence of the anti-slavery Republican party in the North. In Louisiana and Maryland, the Know-Nothings enlisted Catholics. Historian Michael F. Holt, however, argues, "Know Nothingism originally grew in the South for the same reasons it spread in the North — nativism, anti-Catholicism, and animosity toward unresponsive politicos — not because of conservative Unionism." He quotes ex-Governor William B. Campbell of Tennessee, who wrote in January 1855, "I have been astonished at the widespread feeling in favor of their principles — to wit, Native Americanism and anti-Catholicism — it takes everywhere."^[4]

Usage of term

The term "Know Nothing" is better remembered than the party itself. In the late 19th century Democrats would damn the Republicans as "Know Nothings" in order to secure the votes of Catholics. Since the early 20th century, the term has been a provocative slur, suggesting the opponent is both nativist and ignorant. In 2006, an editorial in the neoconservative magazine ''The Weekly Standard'' by William Kristol attacked populist Republicans for not recognizing the danger of "turning the GOP into an anti-immigration, Know-Nothing party."^[5]

The lead editorial of the New York Times for Sunday, May 20, 2007, on a proposed immigration bill, referred to "this generation's Know-Nothings...."

Platform

The platform of the American Party called for, among other things:

★ Severe limits on immigration, especially from Catholic countries.

★ Restricting political office to native-born Americans.

★ Mandating a wait of 21 years before an immigrant could gain citizenship.

★ Restricting public school teachers to Protestants.

★ Mandating daily Bible readings in public schools (from the Protestant version of the Bible).

★ Restricting the sale of liquor.

Fictional portrayals

The American Party was represented in the 2002 film ''Gangs of New York'', led by Daniel Day Lewis as William Cutting, aka Bill The Butcher, the fictionalized version of real-life Know-Nothing leader William Poole. The Know Nothings also play a prominent role in the historical novel ''Shaman'' by Noah Gordon.

See also

★ Second Party System

★ Third Party System

★ Philadelphia Nativist Riots

★ James Greene Hardy

★ William Poole

★ Wide Awakes

★ Nathaniel Prentice Banks

★ Bowery Boys

Notes

1. http://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0161940-0&templatename=/arti
2. http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=838
3. 1920 World Book, Volume V. pp 3271
4. Holt ''The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party'', p. 856.
5. Quoted by Craig Shirley, "How the GOP Lost Its Way" ''Washington Post'' April 22, 2006; Page A21in

Bibliography

★ Anbinder; Tyler. ''Nativism and Slavery: The Northern Know Nothings and the politics of the 1850s'' (1992). Online version; also online at ACLS History e-Book

★ Baum, Dale. "Know-Nothingism and the Republican Majority in Massachusetts: The Political Realignment of the 1850s." ''Journal of American History'' 64 (1977–78): 959-86.
★
★ also in ''The Civil War Party System: The Case of Massachusetts, 1848–1876'' (1984) online

★ Ray A. Billington, ''The Protestant Crusade, 1800–1860: A Study of the Origins of American Nativism'' (1938)

★ Bladek, John David. "'Virginia Is Middle Ground': the Know Nothing Party and the Virginia Gubernatorial Election of 1855." ''Virginia Magazine of History and Biography'' 1998 106(1): 35–70. ISSN 0042-6636

★ Cheathem, Mark R. "'I Shall Persevere in the Cause of Truth': Andrew Jackson Donelson and the Election of 1856". ''Tennessee Historical Quarterly'' 2003 62(3): 218–237. ISSN 0040-3261 Donelson was Andrew Jackson's nephew and K-N nominee for Vice President

★ Dash, Mark. "New Light on the Dark Lantern: the Initiation Rites and Ceremonies of a Know-nothing Lodge in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania" ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 2003 127(1): 89–100. ISSN 0031-4587

★ Gienapp, William E. ''The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852–1856'' (1978), detailed statistical study, state-by-state

★ Clifford S. Griffin; ''Their Brothers' Keepers: Moral Stewardship in the United States, 1800–1865'' Rutgers University Press. 1960

★ Michael Holt. ''The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party'' (1999) online

★ Michael F. Holt, ''Political Parties and American Political Development: From the Age of Jackson to the Age of Lincoln'' (1992)

★ Michael F. Holt, "The Antimasonic and Know Nothing Parties", in Arthur Schlesinger Jr., ed., ''History of United States Political
Parties'' (1973), I, 575–620.

★ Payton Hurt, "The Rise and Fall of the 'Know Nothings' in California," California Historical Society Quarterly 9 (March and June 1930).

★ Ira Leonard and Robert Parmet, ''American Nativism, 1830–1860'' (1971)

★ Levine, Bruce. "Conservatism, Nativism, and Slavery: Thomas R. Whitney and the Origins of the Know-nothing Party" ''Journal of American History'' 2001 88(2): 455–488. ISSN 0021–8723

★ Stephen E. Maizlish, "The Meaning of Nativism and the Crisis of the Union: The Know-Nothing Movement in the Antebellum North."
in William Gienapp, ed. ''Essays on American Antebellum Politics, 1840–1860'' (1982) pp166-98 online edition

★ Melton, Tracy Matthew. ''Hanging Henry Gambrill: The Violent Career of Baltimore's Plug Uglies, 1854–1860'' (2005)

★ Allan Nevins. '', Ordeal of the Union: A House Dividing, 1852–1857'' (1947)

★ Overdyke, W. Darrell ''The Know-Nothing Party in the South'' (1950) online

★ Voss-Hubbard, Mark. ''Beyond Party: Cultures of Antipartisanship in Northern Politics before the Civil War'' Johns Hopkins U. Press 2002.

Primary Sources

★ Frederick Rinehart Anspach. ''The Sons of the Sires: A History of the Rise, Progress, and Destiny of the American Party'' (1855) by K-N activist online edition

★ Samuel Clagett Busey. ''Immigration: Its Evils and Consequences'' (1856) online edition

★ Anna Ella Carroll. ''The Great American Battle: Or, The Contest Between Christianity and Political Romanism'' (1856) online edition

★ Fillmore, Millard. ''Millard Fillmore Papers'' Ed. by Frank H. Severance (1907) online edition

★ ''The Wide-awake Gift: A Know-nothing Token for 1855'' (1855) online edition

External links

★ Nativism in the 1856 Presidential Election

★ Nativism By Michael F. Holt, Ph.D.

★ Lager Beer Riot, Chicago 1855

★

★