العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolINSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
'Institutional economics', known by some as Institutional political economy, focuses on understanding the role of human-made institutions in shaping economic behavior. Aspects of institutional economics are part of mainstream economics -- in particular the so-called new institutional economics -- and focuses on the role of institutions in reducing transaction costs. Heterodox institutional economics emphasizes a broader study of institutions and views markets as a result of the complex interaction of these various institutions (e.g. individuals, firms, states, social norms).
Institutional economics focuses on learning, bounded rationality, and evolution (rather than assume stable preferences, rationality and equilibrium). It was once the main school of economics in the United States, including such famous but diverse economists as Thorstein Veblen, Wesley Mitchell, and John R. Commons. Some institutionalists see Karl Marx as belonging to the institutionalist tradition because he described capitalism as a historically bounded social system; other institutionalist economists disagree with Marx's definition of capitalism, instead seeing defining features such as markets, money and the private ownership of production as evolving over time, as a result of the purposive actions of individuals.
"Traditional" institutionalism [1] rejects the ''reduction'' of institutions to simply tastes, technology, and nature (see naturalistic fallacy). Tastes, along with expectations of the future, habits, and motivations, not only determine the nature of institutions but are limited and shaped by them. If people live and work in institutions on a regular basis, it shapes their world-views. Fundamentally, this traditional institutionalism (and its modern counter-part institutionalist political economy) emphasizes the legal foundations of an economy (see John R. Commons) and the evolutionary, habituated, and volitional processes by which institutions are erected and then changed (see John Dewey, Thorstein Veblen, and Daniel Bromley.) The vacillations of institutions are necessarily a result of the very incentives created by such institutions, and are thus endogenous. Emphatically, traditional institutionalism is in many ways a response to the current economic orthodoxy; its reintroduction in the form of institutionalist political economy is thus an explicit challenge to neoclassical economics, since it is based on the fundamental premiss
that neoclassicists oppose: that economics cannot be separated from the political and social system within which it is embedded. Some of the authors associated with this school include Robert Frank, Warren J. Samuels, Mark R. Tool, Geoffrey Hodgson, Daniel Bromley, Jonathan Nitzan, Shimshon Bichler, Elinor Ostrom, and Anne Mayhew.
:''See also main article.''
With the development of theories of asymmetric and distributed information an attempt was made to integrate institutionalism into mainstream neoclassical economics, under the title new institutional economics. However, this latter variant of institutionalism failed to supersede the classical school, because heterodox economists argue it was heir to what they perceive as the flaws of neoclassical economics. Specifically, new institutional economics failed to avoid criticisms of reductionism and lack of realism: these were levelled at neoclassical economics for effectively ignoring institutions, and at new institutional economics for attempting to reduce institutions to 'rational' and 'efficient' resolutions to the problem of transaction costs.
Modern institutionalism is thus sharply divided between new institutional economics represented by people like Nobel Prizewinner Douglass North and institutional political economy and "old" or "critical" institutionalism (an approach radicaly opposed to mainstream neoclassical economics) associated with the Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Chang, Warren Samuels, Michigan State University, and Geoffrey Hodgson from University of Hertfordshire.
★ North, Douglass C. "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance", Cambridge University Press (1990).
★ Commons, John. "Institutional Economics," ''American Economic Review'' Vol. 21 (1931): pp. 648-657.
★ Hodgson, Geoffrey M., "The Approach of Institutional Economics," ''Journal of Economic Literature'' v36, n1 (March 1998): 166-92.
★ Chang, Ha-Joon, "Globalization, Economic Development and the Role of the State", Zed Books (2002)
★ Cheung, Steven N. S., "The Structure of a Contract & the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource," J. of Law and Economics 13:49-70 (1970).
★ Schmid, A. Allan, ''Conflict & Cooperation: Institutional & Behavioral Economics'', Blackwell (2004).
★ Keaney, Michael., "Critical Institutionalism: From American Exceptionalism to International Relevance", in "Understanding Capitalism: Critical Analysis From Karl Marx to Amartya Sen", ed. Doug Dowd, Pluto Press, 2002.
★ Samuels, Warren J., "The Legal-Economic Nexus," Routledge (2007).
★ _____, “Institutional Economics," ''The '', v. 2 (1987). pp. 866-64.
★ John Kenneth Galbraith, "Power & the Useful Economist," ''American Economic Review'' 63:1-11 (1973).
Journals include ''Journal of Economic Issues'' and ''Journal of Institutional Economics''.
★ Douglass North Nobel lecture
★ Institutional & Behavioral Economics
| Contents |
| Early institutional economics |
| New institutional economics |
| Institutionalism today |
| Some Sources |
| External links |
Early institutional economics
Institutional economics focuses on learning, bounded rationality, and evolution (rather than assume stable preferences, rationality and equilibrium). It was once the main school of economics in the United States, including such famous but diverse economists as Thorstein Veblen, Wesley Mitchell, and John R. Commons. Some institutionalists see Karl Marx as belonging to the institutionalist tradition because he described capitalism as a historically bounded social system; other institutionalist economists disagree with Marx's definition of capitalism, instead seeing defining features such as markets, money and the private ownership of production as evolving over time, as a result of the purposive actions of individuals.
"Traditional" institutionalism [1] rejects the ''reduction'' of institutions to simply tastes, technology, and nature (see naturalistic fallacy). Tastes, along with expectations of the future, habits, and motivations, not only determine the nature of institutions but are limited and shaped by them. If people live and work in institutions on a regular basis, it shapes their world-views. Fundamentally, this traditional institutionalism (and its modern counter-part institutionalist political economy) emphasizes the legal foundations of an economy (see John R. Commons) and the evolutionary, habituated, and volitional processes by which institutions are erected and then changed (see John Dewey, Thorstein Veblen, and Daniel Bromley.) The vacillations of institutions are necessarily a result of the very incentives created by such institutions, and are thus endogenous. Emphatically, traditional institutionalism is in many ways a response to the current economic orthodoxy; its reintroduction in the form of institutionalist political economy is thus an explicit challenge to neoclassical economics, since it is based on the fundamental premiss
that neoclassicists oppose: that economics cannot be separated from the political and social system within which it is embedded. Some of the authors associated with this school include Robert Frank, Warren J. Samuels, Mark R. Tool, Geoffrey Hodgson, Daniel Bromley, Jonathan Nitzan, Shimshon Bichler, Elinor Ostrom, and Anne Mayhew.
New institutional economics
:''See also main article.''
With the development of theories of asymmetric and distributed information an attempt was made to integrate institutionalism into mainstream neoclassical economics, under the title new institutional economics. However, this latter variant of institutionalism failed to supersede the classical school, because heterodox economists argue it was heir to what they perceive as the flaws of neoclassical economics. Specifically, new institutional economics failed to avoid criticisms of reductionism and lack of realism: these were levelled at neoclassical economics for effectively ignoring institutions, and at new institutional economics for attempting to reduce institutions to 'rational' and 'efficient' resolutions to the problem of transaction costs.
Institutionalism today
Modern institutionalism is thus sharply divided between new institutional economics represented by people like Nobel Prizewinner Douglass North and institutional political economy and "old" or "critical" institutionalism (an approach radicaly opposed to mainstream neoclassical economics) associated with the Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Chang, Warren Samuels, Michigan State University, and Geoffrey Hodgson from University of Hertfordshire.
Some Sources
★ North, Douglass C. "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance", Cambridge University Press (1990).
★ Commons, John. "Institutional Economics," ''American Economic Review'' Vol. 21 (1931): pp. 648-657.
★ Hodgson, Geoffrey M., "The Approach of Institutional Economics," ''Journal of Economic Literature'' v36, n1 (March 1998): 166-92.
★ Chang, Ha-Joon, "Globalization, Economic Development and the Role of the State", Zed Books (2002)
★ Cheung, Steven N. S., "The Structure of a Contract & the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource," J. of Law and Economics 13:49-70 (1970).
★ Schmid, A. Allan, ''Conflict & Cooperation: Institutional & Behavioral Economics'', Blackwell (2004).
★ Keaney, Michael., "Critical Institutionalism: From American Exceptionalism to International Relevance", in "Understanding Capitalism: Critical Analysis From Karl Marx to Amartya Sen", ed. Doug Dowd, Pluto Press, 2002.
★ Samuels, Warren J., "The Legal-Economic Nexus," Routledge (2007).
★ _____, “Institutional Economics," ''The '', v. 2 (1987). pp. 866-64.
★ John Kenneth Galbraith, "Power & the Useful Economist," ''American Economic Review'' 63:1-11 (1973).
Journals include ''Journal of Economic Issues'' and ''Journal of Institutional Economics''.
External links
★ Douglass North Nobel lecture
★ Institutional & Behavioral Economics
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
