Discover

An 'independent scholar' is anyone who works outside traditional academia in the pursuit of truth and knowledge. The status of independent scholar is often an amateur rather than a professional although this is not always a matter of choice. There is some debate about the credibility of independent scholars, but their knowledge can be comparable to that of institutional scholars.

Contents

Acceptance of independent scholarship

See also

References

External links

Acceptance of independent scholarship

Criteria on someone's source of income or academic standing have no ''prima facie'' application to how scholarly work should be evaluated. New ideas from outside the academic establishment do however often encounter resistance. If independent scholars publish their work in non-traditional places (anywhere outside learned journals, that is) they are open to attack for lack of peer review. This applies in particular to books. In the humanities, books generally carry more weight than papers; in the sciences the opposite is true. But in both cases there is an assumption that peer-reviewed work attracts greater respect, and is the actual foundation of what books in the subject contain.
An independent scholar must often become a memetic engineer, or propagandist in order to advance his or her contribution. Some are better at this than others. Good ideas can go unrecognised.

See also

★ Scholarly method

★ Pseudoscience

References

★ Gross, Ronald. ''The Independent Scholar's Handbook'', ISBN 0-89815-521-5. Available for free download from the Canadian Academy of Independent Scholars

★ Gross, Ronald. ''Peak Learning'', ISBN 0-87477-957-X

External links

★ National Coalition of Independent Scholars

★ Canadian Academy of Independent Scholars