Discover

(Redirected from Ilion)

(Greek: , ''Troia'', also , ''Ilion''; Latin: ''Troia'', ''Ilium'',^[1] Turkish: ''Truva'') is a legendary city and center of the Trojan War, as described in the Epic Cycle, and especially in the ''Iliad'', one of the two epic poems attributed to Homer. 'Trojan' refers to the inhabitants and culture of Troy.
Today it is the name of an archaeological site, the traditional location of Homeric Troy, Turkish ''Truva'', in Hisarlık in Anatolia, close to the seacoast in what is now Çanakkale province in northwest Turkey, southwest of the Dardanelles under Mount Ida.
A new city of 'Ilium' was founded on the site in the reign of the Roman Emperor Augustus. It flourished until the establishment of Constantinople and declined gradually during Byzantine times.
In the 1870s the German archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann excavated the area. Later excavations revealed several cities built in succession to each other. One of the earlier cities (Troy VII) is often identified with Homeric Troy. While such an identity is disputed, the site has been successfully identified with the city called Wilusa in Hittite texts; ''Ilion'' (which goes back to earlier ''Wilion'' with a digamma) is thought to be the Greek rendition of that name.
The archaeological site of Troy was added to the UNESCO World Heritage list in 1998.

Contents

Legendary Troy

Homeric Troy

Archaeological Troy

Troy I–V

Troy VI

Troy VII

Troy IX

Excavation campaigns

Schliemann

Dörpfeld, Blegen

Korfmann

Pernicka

Hittite and Egyptian evidence

Homeric Ilios and historical Wilusa

Status of the ''Iliad''

''Iliad'' as essentially legendary

''Iliad'' as essentially historical

Fringe theories

Troy in later legend

Tourism

Notes

References and further reading

External links

Legendary Troy

Details concerning Troy were transmitted to the historical Greeks entirely through the written Epic Cycle, of which Homer's ''Iliad'' is the familiar part. Other epic material, such as ''Cypria'' was known in Antiquity but is lost to us. Further ancient material is only known to us in much later literary recensions, such as the fourth century CE ''Posthomerica'' of Quintus of Smyrna. Aside from this mass of material, modern philologists have laboured to tease out the few discernible threads of the earlier legendary material that preceded Homer, from which he worked.
According to Greek mythology the Trojans were the citizens of the ancient municipality of Troy in the Troad region of Anatolia. Troy is presented anachronistically in legend as if it were part of the Greek culture of City states. Since the entire state comprised more than the city of Troy itself, anyone from its jurisdiction, which was mainly the Troad, might be termed "Trojan" in ancient literature.^[2] An alternative classical Greek and Latin term was "Teucrians", a name taken from an ethnicity of the south Troad. Troy was known for its riches gained from port trade with east and west, fancy clothes, iron production, and massive defensive walls. The major language spoken there and the derivative cultures remain uncertain. Legend for the most part ignores language and makes the presumption that Trojans had no problem understanding Greek.
The Trojan royal kinship, in Greek eyes, traced its descent from the Pleiad Electra and Zeus, the parents of Dardanus. Dardanus, according to Greek myths was originally from Arcadia but according to Roman myths was originally from Italy, having crossed over to Asia Minor

from the island of Samothrace, where he met King Teucer. Teucer was himself also a coloniser from Attica, and treated Dardanus with respect. Eventually Dardanus married Teucer's daughters, and founded Dardania (later ruled by Aeneas). Upon Dardanus' death, the Kingdom was passed to his grandson Tros, who called the people Trojans and the land Troad, after himself. Ilus, son of Tros, founded the city of Ilium (Troy) that he called after himself. Zeus gave Ilus the Palladium. Poseidon and Apollo built the walls and fortifications around Troy for Laomedon, son of Ilus the younger. When Laomedon refused to pay, Poseidon flooded the land and demanded the sacrifice of Hesione to a sea monster. Pestilence came and the sea monster snatched away the people of the plain.

In Sardis a self-identified Heracleid dynasty ruled for 505 years until the time of Candaules. The dynasty's founding myth legitimizes their rule by asserting that one generation before the Trojan War, Heracles captured Troy and killed Laomedon and his sons, except for young Priam. Priam later became king. During his reign, the Mycenaean Greeks invaded and captured Troy in the Trojan War (traditionally dated to 1193–1183 BC). The Ionians, Cimmerians, Phrygians, Milesians of Sinope and Lydians moved into Asia Minor. The Persians invaded in 546 BC.
The Maxyans were a west Libyan tribe who said that they were descended from the men of Troy, according to Herodotus. The Trojan ships transformed into naiads, who rejoiced to see the wreckage of Odysseus' ship.
Some famous Trojans are: Dardanus (founder of Troy), Laomedon, Ganymede, Priam and his children (including Paris, Hector, Cassandra and Troilus), Teucer, Oenone, Tithonus, Antigone, Memnon, Corythus, Aeneas, Brutus, and Elymus. Kapys, Boukolion and Aisakos were Trojan princes who had naiad wives. Some of the Trojan allies were the Lycians and the Amazons. The Aisepid nymphs were the naiads of the Trojan River Aisepos. Pegsis was the naiad of the River Granicus near Troy. "Helen of Troy" was born not at Troy but at Sparta.
Mount Ida in Asia Minor is where Ganymede was abducted by Zeus, where Anchises was seduced by Aphrodite, where Aphrodite gave birth to Aeneas, where Paris lived as a shepherd, where the nymphs lived, where the "Judgement of Paris" took place, where the Greek gods watched the Trojan War, where Hera distracted Zeus with her seductions long enough to permit the Achaeans, aided by Poseidon, to hold the Trojans off their ships, and where Aeneas and his followers rested and waited until the Greeks set out for Greece.Buthrotos (or Buthrotum) was a city in Epirus where Helenus, the Trojan seer, built a replica of Troy. Aeneas landed there and Helenus foretold his future.

Homeric Troy

Ancient Greek historians placed the Trojan War variously in the 12th, 13th or 14th century BC: Eratosthenes to 1184 BC, Herodotus to 1250 BC, Douris to 1334 BC.
In the ''Iliad'', the Achaeans set up their camp near the mouth of the river Scamander (presumably modern Karamenderes), where they had beached their ships. The city of Troy itself stood on a hill, across the plain of Scamander, where the battles of the Trojan War took place. The site of the ancient city today is some 15 kilometers from the coast, but the ancient mouths of alleged Scamander, some 3,000 years ago, were some 5 kilometers further inland,^[3][4] pouring into a bay that has since been filled with alluvial material. Recent geological findings have enabled the reconstruction of how the Trojan coastline would have looked, hence they indicate that Homeric geography of Troy is accurate.^[5]
Besides the ''Iliad'', there are references to Troy in the other major work attributed to Homer, the ''Odyssey'', as well as in other ancient Greek literature. The Homeric legend of Troy was elaborated by the Roman poet Virgil in his work the ''Aeneid''. The Greeks and Romans took for a fact the historicity of the Trojan War, and in the identity of Homeric Troy with the site in Anatolia. Alexander the Great, for example, visited the site in 334 BC and made sacrifices at the alleged tombs of the Homeric heroes Achilles and Patroclus.
In November 2001, geologists John C. Kraft from the University of Delaware and John V. Luce from Trinity College, Dublin presented the results Confex. Nature. ''Iliad'', Discovery. of investigations into the geology of the region that had started in 1977. The geologists compared the present geology with the landscapes and coastal features described in the ''Iliad'' and other classical sources, notably Strabo's ''Geographia''. Their conclusion was that there is regularly a consistency between the location of Troy as identified by Schliemann (and other locations such as the Greek camp), the geological evidence, and descriptions of the topology and accounts of the battle in the ''Iliad''.
After the 1995 find of a Luwian biconvex seal at Troy VII, there has been a heated discussion over the language that was spoken in Homeric Troy. Frank Starke of the University of Tubingen recently demonstrated that the name of Priam is connected to the Luwian compound ''Priimuua'', which means "exceptionally courageous".^[6] "The certainty is growing that Wilusa/Troy belonged to the greater Luwian-speaking community", although it's not entirely clear whether Luwian was primarily the official language or it was also in daily use.^[7]

Archaeological Troy

The layers of ruins on the site are numbered Troy I – Troy IX, with various subdivisions:

★ Troy I 3000–2600 (Western Anatolian EB 1)

★ Troy II 2600–2250 (Western Anatolian EB 2)

★ Troy III 2250–2100 (Western Anatolian EB 3 [early])

★ Troy IV 2100–1950 (Western Anatolian EB 3 [middle])

★ Troy V: 20th–18th centuries BC (Western Anatolian EB 3 [late]).

★ Troy VI: 17th–15th centuries BC.

★ Troy VIh: late Bronze Age, 14th century BC

★ Troy VIIa: ca. 1300–1190 BC, most likely candidate for Homeric Troy.

★ Troy VIIb₁: 12th century BC

★ Troy VIIb₂: 11th century BC

★ Troy VIIb₃: until ca. 950 BC

★ Troy VIII: around 700 BC

★ Troy IX: Hellenistic Ilium, 1st century BC
The archaeological site of Troy was added to the UNESCO World Heritage list in 1998.

Troy I–V

The first city was founded in the 3rd millennium BC. During the Bronze Age, the site seems to have been a flourishing mercantile city, since its location allowed for complete control of the Dardanelles, through which every merchant ship from the Aegean Sea heading for the Black Sea had to pass.

Troy VI

Troy VI was destroyed around 1300 BC, probably by an earthquake. Only a single arrowhead was found in this layer, and no bodily remains.

Troy VII

Main articles: Troy VII


The archaeological layer known as Troy VIIa, which has been dated on the basis of pottery styles to the mid- to late-13th century BC, is the most often-cited candidate for the Troy of Homer. It was a walled city with towers reaching a height of nine meters; the foundations of one of its bastions measure 18 meters by 18 meters. It appears to have been destroyed by a war, and there are traces of a fire.
Until the 1988 excavations, the problem was that Troy VII seemed to be a hill-top fort, and not a city of the size described by Homer, but later identification of parts of the city ramparts suggests a city "at least ten times larger than earlier excavators - and thus the broader public - had supposed".^[8] Manfred Korfmann estimated the area of Troy VII at 200,000 square metres or more and put its population at five to ten thousand inhabitants, which makes it "by the standards of its day a large and important city".^[9]
Troy VIIb₁ (ca. 1120 BC) and Troy VIIb₂ (ca. 1020 BC) appear to have been destroyed by fires. Partial human remains were found in houses and in the streets, and near the north-western ramparts a human skeleton with skull injuries and a broken jawbone. Three bronze arrowheads were found, two being in the fort and one in the city. However, only small portions of the city have been excavated, and the finds are too scarce to clearly favour destruction by war over a natural disaster.

Troy IX

The last city on this site, Hellenistic Ilium, was founded by Romans during the reign of the emperor Augustus and was an important trading city until the establishment of Constantinople in the fourth century as the eastern capital of the Roman Empire. In Byzantine times the city declined gradually, and eventually disappeared.

Excavation campaigns

Schliemann

With the rise of modern critical history, Troy and the Trojan War were consigned to the realms of legend. In the 1870s (in two campaigns, 1871–73 and 1878/9), however, the German archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann excavated a hill, called 'Hisarlik' by the Turks, near the town of Chanak (Çanakkale) in north-western Anatolia. Here he discovered the ruins of a series of ancient cities, dating from the Bronze Age to the Roman period. Schliemann declared one of these cities—at first Troy I, later Troy II—to be the city of Troy, and this identification was widely accepted at that time. Schliemann's finds at Hisarlik have become known as Priam's Treasure. They were acquired from him by the Berlin museums, but significant doubts about their authenticity persist.

Dörpfeld, Blegen

After Schliemann, the site was further excavated under the direction of Wilhelm Dörpfeld (1893/4) and later Carl Blegen (1932-8). These excavations have shown that there were at least nine cities built one on top of each other at this site.

Korfmann

In 1988 excavations were resumed by a team of the University of Tübingen and the University of Cincinnati under the direction of Professor Manfred Korfmann. Possible evidence of a battle was found in the form of arrowheads found in layers dated to the early 12th century BC. The question of Troy's status in the Bronze Age world has been the subject of a sometimes acerbic debate between Korfmann and the Tübingen historian Frank Kolb in 2001/2002.
In August 2003 following a magnetic imaging survey of the fields below the fort, a deep ditch was located and excavated among the ruins of a later Greek and Roman city. Remains found in the ditch were dated to the late Bronze Age, the alleged time of Homeric Troy. It is claimed by Korfmann that the ditch may have once marked the outer defences of a much larger city than had previously been suspected.

Pernicka

In summer 2006 the excavations continued under the direction of Korfmann's colleague Ernst Pernicka, with a new digging permit.^[10]

Hittite and Egyptian evidence

In the 1920s the Swiss scholar Emil Forrer claimed that placenames found in Hittite texts — ''Wilusa'' and ''Taruisa'' — should be identified with Ilium and Troia respectively. He further noted that the name of ''Alaksandus'', king of Wilusa, mentioned in one of the Hittite texts is quite similar to the name of Prince ''Alexandros'' or ''Paris'', of Troy.
An unnamed Hittite king wrote a letter to the king of the ''Ahhiyawa'', treating him as an equal and implying that Miletus (''Millawanda'') was controlled by the ''Ahhiyawa'', and also referring to an earlier "''Wilusa'' episode" involving hostility on the part of the ''Ahhiyawa''. This people has been identified with the Homeric Greeks (Achaeans). The Hittite king was long held to be Mursili II (ca 1321-1296), but since the 1980s his son Hattusili III (1265-1240) is commonly preferred, although Mursili's other son Muwatalli (ca 1296-1272) is still considered a possibility.
An Egyptian inscription at Deir al-Madinah records a victory of Ramesses III over Sea Peoples, including some named ''Tursha'' (spelled [twrš3] in Egyptian script). These are probably the same as the earlier Teresh (found written as [trš.w]) of the Merneptah Stele, commemorating Merneptah’s victory in a Libyan campaign at about 1220 BC. Although this may be too early for the Trojan War, some scholars have connected the name to the city mentioned in Hittite records as ''Taruisas'', or Troy.^[11]
These identifications were rejected by many scholars as being improbable or at least unprovable. Trevor Bryce in 1998 championed them in his book ''The Kingdom of the Hittites'', citing a recovered piece of the so-called Manapa-Tarhunda letter, which refers to the kingdom of Wilusa as beyond the land of the ''Seha'' (known in classical times as the Caicus) river, and near the land of ''Lazpa'' (Lesbos Island).
Recent evidence adds weight to the theory that Wilusa is identical to archaeological Troy. Hittite texts mention a water tunnel at Wilusa, and a water tunnel excavated by Korfmann, previously thought to be Roman, has been dated to around 2600 BC. The identifications of ''Wilusa'' with archaeological Troy and of the Achaeans with the ''Ahhiyawa'' remain controversial, but gained enough popularity during the 1990s to be considered a majority opinion.

Homeric Ilios and historical Wilusa

Main articles: Historicity of the Iliad

The events described in Homer's ''Iliad'', even if based on historical events that preceded its composition by some 450 years, will never be completely identifiable with historical or archaeological facts, even if there was a Bronze Age city on the site now called Troy, and even if that city was destroyed by fire or war at about the same time as the time postulated for the Trojan War.
No text or artifact has been found on site itself which clearly identifies the Bronze Age site. This is probably due to the planification of the former hillfort during the construction of Hellenistic Ilium (Troy IX), destroying the parts that most likely contained the city archives. In 1995, a of a Luwian scribe has been found in one of the houses, proving the presence of written correspondence in the city, but not a single text. Our emerging understanding of the geography of the Hittite Empire makes it very likely that the site corresponds to the city of ''Wilusa''. But even if that is accepted, it is of course no positive proof of identity with Homeric ''(W)ilion''.
A name ''Wilion'' or ''Troia'' does not appear in any of the Greek written records from the Mycenean sites. The Mycenaean Greeks of the 13th century BC had colonized the Greek mainland and Crete, and were only beginning to make forays into Anatolia, establishing a bridgehead in Miletus (''Millawanda''). Historical ''Wilusa'' was one of the ''Arzawa'' lands, in loose alliance with the Hittite Empire, and written reference to the city is therefore to be expected in Hittite correspondence rather than in Mycenaean palace archives.

Status of the ''Iliad''

The dispute over the historicity of the Iliad was very heated at times. The more we know about Bronze Age history, the clearer it becomes that it is not a yes-or-no question but one of educated assessment of ''how much'' historical knowledge is present in Homer. The story of the ''Iliad'' is not an account of the war, but a tale of the psychology, wrath, vengeance and death of individual heroes that assumes common knowledge of the Trojan War to create a backdrop. No scholars assume that the individual events in the tale (many of which centrally involve divine intervention) are historical fact; on the other hand, no scholars claim that the scenery is entirely devoid of memories of Mycenaean times: it is rather a subjective question of whether the factual content is rather more or rather less than one would have expected.
The ostensible historicity of Homer's Troy faces the same hurdles as with Plato's Atlantis. In both cases, an ancient writer's story is now seen by some to be true, by others to be mythology or fiction. It may be possible to establish connections between either story and real places and events, but these connections may be subject to selection bias.

''Iliad'' as essentially legendary

Some archaeologists and historians maintain that none of the events in Homer are historical. Others accept that there may be a foundation of historical events in the Homeric stories, but say that in the absence of independent evidence it is not possible to separate fact from myth in the stories.
In recent years scholars have suggested that the Homeric stories represented a synthesis of many old Greek stories of various Bronze Age sieges and expeditions, fused together in the Greek memory during the "dark ages" which followed the fall of the Mycenean civilization. In this view, no historical city of Troy existed anywhere: the name derives from a people called the Troies, who probably lived in central Greece. The identification of the hill at Hisarlik as Troy is, in this view, a late development, following the Greek colonisation of Asia Minor in the 8th century BC.

''Iliad'' as essentially historical

Another view is that Homer was heir to an unbroken tradition of epic poetry reaching back some 500 years into Mycenaean times. In this view, the poem's core could reflect a historical campaign that took place at the eve of the decline of the Mycenaean civilization. Much legendary material would have been added during this time, but in this view it is meaningful to ask for archaeological and textual evidence corresponding to events referred to in the Iliad. Such a historical background gives a credible explanation for the geographical knowledge of Troy (which could, however, also have been obtained in Homer's time by visiting the traditional site of the city) and otherwise unmotivated elements in the poem (in particular the detailed Catalogue of Ships). Linguistically, a few verses of the Iliad suggest great antiquity, because they only fit the meter if projected back into Mycenaean Greek, suggesting a poetic tradition spanning the Greek Dark Ages. Even though Homer was Ionian, the Iliad reflects the geography known to the Mycenaean Greeks, showing detailed knowledge of the mainland but not extending to the Ionian islands or Anatolia, which suggests that the Iliad reproduces an account of events handed down by tradition, to which the author did not add his own geographical knowledge.

Fringe theories

:''See also: Where Troy Once Stood''
Kenneth J. Dillon argues Scientia Preß. that the Trojans were originally a steppe people related to the Magyars. After attacking and destroying the Hittite Empire, they came to control the Straits. During the Trojan War, the Greeks used a naval blockade to prevent Trojans on the European shore and on Lemnos from coming to the aid of Troy. Once Troy fell, the Trojans on the European shore fled northward and ended up as the Etruscans in Italy. A small minority of contemporary writers argue that Homeric Troy was not in Anatolia, but located elsewhere: England,^[12] Croatia, and Scandinavia have been proposed. These theories have not been accepted by mainstream scholars.

Troy in later legend

Such was the fame of the Epic Cycle in Roman and medieval times that it was built upon to provide a starting point for various founding myths of national origins. The progenitor of all of them is undoubtedly that promulgated by Virgil in the ''Aeneid'', tracing the ancestry of the founders of Rome, more specifically the Julio-Claudian dynasty, to the Trojan prince Aeneas. The heroes of Troy, both those noted in the epic texts or those purpose-invented, continued to perform the role of founder for the nations of Early Medieval Europe.^[13] Denys Hay noted the widespread adoption of Trojan forebears as an authentication of national status, in ''Europe: the Emergence of an Idea'' (Edinburgh 1957). The ''Roman de Troie'' was common cultural ground for European governing classes,^[14] for whom a Trojan pedigree was gloriously ancient, and it established the successor-kingdoms of which they were direct heirs as equals of the Romans. A Trojan pedigree justified the occupation of parts of Rome's erstwhile territories (Huppert 1965).
The Franks filled the lacunae of their legendary origins with Trojan and pseudo-Trojan names; in Fredegar's seventh-century chronicle of Frankish history, Priam appears as the first king of the Franks.^[15] The Trojan origin of Franks and France was such an established article of faith that in 1714 the learned Nicolas Fréret was Bastilled for showing through historical criticism that the Franks had been Germanic, a sore point counter to Valois and Bourbon propaganda.^[16]
Similarly Geoffrey of Monmouth traces the legendary Kings of the Britons to a supposed descendant of Aeneas called Brutus. Snorri Sturluson, in the Prologue to his Prose Edda, converts several half-remembered characters from Troy into characters from Norse mythology, and refers to them having made a journey across Europe towards Scandinavia, setting up kingdoms as they went.

Tourism

Today there is a Turkish town called 'Truva' in the vicinity of the archaeological site, but this town has grown up recently to service the tourist trade. The archaeological site is officially called 'Troia' by the Turkish government and appears as such on many maps.
A large number of tourists visit the site each year, mostly coming from Istanbul by bus or by ferry via Çanakkale, the nearest major town about 50 km to the north-east. The visitor sees a highly commercialised site, with a large wooden horse built as a playground for children, then shops and a museum. The archaeological site itself is, as a recent writer said, "a ruin of a ruin," because the site has been frequently excavated, and because Schliemann's archaeological methods were very destructive: in his conviction that the city of Priam would be found in the earliest layers, he demolished many interesting structures from later eras, including all of the house walls from Troy II. For many years also the site was unguarded and was thoroughly looted. However what remains, particularly if put into context by one of the knowledgeable professional guides to the site, is an illuminating insight into civilizations of the Bronze Age, if not to the legends.

Notes

1. ''Troia'' is the preferred Latin name for the city. ''Ilium'' is a more poetic term.
2. This is the view of Strabo, XIII.1.7.
3. Geography XIII, I, 36,
Strabo, tr. H. L. Jones, Loeb Classical Library.
4. ''Natural History'', V,33, Pliny the Elder, tr. H. Rackham, W. S. Jones and D. E. Eichholz, Loeb Classical Library.
5.
Trojan battlefield reconstructed
6. Starke, Frank. "Troia im Kontext des historisch-politischen und sprachlichen Umfeldes Kleinasiens im 2. Jahrtausend". // Studia Troica, 1997, 7, 447-87.
7. Quoted from Latacz, page 116.
8. Quoted from Latacz, page 38.
9. Ibidem.
10. Universität Tübingen setzt Ausgrabungen in Troia fort.
11. Carter-Morris, p. 34-35.
12. Iman Wilkens, ''Where Troy Once Stood'', (Groningen 2005), p. 68.
13. George Huppert, "The Trojan Franks and their Critics" ''Studies in the Renaissance'' '12' (1965), pp. 227-241.
14. A. Joly first traced the career of the ''Roman de Troie'' in ''Benoit de Sainte-More et le Roman de Troie'' (Paris 1871).
15. ''Exinde origo Francorum fuit. Priamo primo rege habuerant'',
16. ''Larousse du XIXe siècle'' sub "Fréret", noted by Huppert 1965.

References and further reading

★ Carter, Jane Burr; Morris, Sarah P. ''The Ages of Homer''. University of Texas Press, 1995. ISBN 0292712081.

★ Easton, D.F.; Hawkins, J.D.; Sherratt, A.G.; Sherratt, E.S. "Troy in Recent Perspective", ''Anatolian Studies'', Issue 52. (2002), pp. 75–109.

★

★ ''Fantasies of Troy: Classical Tales and the Social Imaginary in Medieval and Early Modern Europe'', edited by Alan Shepard and Stephen D. Powell. Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2004.

External links

★ Hisarlık Troy

★ Archaeology

★
★ Project Troia - The new excavations at Troy

★
★
★ digital reconstructions of the city

★
★
★ Greek, Roman and Byzantine Pottery at Ilion (Troia)

★
★ Troy VII and the Historicity of the Trojan War

★
★ Where Is "Troy" Now?

★
★ Ilios. The city and country of the Trojans: the results of researches and discoveries on the site of Troy and through the Troad in the years 1871-72-73-78-79; (searchable facsimile at the University of Georgia Libraries, requires dejavu-plugin)

★
★ The Identification of Troy by Jan Sammer

★ Geography

★
★ the Troad (with an image of a model of Troy II)

★
★ Troy pictures

★
★ ''Geology corresponds with Homer’s description of ancient Troy'', article by Neil Thomas on the University of Delaware site.

★ Troy on Wikimapia

★ Troy and Trojan War by Homer in Iliad