'Human Rights Watch' is a
United States-based international
non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on
human rights. Its headquarters is in
New York City.
Profile
Human Rights Watch produces research reports on violations of international human rights norms as set out by the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other internationally-accepted human rights norms. This is intended to draw international attention to abuses and to put pressure on governments and international organizations to reform. Researchers conduct fact-finding missions to investigate suspect situations and generate coverage in local and international
media. Issues raised by Human Rights Watch in its reports include social and
gender discrimination,
torture,
military use of children,
political corruption, and abuses in
criminal justice systems. Human Rights Watch documents and reports violations of the laws of
war and international humanitarian law.
Human Rights Watch was founded under the name
Helsinki Watch in
1978 to monitor the former
Soviet Union's compliance with the
Helsinki Accords. As the organization grew, it formed other "watch committees" to cover other regions of the world. In
1988, all of the committees were united under one umbrella to form Human Rights Watch. One of the original founders and a president of the organization was
Robert L. Bernstein.
Human Rights Watch was one of six international NGOs that founded the
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers in
1998. It is also the co-chair of the
International Campaign to Ban Landmines, a global coalition of civil society groups that successfully lobbied to introduce the
Ottawa Convention, a treaty that prohibits the use of anti-personnel landmines.
Each year, Human Rights Watch gives grants to writers worldwide who are in financial need and who they consider to have been victims of persecution. The Hellman/Hammett grants are financed by the estate of the playwright
Lillian Hellman in funds set up in her name and that of her long-time companion, the novelist
Dashiell Hammett. In addition to providing financial assistance, the Hellman/Hammett grants attempt to raise awareness of censorship
[1].
Pursuant to the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Human Rights Watch opposes violations of basic human rights, including the
death penalty and discrimination on the basis of
sexual orientation. Human Rights Watch advocates freedoms in connection with fundamental human rights, such as
freedom of religion and
the press.
Human Rights Watch is a founding member of the
International Freedom of Expression Exchange, a global network of
non-governmental organizations that monitor
censorship worldwide.
Human Rights Watch has 233 paid staff, and a budget of US$26 million a year.
[2]
The current executive director of Human Rights Watch is Kenneth Roth. He has held this position since 1993. Roth is a graduate of
Yale Law School and
Brown University. His father fled Nazi
Germany in 1938. Roth started working on human rights after the declaration of martial law in
Poland in 1981, and later became engaged in
Haiti issues.
[3]
Issues and campaigns
★ Traffic in
small arms
★
Land mines
★
Abortion rights
★
Gay rights
★ Rights of
AIDS patients
★ Safety of civilians in war; opposes use of
cluster bombs
★
Child labor
★
Child soldiers
★
Street children
★
Genocide,
war crimes and
crimes against humanity
★
Torture
★
Extrajudicial killings and abductions
★
Legal proceedings against human rights abusers
★
Trafficking in women and girls
★ Abolition of capital punishment worldwide
Recent
Human Rights Watch made recent headlines by criticizing the
Jordanian government for arresting elected officials who praised
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the head of
Al Qaeda in Iraq, at ceremonies held in response to his death. Human Rights Watch also spoke out against the
mass killings and government-imposed
famines during the last decade of former
Iraqi leader
Saddam Hussein's rule [4].
On July 26th 2007 HRW denounced that hundreds of migrant children held in emergency centers in the Spanish
Canary Islands are living in
squalid, overcrowded conditionsand face the risk of abuse from their custodians and other children. The
Canary Islands government, which runs the facilities, replied in a statement
[5] that the report lacked "rigor" and that "an internal investigation had failed to corroborate" Human Rights Watch's findings.
Publications
Human Rights Watch publishes reports on several topics
[6] and compiles annual reports ("World Report") presenting an overview of the worldwide state of human rights.
Human Rights Watch has published extensively on the
Rwandan Genocide of 1994
[7] and the conflicts in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo [8].
Comparison with Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch and
Amnesty International are the only two international human rights organizations operating worldwide in most situations of severe repression or abuse. Though close allies, the two groups play complementary roles, reflecting a division of labour. The major differences lie in the groups’ structure and methods for promoting change.
Amnesty International is a mass-membership organization. Mobilization of those members is the organization's central advocacy tool. Human Rights Watch's main products are its crisis-directed research and lengthy reports, whereas Amnesty lobbies and writes detailed reports, but also focuses on mass letter-writing campaigns, adopting individuals as "prisoners of conscience" and lobbying for their release. Human Rights Watch will openly lobby for specific actions for other governments to take against human rights offenders, including naming specific individuals for arrest, or for
sanctions to be levied against certain countries, recently calling for punitive sanctions against the top leaders in
Sudan who have overseen a killing campaign in
Darfur.
Its documentations of human rights abuses often include extensive analyses of the political and historical backgrounds of the conflicts concerned, some of which have been published in academic journals. AI's reports, on the other hand, tend to contain less analysis, and instead focus on specific abuses of rights.
Criticisms
Main articles: Criticism of Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch has been criticized for perceived anti-Western, anti-India, anti-China, and anti-Israel bias. At the same time, others have criticized it for having a pro-western bias. According to a report in the Egyptian press, "the government often accuses human rights groups [including Human Rights Watch] of importing a Western agenda that offends local religious and cultural values."
[9]
Human Rights Watch’s coverage of India is among the most controversial. Yatindra Bhatnagar, chief editor of "International Opinion", has criticized Human Rights Watch representatives and those of related organizations of having an anti-India bias with regards to their reports of communal riots in India between Hindus and Muslims, particularly in reference to the 2002 Gujarat violence.
[10]
See also
★
Amnesty International
★
Democracy Watch (International)
★
Freedom House
★
Helsinki Committee for Human Rights
★
Human rights abuse
★
International Freedom of Expression Exchange
★
US Human Rights Network
★
American Freedom Campaign
References
1. Hellman-Hammett Grants,''Human Rights Watch''
2. Financial statement,''Human Rights Watch''
3. Kenneth Roth Bio,''Human Rights Watch''
4. Middle east and North Africa,''Human Rights Watch''
5. Human Rights Watch says migrant children are at risk in Canary Islands,''International Herald Tribune''
6. Publications,''Human Rights Watch''
7. Rwandan genocide report,''Human Rights Watch''
8. Congo report,''Human Rights Watch''
9. http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/680/eg9.htm Not just the Queen Boat: HRW is asking the Egyptian government to stop persecuting homosexuals and commit to reform]
10. Hours of Anti-India, Anti-Hindutva Rhetoric at “Indian” Muslim Meet, bu Yatindra Bhatnagar,''International Opinion''.
★ Neier, Aryeh (2006)
"The Attack on Human Rights Watch", ''New York Review of Books'', 53(17) November 2, 2006, accessed 20 October 2006.
★
Human Rights Watch claims US involved in secret detention of Somalis
External links
★
Human Rights Watch (official website)
★
Human Rights Watch World Report 2006
★
Press info on Human Rights Watch World Report 2006
★ Edward S. Herman, David Peterson, and George Szamuely,
Human Rights Watch in Service to the War Party: Including A Review of “Weighing the Evidence: Lessons from the Slobodan Milosevic Trial” (Human Rights Watch, December, 2006), ZNet, February 25, 2007
★ Michael Barker, "
Hijacking Human Rights: A Critical Examination of Human Rights Watch’s Americas Branch and their Links to the ‘Democracy’ Establishment", ''Znet'', August 3, 2007