(Redirected from Gay rights)
'LGBT social movements' share related goals of social acceptance of
homosexuality,
bisexuality, or
transgenderism.
LGBT refers to
lesbian,
gay,
bisexual and
transgender people, and their movements include the 'Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement',
Gay Liberation,
lesbian feminism, the
queer movement and
transgender activism. A commonly stated goal is
social equality for LGBT people; some have also focused on building LGBT communities, or worked towards
liberation for the broader society from
sexual oppression. LGBT movements organized today are made up of a wide range of
political activism and cultural activity, such as
lobbying and
street marches; social groups, support groups and community events; magazines, films and literature; academic research and writing; and even business activity.
Goals and strategies
Sociologist Mary Bernstein writes: "For the lesbian and gay movement, then, cultural goals include (but are not limited to) challenging dominant constructions of
masculinity and
femininity,
homophobia, and the primacy of the gendered heterosexual
nuclear family (
heteronormativity). Political goals include changing laws and policies in order to gain new
rights, benefits, and protections from harm."
[1] Bernstein emphasizes that activists seek both types of goals in both the civil and political spheres.
As with other social movements, there is also conflict within and between LGBT movements, especially about strategies for change and debates over exactly who comprises the constituency that these movements represent. There is debate over to what extent lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgendered people, intersexed people and others share common interests and a need to work together. Leaders of the lesbian and gay movement of the 1970s, 80s and 90s often attempted to hide butch lesbians, feminine gay men, transgendered people, and bisexuals from the public eye, creating internal divisions within LGBT communities.
[2]
LGBT movements have often adopted a kind of
identity politics that sees lesbians, gay men, bisexuals and/or transgender people as a fixed class of people; a
minority group or groups. Those using this approach aspire to
liberal political goals of freedom and
equal opportunity, and aim to join the political mainstream on the same level as other groups in society.
[3] In arguing that
sexual orientation and
gender identity are innate and cannot be consciously changed, attempts to change gay, lesbian and bisexual people into heterosexuals ("
reparative therapy") are generally opposed.
However, others within LGBT movements have criticised identity politics as limited and flawed,
[4] and have instead aimed to transform fundamental institutions of society (such as
lesbian feminism) or have argued that all members of society have the potential for same-sex sexuality (such as
Adolf Brand or
Gay Liberation) or a broader range of gender expression (such as the
transgender writing of
Kate Bornstein). Some elements of the
queer movement have argued that the categories of gay and lesbian are restrictive, and attempted to
deconstruct those categories, which are seen to "reinforce rather than challenge a cultural system that will always mark the nonheterosexual as inferior."
[5]
Opposition
Main articles: LGBT rights opposition
LGBT movements are opposed by a variety of individuals and organizations. They may have a personal, moral or religious objection to homosexuality. Studies have consistently shown that people with negative
attitudes towards lesbians and gays are more likely to be male, older, religious,
politically conservative, and have little close personal contact with
out gay men and lesbians.
[6] They are also more likely to have negative attitudes towards other minority groups
[7] and support traditional gender roles.
[8]
History
Main articles: Timeline of LGBT history
Before 1860
In
eighteenth and
nineteenth century Europe, same-sex sexual behaviour and
cross-dressing were widely considered to be socially unacceptable, and were serious crimes under
sodomy and
sumptuary laws. Any organized community or social life was underground and secret.
Thomas Cannon wrote what may be the earliest published defence of homosexuality in English, ''Ancient and Modern Pederasty Investigated and Exemplify'd'' (1749). Social reformer
Jeremy Bentham wrote the first known argument for homosexual law reform in England around 1785, at a time when the legal penalty for "buggery" was death by hanging.
[9] However, he feared reprisal, and his powerful essay was not published until 1978. The emerging currents of
secular humanist thought which had inspired Bentham also informed the
French Revolution, and when the newly-formed
National Constituent Assembly began drafting the policies and laws of the new republic in 1790, groups of militant 'sodomite-citizens' in Paris petitioned the
Assemblée nationale, the governing body of the
French Revolution, for freedom and recognition.
[10] In 1791 France became the first nation to decriminalise homosexuality, probably thanks in part to the homosexual
Jean Jacques Régis de Cambacérès who was one of the authors of the
Napoleonic code.
In 1833, an anonymous English-language writer wrote a poetic defence of Captain Nicholas Nicholls, who had been sentenced to death in London for
sodomy:
:''Whence spring these inclinations, rank and strong?''
:''And harming no one, wherefore call them wrong?''
10
Three years later in Switzerland, Heinrich Hoessli published the first volume of ''Eros: Die Mannerliebe der Griechen'' ("Eros: The Male-love of the Greeks"), another defence of same-sex love.
10
1860 - 1944
Modern historians usually look to German activist
Karl Heinrich Ulrichs as the pioneer of the LGBT rights movement. Ulrichs
came out publicly and began publishing books about same-sex love and gender variance in the
1860s, a few years before the term "homosexual" was first published in
1869. Ulrichs' ''
Uranians'' were people with a range of gender expressions and same-sex desires; he considered himself "a female psyche in a male body".
From the 1870s, social reformers in other countries had begun to take up the Uranian cause, but their identities were kept secret for fear of reprisal. A secret British society called the "
Order of Chaeronea" campaigned for the legalisation of homosexuality, and counted playwright
Oscar Wilde among its members in the last decades of the 19th century.
[11] In the 1890s, English
socialist poet
Edward Carpenter and Scottish
anarchist John Henry Mackay wrote in defense of same-sex love and
androgyny; Carpenter and British homosexual rights advocate
John Addington Symonds contributed to the development of
Havelock Ellis's groundbreaking book ''Sexual Inversion'', which called for tolerance towards "inverts" and was suppressed when first published in England.
In Europe and America, a broader movement of "
free love" was also emerging from the 1860s among
first-wave feminists and radicals of the
libertarian left. They critiqued
Victorian sexual morality and the traditional institutions of family and marriage that were seen to enslave women. Some advocates of free love in the early 20th century also spoke in defence of same-sex love and challenged repressive legislation, such as the Russian anarchist and feminist
Emma Goldman.
In
1898, German doctor and writer
Magnus Hirschfeld formed the
Scientific-Humanitarian Committee to campaign publicly against the notorious law "
Paragraph 175", which made sex between men illegal.
Adolf Brand later broke away from the group, disagreeing with Hirschfeld's medical view of the "
intermediate sex", seeing male-male sex as merely an aspect of manly virility and male social bonding. Brand was the first to use "
outing" as a political strategy, claiming that German
Chancellor Bernhard von Bülow engaged in homosexual activity.

May 14, 1928 issue of German lesbian periodical ''Die Freundin'' (Girlfriend).
The 1901 book ''Sind es Frauen? Roman über das dritte Geschlecht'' (Are These Women? Novel about the Third Sex) by
Aimée Duc was as much a political
treatise as a novel, criticising pathological theories of homosexuality and gender inversion in women.
[12] Anna Rüling, delivering a public speech in 1904 at the request of Hirschfeld, became the first female Uranian activist. Rüling, who also saw "men, women, and homosexuals" as three distinct genders, called for an alliance between the women's and sexual reform movements, but this speech is her only known contribution to the cause. Women only began to join the previously male-dominated sexual reform movement around 1910 when the German government tried to expand Paragraph 175 to outlaw sex between women. Heterosexual feminist leader
Helene Stöcker became a prominent figure in the movement.
Hirschfeld, whose life was dedicated to social progress for homosexual and transgender people, formed the
Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexology) in 1919. The institute conducted an enormous amount of research, saw thousands of transgender and homosexual clients at consultations, and championed a broad range of sexual reforms including sex education, contraception and women's rights. However, the gains made in Germany would soon be
drastically reversed with the rise of
Nazism, and the institute and its library were destroyed in
1933. The Swiss journal
Der Kreis was the only part of the movement to continue through the Nazi era.
In the United States, several secret or semi-secret groups were formed explicitly to advance the rights of homosexuals as early as the turn of the twentieth century, but little is known about them.
[13] A better documented group is
Henry Gerber's
The Society for Human Rights formed in Chicago in 1924, which was quickly suppressed.
[14]
1945 - 1968
Main articles: Homophile
Immediately following
World War II, a number of homosexual rights groups came into being or were revived across the
Western world, in Britain, France, Germany, Holland, the Scandinavian countries and the United States. These groups usually preferred the term homophile to "homosexual", emphasising love over sex. The homophile movement began in the late 1940s with groups in the Netherlands and Denmark, and continued throughout the 1950s and 1960s with groups in Sweden, Norway, the United States, France, Britain and elsewhere.
ONE, Inc., the first public homosexual organization in the U.S,
[15] was bankrolled by the wealthy transsexual man
Reed Erickson. A U.S. transgender-rights journal, ''Transvestia: The Journal of the American Society for Equality in Dress'', also published two issues in 1952.
The homophile movement lobbied within established political systems for social acceptability; radicals of the 1970s would later disparage the homophile groups for being
assimilationist. Any demonstrations were orderly and polite.
[16] By 1969, there were dozens of homophile organizations and publications in the U.S,
[17] and a national organization had been formed, but they were largely ignored by the media. A 1965 gay march held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, according to some historians, marked the beginning of the modern gay rights movement. Meanwhile in San Francisco in 1966, transgender street prostitutes in the poor neighbourhood of
Tenderloin rioted against police harassment at a popular all-night restaurant,
Gene Compton's Cafeteria.
1969 - 1974
Main articles: Gay Liberation

This 1970 poster from New York shows the spirit of pride, openness and celebration.
Gay Liberation's links with the counterculture are also evident.
The
new social movements of the sixties, such as the
Black Power and
anti-Vietnam war movements in the U.S, the
May 1968 insurrection in France, and
Women's Liberation throughout the Western world, inspired some LGBT activists to become more radical,
16 and the
Gay Liberation Movement emerged towards the end of the decade. This new radicalism is often attributed to the
Stonewall riots of
1969, when a group of transgender, lesbian and gay male patrons at a bar in
New York resisted a police raid.
14 Although Gay Liberation was already underway, Stonewall certainly provided a rallying point for the fledgling movement.
Immediately after Stonewall, such groups as the
Gay Liberation Front (GLF), in part founded by
Morris Kight, and the
Gay Activists' Alliance (GAA) were formed. Their use of the word "
gay" represented a new unapologetic defiance — as an antonym for "straight" ('respectable sexual behaviour'), it encompassed a range of non-normative sexualities and gender expressions, such as transgender street prostitutes, and sought ultimately to free the bisexual potential in everyone, rendering obsolete the categories of homosexual and heterosexual.
[18][19] According to Gay Lib writer
Toby Marotta, "their Gay political outlooks were not homophile but liberationist".
[20] "Out, loud and proud", they engaged in colourful
street theatre.
[21] The GLF’s "A Gay Manifesto" set out the aims for the fledgling gay liberation movement, and influential intellectual
Paul Goodman published “The Politics of Being Queer” (1969). Chapters of the GLF were established across the U.S. and in other parts of the Western world. The
Front Homosexuel d'Action Révolutionnaire was formed in 1971 by lesbians who split from the
Mouvement Homophile de France in 1971. One of the values of the movement was
gay pride. Organized by an early
GLF leader
Brenda Howard, the Stonewall riots were commemorated by annual marches that became known as
Gay pride parades. From 1970 activists protested the classification of homosexuality as a mental illness by the
American Psychiatric Association in their
DSM, and in 1974 it was replaced with a category of "sexual orientation disurbance" then "ego-dystonic homosexuality", which was also deleted, although "gender identity disorder" remains.
1975 - 1986
From the anarchistic Gay Liberation Movement of the early 1970s arose a more
reformist and single-issue "Gay Rights Movement", which portrayed gays and lesbians as a
minority group and used the language of civil rights — in many respects continuing the work of the homophile period.
[22] In Berlin, for example, the radical
Homosexuelle Aktion Westberlin was eclipsed by the
Allgemeine Homosexuelle Arbeitsgemeinschaft.
[23] This period also saw a shift away from transgender issues, and butch "bar dykes" and flamboyant "street queens" came to be seen as negative stereotypes of lesbians and gays. Veteran activists such as
Sylvia Rivera and
Beth Elliot were sidelined or expelled because they were transsexual. During this period, the
International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) was formed (1978), and it continues to campaign for lesbian and gay
human rights with the
United Nations and individual national governments.
Lesbian feminism, which was most influential from the mid 1970s to the mid 1980s, encouraged women to direct their energies toward other women rather than men, and advocated lesbianism as the logical result of feminism.
[24] As with Gay Liberation, this understanding of the lesbian potential in all women was at odds with the minority-rights framework of the Gay Rights movement. Many women of the Gay Liberation movement felt frustrated at the domination of the movement by men and formed separate organisations; some who felt gender differences between men and women could not be resolved developed "
lesbian separatism", influenced by writings such as
Jill Johnston's 1973 book ''Lesbian Nation''. Disagreements between different political philosophies were, at times, extremely heated, and became known as the
lesbian sex wars,
[25] clashing in particular over views on
sadomasochism,
prostitution and
transsexuality. The term "gay" came to be more strongly associated with homosexual males.
In Canada, the coming into effect of s.15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1985 saw a shift in the gay rights movement in Canada, as Canadian gays and lesbians moved from liberation to litigious strategies. Premised on Charter protections and on the notion of the immutability of homosexuality, judicial rulings rapidly advanced rights, including those that compelled the Canadian government to legalize same-sex marriage. It has been argued that while this strategy was extremely effective in advancing the safety, dignity and equality of Canadian homosexuals, its emphasis of sameness came at the expense of difference and may have undermined opportunities for more meaningful change.
[26]
1987 - present
Some historians consider that a new era of the gay rights movement began in the 1980s with the emergence of
AIDS, which decimated the leadership and shifted the focus for many.
15 This era saw a resurgence of militancy with
direct action groups like
ACT UP (formed in 1987), and its offshoots
Queer Nation (1990) and the
Lesbian Avengers (1992). Some younger activists, seeing "gay and lesbian" as increasingly normative and politically conservative, began using the word
queer as a defiant statement of all
sexual minorities and gender variant people — just as the earlier liberationists had done with the word "gay". Less confrontational terms that attempt to reunite the interests of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transpeople also became prominent, including various
acronyms like
LGBT, LGBTQ, and LGBTI. As of
2006, these acronyms have become commonplace descriptors used by organisations that once described themselves as "gay rights" groups.
In the 1990s, organizations began to spring up in non-western countries, such as Progay Philippines, which was founded in 1993 and organized the first Gay Pride march in Asia on June 26, 1994. In many countries, LGBT organizations remain illegal (as of
2006) and transgender and homosexual activists face extreme opposition from the state. Also, many activists attempted to turn the attention of the West to the situation of queers in non-western countries.
The 1990s also saw a rapid expansion of
transgender rights movements across the globe.
Hijra activists campaigned for recognition as a
third sex in India and
Travesti groups began to organize against police brutality across
Latin America, while activists in the
United States formed militant groups such as
Transexual Menace. An important text was
Leslie Feinberg's, "Transgender Liberation: A Movement Whose Time Has Come", published in 1992. 1993 is considered to mark the beginning of a new movement of
intersexuals, with the founding of the
Intersex Society of North America by
Cheryl Chase.
In many cases, LGBTI rights movements came to focus on questions of
intersectionality, the interplay of oppressions arising from being both queer and
underclass,
colored,
disabled, etc.
In 2007 United States Congress passed a historic hate crimes bill allowing for federal investigation of hate crimes. This bill serves to help local law enforcement cut down on hate crimes against LGBT people and others that may be targeted. It allows for federal aid in solving hate crime cases and other things. This is a great change and victory for the homosexual community. No longer will cases of those such as Teena Brandon (Brandon Teena), a transgender woman who was raped and then later killed by the free men who raped her, be tolerated. This is the first time a bill has included the words "sexual orientation."
See also
★
LGBT rights by country
★
Ethic of reciprocity
★
Inalienable rights
★
Moral universalism
★
Social criticism
Articles
★
Age of consent
★
Declaration of Montreal
★
LGBT rights opposition
★
Heterosexism
★
Homophobia
★
Homosexual agenda
★
Homosexuality in India
★
Homosexuality laws of the world
★
LGBT movements in the United States
★
List of gay-rights organizations
★
List of LGBT rights activists
★
Pro-gay slogans and symbols
★
Queer nationalism
★
Special rights
★
Timeline of LGBT history
★
Transgenderism
Categories
★
★
★
★
References
1. Bernstein, Mary (2002). ''Identities and Politics: Toward a Historical Understanding of the Lesbian and Gay Movement''. Social Science History 26:3 (fall 2002).
2. Bull, C., and J. Gallagher (1996) Perfect Enemies: The Religious Right, the Gay Movement, and the Politics of the 1990s. New York: Crown.
3. One example of this approach is: Sullivan, Andrew. (1997) ''Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con.'' New York: Vintage.
4. e.g. Altman, Dennis. (1982) ‘‘The gay movement ten years later.’’ Nation, 13 November: 494–96.
Vaid, Urvashi. (1995) Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation. New York: Anchor.
5. Bernstein (2002)
6. Studies finding that heterosexual men usually exhibit more hostile attitudes toward gay men and lesbians than do heterosexual women:
:
★ Herek, G. M. (1994). ''Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men.'' In "B. Greene and G.M. Herek (Eds.) Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay issues: Vol. 1 Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications." Thousands Oaks, Ca: Sage.
:
★ Kite, M.E. (1984). ''Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexuals: A meta-analytic review.'' Journal of Homosexuality, 10 (1-2), 69-81.
:
★ Morin, S., & Garfinkle, E. (1978). ''Male homophobia.'' Journal of Social Issues, 34 (1), 29-47.
:
★ Thompson, E., Grisanti, C., & Pleck, J. (1985). ''Attitudes toward the male role and their correlates.'' Sex Roles, 13 (7/8), 413-427.
★ 'For other correlates, see:'
:
★ Larson et al. (1980) ''Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Homosexuality'', The Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245-257
:
★ Herek, G. (1988), ''Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men'', The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451-477
:
★ Kite, M.E., & Deaux, K., 1986. ''Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,'' 7, 137-162
:
★ Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). ''Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals.'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105-1118.
:
★ Lewis, Gregory B., ''Black-White Differences in Attitudes toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights,'' Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 67, Number 1, Pp. 59-78
7. Herek, G.M. (1991). ''Stigma, prejudice, and violence against lesbians and gay men.'' In: J. Gonsiorek & J. Weinrich (Eds.), "Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy" (pp. 60-80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Kyes, K.B. & Tumbelaka, L. (1994). ''Comparison of Indonesian and American college students' attitudes toward homosexuality.'' Psychological Reports, This includes possible anger at the dismissal of others believes to justify there own 74, 227-237.
9. Bentham, Jeremy, ''Offences Against One's Self'', c1785 (full text online).
10. Blasius, Mark and Phelan, Shane (eds.), 1997. "We Are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics", New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-90859-0
11. McKenna, Neil (2003), "The Secret Life of Oscar Wilde: An Intimate Biography". (London: Century) ISBN 0-7126-6986-8
12. Breger, Claudia. 2005. ''Feminine Masculinities: Scientific and Literary Representations of "Female Inversion" at the Turn of the Twentieth Century''. Journal of the History of Sexuality 14.1/2 (2005) 76-106
13. Norton, Rictor, (2005), "The Suppression of Lesbian and Gay History"
14. Bullough, Vern, "When Did the Gay Rights Movement Begin?", 18 April, 2005
15. Percy, William A. & William Edward Glover, 2005, Before Stonewall, November 5, 2005
16. Matzner, 2004, "Stonewall Riots "
17. Percy, 2005, "Before Stonewall: Activists for Gay and Lesbian Rights"
18. Altman, D. (1971). ''Homosexual: Oppression and Liberation.'' New York: Outerbridge & Dienstfrey.
19. Adam, B. D. (1987). ''The rise of a gay and lesbian movement''. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
20. Marotta, Toby, ''The Politics of Homosexuality'', Boston, p. 68
21. Gallagher,John & Bull, Chris, 1996, Perfect Enemies
22. Epstein, S. (1999). ''Gay and lesbian movements in the United States: Dilemmas of identity, diversity, and political strategy.'' in B. D. Adam, J. Duyvendak, & A. Krouwel (Eds.), "The global emergence of gay and lesbian politics" (pp. 30-90). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23. Hekman, Gert; Oosterhuis, Harry; Steakley, James (1995). ''Leftist Sexual Politics and Homosexuality: A Historical Overview'', Journal of Homosexuality. New York: Sep 30, 1995. Vol.29, Iss. 2/3
24. Rich, A. (1980). ''Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence''. Signs, 5, 631-660.
25. Lesbian Sex Wars, article by Elise Chenier from GLBTQ encyclopedia.
26. Lehman, M. (2005). [[1]].
External links
★
12 Injured as Gay Pride Marchers Attacked in Estonia
★ Gallagher, John & Chris Bull,
, ''Perfect Enemies'', 1996, Crown, 300 pp.
★ Norton, Rick,
“The Suppression of Lesbian and Gay History”, February 12, 2005, updated April 5, 2005.
★ Percy, William A.,
Review of “Before Stonewall: Activists for Gay and Lesbian Rights”, November 22, 2005. Accessed on 18 June, 2006.
★ Gerald Schoenewolf,
"Gay Rights and Political Correctness: A Brief History"
★ Spitzer, RL,
"The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues." Am J Psychiatry. 1981 Feb;138(2):210-5.
★ IGLHRC
★
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)
★
International Lesbian and Gay Association World Legal Survey (2000)
★
Gay Rights Community Center (USA)
★ Good As You
"Gay & Lesbian Activism With A Sense of Humor"
★
The Prague Post - New era for gay rights movement in the Czech Republic
★
"Is That All There Is?: More to Gay Rights Than Marriage", The Indypendent, July 4, 2003
Further reading
★ Lauritsen, John and Thorstad, David. ''The Early Homosexual Rights Movement (1864-1935).'' Revised edition. 1974; Ojai, CA: Times Change Press, 1995. ISBN 0-87810-041-5
★ Cruikshank, Margaret. ''The Gay and Lesbian Liberation Movement.'' New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1992. ISBN 0-415-90648-2
★ Duberman, Martin. ''Stonewall.'' New York: Plume, 1994. ISBN 0-452-27206-8
Eisenbach, David, "Gay Power: An American Revolution." New York: Carroll & Graf, 2006. ISBN-10: 0-78671-633-9
★ Adam, Barry D. ''The Rise of a Gay and Lesbian Movement.'' Revised edition. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1995. ISBN 0-8057-3864-9
★ Johansson, Warren and Percy, William A.
''Outing: Shattering the Conspiracy of Silence.'' New York and London: Haworth Press, 1994.
★ Aldrich, Robert (ed.)
''Gay Life and Culture: A World History.'' London: Thames & Hudson, 2006.
★ Carter, David [MA] ''Stonewall: the riots that sparked the Gay revolution;'' New York, NY; St Martin’s Press; 2004. ISBN 0-312-20025-0
★ Miller, Neil; ''Out of the Past: Gay and Lesbian history from 1869 to the present;'' New York, NY; Alyson Books; 2006. ISBN 0-7394-6463-0
★ Caramagno, Thomas C. "Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate." Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002. ISBN: 0-275-97721-8