 | Splinter Cell Chaos Theory N-Gage developer interview interview with developer on SCCT on N-Gage |
 | Lecture 7 | Modern Physics: Special Relativity (Stanford) Lecture 7 of Leonard Susskind's Modern Physics course concentrating on Special Relativity. Recorded May 25, 2008 at Stanford University. This Stanford Continuing Studies course is the first of a six-quarter sequence of classes exploring the essential theoretical foundations of modern physics. The topics covered in this course focus on classical mechanics. Leonard Susskind is the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University. Complete Playlist for the Course: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=CCD6C043FEC59772 Stanford Continuing Studies: http://continuingstudies.stanford.edu/ About Leonard Susskind: http://www.stanford.edu/dept/physics/people/faculty/susskind_leonard.html Stanford University Channel on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/stanford |
 | Splinter Cell Chaos Theory N-Gage Game Trailer |
 | string decay to oscillons 2 superconducting flux tubes annihilate to create 2 oscillons which then coalesce to form a single oscillon. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~jthorarinson/ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701294 Simulation by Joel Thorarinson |
 | g=2.5 2d U(1) Flux tube Coalescence vortex-vortex pairs of the same sign are placed 5 units apart on a lattice to interact. Lattice details L=50^2, dx=0.2. g=2.5, friction=0.05, standard higgs potential, toroidal boundary conditions. Pairs form N=2 vortices. energy density (top slice), magnetic field (middle), -phi*phi (bottom), 1d-isosurface is phi*phi=1.0 (the classical vacuum) |
 | 3d Type 1 Nucleonic Flux Tubes 2 N=3 flux tubes interacting to form a 6-vortex and 2 N=-1 form a N=-2 in the charged proton neutron system. Blue is a Gauge energy density (E^2 +B^2) isosurface, green the neutron condensate -0.04 from the vev , red is the proton condensate with isosurface 0.5 away from the vev. the proton density is 10% of the neutrons, and the P_N coupling is 0.5. g=2.0 and all other coupling set to 1. No entrainment interaction... I have added a low temperature gauge invariant perturbation in the beginning of the simulation to catalyze an possible instabilities that might appear due to too much symmetry in the initial conditions. This shows that the 2d simulation captures very well the full 3d as small perturbations in the flux tube structure do not amplify to perturb the z direction symmetry. |
 | g=2.0 2d U(1) Flux tube Coalescence N=16 N=16 g=2.0 |
 | Towards a Spin Foam Model of Quantum Gravity NOTE: pdf link for transparencies- http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/loops05/loops05.pdf Probably not everyones cup of tea. A clip from a lecture by John Baez in conjunction with the LOOPS 'O5 series by the Max Planck Institute of Gravitation (Albert Einstein Institute) regarding a proposal for quantum gravity (the clip appears to start at page 14 of the transparencies). Date- 11th Oct 05. Source- http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/loops05/ LOOPS '05- http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/ 'Spin foam models include several different classes of physical theories: lattice gauge theories, dynamical triangulation models of quantum gravity, "chain mail" quantum field theories, and topological string theories. Is there a spin foam model of quantum gravity in 4 dimensions? To address this question, we review recent work on causal dynamical triangulations and the renormalization group. This suggests that quantum gravity is a well-defined theory with the curious property that spacetime is effectively 4-dimensional at large distance scales, but 2-dimensional at very short distance scales. This is just what one might expect from a spin foam model, since spacetime is fundamentally 2-dimensional in these theories. We discuss properties a spin foam model should have in order to approximate general relativity at large distance scales.' |
 | n-gage this is me just showing the n-gage and spinter cell chaos theory i have also monkey ball and sims and tennis but i might show those in another vid |
 | "How the Towers Fell" (1 of 13)-Architect Richard Gage If you have a closed mind about what happened on 911 and you have bought into the "official" conspiracy theory, don't bother watching this. Slide show link: http://www.ae911truth.net/ppt_web/slideshow.php If you wish to honor the memory of those who were massacred on 911 by relentlessly probing for the truth of what happened, carry on and watch these videos of a presentation by Architect Richard Gage as he meticulously examines the facts of 911. Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses? Jan 1, 2007 — Richard Gage, AIA The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available. Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience. In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"... and, quite willing to, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that "the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires". After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses". There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST. It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website (http://ae911truth.org) as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly. After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation. "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." — Larry Silverstein - WTC Lease Holder |
 | "How the Towers Fell" (2 of 13)-Architect Richard Gage If you have a closed mind about what happened on 911 and you have bought into the "official" conspiracy theory, don't bother watching this. If you wish to honor the memory of those who were massacred on 911 by relentlessly probing for the truth of what happened, carry on and watch these videos of a presentation by Architect Richard Gage as he meticulously examines the facts of 911. Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses? Jan 1, 2007 — Richard Gage, AIA The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available. Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience. In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"... and, quite willing to, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that "the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires". After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses". There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST. It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website (http://ae911truth.org) as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly. After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation. "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." — Larry Silverstein - WTC Lease Holder |
 | "How the Towers Fell" (3 of 13)-Architect Richard Gage If you have a closed mind about what happened on 911 and you have bought into the "official" conspiracy theory, don't bother watching this. If you wish to honor the memory of those who were massacred on 911 by relentlessly probing for the truth of what happened, carry on and watch these videos of a presentation by Architect Richard Gage as he meticulously examines the facts of 911. Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses? Jan 1, 2007 — Richard Gage, AIA The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available. Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience. In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"... and, quite willing to, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that "the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires". After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses". There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST. It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website (http://ae911truth.org) as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly. After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation. "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." — Larry Silverstein - WTC Lease Holder |
العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español
