Discover

富國强兵 '''Fukoku kyōhei'''
Chinese Characters
Traditional Chinese:	富國強兵, 富國强兵, etc.
Simplified Chinese used in Mainland China and Singapore:	富国强兵
Shinjitai (simplified characters used in Japan):	富国強兵
Standard Mandarin Chinese
Hanyu Pinyin:	fùguóqiángbīng
Wade-Giles:	fu4kuo2ch'iang2ping1
Japanese
Kana (Modern kana usage):	ふこくきょうへい
Kana (Historical kana usage):	ふこくきやうへい
Hepburn romanization:	fukoku kyōhei
Korean
Hangul:	부국강병
Revised Romanization:	buguk gangbyeong
McCune-Reischauer:	puguk kangbyŏng

'Fukoku kyōhei' (Kyūjitai: 富國强兵; Shinjitai: 富国強兵), "Enrich the country, strengthen the military", originally a phrase from the ancient Chinese historical work on the Warring States Period, Zhan Guo Ce (''Kanjigen'', ), was Japan's national slogan during the Meiji Era, replacing sonnō jōi.
The slogan was the central objective of the Meiji leaders. Fukoku kyohei entailed the formulation of far-reaching policies to transform Japanese society in an all out effort to catch up with the West. Although the government played a major role in providing the setting for industrialization, destroying old institutions that proved obstacles to industrialization and creating new institutions that would facilitate economic and political modernization, private enterprise also played a critical role in the distinctly Japanese combination of public and private sector effort later criticized in the 1980s as "Japan Inc." This symbolized an emerging nationalism in Japan.
Originating from the Iwakura Mission to Europe, the phrase not only demonstrated national objectives, but also revealed awareness of the predatory nature of international politics at the time. Both Okubo Toshimichi and Ito Hirobumi called for the advice of German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck; his advice convinced the Meiji leaders of the necessity for a militarily and economically strong Japan and nationalism in order to preserve independence.
The fukoku kyohei objective led to massive governmental overhaul. Okubo thought that the Meiji government had to play a key role and formulate a clear set of policies. He thus espoused mercantilist visions and rejected the free trade ideas of Fukuzawa Yukichi. Ito Hirobumi also cautioned against free trade – he advocated the establishment of a protective tariff to ensure the prosperity of domestic manufactures. However, when the tariff has outlived its usefulness, Japan should imitate England and permit free trade. But before Japan could decide on its own foreign trade policy, it first had to get rid of the unequal treaties imposed by the imperial powers in the 1850s.
The industrial policy that resulted had 5 components: (1) An active role for the state in the development of the economy; (2) import substitution for industries that would compete with imports – the most important being cotton goods in textiles, threads and yarns; (3) adoption of Western technology to increase production of sophisticated products; (4) export development of crafts, tea and raw silk but also increasingly value-added products; (5) avoidance of relying on foreign loans.
The active role of the state was never realized: the government lacked the funds for a proper industrial policy. It managed to fund only one single cotton factory. The exception was the military sector and the defense industry, where huge sums were spent, up to 20% of the budget.
All in all, this imitation of the West did not ameliorate tensions between Japan and Europe. It was rather as a sign of Japanese acceptance of realpolitik. Japan’s increasing trade and industrialization was meant to combat the West’s influence by becoming militarily and financially strong enough to become an actor in Imperialism.