العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolFOSSIL FUEL
'Fossil fuels' are hydrocarbons, primarily coal and petroleum (fuel oil or natural gas), formed from the fossilized remains of dead plants and animals[1] by exposure to heat and pressure in the Earth's crust over hundreds of millions of years[2]. The theory that hydrocarbons were formed from these remains was first introduced by Mikhail Lomonosov in 1757. In common parlance, the term "fossil fuel" also includes hydrocarbon-containing natural resources that are not derived entirely from biological sources, such as tar sands. These latter sources are properly known as 'mineral fuels'.
Modern large-scale industrial development is based on fossil fuel use, which has largely supplanted water-driven mills, as well as the combustion of wood or peat for heat. With global modernization in the 20th and 21st centuries, the growth in energy production from fossil fuels, especially gasoline derived from oil, is one of the causes of major regional and global conflicts and environmental issues. A global movement toward the generation of renewable energy is therefore under way to help meet the increased global energy needs.
The burning of fossil fuels by humans is the largest source of emissions of carbon dioxide, which is one of the greenhouse gases that enhances radiative forcing and contributes to global warming. The atmospheric concentration of CO2, a greenhouse gas, is increasing, raising concerns that solar heat will be trapped and the average surface temperature of the Earth will rise in response.
Fossil fuels have literally and figuratively fueled dramatic increases in the quality of life for humanity in a relatively short amount of time, and could reasonably be called one of mankinds all-time greatest discoveries.
Main articles: Hubbert peak theory
The principle of supply and demand suggests that as hydrocarbon supplies diminish, prices will rise. Therefore higher prices will lead to increased alternative, renewable energy supplies as previously uneconomic sources become sufficiently economical to exploit. Artificial gasolines and other renewable energy sources currently require more expensive production and processing technologies than conventional petroleum reserves, but may become economically viable in the near future. See Future energy development.
Different alternative sources of energy include alcohols, hydrogen, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind, and geothermal.
Levels of primary energy sources are the reserves in the ground. Flows are production. The most important part of primary energy sources are the carbon based fossil energy sources. Oil, coal, and gas stood for 79.6% of primary energy production during 2002 (in million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe)) (34.9+23.5+21.2).
Levels (reserves) (EIA oil, gas, coal estimates, EIA oil, gas estimates)
★ Oil: 1,050,691 to 1,277,702 billion barrels (167 to 203 km³) 2003-2005
★ Gas: 6,040,208 - 6,805,830 billion cubic feet (171,040 to 192,720 km³) 6,805.830
★ 0.182= 1,239 BBOE 2003-2005
★ Coal: 1,081,279 million short tons (1,081,279
★ 0.907186
★ 4.879= 4,786 BBOE) (2004)
Flows (daily production) during 2002 (7.9 is a ratio to convert tonnes of oil equivalent to barrels of oil equivalent)
★ Oil: (10,230
★ 0.349)
★ 7.9/365= 77 MBD
★ Gas: (10,230
★ 0.212)
★ 7.9/365= 47 MBOED
★ Coal: (10,230
★ 0.235)
★ 7.9/365= 52 MBOED
Years of production left in the ground with the most optimistic reserve estimates (Oil & Gas Journal, World Oil)
★ Oil: 1,277,702/77/365= '45 years'
★ Gas: 1,239,000/47/365= '72 years'
★ Coal: 4,786,000/52/365= '252 years'
Note that this calculation assumes that the product could be produced at a constant level for that number of years and that all of the reserves could be recovered. In reality, consumption of all three resources has been increasing. While this suggests that the resource will be used up more quickly, in reality, the production curve is much more akin to a bell curve. At some point in time, the production of each resource within an area, country, or globally will reach a maximum value, after which, the production will decline until it reaches a point where is no longer economically feasible or physically possible to produce. See Hubbert peak theory for detail on this decline curve with regard to petroleum.
The above discussion emphasizes worldwide energy balance. It is also valuable to understand the ratio of reserves to annual consumption (R/C) by region or country. For example, energy policy of the United Kingdom recognizes that Europe's R/C value is 3.0, very low by world standards, and exposes that region to energy vulnerability. Specific alternatives to fossil fuels are a subject of intense debate worldwide.
In the United States, more than 90% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the combustion of fossil fuels.[3] Combustion of fossil fuels also produces other air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, volatile organic compounds and heavy metals.
According to Environment Canada:
Combustion of fossil fuels generates sulphuric, carbonic, and nitric acids, which fall to Earth as acid rain, impacting both natural areas and the built environment. Monuments and sculptures made from marble and limestone are particularly vulnerable, as the acids dissolve calcium carbonate.
Fossil fuels also contain radioactive materials, mainly uranium and thorium, that are released into the atmosphere. In 2000, about 12,000 metric tons of thorium and 5,000 metric tons of uranium were released worldwide from burning coal.[5] It is estimated that during 1982, US coal burning released 155 times as much radioactivity into the atmosphere as the Three Mile Island incident.[6]
Burning coal also generates large amounts of fly ash and bottom ash.
Harvesting, processing, and distributing fossil fuels can also create environmental problems. Coal mining methods, particularly mountaintop removal and strip mining, have extremely negative environmental impacts, and offshore oil drilling poses a hazard to aquatic organisms. Oil refineries also have negative environmental impacts, including air and water polluition. Transportation of coal requires the use of diesel-powered locomotives, while crude oil is typically transported by tanker ships, each of which requires the combustion of additional fossil fuels.
Environmental regulation uses a variety of approaches to limit these emissions, such as command-and-control (which mandates the amount of pollution or the technology used), economic incentives, or voluntary programs.
An example of such regulation in the USA is the "EPA is implementing policies to reduce airborne mercury emissions. Under regulations issued in 2005, coal-fired power plants will need to reduce their emissions by 70 percent by 2018."[7].
In economic terms, pollution from fossil fuels is regarded as a negative externality. Taxation is considered one way to make societal costs explicit, in order to 'internalize' the cost of pollution. This aims to make fossil fuels more expensive, thereby reducing their use and the amount of pollution associated with them, along with raising the funds necessary to counteract these factors. Although European nations impose some pollution taxes, they also give billions of subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, offsetting the taxes.
Many in America believe that a move away from an economy that is solely dependent on fossil fuels will allow a more even-handed approach to foreign policy. Former CIA Director James Woolsey recently outlined the national security arguments in favor of moving away from fossil fuels. Video of Woolsey speech
★ Abiogenic petroleum origin proposes that petroleum is not a fossil fuel
★ Climate change
★ Energy policy
★ Flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion
★ Future energy development
★ Greenhouse gas
★ Global warming
★ Hubbert peak theory
★ List of energy topics
★ Low-carbon economy
★ Petroleum dependence
★ Over-consumption
★ Overpopulation
★ Petroleum
★ Radiative forcing
★ Renewable energy
★ World energy resources and consumption
★ Proposed Oil phase-out in Sweden
★ Peak oil
1. Canada's Fossil Fuel Dependency Dr. Irene Novaczek
2. Fossil fuel
3. US EPA.2000. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1998, Rep. EPA 236-R-00-01. US EPA, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming
4. Electricity Generation
5. Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger - Alex Gabbard
6. Nuclear proliferation through coal burning - Gordon J. Aubrecht, II, Ohio State University
7. Frequently Asked Questions, Information on Proper Disposal of Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs)
★ "EPA defines fossil fuel"
★ "The Coming Energy Crisis?" - essay by James L. Williams of WTRG Economics and A. F. Alhajji of Ohio Northern University
★ "Powering the Future" - Michael Parfit (''National Geographic'')
★ "Will We Run Out of Energy ?" - article by Mark Bradley
★ "Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions"
★ Fossil Fuel Subsidies in Europe
★ US Fossil Fuel Subsidies
★ 2003 Congressional briefing on fossil fuel subsidies
Modern large-scale industrial development is based on fossil fuel use, which has largely supplanted water-driven mills, as well as the combustion of wood or peat for heat. With global modernization in the 20th and 21st centuries, the growth in energy production from fossil fuels, especially gasoline derived from oil, is one of the causes of major regional and global conflicts and environmental issues. A global movement toward the generation of renewable energy is therefore under way to help meet the increased global energy needs.
The burning of fossil fuels by humans is the largest source of emissions of carbon dioxide, which is one of the greenhouse gases that enhances radiative forcing and contributes to global warming. The atmospheric concentration of CO2, a greenhouse gas, is increasing, raising concerns that solar heat will be trapped and the average surface temperature of the Earth will rise in response.
Fossil fuels have literally and figuratively fueled dramatic increases in the quality of life for humanity in a relatively short amount of time, and could reasonably be called one of mankinds all-time greatest discoveries.
| Contents |
| Limits and alternatives |
| Levels and flows |
| Environmental effects |
| See also |
| References |
| External links |
Limits and alternatives
Main articles: Hubbert peak theory
Annual carbon dioxide emission broken down into various fuel types during 1800-2000 AD.
The principle of supply and demand suggests that as hydrocarbon supplies diminish, prices will rise. Therefore higher prices will lead to increased alternative, renewable energy supplies as previously uneconomic sources become sufficiently economical to exploit. Artificial gasolines and other renewable energy sources currently require more expensive production and processing technologies than conventional petroleum reserves, but may become economically viable in the near future. See Future energy development.
Different alternative sources of energy include alcohols, hydrogen, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind, and geothermal.
Levels and flows
Levels of primary energy sources are the reserves in the ground. Flows are production. The most important part of primary energy sources are the carbon based fossil energy sources. Oil, coal, and gas stood for 79.6% of primary energy production during 2002 (in million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe)) (34.9+23.5+21.2).
Levels (reserves) (EIA oil, gas, coal estimates, EIA oil, gas estimates)
★ Oil: 1,050,691 to 1,277,702 billion barrels (167 to 203 km³) 2003-2005
★ Gas: 6,040,208 - 6,805,830 billion cubic feet (171,040 to 192,720 km³) 6,805.830
★ 0.182= 1,239 BBOE 2003-2005
★ Coal: 1,081,279 million short tons (1,081,279
★ 0.907186
★ 4.879= 4,786 BBOE) (2004)
Flows (daily production) during 2002 (7.9 is a ratio to convert tonnes of oil equivalent to barrels of oil equivalent)
★ Oil: (10,230
★ 0.349)
★ 7.9/365= 77 MBD
★ Gas: (10,230
★ 0.212)
★ 7.9/365= 47 MBOED
★ Coal: (10,230
★ 0.235)
★ 7.9/365= 52 MBOED
Years of production left in the ground with the most optimistic reserve estimates (Oil & Gas Journal, World Oil)
★ Oil: 1,277,702/77/365= '45 years'
★ Gas: 1,239,000/47/365= '72 years'
★ Coal: 4,786,000/52/365= '252 years'
Note that this calculation assumes that the product could be produced at a constant level for that number of years and that all of the reserves could be recovered. In reality, consumption of all three resources has been increasing. While this suggests that the resource will be used up more quickly, in reality, the production curve is much more akin to a bell curve. At some point in time, the production of each resource within an area, country, or globally will reach a maximum value, after which, the production will decline until it reaches a point where is no longer economically feasible or physically possible to produce. See Hubbert peak theory for detail on this decline curve with regard to petroleum.
The above discussion emphasizes worldwide energy balance. It is also valuable to understand the ratio of reserves to annual consumption (R/C) by region or country. For example, energy policy of the United Kingdom recognizes that Europe's R/C value is 3.0, very low by world standards, and exposes that region to energy vulnerability. Specific alternatives to fossil fuels are a subject of intense debate worldwide.
Environmental effects
In the United States, more than 90% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the combustion of fossil fuels.[3] Combustion of fossil fuels also produces other air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, volatile organic compounds and heavy metals.
According to Environment Canada:
"The electricity sector is unique among industrial sectors in its very large contribution to emissions associated with nearly all air issues. Electricity generation produces a large share of Canadian nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide emissions, which contribute to smog and acid rain and the formation of fine particulate matter. It is the largest uncontrolled industrial source of mercury emissions in Canada. Fossil fuel-fired electric power plants also emit carbon dioxide, which may contribute to climate change. In addition, the sector has significant impacts on water and habitat and species. In particular, hydro dams and transmission lines have significant effects on water and biodiversity."[4]
Combustion of fossil fuels generates sulphuric, carbonic, and nitric acids, which fall to Earth as acid rain, impacting both natural areas and the built environment. Monuments and sculptures made from marble and limestone are particularly vulnerable, as the acids dissolve calcium carbonate.
Fossil fuels also contain radioactive materials, mainly uranium and thorium, that are released into the atmosphere. In 2000, about 12,000 metric tons of thorium and 5,000 metric tons of uranium were released worldwide from burning coal.[5] It is estimated that during 1982, US coal burning released 155 times as much radioactivity into the atmosphere as the Three Mile Island incident.[6]
Burning coal also generates large amounts of fly ash and bottom ash.
Harvesting, processing, and distributing fossil fuels can also create environmental problems. Coal mining methods, particularly mountaintop removal and strip mining, have extremely negative environmental impacts, and offshore oil drilling poses a hazard to aquatic organisms. Oil refineries also have negative environmental impacts, including air and water polluition. Transportation of coal requires the use of diesel-powered locomotives, while crude oil is typically transported by tanker ships, each of which requires the combustion of additional fossil fuels.
Environmental regulation uses a variety of approaches to limit these emissions, such as command-and-control (which mandates the amount of pollution or the technology used), economic incentives, or voluntary programs.
An example of such regulation in the USA is the "EPA is implementing policies to reduce airborne mercury emissions. Under regulations issued in 2005, coal-fired power plants will need to reduce their emissions by 70 percent by 2018."[7].
In economic terms, pollution from fossil fuels is regarded as a negative externality. Taxation is considered one way to make societal costs explicit, in order to 'internalize' the cost of pollution. This aims to make fossil fuels more expensive, thereby reducing their use and the amount of pollution associated with them, along with raising the funds necessary to counteract these factors. Although European nations impose some pollution taxes, they also give billions of subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, offsetting the taxes.
Many in America believe that a move away from an economy that is solely dependent on fossil fuels will allow a more even-handed approach to foreign policy. Former CIA Director James Woolsey recently outlined the national security arguments in favor of moving away from fossil fuels. Video of Woolsey speech
See also
★ Abiogenic petroleum origin proposes that petroleum is not a fossil fuel
★ Climate change
★ Energy policy
★ Flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion
★ Future energy development
★ Greenhouse gas
★ Global warming
★ Hubbert peak theory
★ List of energy topics
★ Low-carbon economy
★ Petroleum dependence
★ Over-consumption
★ Overpopulation
★ Petroleum
★ Radiative forcing
★ Renewable energy
★ World energy resources and consumption
★ Proposed Oil phase-out in Sweden
★ Peak oil
References
1. Canada's Fossil Fuel Dependency Dr. Irene Novaczek
2. Fossil fuel
3. US EPA.2000. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1998, Rep. EPA 236-R-00-01. US EPA, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming
4. Electricity Generation
5. Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger - Alex Gabbard
6. Nuclear proliferation through coal burning - Gordon J. Aubrecht, II, Ohio State University
7. Frequently Asked Questions, Information on Proper Disposal of Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs)
External links
★ "EPA defines fossil fuel"
★ "The Coming Energy Crisis?" - essay by James L. Williams of WTRG Economics and A. F. Alhajji of Ohio Northern University
★ "Powering the Future" - Michael Parfit (''National Geographic'')
★ "Will We Run Out of Energy ?" - article by Mark Bradley
★ "Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions"
★ Fossil Fuel Subsidies in Europe
★ US Fossil Fuel Subsidies
★ 2003 Congressional briefing on fossil fuel subsidies
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Vacation By V | |
| Golf Holidays International |
Fossil fuel Videos
 | Home, Sweet Home: The Ozone Song |
 | Electric Wheels |
