Discover

The fundamental unit of 'government for Canadian First Nations' people is the ''band''. A band is typically, but not always, composed of a single community. Many bands, especially in British Columbia, control multiple reserves, that is, multiple parcels of land. Although bands currently have considerable control over their reserve land, strictly speaking neither the band itself nor its members owns the land. Rather, the land is held in trust for the band by the Crown.
The term ''band'' is historically related to the anthropological term band, but as a legal and administrative unit the band need not correspond to a band in the anthropological sense. Some bands draw their members from two or more ethnic groups due to the disruption of traditional ways by colonization and/or the administrative convenience of Canada.
Two or more bands may unite to form a tribal council. Tribal councils have no independent status; they draw their powers entirely from their member bands. What powers are delegated to the tribal council and which services are provided centrally by the tribal council varies according to the wishes of the member bands.
In addition to tribal councils, bands may create joint organizations for particular purposes, such as providing social services or health care. For example, in the central interior of British Columbia, Carrier Sekani Family Services provides social services for a dozen bands. CSFS was originally a part of the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council but is now a separate organization and includes among its members bands that are not members of CSTC.
The functioning of a band is controlled by the Indian Act, the legislation that defines the position of status Indians. The band government is controlled by a chief and council. The number of councilors is determined by the number of band members, with a minimum of two in addition to the Chief. The Indian Act specifies procedures for the election of the chief and council. However, some bands make use of a provision that allows them to exempt themselves from these requirements in order to follow traditional procedures for the choice of leaders. This is a matter of controversy. Proponents argue that it allows First Nations to adapt the externally defined system to their traditions. Opponents argue that custom systems are frequently not traditional and that, traditional or not, they are unfair and undemocratic and have the effect of preserving the power of corrupt cliques and, in many cases, of excluding women.
Although the current policy of the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs is to treat band governments as largely autonomous, under the Indian Act Band Council Resolutions have no effect unless endorsed by the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs.
In addition to the chief and council system mandated by the Indian Act, some bands have a traditional system of government that retains considerable influence. In some cases the two systems have come to an accommodation. In other cases the two are in conflict.
A further complication is created by the existence of groups of Indian descent whose status is not recognized by Canada. These are often the descendants of bands considered by Canada to have become extinct. Such groups have no official existence but may nonetheless have some degree of political organization. The Sinixt of British Columbia are an example.
In addition to tribal councils and special-purpose service organizations, bands may form larger organizations. The largest is the Assembly of First Nations, which represents the chiefs of over 600 bands throughout Canada. There are also some regional organizations. The Chief of the AFN is referred to as the ''National Chief''. The AFN also has a Vice-Chief for each region.
In British Columbia, the First Nations Summit represents the approximately two-thirds of bands in the province that are engaged in treaty negotiations with Canada and British Columbia, while an older organization, the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, represents the bands that reject the current treaty process. Some bands belong to both. In Ontario, the Chiefs of Ontario serve as the provincial-level organization; in Saskatchewan, the provincial-level grouping is the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations.
From a constitutional point of view, not all indigenous people are First Nations people. In addition to Indians, the Constitution (section 35.2) recognizes two other indigenous groups: the Inuit and the Métis. The national organization of the Inuit is the Inuit Tapirisat of Canada. The self-governing territory of Nunavut is inhabited primarily by Inuit people. The status of the Métis remains unresolved but has been the subject of recent negotiations leading to the Métis Nation Framework Agreement between various Métis organizations and Canada.

Contents

See also

External links

See also

★ List of First Nations governments

★ Indian Act

External links

★ Assembly of First Nations

★ Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians

★ Chiefs of Ontario

★ Department of Indian and Northern Affairs

★ First Nations of Treaty 3

★ First Nations Summit (British Columbia)

★ Institute for Indigenous Government

★ Inuit Tapirisaat of Canada

★ Metis Nation Framework Agreement

★ Nishnawbe-Aski Nation

★ Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs

★ Union of Ontario Indians