In
macro-economics the term
infrastructure usually refers to
public infrastructure. That is, that which provides or supports
state services. There is also 'firm-specific infrastructure' such as factories, private roads, capital equipment, and other
infrastructural capital assets under
private ownership.
The related term "
firm-specific human capital" applies to the development of
individual capital,
social capital and
instructional capital to specifically enable the activities of a particular firm or enterprise.
May be critical
So-called
critical infrastructure includes some public and some firm-specific assets, for example, a private
electric power utility would include assets such as
transmission towers and
transformers. For purposes of determining if they are "critical", it is their function, not their ownership, that matters.
Types of infrastructure
Information technology
Special terminology has evolved to deal with infrastructure that is devoted to information and communication. In this area in particular,
public infrastructure may rely on a large number of private operators, e.g.
Internet service providers,
telcos,
computer support and
boot image service providers. The management of these assets is usually described in terms like:
★
total cost of ownership and
of operations
★
technology lifecycle management
★
information technology asset management
★
supply chain management
★
technology deployment methodology
★
service level agreement
According to Harry Zarek, a Canadian
systems integration expert, these and "many other concepts are important to running a modern technology infrastructure." Such assets all would be considered 'firm-specific infrastructure.'
Accounting treatment
Accounting for firm-specific infrastructure investment varies by
jurisdiction. The
GAAP framework is the most generally applied, though not followed everywhere.
One focus of
accounting reform efforts is to match
Capital Cost Allowance for
asset depreciation to either actual, or desirable,
asset lifecycle of each type of asset. There are numerous tradeoffs in policy including the dangers of encouraging
waste if assets too easily become a "
writeoff", or failing to keep up with the technology of a rapidly changing
industrial base.
With respect to information technology in particular this is a cogent concern, as
toxic e-waste is becoming an increasing problem everywhere
computers and
cell phones are used.
In
Canada the rapid writeoff of new technology has been linked to the goal of
sustainability, so that only those assets which aid in
energy conservation,
materials conservation and
waste reduction quality for favourable accounting treatment. ''With respect to public infrastructure, this goal is being pursued a different way - via
best practice exchange in
sustainable municipal infrastructure, and
government performance auditing.''