Member Login
Username:Password:
or Sign up here
Discover

FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO

The 'farebox recovery ratio' of a passenger transportation system is the proportion of the amount of revenue generated through fares by its paying customers as a fraction of the cost of its total operating expenses. Most systems aren't self-supporting, so advertising revenue and government subsidies are usually required to cover costs. The Hong Kong MTR Corporation is one of the few self-supporting transit systems in the world.

Contents
Need for government subsidy
Farebox ratios around the world
Notes

Need for government subsidy


There are several practical reasons for government subsidies of public transit. By subsidizing mass transit, it encourages ridership and subsequently lowers traffic congestion. Another benefit is lowering pollution from single occupant vehicles that are no longer on the roads. The third benefit is reducing infrastructure costs needed to build and maintain more street, highway, and freeway lanes associated with increased traffic congestion. These factors considered together also contribute to a better quality of life as defined by global quality of living measurements. [1]
However, some argue that there would be no need to subsidize mass transit if gasoline (petroleum) were not also subsidized. In 1965, the landmark "Urban Transportation Problem" by John Meyers argued that the urban transportation problem was actually a pricing problem. Consumers do not pay the actual cost for congestion and the government subsidizes all modes. This creates a modal imbalance between all modes but particularly between subsidized urban highways and transit. from A study by the International Center for Technology Assessment found that after accounting for government subsidies, pollution cleanup and other costs, the real price of gasoline is estimated to be somewhere between and per gallon.[2] Were gasoline sold within this range of prices, people might voluntarily drive less, choose more fuel-efficient vehicles, and use mass transit.

Farebox ratios around the world


The following table lists farebox ratios for some public transportation systems around the world.
Ratio of fares to operating costs for public transport systems (%)
System Ratio Year
Europe
Brussels 28% 1991[3]
Copenhagen 52% 19913
London Underground 84% 19913
Milan 28% 19913
Munich 42% 19913
RATP (Paris) 43% 19913
Stockholm 30% 19913
Vienna 50% 19913
Zurich 66% 19913
Japan
Osaka (Hankyu Railway) 123% 19913
Osaka (OMTB) 137% 19913
Teito RTA (now Tokyo Metro) 170% 19913
North America
Atlanta (MARTA) 32.3% 2006[4]
Bay Area (BART) 56% 2005[5]
Chicago (CTA) 44.3% 2002[6]
Edmonton, Canada (ETS) 39.4% 2007 [7]
Cleveland (GCRTA) 21.5% 20026
Detroit (DDOT) 13.9% 2002[8]
Los Angeles (LACMTA) 30.6% 2004[9]
Las Vegas Monorail 56.0% 2006[10]
Maryland (MTA) 26.3% 20026
Massachusetts Bay (MBTA) 43.7% 20026
Miami-Dade Transit 16.1% 20026
Montreal (SMT) 57.1% 2006 [11]
New York City subway 67.3% 20026
Ottawa(OC) 43.2% 2007 [12]
New York/New Jersey (PATH) 41.0% 20026
Philadelphia (SEPTA) 58.6% 20026
Philadelphia/New Jersey (PATCO) 61.4% 20026
Staten Island Railway 15.2% 20026
Toronto Transit Commission 74.5% 2005 [13]
Washington, DC (WMATA) 61.6% 20026

Notes


1. http://www.mercerhr.com/summary.jhtml?idContent=1173370>Mercer Human Resources Consulting QOL Reports c2005
2. http://www.icta.org/doc/Real%20Price%20of%20Gasoline.pdf
3. http://www.jrtr.net/jrtr29/pdf/f12_sho.pdf
4. MARTA FY2006 annual report
5. http://www.bart.gov/docs/AR2005.txt BART 2005 Annual Report
6. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1215/is_7_205/ai_n6150069
7. http://www.edmonton.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_280_218_0_43/http%3B/CMSServer/COEWeb/getting+around/about+ets/2007+ETS+Operating+Budget.htm
8. http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/pubs/dt/2002/PDF_files/2002_Table_26.pdf
9. http://www.mta.net/about_us/finance/pdf/sandp2004.htm Standard & Poors Credit Rating 2004
10. Calculation based on figures of "9,000 needed daily to cover operating costs and debt service" and "falling as much as ,000 a day short". Monorail rating, ridership go down: Bleak outlook puts bond sale at risk Omar Sofradzija
11. http://www.stcum.qc.ca/English/en-bref/a-rapfin06.pdf
12. http://www.octranspo.com/admin/Facts_Figures/Facts_funding.htm
13. http://www.toronto.ca/ttc/pdf/ttc_annual_report_2005.pdf


This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.