Discover

Executive (government) Search Results

Executive (government) Companies

No directory listings found matching your search. Do you want to submit your listing?

Executive (government) Articles

Executive (government) Trips

No trips found for Executive (government)

Executive (government) Videos

Cheney's Secret Government: Rahm Emanuel vs. Dick Cheney
Raw Story: Democrats plan to cut Cheney out of executive funding bill Following Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion that his office is not a part of the executive branch of the US government, Democratic Caucus Chairman Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) plans to introduce an amendment to the the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill to cut funding for Cheney's office. The amendment to the bill that sets the funding for the executive branch will be considered next week in the House of Representatives. http://nogibbons.blogspot.com
Schoolhouse Rock - Three-Ring Government
The 3 branches of the US Government: Executive, Legislative, Judiciary established in the US Constitution on Sept 17, 1787! '70s learnin' music video cartoons! (below the video, look for a 'VIDEO RESPONSE' to my next Schoolhouse Rock video! :-)
Red Beckman 8 - IRS Unconstitutional Under the Executive Bra
revolutionmarch.com *THIS VIDEO LECTURE (12 parts total) IS A MUST SEE FOR ALL PEOPLE TRYING TO GET OUR GOVERNMENT BACK TO FOLLOWING THE CONSTIUTION (less or no taxes, real money, limited government, etc.) This particular segment covers: • Grand Jury is supposed to ENFORCE the GOVERNMENT for we the people • WHY IS THE IRS under the EXECUTIVE branch when the Constitution gave the power to tax to Congress??? • How things would be much better if the IRS was within the Legislative Branch
FEMA Presidential Executive Orders List & Directive 51
A brief summary of presidential directives, executive orders, and congressionaly approved bills that where signed into law over the last 40ish years. And no, this isn't a bunch of conspiracy nonsense. They are simply facts. It spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress , only members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain" around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979. Operation Cable Splicer, Garden Plot, and REX 84 (short for Readiness Exercise 1984) are programs long on the shelf, awaiting the appropriate "disaster" to be taken down and implemented. Garden Plot is a program designed to control the population, while Cable Splicer is a program engineered for an orderly takeover of state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and will head up operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation, and include the following: 10990 (allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports), 10995 (allows the government to seize and control the communication media), 10997 (allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals), 10998 (allows the government to take over all food resources and farms), 11000 (allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision), 11001 (allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions), 11002 (designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons), 11003 (allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft), 11004 (allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations) and 11005 (allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities). More recently, the National Defense Authorization Act, under Sect. 1042, allows the use of "the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies" and explicitly gives the executive the power to invoke martial law -- in other words, kiss Posse Comitatus good-bye. For the first time in more than a century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order," Lewis Seiler and Dan Hamburg wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle in February. Add to this the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and National Security Presidential Directive 51, allowing for "continuity of government" in the event of what NSPD-5 vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency," and the framework is in place for the imposition of martial law. As a recent example of the sort of activity FEMA is engaged in, as they tell flood victims in the Midwest to fend for themselves, consider the $22 million per year the agency has spent "on a terror training program within a real town in New Mexico where helicopters buzz overhead in the middle of the night, mock nuclear explosions are drilled and 'suicide bombers' are taken down by SWAT teams who pull citizens out of their homes," writes Steve Watson. The Associated Press (see video) deems such events "unthinkable," and indeed they are, while floods and hurricanes are a reality. FEMA has very little to do with the sort of natural disasters the people of Iowa, Wisconsin, and Indiana are currently experiencing and everything to do with martial law, thus DHS boss Chertoff's satisfaction "with the federal response to the massive Midwest flooding" is little more than a dog and pony show, a public relations gimmick slapped over the real face of FEMA.
Freedom of the Press at the White House
How free is the press today, and what did the founders intend? Come along with OTN on location at the Executive House and see how police respond to a film crew not approved by the state. Want more details? Check out the report this story is based upon here: http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/ustreas/usss/t1pubrpt.html
THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION By the President of the United States of America: A PROCLAMATION Whereas on the 22nd day of September, A.D. 1862, a proclamation was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, the following, to wit: "That on the 1st day of January, A.D. 1863, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom. "That the executive will on the 1st day of January aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the States and parts of States, if any, in which the people thereof, respectively, shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State or the people thereof shall on that day be in good faith represented in the Congress of the United States by members chosen thereto at elections wherein a majority of the qualified voters of such States shall have participated shall, in the absence of strong countervailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such State and the people thereof are not then in rebellion against the United States." Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested as Commander-In-Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for supressing said rebellion, do, on this 1st day of January, A.D. 1863, and in accordance with my purpose so to do, publicly proclaimed for the full period of one hundred days from the first day above mentioned, order and designate as the States and parts of States wherein the people thereof, respectively, are this day in rebellion against the United States the following, to wit: Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana (except the parishes of St. Bernard, Palquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James, Ascension, Assumption, Terrebone, Lafourche, St. Mary, St. Martin, and Orleans, including the city of New Orleans), Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia (except the forty-eight counties designated as West Virginia, and also the counties of Berkeley, Accomac, Morthhampton, Elizabeth City, York, Princess Anne, and Norfolk, including the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth), and which excepted parts are for the present left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued. And by virtue of the power and for the purpose aforesaid, I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States and parts of States are, and henceforward shall be, free; and that the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons. And I hereby enjoin upon the people so declared to be free to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defence; and I recommend to them that, in all case when allowed, they labor faithfully for reasonable wages. And I further declare and make known that such persons of suitable condition will be received into the armed service of the United States to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service. And upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind and the gracious favor of Almighty God.
10 Most Wanted: Joe Cassano HQ - AIG Executive Junket Scandal Wall Street Bail Out
CNN - Anderson Cooper 360 segment profiling the 10 most wanted culprits of the collapse; people who greatly contributed to the country's financial crisis. The first name on the list is Joe Cassano of AIG. AIG received an $85 billion government bailout recently, and now they are getting another $35 billion. Meanwhile the executives are living it up at luxury retreats and spa treatments. And while his company is borrowing money from the government to prevent bankruptcy Joe Cassano is drawing a million dollar a month salary. I think this will be a great series. We need to put faces on these crooks so they don't end up as our next secretary of treasury. SUBSCRIBE FOR HIGH QUALITY ELECTION COVERAGE!
Hong Kong Chief Sorry for Cultural Revolution comment
Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang is sorry for his comment comparing democracy to Cultural Revolution. Host : I was struck by one phrase at the end of the policy address, towards the end of the conclusion, you say, we promote democratic development without compromising social stability or government efficiency, that kind of implies that democratic development does compromise social stability or government efficiency? ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Donald Tsang : It can, it can, if we go to the extreme, people go to the extreme, and you have a cultural revolution, for instance, in China. When people take everything into their hands, then you cannot govern the place. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Host : But Cultural Revolution wasn't really an extreme example of democracy. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Donald Tsang : What is it? People taking power into their own hands! Now, this is what it means by democracy, if you take it to the full swing. In other democracies, even if you have an elected person, then you overturn the policy in California, for instance, you have initiative number, number, number what, then you overturn policy taken by the government, that's not necessarily conducive to efficient government. Tsang apologises over Cultural Revolution remarks 2007-10-13 HKT 16:22 The Chief Executive, Donald Tsang, has issued an apology for remarks he made during a radio interview suggesting that the Cultural Revolution was an extreme form of democracy. Mr Tsang's initial comments prompted widespread criticism. In a statement Mr Tsang said he was very sorry that he'd made an inappropriate remark concerning the Cultural Revolution and he wished to retract it. He said Hong Kong people treasure democracy and hope to implement universal suffrage as soon as possible, adding that he shared the same aspirations. Mr Tsang reiterated that he would honour the pledge he made in Wednesday's Policy Address to do his utmost in resolving the question of universal suffrage during his current term. http://www.rthk.org.hk/rthk/news/englishnews/news.htm?englishnews&20071013&56&438734
What the government doesn't want you to know
This is a video about the upcoming martial law, executive orders that support it, and concentration camps. The question mark at end of vid about the family relations was accidental--it wasn't a question, it was a statement. Hope you also check the video that is in response to this one. It is about the Bush family tree. They are all related. You might want to turn the volume down a little and might have to pause on a couple of pages. I recommend you check out the video that responds to this one and the one that this one responds to. The one that responds to this one shows you Bush family tree or should it be called the Bush family bush? New article about detention camps: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20288.htm
new executive order 13438 you have no rights
july 17 2007 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html how do you feel about losing everything simply because you disagree with your government?