The 'Epistle to the Hebrews' (abbr. 'Heb' for
citations) is one of the books in the
New Testament. Though traditionally credited to the
Apostle Paul, the letter is anonymous and most modern scholars, both conservative and critical, believe its author was not Paul himself but some other member of his
Pauline community.
The letter has carried its traditional title since
Tertullian described it as ''Barnabae titulus ad Hebraeos'' in ''De Pudicitia'' chapter 20 ("Barnabas's Letter to the Hebrews".)
Authorship

Paul of Tarsus, the traditional author, as dipicted by
Rembrandt. Most scholars today do not believe Paul was the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, which was written anonymously.
Main articles: Authorship of the Pauline Epistles
The author of Hebrews is not known. The text as it has been passed down to the present time is internally anonymous, though ancient title headings often attribute it to the Apostle Paul.
[1] However, even in antiquity doubts were raised about Paul's alleged authorship. The reasons for this controversy are fairly plain. For example, his letters always contain an introduction stating authorship, yet Hebrews includes none such. Also, while much of its theology and teachings may be considered
Pauline, it contains many other ideas which seem to have no such root or influence. Moreover, the writing style is substantially different from that of Paul's authentic epistles, a characteristic first noticed by
Clement (c. 210). In particular, Hebrews claims to have been written by a person who received the Christian message from others,
[2] while in his letter to the Galatians Paul forcefully defends his claim that he received his gospel directly from the
resurrected Jesus himself.
Nevertheless, in the fourth century, the church largely agreed to include Hebrews as the fourteenth letter of Paul.
Jerome and
Augustine of Hippo were influential in affirming Paul's authorship,
[3] and the Church affirmed this authorship until the Reformation.
In response to the doubts raised about Paul's involvement, other possible authors were suggested as early as the third century A.D.
Origen (c. 240) suggested that either
Luke the Evangelist or
Clement of Rome might be the author.
[4] Tertullian proposed Paul's companion
Barnabas. (Barnabas, to whom other noncanonical works are attributed (such as
Epistle of Barnabas), was close to Paul in his ministry, and exhibited skill with midrash of Hebrew Scripture; the other works attributed to him bolster the case for his authorship of Hebrews with similar style, voice, and skill.)
Martin Luther proposed
Apollos, an Alexandrian (Acts 18:24), "a learned man" (Acts 18:24), popular in Corinth (1 Cor 1:12), and adept at using the scriptures and arguing for Christianity while "refuting the Jews" (Acts 18:27–28). In more recent times, some scholars have advanced a case for the authorship of Hebrews belonging to
Priscilla or
Silas.
In general, the evidence against Pauline authorship is too solid for scholarly dispute. Donald Guthrie, in his ''New Testament Introduction'' (1976), commented that "most modern writers find more difficulty in imagining how this Epistle was ever attributed to Paul than in disposing of the theory".
[5] Harold Attridge tells us that "it is certainly not a work of the apostle";
[6] Daniel Wallace simply states, "the arguments against Pauline authorship, however, are conclusive".
[7] As a result, few supporters of Pauline authorship remain. As Richard Heard notes, in his ''Introduction To The New Testament'', "modern critics have confirmed that the epistle cannot be attributed to Paul and have for the most part agreed with Origen’s judgement, ‘But as to who wrote the epistle, God knows the truth’".
[8]

The King James Bible 1611 ed. ends the Epistle to the Hebrews with "Written to the Hebrewes, from Italy, by Timothie"
Audience
Hebrews was written to a specific audience facing very specific circumstances. We can discern various facts about the recipients of Hebrews through a careful mirror reading of the letter:
★ The original readers of the letter were conversant in the
Septuagint translation of the Old Testament, as the author's usage shows.
★ The contrast in 13:14 and the types of sins listed in chapter 13 suggest they lived in a city.
★ They had once faced persecution (10:32–34), but not to the point of shedding blood (12:4). It is possible that 12:1–3 and 13:12–13 imply that they would soon face renewed opposition.
★ Some had stopped assembling together because of persecution (10:25).
★ As the author saw it, at least some among them were being tempted to avoid severe persecution by "shrinking back" [10:32-39] from the eschatalogical fulfilment of the true hope and faith of the Old Testament proclaimed by the apostolic witness to Jesus Christ. It is debated whether the anticipated persecution was from secular (i.e., Roman) authorities or Jewish authorities. Perhaps there were elements of both, or as we see elsewhere in the New Testament, the Jewish authorities may have stirred up the secular authorities to suppress the Christians. The author exhorted them to encourage "love and good works" (10:24) and warned them that if they "sin willfully" by denying Jesus' sacrifice it will become ineffective for them(26). But for non-Jews, these loving actions are sufficient for "great recompence of reward" (35) as long as they "hold fast the profession of our faith [in Jesus] without wavering" (23), and thus do not need to convert to Judaism.
★ In 13:24 the author says that those from Italy greet the readers. This could mean that the author is writing from Italy or that the author is writing to recipients in Italy, and that Italians present with the author are greeting those back home.
Traditional scholars have argued the letter's audience was
Jewish Christians, as early as the end of the second century (hence its title, "The Epistle to the Hebrews"). However, Hebrews is part of an internal New Testament debate between the extreme
Judaizers (who argued that non-Jews must
convert to Judaism before they can receive the Holy Spirit of Jesus's Jewish covenant) versus the extreme
lawless ones (who argued that Jews must reject God's commandments and that God's eternal
Torah was no longer in effect). Peter and Paul represent the moderates of each faction, respectively. The Epistle emphasizes non-Jewish followers of Jesus do not need to convert to Judaism to share in all of God's promises to Jews. Liberal American theologian
Edgar Goodspeed notes, "But the writer's Judaism is not actual and objective, but literary and academic, manifestly gained from the reading of the
Septuagint Greek version of the Jewish scriptures, and his polished Greek style would be a strange vehicle for a message to
Aramaic-speaking Jews or Christians of Jewish blood."
Hebrews is often erroneously named as one of the
general (or catholic) epistles. But since it was written to a specific group of Jewish-Christians, it is not technically a general epistle.
Date
Although the author is unknown, Hebrews has been dated to shortly after the
Pauline epistles were collected and began to circulate, c.
95. This date is dependent on a traditional date for ''
I Clement'' of
96.
Harold W. Attridge claims only a general dating is possible and places the letter as being written between
60 and
100.
Some, such as
John A.T. Robinson, place the entire New Testament at a much earlier date. Robinson argues, for example, that there is no textual evidence that the New Testament authors had knowledge of the destruction of the
Second Temple by the Romans in
70. The use of tabernacle terminology in Hebrews has been used to date the epistle before the
destruction of the temple, the idea being that knowing about the destruction of both Jerusalem and the temple would have influenced the development of his overall argument to include such evidence.
Purpose for writing
Most scholars today believe the document was written to prevent apostasy. (
Apostasy is the abandonment of a political or religious belief.) Some have interpreted apostasy to mean a number of different things, such as a group of Christians in one sect leaving for another more conservative sect, one in which the author disapproves. Some have seen apostasy as a move from the Christian assembly to pagan ritual. In light of a possibly Jewish-Christian audience, the apostasy in this sense may be in regard to Jewish-Christians leaving the Christian assembly to return to the synagogue. In light of Pauline doctrine, the epistle dissuades non-Jewish Christians from feeling a need to convert to Judaism. Therefore the author writes, "Let us hold fast to our confession" (Heb 4:14).
The Bible's Epistle to the Hebrews affirms
special creation. It affirms that God by His Son, Jesus Christ, made the worlds. " God...hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son...by whom also he made the worlds" (Hebrews 1:1-2). The epistle also states that the worlds themselves do not provide the evidence of how God formed them. "Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the Word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear" (Hebrews 11:3).
According to the
Catholic Encyclopedia: Epistle to the Hebrews:
:"... the Epistle opens with the solemn announcement of the superiority of the
New Testament Revelation by the Son over
Old Testament Revelation by the
prophets (). It then proves and explains from the Scriptures the superiority of this
New Covenant over the Old by the comparison of the Son with the
angels as
mediators of the
Old Covenant (), with
Moses and
Josue as the founders of the Old Covenant (), and, finally, by opposing the high-priesthood of Christ after the order of
Melchisedech to the
Levitical priesthood after the order of
Aaron ()."
Style
Hebrews is a very consciously "literary" document. The purity of its Greek was noted by
Clement of Alexandria, according to
Eusebius (''Historia Eccl.'', VI, xiv), and
Origen asserted that every competent judge must recognize a great difference between this epistle and Paul's (Eusebius, VI, xxv).
This letter consists of two strands: an expositional or doctrinal strand (1:1–14; 2:5–18; 5:1–14; 6:13–9:28; 13:18–25), and a hortatory or ethical strand which punctuates the exposition parenthetically at key points as warnings to the readers (2:1–4; 3:1–4:16; 6:1–12; 10:1–13:17).
Hebrews does not fit the form of a traditional
Hellenistic epistle, lacking a proper prescript. Modern scholars generally believe this book was originally a sermon or homily, although possibly modified after it was delivered to include the travel plans, greetings and closing (13:20-25).
[10]
Hebrews contains many references to the
Old Testament—specifically to its
Septuagint text. It has been regarded as a treatise supplementary to the
Romans and
Galatians, and as a kind of commentary on the book of
Leviticus and
Temple worship in general.
See also
★
Authorship of the Pauline epistles
★
Sermon on the Mount#Interpretation
★
Antinomianism
★
Justification by Faith
★
Antilegomena
References
1. A number of mss., namely the earliest extant (P46), bear the title of simply, "To the Hebrews," without Paul's name.
2. Heb 2:3–4
3. Lane, William L. ''Hebrews 1-8'' (Word Biblical Commentary Vol. 47A. Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1991), Introduction page cliv.
4. Eusebius, Church History 6.25.11-14
5. http://www.experiencegrace.com/Authorship_of_Hebrews.html Jeffrey S. Bowman, "The Authorship of the Book of Hebrews"
6. http://earlychristianwritings.com/hebrews.html Peter Kirby, EarlyChristianWritings.com
7. http://web.archive.org/web/20000830073548/http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/hebotl.htm Daniel Wallace, "Hebrews: Introduction, Argument and Outline"
8. http://religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=531&C=563 Richard Heard, ''Introduction To The New Testament''
9. See also Antithesis of the Law.
10. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, , Bart D., Ehrman, Oxford, 2004, ISBN 0-19-515462-2
Further reading
★ Attridge, Harold W. ''Hebrews''. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1989.
★ Hagen, Kenneth. ''Hebrews Commenting from Erasmus to Beze''. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1981.
★ Heen, Erik M. and Krey, Philip D.W., eds. ''Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: Hebrews''. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2005.
★ Hughes, P.E. ''A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews''. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1977.
★ Guthrie, Donald ''The Letter to the Hebrews''. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1983
★ Phillips, John ''Exploring Hebrews (Revised)''. Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1977, 1988
★ Lane, William L. ''Hebrews 1-8''. Word Biblical Commentary Vol. 47A. Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1991.
★ Lane, William L. ''Hebrews 9-13''. Word Biblical Commentary Vol. 47B. Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1991.
★ M'Cheyne, Robert Murray
'The Glory of the Christian Dispensation' (Hebrews 8 & 9)
Diggory Press, 2007, ISBN 978-1846857034
External links
Online translations of the Epistle to the Hebrews:
★
''Online Bible'' at GospelHall.org
Related articles:
★
Goodspeed's introductory analysis of ''Hebrews'', 1908 at earlychristianwritings.com
★
Catholic Encyclopedia: Epistle to the Hebrews: "... the Epistle opens with the solemn announcement of the superiority of the
New Testament Revelation by the Son over
Old Testament Revelation by the
prophets (). It then proves and explains from the Scriptures the superiority of this
New Covenant over the Old by the comparison of the Son with the
angels as
mediators of the
Old Covenant (), with
Moses and
Josue as the founders of the Old Covenant (), and, finally, by opposing the high-priesthood of Christ after the order of
Melchisedech to the
Levitical priesthood after the order of
Aaron ()."
★
''Easton's Bible Dictionary'' 1897: Epistle to the Hebrews
★
Holiness in Hebrews by Wayne McCown
★
''Biblaridjgf,ghjvnmion magazine'': A critical examination of the destination, authorship and dating of the Epistle to the Hebrews
★
Hebrews from the Biblical Resource Database
★
Eusebius' Church History 3.3.5 includes comment by
Eusebius on canonicity of Hebrews and also extensive note by
Philip Schaff on topic
★
Encyclopedia Britannica: Hebrews, Epistle to the