'Environmental Management' is not, as the phrase could suggest, the management of the ''environment'' as such but rather the management of the humankind's interaction with and impact upon the environment. The three main issues that affect managers are issues involving politics (networking), programs (projects), and resources (i.e. money, facilities, etc). The need for environmental management can be viewed from a variety of perspectives. A more common philosophy and impetus behind environmental management is the concept of
carrying capacity. Simply put, carrying capacity refers to the maximum number of organisms a particular resource can sustain. The concept of carrying capacity, whilst understood by many cultures over history, has its roots in Malthusian theory. A common example of the consequences of exceeding the carrying capacity of an area is the starvation and eventual cannibalism of tribes on the Easter Islands after the depletion of the island's resources. Environmental management is therefore not the conservation of the environment solely for the environment's sake, but rather the conservation of the environment for humankind's sake. This element of sustainable exploitation, getting the most out of natural assets, is visible in the EU
Water Framework Directive.
Environmental management involves the management of all components of the bio-physical environment, both living (biotic) and non-living (abiotic). This is due to the interconnected and network of relationships amongst all living species and their habitats. The environment also involves the relationships of the human environment, such as the social, cultural and economic environment with the bio-physical environment.
As with all management functions, effective management tools, standards and systems are required. An 'environmental management standard or system or protocol attempts to reduce
environmental impact as measured by some objective criteria. The
ISO 14001 standard is the most widely used standard for environmental
risk management and is closely aligned to the European Eco Management & Audit Scheme (EMAS). As a common auditing standard, the
ISO 19011 standard explains how to combine this with
quality management. The UK has developed a phased standard (BS8555) that can help smaller companies move to ISO 14001 in six manageable steps.
Other
environmental management systems tend to be based on this standard and to extend it in various ways:
★
The Natural Step focuses on basic
sustainability criteria and helps focus
engineering on reducing use of materials or energy use that is unsustainable in the long term
★
Natural Capitalism advises using
accounting reform and a general
biomimicry and
industrial ecology approach to do the same thing
★
US Environmental Protection Agency has many further terms and standards that it defines as appropriate to large-scale EMS.
★ The
UN and
World Bank has encouraged adopting a "
natural capital" measurement and management framework.
★ The
European Union Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)
Other strategies exist that rely on making simple distinctions rather than building top-down management "systems" using
performance audits and
full cost accounting. For instance,
Ecological Intelligent Design divides products into
consumables,
service products or durables and
unsaleables - toxic products that no one should buy, or in many cases, do not realize they are buying. By eliminating the unsaleables from the
comprehensive outcome of any purchase, better environmental management is achieved without "systems".
Academic resources
★ ''Journal of Environmental Planning and Management'', ISSN 1360-0559 (electronic) ISSN 0964-0568 (paper), Routledge
See also
★
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
★
Department of Environmental Management
★
Environmental impact assessment
★
Environmental management scheme
★
Environmental Risk Management Authority
★
Environmental Quality Management
★
ISO 14000
★
ISO 19011
★
ISO Guide 64
★
List of environmental studies topics