'Edward Lowth Badeley' (
1803/
4 –
29 March,
1868) was an
English ecclesiastical lawyer, a member of the
Oxford Movement, who was involved in some of the most notorious cases of the
nineteenth century
Early life
Edward was the younger son of John Badeley
MD and his wife, Charlotte ''née'' Brackenbury of
Chelmsford. He
graduated from
Brasenose College, Oxford in
1823, took his
MA in
1828 and was
called to the bar by the
Inner Temple in
1841.
[1]
He started to practise on the home circuit but was attracted by ecclesiastical law. Badeley had met
John Henry Newman in
1837 and become a follower soon after. He soon became associated with fellow
Anglo-Catholic lawyers
James Hope-Scott and
Edward Bellasis in defending "
Tractarianism".
In
1848 he appeared for the objectors to the appointment of
Renn Dickson Hampden as
Bishop of Hereford. In
1949, a
commission had been established to review the prohibition of marriage with a deceased wife's sister, a practice that was to remain unlawful in the
UK until the
Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907. Badeley made a submission, communicated by
Edward Bouverie Pusey opposing any change in the law.
The Gorham judgment
Badeley appeared for
Henry Phillpotts,
Bishop of Exeter before the
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council when
George Cornelius Gorham appealed against Phillpotts' refusal to confirm him in the
benefice of
Brampford Speke. The Privy Council overturned the Bishop's ruling, confirming Gorham in his living, and were seen to impose secular over canon authority, causing a great scandal in some quarters. In the summer of
1850, Badeley,
Henry Manning and 12 other prominent
Anglicans called upon the
Church of England to repudiate the views that the Privy Council had expressed on
baptism. There was no response from the Church and Badeley was one of many when he joined the
Roman Catholic Church in
1852.
Later life
Badeley was assistant counsel to
Sir Alexander Cockburn in Newman's defence when he was
prosecuted for
libel by
Giacinto Achilli in 1852. Badeley frequently advised Newman on legal matters therafter, advising that Newman reject
Charles Kingsley's partial withdrawal of his satirical jibe that
Newman cared little for truth and encouraging him to write the ''
Apologia Pro Vita Sua'' in response.
Much of his later practice concerned
trusts and
charities. In
1865, in the
Constance Kent case, he argued, against settled opinion, that the principle of
priest-penitent privilege applied in
English law.
[2]
He maintained a life-long friendship and correspondence with Hope-Scott and his family and Newman dedicated his ''Verses on Various Occasions'' to him as gratitude for his support in the Achilli trial. Badeley died at his chambers at
3 Paper Buildings in the Inner Temple.
References
1. Courtney (2004)
2. Badeley (1865)
Bibliography
★
The Privilege of Religious Confessions in English Courts of Justice Considered, in a Letter to a Friend, Badeley, E., , , Butterworths, 1865,
★ Courtney, W. P. (2004) "Badeley, Edward Lowth (1803/4–1868)", rev. G. Martin Murphy, ''
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography'', Oxford University Press,
accessed 22 July 2007 (subscription required)