العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolDONATIST
(Redirected from Donatism)
The 'Donatists' (founded by the Berber Christian Donatus Magnus) were followers of a belief considered a heresy by the broader churches of the Catholic tradition. They lived in the Roman province of Africa and flourished in the fourth and fifth centuries.
The primary disagreement between Donatists and the rest of the early Christian church was over the treatment of those who renounced their faith during the persecution of Roman emperor Diocletian (303–305), a disagreement that had implications both for the Church's understanding of the Sacrament of Penance and of the other sacraments in general.
The rest of the Church was far more forgiving of these people than the Donatists were. The Donatists refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the persecution. Many church leaders had gone so far as to turn Christians over to Roman authorities and had handed over sacred religious texts to authorities to be publicly burned. These people were called 'traditors' ("people who had handed over"). These 'traditors' had returned to positions of authority under Constantine I, and the Donatists proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by these priests and bishops were invalid.
The first question, therefore, was whether the Sacrament of Penance can effect a reconciliation whereby the apostate, or in some cases specifically the 'traditor', may be returned to full communion. The Catholic position was that the sacrament was for precisely such cases, though at the time the Church still followed the discipline of public penance whereby a penitent for such a grievous offense would spend years, even decades, first outside the doors of the church begging for the prayers of those entering, then kneeling inside the church building during services, then standing with the congregation, and finally receiving the Eucharist again in a long progress toward full reconciliation. The Donatists held that such a crime, after the forgiveness of Baptism, rendered one unfit for further membership in the Church, a position of extreme rigorism.
The second question was the validity of sacraments confected by priests and bishops who had been apostates under the persecution. The Donatists held that all such sacraments were invalid: by their sinful act, such clerics had rendered themselves incapable of celebrating valid sacraments. This is known as: 'ex opere operantis' - Latin for 'from the work of the one doing the working,' that is, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the worthiness and holiness of the minister confecting it. The Catholic position was (and is): 'ex opere operato' - 'from the work having been worked', in other words, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the holiness of God, the minister being a mere instrument of God's work, so that any priest or bishop, even one in a state of mortal sin, who speaks the formula of the sacrament with valid matter and the intent of causing the sacrament to occur acts validly. Hence, to the Donatists, a priest who had been an apostate but who repented could speak the words of consecration forever, but he could no longer confect the Eucharist. To the Catholics, a person who received the Eucharist from the hands of even an unrepentant sinning priest still received Christ's Body and Blood, their own sacramental life being undamaged by the priest's faults.
As a result, many towns were divided between Donatist and non-Donatist congregations. The sect had particularly developed and grown in northern Africa. Constantine, as emperor, began to get involved in the dispute, and in 314 he called a Council at Arles; the issue was debated and the decision went against the Donatists. The Donatists refused to accept the decision of the council, their distaste for bishops who had collaborated with Rome came out of their broader view of the Roman empire.
After the Constantinian shift, when other Christians accepted the emperor as a leader in the church, the Donatists continued to see the emperor as the devil. In particular, the birth of the Donatist movement came out of opposition to the appointment of Caecilianus as bishop of Carthage in 312, because of his pro-government stance. In 317 Constantine sent troops to deal with the Donatists in Carthage, for the first time Christian persecuting Christian. It resulted in banishments and even executions. It failed completely and Constantine had to withdraw and cancel the persecutions in 321.
More laws against the Donatists were issued by Valentinian I, after the defeat of the Donatist usurper Firmus in Northern Africa.
Donatists were more than just an opposition movement. "The Donatist vision of the church included the following features: the church was a ‘mystical union of the righteous inspired by the Holy Spirit and instructed by the Bible’; discipleship was to be taken very seriously by all church members, so monasticism, whereby higher standards were expected of some than others, was rejected; repentance and readiness to suffer were key components in this, as was meditating on the Bible; the church was to be a people of joyful praise; the ministry of the Holy Spirit was emphasised; the agape meal was celebrated; and feasting as well as fasting was encouraged."[1] Anabaptists and other church traditions have looked to Donatists as historical predecessors because of their opposition to the union of state and church, their emphasis on discipleship and, in some cases, their commitment to nonviolence and social justice. Like those in the Radical Reformation in the 16th century, the Donatists saw the Catholics as impure and corrupted.
The Donatists also drew their beliefs from the writings of Tertullian and Cyprian.
St. Augustine of Hippo campaigned against this heterodox belief throughout his tenure as bishop of Hippo, and through his efforts the Catholic Church gained the upper hand. His view, which was also the majority view within the Church, was that it was the office of priest, not the personal character of the incumbent, that gave validity to the celebration of the sacraments.
In 409, Marcellinus of Carthage, Emperor Honorius's secretary of state, decreed the group heretical and demanded that they give up their churches. They were harshly persecuted by the Roman authorities, and even Augustine protested at their treatment.
Nevertheless, his successes were reversed when the Vandals conquered North Africa. Donatism survived the Vandal occupation and the Byzantine reconquest under Justinian I. It is unknown how long this belief persisted into the Muslim period, but some Christian historians believe the Donatist schism and the discord it caused in the Christian community made the military takeover of the region by Islam easier.[2]
★ Majorinus (311-315)
★ Donatus II Magnus (315-355; exiled 347)
★ Parmenianus (355-391)
★ Primian (391-393), 1st time
★ Maximianus (393-394)
★ Primian (394-''c.'' 400), 2nd time
During and after the Reformation, the word "Donatist" (sometimes "neo-Donatist") was commonly used by the magisterial reformers as an incriminating label to refer to the more radical reformers such as the Anabaptists. This usage is described at length in the first chapter of Leonard Verduin's book, ''The Reformers and Their Stepchildren'', ISBN 0-8028-3791-3. Confessional Lutherans are sometimes labeled ''Donatist'' by liberal Lutherans, as a reference to their doctrine of church-fellowship[3] and position that churches that deny that Jesus' true body and true blood are eaten do not celebrate a valid Lord's Supper.[4]
★ Agonistici, Donatists sent out to disseminate their doctrine
★ Patriarchate of Carthage
★ St. Cyprian
1. Murray, Stuart, The Donatists — A fairly in-depth article on the origins of the Donatists, their fluctuating fortunes between 317 and 535, and their beliefs.
2. See Concordia Cyclopedia: Donatism
3. See this classic exposition of the doctrine of church-fellowship
4. See What Constitutes A Valid Celebration Of The Lord’s Supper? by Paul W. Metzger
★ ''The Donatist Church: A Movement of Protest in Roman North Africa'', W. H. C. Frend (Oxford University Press, 1952) ISBN 0-19-826408-9.
★ ''The Bible in Christian North Africa: The Donatist World'', Maureen A. Tilley (Fortress Press, 1997) ISBN 0-8006-2880-2.
★ ''Donatist martyr stories: the Church in conflict in Roman North Africa''. Translated with notes and introduction by Maureen A. Tilley (Liverpool University Press, 1996) ISBN 0-85323-931-2.
★ ''This Holy Seed: Faith, Hope and Love in the Early Churches of North Africa'', Robin Daniel (Harpenden: Tamarisk Publications, 1993) ISBN 0-9520435-0-5.
★ Donatus & the Donatist Schism - List of primary and secondary sources on the Donatists.
★ Donatists in the Catholic Encyclopedia - goes into some detail about the politics in the early church that was the background for the rise and fall of Donatism.
★ Letter of Petilian the Donatist - Actual letter written by a Donatist leader. One of the few primary sources available from the Donastist affair.
The 'Donatists' (founded by the Berber Christian Donatus Magnus) were followers of a belief considered a heresy by the broader churches of the Catholic tradition. They lived in the Roman province of Africa and flourished in the fourth and fifth centuries.
| Contents |
| Donatist churches |
| Donatist bishops |
| Donatist bishops of Carthage |
| "Donatist" used as an epithet |
| See also |
| References |
| Bibliography |
| External links |
Donatist churches
The primary disagreement between Donatists and the rest of the early Christian church was over the treatment of those who renounced their faith during the persecution of Roman emperor Diocletian (303–305), a disagreement that had implications both for the Church's understanding of the Sacrament of Penance and of the other sacraments in general.
The rest of the Church was far more forgiving of these people than the Donatists were. The Donatists refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the persecution. Many church leaders had gone so far as to turn Christians over to Roman authorities and had handed over sacred religious texts to authorities to be publicly burned. These people were called 'traditors' ("people who had handed over"). These 'traditors' had returned to positions of authority under Constantine I, and the Donatists proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by these priests and bishops were invalid.
The first question, therefore, was whether the Sacrament of Penance can effect a reconciliation whereby the apostate, or in some cases specifically the 'traditor', may be returned to full communion. The Catholic position was that the sacrament was for precisely such cases, though at the time the Church still followed the discipline of public penance whereby a penitent for such a grievous offense would spend years, even decades, first outside the doors of the church begging for the prayers of those entering, then kneeling inside the church building during services, then standing with the congregation, and finally receiving the Eucharist again in a long progress toward full reconciliation. The Donatists held that such a crime, after the forgiveness of Baptism, rendered one unfit for further membership in the Church, a position of extreme rigorism.
The second question was the validity of sacraments confected by priests and bishops who had been apostates under the persecution. The Donatists held that all such sacraments were invalid: by their sinful act, such clerics had rendered themselves incapable of celebrating valid sacraments. This is known as: 'ex opere operantis' - Latin for 'from the work of the one doing the working,' that is, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the worthiness and holiness of the minister confecting it. The Catholic position was (and is): 'ex opere operato' - 'from the work having been worked', in other words, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the holiness of God, the minister being a mere instrument of God's work, so that any priest or bishop, even one in a state of mortal sin, who speaks the formula of the sacrament with valid matter and the intent of causing the sacrament to occur acts validly. Hence, to the Donatists, a priest who had been an apostate but who repented could speak the words of consecration forever, but he could no longer confect the Eucharist. To the Catholics, a person who received the Eucharist from the hands of even an unrepentant sinning priest still received Christ's Body and Blood, their own sacramental life being undamaged by the priest's faults.
As a result, many towns were divided between Donatist and non-Donatist congregations. The sect had particularly developed and grown in northern Africa. Constantine, as emperor, began to get involved in the dispute, and in 314 he called a Council at Arles; the issue was debated and the decision went against the Donatists. The Donatists refused to accept the decision of the council, their distaste for bishops who had collaborated with Rome came out of their broader view of the Roman empire.
After the Constantinian shift, when other Christians accepted the emperor as a leader in the church, the Donatists continued to see the emperor as the devil. In particular, the birth of the Donatist movement came out of opposition to the appointment of Caecilianus as bishop of Carthage in 312, because of his pro-government stance. In 317 Constantine sent troops to deal with the Donatists in Carthage, for the first time Christian persecuting Christian. It resulted in banishments and even executions. It failed completely and Constantine had to withdraw and cancel the persecutions in 321.
More laws against the Donatists were issued by Valentinian I, after the defeat of the Donatist usurper Firmus in Northern Africa.
Donatists were more than just an opposition movement. "The Donatist vision of the church included the following features: the church was a ‘mystical union of the righteous inspired by the Holy Spirit and instructed by the Bible’; discipleship was to be taken very seriously by all church members, so monasticism, whereby higher standards were expected of some than others, was rejected; repentance and readiness to suffer were key components in this, as was meditating on the Bible; the church was to be a people of joyful praise; the ministry of the Holy Spirit was emphasised; the agape meal was celebrated; and feasting as well as fasting was encouraged."[1] Anabaptists and other church traditions have looked to Donatists as historical predecessors because of their opposition to the union of state and church, their emphasis on discipleship and, in some cases, their commitment to nonviolence and social justice. Like those in the Radical Reformation in the 16th century, the Donatists saw the Catholics as impure and corrupted.
The Donatists also drew their beliefs from the writings of Tertullian and Cyprian.
St. Augustine of Hippo campaigned against this heterodox belief throughout his tenure as bishop of Hippo, and through his efforts the Catholic Church gained the upper hand. His view, which was also the majority view within the Church, was that it was the office of priest, not the personal character of the incumbent, that gave validity to the celebration of the sacraments.
In 409, Marcellinus of Carthage, Emperor Honorius's secretary of state, decreed the group heretical and demanded that they give up their churches. They were harshly persecuted by the Roman authorities, and even Augustine protested at their treatment.
Nevertheless, his successes were reversed when the Vandals conquered North Africa. Donatism survived the Vandal occupation and the Byzantine reconquest under Justinian I. It is unknown how long this belief persisted into the Muslim period, but some Christian historians believe the Donatist schism and the discord it caused in the Christian community made the military takeover of the region by Islam easier.[2]
Donatist bishops
Donatist bishops of Carthage
★ Majorinus (311-315)
★ Donatus II Magnus (315-355; exiled 347)
★ Parmenianus (355-391)
★ Primian (391-393), 1st time
★ Maximianus (393-394)
★ Primian (394-''c.'' 400), 2nd time
"Donatist" used as an epithet
During and after the Reformation, the word "Donatist" (sometimes "neo-Donatist") was commonly used by the magisterial reformers as an incriminating label to refer to the more radical reformers such as the Anabaptists. This usage is described at length in the first chapter of Leonard Verduin's book, ''The Reformers and Their Stepchildren'', ISBN 0-8028-3791-3. Confessional Lutherans are sometimes labeled ''Donatist'' by liberal Lutherans, as a reference to their doctrine of church-fellowship[3] and position that churches that deny that Jesus' true body and true blood are eaten do not celebrate a valid Lord's Supper.[4]
See also
★ Agonistici, Donatists sent out to disseminate their doctrine
★ Patriarchate of Carthage
★ St. Cyprian
References
1. Murray, Stuart, The Donatists — A fairly in-depth article on the origins of the Donatists, their fluctuating fortunes between 317 and 535, and their beliefs.
2. See Concordia Cyclopedia: Donatism
3. See this classic exposition of the doctrine of church-fellowship
4. See What Constitutes A Valid Celebration Of The Lord’s Supper? by Paul W. Metzger
Bibliography
★ ''The Donatist Church: A Movement of Protest in Roman North Africa'', W. H. C. Frend (Oxford University Press, 1952) ISBN 0-19-826408-9.
★ ''The Bible in Christian North Africa: The Donatist World'', Maureen A. Tilley (Fortress Press, 1997) ISBN 0-8006-2880-2.
★ ''Donatist martyr stories: the Church in conflict in Roman North Africa''. Translated with notes and introduction by Maureen A. Tilley (Liverpool University Press, 1996) ISBN 0-85323-931-2.
★ ''This Holy Seed: Faith, Hope and Love in the Early Churches of North Africa'', Robin Daniel (Harpenden: Tamarisk Publications, 1993) ISBN 0-9520435-0-5.
External links
★ Donatus & the Donatist Schism - List of primary and secondary sources on the Donatists.
★ Donatists in the Catholic Encyclopedia - goes into some detail about the politics in the early church that was the background for the rise and fall of Donatism.
★ Letter of Petilian the Donatist - Actual letter written by a Donatist leader. One of the few primary sources available from the Donastist affair.
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Green Parrot Beach Houses Resort | |
| Selloffvacations.com Oakville |
