A 'dictatorship' is an
autocratic form of government in which the
government is ruled by a
dictator. It has three possible meanings:
★
Roman dictator was a
political office of the
Roman Republic. Roman dictators were allocated absolute power during times of emergency. Their power was originally neither arbitrary nor unaccountable, however, being subject to
law and requiring retrospective justification. There were no such dictatorships after the beginning of the 2nd century BC, and later dictators such as
Sulla and the
Roman Emperors exercised power much more personally and arbitrarily.
★ In contemporary usage, dictatorship refers to an autocratic form of absolute rule by leadership unrestricted by law,
constitutions, or other social and political factors within the state.
★ For some scholars, like
Joseph C.W. Chan from
the University of Hong Kong, dictatorship is a form of government that has the power to govern without consent of those being governed, while
totalitarianism describes a state that regulates nearly every aspect of public and private behavior of the people. In other words, dictatorship concerns the source of the governing power (where the power comes from) and totalitarianism concerns the scope of the governing power (what the government regulates). In this sense, dictatorship (government without people's consent) is a contrast to
democracy (government whose power comes from people) and totalitarianism (government controls every aspect of people's life) corresponds to
liberalism (government emphasizes individual right and liberty). Though the definitions of the terms differ, they are related in reality as most of the dictatorship states tend to show totalitarian characteristics. When governments' power does not come from the people, their power is not limited and tend to expand their scope of power to control every aspect of people's life.
Postwar Era and the Cold War
In the
postwar era, dictatorship became a frequent feature of military government, especially in
Latin America,
Asia, and
Africa. In the case of many African or Asian former colonies, after achieving their independence in the postwar wave of
decolonization,
presidential regimes were gradually transformed into personal dictatorships. These regimes often proved unstable, with the personalization of power in the hands of the
dictator and his associates, making the political system uncertain.
It's often alleged that the rise of these dictatorships were substantially influenced by the
Cold War dynamics. Both the
United States and the
USSR managed to expand or maintain their influence zones by financing
paramilitary and political groups and encouraging
coups d'état, especially in Africa, that have led many countries to brutal
civil wars and consequent manifestations of authoritarianism. In Latin America the threat of either
communism or
capitalism was often used as justification for dictatorship, while in the Middle East the desire to oppose
Israel and later
Islamic fundamentalism proved an important motivating pattern.
In fiction, dictatorship has sometimes been portrayed as the political system of choice for controlling
dystopian societies, such as in
George Orwell's "
Nineteen Eighty-Four",
Yevgeny Zamyatin's "
We",
Fritz Leiber's "
Ill Met in Lankhmar", and
Ray Bradbury's "
Fahrenheit 451".
Some dictators came to power in desparate situations.
See also
★
Absolute monarchy
★
Totalitarianism
★
Plutocracy
★
Kleptocracy
★
Generalissimo
★
Maximum Leader
★
Military rule
★
Military dictatorship
★
Police state
★
Elective dictatorship
★
Constitutional dictatorship
★
Dictator
Further reading
★ Friedrich, Carl J. and
Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, ''Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy'', Praeger, 2nd ed., 1965.
★
The Logic of Political Survival, , Bruce, Bueno de Mesquita, The MIT Press, 2003, ISBN 0-262-63315-9