Discover

AXIOM OF DEPENDENT CHOICE

(Redirected from Dependent choice)
In mathematics, the 'axiom of dependent choices', denoted 'DC', is a weak form of the axiom of choice (AC) which is still sufficient to develop most of real analysis. Unlike full AC, DC is insufficient to prove (given ZF) that there is a nonmeasurable set of reals, or that there is a set of reals without the property of Baire or without the perfect set property.
The axiom can be stated as follows: For any nonempty set ''X'' and any entire binary relation ''R'' on ''X'', there is a sequence (''x''''n'') in ''X'' such that ''x''''n''''R''''x''''n''+1 for each ''n'' in 'N'. (Here an ''entire'' binary relation on ''X'' is one such that for each ''a'' in ''X'' there is a ''b'' in ''X'' such that ''aRb''.) Note that even without such an axiom we could form the first ''n'' terms of such a sequence, for any natural number ''n''; the axiom of dependent choices merely says that we can form a whole sequence this way, which is intuitively obvious.
If the set ''X'' above is restricted to be the set of all real numbers, the resulting axiom is called 'DCR'.
DC is the fragment of AC required to show the existence of a sequence constructed by transfinite recursion of countable length, if it is necessary to make a choice at each step.
DC is (over the theory ZF) equivalent to the statement that every (nonempty) pruned tree has a branch. It is also equivalent[1]
to the Baire category theorem for complete metric spaces.

Contents
See also
References

See also



Axiom of countable choice

References


1. Blair, Charles E. ''The Baire category theorem implies the principle of dependent choices.'' Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 25 (1977), no. 10, 933--934.


★ Jech, Thomas, 2003. ''Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded''. Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.

psst.. try this: add to faves