العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolDEISM
'Deism' is a religious philosophy and movement that became prominent in Great Britain, France, and the United States in the 17th and 18th centuries and continues to this day in the form of Classical Deism and Modern Deism. Deism derives the existence and nature of God from reason and personal experience, in contrast to theism (with religions like Christianity, Islam and Judaism) which relies on revelation in sacred scriptures or the testimony of other people.
Deists typically reject supernatural events (prophecy, miracles) and tend to assert that God does not interfere with human life and the laws of the universe. Deists commonly respect divine revelation prominent in organized religion, along with holy books as conveying the reasoning and personal experience of others.
Overview
The concept of Deism covers a wide variety of positions on a wide variety of religious issues. See the section ''Features of Deism'', below. Deism can also refer to a personal set of beliefs having to do with the role of nature in spirituality.
The words ''Deism'' and ''theism'' are both derived from the word ''god'':
★ The root of the word ''Deism'' is the Latin word ''deus'', which means "god".
★ The root of the word ''theism'' is the Greek word ''theos'' (θεóς), which also means "god".
A helpful discussion of Deism, theism, and other positions on divine beings can be found in the theism article.
Perhaps the first use of the term ''Deist'' is in Pierre Viret's ''Instruction Chrestienne'' (1564), reprinted in Bayle's ''Dictionnaire'' entry ''Viret''. Viret, a Calvinist, regarded Deism as a new form of Italian heresy.[1] Viret wrote:
In England, the term ''Deist'' first appeared in Robert Burton's ''The Anatomy of Melancholy'' (1621).[2]
Lord Herbert of Cherbury (d. 1648) is generally considered the "father of English Deism", and his book ''De Veritate'' (1624) the first major statement of Deism. Deism flourished in England between 1690 and 1740, at which time Matthew Tindal's ''Christianity as Old as the Creation'' (1730), or 'the Deist's Bible', gained much attention. Later Deism spread to France, notably via the work of Voltaire, to Germany, and to America.
Historical background
Deistic thinking has existed since ancient times (e.g., in philosophers such as Heraclitus and most especially Plato, who envisaged God as the Demiurge or 'craftsman')) and in many cultures. The word ''Deism'' is generally used to refer to the movement toward natural theology or freethinking that occurred in 17th-century Europe, and specifically in Britain.
Natural theology is a facet of the revolution in world view that occurred in Europe in the 17th century. To understand the background to that revolution is also to understand the background of Deism. Several cultural movements of the time contributed to the movement.[3]
The discovery of diversity
The humanist tradition of the Renaissance included a revival of interest in Europe's classical past in Greece and Rome. With study of the past came a growing awareness that the world in which the classical authors lived was quite different from the present.
In addition, study of classical documents led to the realization that some historical documents are less reliable than others, which led to the beginnings of biblical criticism. In particular, as scholars worked on biblical manuscripts, they began developing the principles of textual criticism and a view of the New Testament as the product of a particular historical period different from their own.
"Life and works of Confucius", by Prospero Intorcetta, 1687.
In addition to discovering diversity in the past, Europeans discovered diversity in the present. The voyages of discovery of the 16th and 17th centuries acquainted Europeans with new and different cultures in the Americas, in Asia, and in the Pacific. They discovered a greater amount of cultural diversity than they had ever imagined, and the question arose of how this vast amount of human cultural diversity could be compatible with the biblical account of Noah's descendants. In particular, the ideas of Confucius, translated into European languages by the Jesuits stationed in China, are thought to have had considerable influence on the Deists and other philosophical groups of the Enlightenment who were interested by the integration of the system of morality of Confucius into Christianity.[4][5].
In particular, cultural diversity with respect to religious beliefs could no longer be ignored. As Herbert wrote in ''De Religione Laici'' (1645),
This new awareness of diversity led to a feeling that Christianity was just one religion among many, with no better claim than any other to correctness.
Religious conflict
Europe had been plagued by vicious sectarian conflicts and religious wars since the beginning of the Reformation. In 1642, when Lord Herbert of Cherbury's ''De Veritate'' was published, the Thirty Years War had been raging on continental Europe for nearly 25 years. It was an enormously destructive religious war that (it is estimated) destroyed 15–20% of the population of Germany. Closer to home, the English Civil War pitting King against Parliament was just beginning.
Such massive sectarian violence inspired a visceral rejection of the sectarianism that had led to the violence. It also led to a search for natural religious truths — truths that could be universally accepted, because they had been either "written in the book of Nature" or "engraved on the human mind" by God.
Deism also had a great connection to religious toleration.
Advances in scientific knowledge
The 17th century saw a remarkable advance in scientific knowledge: the scientific revolution. The work of Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo destroyed the old notion that the earth was the center of the universe and showed that the universe was incredibly larger than ever imagined. These discoveries posed a serious challenge to biblical authority and to the religious authorities, Galileo's condemnation for heresy being an especially visible example. In consequence, the Bible came to be seen as authoritative on matters of faith and morals but no longer authoritative (or meant to be) on matters of science.
Isaac Newton's discovery of universal gravitation explained the behavior both of objects here on earth and of objects in the heavens. It promoted a world view in which the natural universe is controlled by laws of nature. This, in turn, suggested a theology in which God created the universe, set it in motion controlled by natural law, and retired from the scene. (See the Watchmaker analogy.)
The new awareness of the explanatory power of universal natural law also produced a growing skepticism about such religious staples as miracles (i.e., violations of natural law) and about books, such as the Bible, that reported them.
Whereas the Age of Faith found its truths in religious tradition, the Age of Reason found its truths in observable natural phenomena and individual human reason.
Features of Deism
Critical and constructive Deism
The concept of Deism covers a wide variety of positions on a wide variety of religious issues. Following Sir Leslie Stephen's ''English Thought in the Eighteenth Century'', most commentators agree that two features constituted the core of Deism:
★ The rejection of revealed religion — this was the ''critical'' aspect of Deism.
★ The belief that reason, not faith, leads us to certain basic religious truths — this was the positive or ''constructive'' aspect of Deism.
Deist authors advocated a combination of both critical and constructive elements in proportions and emphases that varied from author to author.
'Critical' elements of Deist thought included:
★ Rejection of all religions based on books that claim to contain the revealed word of God.
★ Rejection of reports of miracles, prophecies and religious "mysteries".
★ Rejection of the Genesis account of creation and the doctrine of original sin, along with all similar beliefs.
★ Rejection of Judaism, Christianity, Islam and other religious beliefs.
'Constructive' elements of Deist thought included:
★ God exists and created the universe.
★ God wants human beings to behave morally.
★ Human beings have souls that survive death; that is, there is an afterlife.
★ In the afterlife, God will reward moral behavior and punish immoral behavior.
Individual Deists varied in the set of critical and constructive elements for which they argued. Some Deists rejected miracles and prophecies but still considered themselves Christians because they believed in what they felt to be the pure, original form of Christianity — that is, Christianity as it existed before it was corrupted by additions of such superstitions as miracles, prophecies, and the doctrine of the Trinity. Some Deists rejected the claim of Jesus' divinity but continued to hold him in high regard as a moral teacher (see, e.g., Thomas Jefferson's famous Jefferson Bible). Other, more radical Deists rejected Christianity altogether and expressed hostility toward Christianity, which they regarded as pure superstition. In return, Christian writers often charged radical Deists with atheism.
Note that the terms ''constructive'' and ''critical'' are used to refer to aspects of Deistic thought, not sects or subtypes of Deism — it would be incorrect to classify any particular Deist author as "a constructive Deist" or "a critical Deist". As Peter Gay notes:
It should be noted, however, that the constructive element of Deism was not unique to Deism. It was the same as the natural theology that was so prevalent in all English theology in the 17th and 18th centuries. What set Deists apart from their more orthodox contemporaries was their critical concerns.
One of the remarkable features of Deism is that the critical elements did not overpower the constructive elements. As E. Graham Waring observed,[6] "A strange feature of the [Deist] controversy is the apparent acceptance of all parties of the conviction of the existence of God." And Basil Willey observed[7]
Concepts of "reason"
"Reason" was the ultimate court of appeal for Deists. Tindal's Lockean definitions of reason, self-evident truth, and the light of nature are especially lucid.
Deists did appeal to "the light of nature" to support the self-evident nature of their positive religious claims.
Once a proposition is asserted to be a self-evident truth, there is not much more to say about it. Consequently, Deist authors expended most of their ink using reason as a critical tool for exposing and rejecting what they saw as nonsense. Here are two typical examples. The first is from John Toland's ''Christianity Not Mysterious''.[8]
Arguments for the existence of God
Thomas Hobbes— an early Deist and important influence on subsequent Deists— used the cosmological argument for the existence of God at several places in his writings.
History of religion and the Deist mission
Most Deists saw the religions of their day as corruptions of an original, pure religion that was simple and rational. They felt that this original pure religion had become corrupted by "priests" who had manipulated it for the priests' personal gain and for the class interests of the priesthood in general.
According to this world view, over time "priests" had succeeded in encrusting the original simple, rational religion with all kinds of superstitions and "mysteries" — irrational theological doctrines. Laymen were told by the priests that only the priests really knew what was necessary for salvation and that laymen must accept the "mysteries" on faith and on the priests' authority. This kept the laity baffled by the nonsensical "mysteries", confused, and dependent on the priests for information about the requirements for salvation. The priests consequently enjoyed a position of considerable power over the laity, which they strove to maintain and increase. Deists referred to this kind of manipulation of religious doctrine as "priestcraft", a highly derogatory term.
Deists saw their mission as the stripping away of "priestcraft" and "mysteries" from religion, thereby restoring religion to its original, true condition — simple and rational. In many cases, they considered true, original Christianity to be the same as this original natural religion. As Matthew Tindal put it:
One implication of this Deist origin myth was that primitive societies, or societies that existed in the distant past, should have religious beliefs that are less encrusted with superstitions and closer to those of natural theology. This became a point of attack for thinkers such as David Hume as they studied the "natural history of religion".
Freedom and necessity
Enlightenment thinkers, under the influence of Newtonian science, tended to view the universe as a vast machine, created and set in motion by a Creator Being, that continues to operate according to natural law, without any divine intervention. This view naturally led to what was then usually called necessitarianism: the view that everything in the universe — including human behavior — is completely causally determined by antecedent circumstances and natural law. (See, e.g., La Mettrie's ''L'Homme machine''.) As a consequence, debates about freedom versus determinism were a regular feature of Enlightenment religious and philosophical discussions.
Because of their high regard for natural law and for the idea of a universe without miracles, Deists were especially susceptible to the temptations of necessitarianism. Reflecting the intellectual climate of the time, there were differences among Deists about freedom and necessity. Some, such as Anthony Collins, actually were necessitarians.
Beliefs about immortality of the soul
Deists held a variety of beliefs about the soul. Some, such as Lord Herbert of Cherbury and William Wollastson,[9] held that souls exist, survive death, and in the afterlife are rewarded or punished by God for their behavior in life. Others such as Thomas Paine were agnostic about the immortality of the soul:
Still others such as Anthony Collins,[9] Bolingbroke, Thomas Chubb, and Peter Annet were materialists and either denied or doubted the immortality of the soul.[9]
Deist terminology
Deist authors — and 17th- and 18th-century theologians in general — referred to God using a variety of vivid circumlocutions such as:
★ Supreme Being
★ Divine Author of the Universe
★ Nature's God — ''used in the United States Declaration of Independence''
★ Father of Lights — ''Benjamin Franklin, when proposing that meetings of the Constitutional Convention begin with prayers'' [1]
The history of Deism
Precursors of Deism
Early works of biblical criticism, such as Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan and Spinoza's Theologico-Political Treatise, as well as works by lesser-known authors such as Richard Simon and Isaac La Peyrère, paved the way for the development of critical Deism.
Early Deism
Edward Herbert, portrait by Isaac Oliver (1560–1617)
Lord Herbert of Cherbury (d. 1648) is generally considered the "father of English Deism", and his book ''De Veritate'' (''On Truth, as It Is Distinguished from Revelation, the Probable, the Possible, and the False'') (1624) the first major statement of Deism.[12][13]
Like his contemporary Descartes, Herbert searched for the foundations of
knowledge. In fact, the first two thirds of ''De Veritate'' are devoted to an exposition of Herbert's theory of knowledge. Herbert distinguished truths obtained through experience, and through reasoning about experience, from innate truths and from revealed truths. Innate truths are imprinted on our minds, and the evidence that they are so imprinted is that they are universally accepted. Herbert's term for universally accepted truths was ''notitiae communes'' — common notions.
In the realm of religion, Herbert believed that there were five common notions.
It is worth quoting Herbert at some length, to give the flavor of his writing. A
sense of the importance that Herbert attributed to innate Common Notions will
help in understanding how devastating Locke's attack on innate ideas was for
Herbert's philosophy.
According to Gay, Herbert had relatively few followers, and it was not until the 1680s that Herbert found a true successor in Charles Blount (1654–1693). Blount made one special contribution to the Deist debate: "by utilizing his wide classical learning, Blount demonstrated how to use pagan writers, and pagan ideas, against Christianity. ... Other Deists were to follow his lead."[14]
John Locke
The publication of John Locke's ''An Essay Concerning Human Understanding'' (1689, but dated 1690) marks a major turning point in the history of Deism. Since Herbert's ''De Veritate'', innate ideas had been the foundation of Deist epistemology. Locke's famous attack on innate ideas in the first book of the ''Essay'' effectively destroyed that foundation and replaced it with a theory of knowledge based on experience. ''Innatist'' Deism was replaced by ''empiricist'' Deism.
Locke himself was not a Deist. He accepted both miracles and revelation, and he regarded miracles as the main proof of revelation.[9]
After Locke, constructive Deism could no longer appeal to innate ideas for justification of its basic tenets such as the existence of God. Instead, under the influence of Locke and Newton, Deists turned to natural theology and to arguments based on experience and Nature: the cosmological argument and the argument from design.
The flowering of British Deism (1690–1740)
Peter Gay places the zenith of Deism "from the end of the 1690s, when the vehement response to John Toland's ''Christianity Not Mysterious'' (1696) started the Deist debate, to the end of the 1740s when the tepid response to Middleton's ''Free Inquiry'' signalized its close."[14]
Other prominent British Deists included William Wollastson, Charles Blount, Shaftesbury (who did not think of himself as a Deist, but shared so many attitudes with Deists that Gay calls him "a Deist in fact, if not in name"[14]) and
Bolingbroke.
Matthew Tindal
Especially noteworthy is Matthew Tindal's ''Christianity as Old as the Creation'' (1730), which "became, very soon after its publication, the focal center of the Deist controversy. Because almost every argument, quotation, and issue raised for decades can be found here, the work is often termed 'the Deist's Bible'."[18]
Following Locke's successful attack on innate ideas, Tindal's "Deist Bible" redefined the foundation of Deist epistemology as knowledge based on experience or human reason. This effectively widened the gap between traditional Christians and what he called "Christian Deists", since this new foundation required that "revealed" truth be validated through human reason. In ''Christianity as Old as the Creation'', Tindal articulated a number of the basic tenets of Deism:
★ He argued against special revelation: "God designed all Mankind should at all times know, what he wills them to know, believe, profess, and practice; and has given them no other Means for this, but the Use of Reason."
David Hume
David Hume
The writings of David Hume are sometimes credited with causing or contributing to the decline of Deism. English Deism, however, was already in decline before Hume's works were published. Furthermore, Hume's writings on religion were not very influential at the time that they were published.[9]
Nevertheless, modern scholars find it interesting to study the implications of his thoughts for Deism.
★ Hume's skepticism about miracles makes him a natural ally of Deism.
★ His skepticism about the validity of natural religion cuts equally against Deism and Deism's opponents, who were also deeply involved in natural theology. But his famous ''Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion'' were not published until 1779, by which time Deism had almost vanished in England.
In its implications for Deism, the ''Natural History of Religion'' (1757) may be Hume's most interesting work. In it, Hume contends that polytheism, not monotheism, was "the first and most ancient religion of mankind". In addition, contends Hume, the psychological basis of religion is not reason, but fear of the unknown.
As E. Graham Waring observed:[6]
Experts dispute whether Hume was a Deist, an atheist, or something else. Hume himself was uncomfortable with the terms ''Deist'' and ''atheist'', and Hume scholar Paul Russell has argued that the best and safest term for Hume's views is ''irreligion''.
Continental Deism
Voltaire at age 24
by Nicolas de Largillière
by Nicolas de Largillière
English Deism, in the words of Peter Gay, "travelled well. ... As Deism waned in England, it waxed in France and the German states."[14]
France had its own tradition of religious skepticism and natural theology in the works of Montaigne, Bayle, and Montesquieu. The most famous of the French Deists was Voltaire, who acquired a taste for Newtonian science, and reinforcement of Deistic inclinations, during a two-year visit to England starting in 1726.
French Deists also included Maximilien Robespierre and Rousseau. For a short period of time during the French Revolution the Cult of the Supreme Being was the state religion of France.
Kant's identification with Deism is controversial. An argument in favor of Kant as Deist is Alan Wood's "Kant's Deism," in P. Rossi and M. Wreen (eds.), ''Kant's Philosophy of Religion Re-examined'' (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991); an argument against Kant as Deist is Stephen Palmquist's "Kant's Theistic Solution".
Deism in America
Thomas Paine
In America, Enlightenment philosophy (which itself was heavily inspired by Deist ideals) played a major role in creating the principle of separation of church and state, expressed in the religious freedom clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Founding Fathers who were especially noted for being influenced by such philosophy include Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Cornelius Harnett, Gouverneur Morris, and Hugh Williamson. Although these men were members of traditional Christian denominations (Hugh Williamson was a Presbyterian and the rest were Episcopalians), their political speeches show distinct Deistic influence. Other notable Founding Fathers may have been more directly Deist. These include Ethan Allen[22] and Thomas Paine (who published The Age of Reason, a treatise that helped to popularize Deism throughout America and Europe). Elihu Palmer (1764-1806) wrote the "Bible" of American Deism in his ''Principles of Nature'' (1801) and attempted to organize Deism by forming the "Deistical Society of New York."
Currently (as of 2007) there is an ongoing controversy in the United States over whether or not America was founded as a "Christian nation" based on Judeo-Christian ideals. This has spawned a subsidiary controversy over whether the Founding Fathers were Christians or Deists or something in between.[23] Particularly heated is the debate over the beliefs of Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington, for some of whom the evidence is mixed.[24] However, Benjamin Franklin wrote in his autobiography, "Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle's lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist. My arguments perverted some others, particularly Collins and Ralph; but each of them having afterwards wrong'd me greatly without the least compunction, and recollecting Keith's conduct towards me (who was another freethinker) and my own towards Vernon and Miss Read, which at times gave me great trouble, I began to suspect that this doctrine, tho' it might be true, was not very useful."[25] In a letter written towards the end of his life Franklin expressed interest in Christianity though he stated that prior to this he had been uninterested in Religion.
The waning of Deism
Deism is generally considered to have died out as an influential school of thought by around 1800. It is probably more accurate, however, to say that Deism evolved into, and contributed to, other religious movements. The term ''Deist'' fell into disuse, but Deist ideas and influences did not. They can be seen in 19th-century liberal British theology and in the rise of Unitarianism, which adopted many of its ideas. Even today, there are a significant number of Deist Web sites.
Several factors contributed to a general decline in the popularity of Deism, including:
★ the writings of David Hume and Immanuel Kant (and later, Charles Darwin), which increased doubt about the first cause argument and the argument from design, turning many (though not all) potential Deists towards atheism or panendeism
★ loss of confidence that reason and rationalism could solve all problems
★ criticisms of excesses of the French Revolution
★ criticisms that Deism was not significantly distinct from pantheism and then that pantheism was not significantly different from atheism
★ criticisms that freethought would lead inevitably to atheism
★ frustration with the determinism implicit in "This is the best of all possible worlds"
★ the fact that Deism remained a personal philosophy and never became an organized movement (was, in fact, inconsistent with having an organized movement, compared with organized religions)
★ an anti-Deist and anti-reason campaign by some Christian clergymen to vilify Deism and equate it with atheism in public opinion
★ Christian revivalist movements which taught that a more personal relationship with a deity was possible
Deism today
Contemporary Deism attempts to integrate classical Deism with modern philosophy and the current state of scientific knowledge. This attempt has produced a wide variety of personal beliefs under the broad classification/category of belief of "Deism". The Modern Deism Web site includes one list of the unofficial tenets of modern deism.
Classical Deism held that a human's relationship with God was impersonal: God created the world and set it in motion but does not actively intervene in individual human affairs but rather through Divine Providence. What this means is that God will give humanity such things as reason and compassion but this applies to all and not individual intervention.
Some modern Deists have modified this classical view and believe that humanity's relationship with God is transpersonal which means that God transcends the personal/impersonal duality and moves beyond such human terms. Also, this means that it makes no sense to state that God intervenes or does not intervene as that is a human characteristic which God does not contain. Modern Deists believe that they must continue what the classial Deists started and continue to use modern human knowledge to come to understand God which in turn is why a human-like God that can lead to numerous contradictions and inconsistencies is no longer believed in and has been replaced with a much more abstract conception.
A modern definition has been created and provided by WUD that provides a modern understanding of Deism:
''"Deism is the recognition of a universal creative force greater than that demonstrated by mankind, supported by personal observation of laws and designs in nature and the universe, perpetuated and validated by the innate ability of human reason coupled with the rejection of claims made by individuals and organized religions of having received special divine revelation."''
Because Deism accepts God without accepting claims of divine revelation, it appeals to people from both ends of the religious spectrum. Antony Flew, for example, is a convert from atheism, and Raymond Fontaine[2] was a Roman Catholic priest for over 20 years. William Veader is another well-known Deist.
Category of Belief
Deism, like Theism, is a category of belief rather than a religion.
A Category of Belief is a basic theological position taken by an individual. Theism is a faith based belief in a God while atheism is either absence of belief that deities exist or a rejection of such belief.
Now, before going further, the reason that Theism and Deism are different categories is because of how Theism and Deism see God. Theism sees God as a being that has a personal relationship with existence while Deism sees God as a non-being that has a transpersonal relationship with God (which is to say that God transcends the personal/impersonal duality).
There are four types of Categories of Belief and they are Theism, Deism, Atheism and Agnosticism. Next comes the Sub-category of Belief which is how one sees God(s) and these are Mono, Pan, Panen and Poly. After this we get Religion which is when principles and creeds are introduced to the belief system but the institution has not been created yet. The institution comes with the formation of a Denomination and then finally a Community is formed when a group develops around the institution.
A general breakdown would look like this:
'Category of Belief - Sub-Category of Belief - Religion (principles and creeds) - Denomination (institution)- Community (fellowship)'
Here are comparison examples of Theism vs Deism:
'Theism - Monotheist - Christianity - United Methodism - Anytown United Methodist Church'
'Deism - PanenDeist - None Exists - None Exists - Internet Discussion Forum'
Unlike Theism, Deism has no Religions nor Denomination as of yet and may never. However, each Deist like each Theist must develop their own beliefs within the context of the Transpersonal God.
This is why there is so much diversity within Deism as it is not a religion but a category of belief.
Modern Deism on the Web
In 1993, Robert L. Johnson established the first Deist organization since the days of Thomas Paine and Elihu Palmer with the World Union of Deists. The 'WUD' offered the monthly hardcopy publication ''THINK!''. Currently the WUD offers two online Deist publications, ''THINKonline!'' and ''Deistic Thought & Action!'' As well as using the Internet for spreading the Deist message, the WUD is also conducting a direct mail campaign.
1996 saw the first Web site dedicated to Deism with the WUD site www.deism.com . From this effort, many other Deist sites and discussion groups have appeared on the Internet such as Positive Deism, Deist Info, Modern Deism and many others. In the last few years, the Deist Alliance was created so that many of the sites on the internet could come together to support each other and advocate Deism. The Deist Alliance has its own quarterly newsletter that is written by members and readers.
Panendeism
'Panendeism' combines Deism with panentheism, the belief that the universe is part of God, but not all of God. The term was purportedly coined in late 2000 by Larry Copling in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, although some earlier uses have been spotted. For example, a 1995 news article quotes this use of the term by Jim Garvin, a Vietnam vet who became a Trappist monk in the Holy Cross Abbey[3] of Berryville, Virginia, and went on to lead the economic development of Phoenix, Arizona. Garvin described his spiritual position as "'pandeism' or 'pan-en-deism,' something very close to the Native American concept of the all- pervading Great Spirit..."[26]
Copling coinage came while developing a more Deistic interpretation of the panentheistic approach to understanding the Divine. The term was first published on Copling's website,[4] in early 2001. A more complete description of the concept was later made available via an article published on Copling's personal website ([5]) in 2004. The original ideology known as "PanenDeism", as outlined by the writings of Larry Copling, continues in its present development.
Pandeism
Pandeism combines Deism with Pantheism, the belief that the universe is identical to God. Pandeism holds that God was a conscious and sentient force or entity that designed and created the universe, which operates by mechanisms set forth in the creation. God thus became an unconscious and nonresponsive being by ''becoming'' the universe. Other than this distinction (and the possibility that the Universe will one day return to the state of being God), pandeistic beliefs are identical to Deist. The term, pandeism, was coined in 1859 by German philosophers and frequent collaborators Moritz Lazarus and Heymann Steinthal in ''Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft''. They wrote:
This is translated as:
In the 1960s, theologian Charles Hartshorne scrupulously examined and rejected both deism and pandeism (as well as pantheism) in favor of a God whose characteristics included "absolute perfection in some respects, relative perfection in all others" or "AR", writing that this theory "is able consistently to embrace all that is positive in either deism or pandeism", concluding that "panentheistic doctrine contains all of deism and pandeism except their arbitrary negations".[27]
Opinions about the nature of God
Modern Deists hold a wide range of views on the nature of God and God's relationship to the world. The common area of agreement is the desire to use reason, experience, and nature as the basis of belief.
There are a number of subcategories of modern Deist, including Spiritual Deism, Monodeism, Pandeism, Process Deism, Christian Deism, Scientific Deism, Humanistic Deism. Some Deists see design in nature and purpose in the universe and in their lives (Prime Designer). Others see God and the universe in a co-creative process (Prime Motivator). Some Deists view God in classical terms and see God as observing humanity but not directly intervening in our lives (Prime Observer), while others see God as a subtle and persuasive spirit (Prime Mover).
Opinions about prayer
Many classical Deists were critical of some types of prayer. For example, in ''Christianity as Old as the Creation'', Matthew Tindal argues against praying for miracles, but advocates prayer as both a human duty and a human
need. External link to portion of text
Today, Deists hold a variety of opinions about prayer:
★ Some contemporary Deists believe (with the classical Deists) that God has created the universe perfectly, so no amount of supplication, request, or begging can change the fundamental nature of the universe.
★ Some Deists believe that God is not an entity that can be contacted by human beings through petitions for relief; rather, God can only be experienced through the nature of the universe.
★ Some Deists do not believe in divine intervention but still find value in prayer as a form of meditation, self-cleansing, and spiritual renewal. Such prayers are often appreciative (i.e., "Thank you for ...") rather than supplicative (i.e., "Please God grant me ...").[6]
★ Some Deists, usually referred to as Spiritual Deists, practice meditation and make frequent use of Affirmative Prayer, a non-supplicative form of prayer which is common in the New Thought movement. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Spiritual_Deism
Alexander Pope, generally considered to have Deistic sympathies, composed a poem he called "The Universal Prayer.[7]
Albert Einstein, had a kind of Deistic view. [8]
See also
★ Atheistic Deism
★ Ceremonial Deism
★ Cosmological argument
★ Evolutionary Creationism
★ Freethought
★ Freethought Association
★ George Washington
★ Infinitism
★ List of Deists
★ List of U.S. Presidential religious affiliations
★ Philosophical theism
References
1. See the article on the history of Deism in the online ''Dictionary of the History of Ideas''.
2.
, , Peter Hanns, Reill, Facts On File, ,
3. The discussion of the background of Deism is based on the excellent summary in "The Challenge of the Seventeenth Century" in ''The Historical Jesus Question'' by Gregory W. Dawes (Westminster: John Knox Press, 2001). Good discussions of individual Deist writers can be found in ''The Seventeenth Century Background'' and ''The Eighteenth Century Background'' by Basil Willey.
4. "Windows into China", John Parker, p.25, ISBN 0890730504
5. "The Eastern origins of Western civilization", John Hobson, p194-195, ISBN 0521547245
6. Deism and Natural Religion: A Source Book, , E. Graham, Waring, , ,
7. The Eighteenth Century Background, , Basil, Willey, , ,
8. Quoted in ''Deism and Natural Religion: A Source Book'', pp. 1–12
9. English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits, , John, Orr, Eerdmans, ,
10. English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits, , John, Orr, Eerdmans, ,
11. English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits, , John, Orr, Eerdmans, ,
12. The Seventeenth Century Background, , Basil, Willey, , ,
13. English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits, , John, Orr, , ,
14. Deism: An Anthology, , Peter, Gay, Van Nostrand, ,
15. English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits, , John, Orr, Eerdmans, ,
16. Deism: An Anthology, , Peter, Gay, Van Nostrand, ,
17. Deism: An Anthology, , Peter, Gay, Van Nostrand, ,
18. Deism and Natural Religion: A Source Book, , E. Graham, Waring, , ,
19. English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits, , John, Orr, Eerdmans, ,
20. Deism and Natural Religion: A Source Book, , E. Graham, Waring, , ,
21. Deism: An Anthology, , Peter, Gay, Van Nostrand, ,
22. See: this
23. This andThis demonstrate this controversy well. David L. Holmes's ''The Faiths of the Founding Fathers'' is a recent study of the subject.
24. Founding Fathers Religion page at www.adherents.com.
25. As to whether George Washington was a Deist or not, see this Washington Post book review of two books on the subject. For Jefferson's Deism, see this article; and for Franklin, see Kerry S. Walters, ''Benjamin Franklin and His Gods'' (University of Illinois Press, 1999) and also this except from ''Benjamin Franklin: An American Life'' by Walter Isaacson.
26. ''Albuquerque Journal'', Saturday, November 11, 1995, B-10.
27. Charles Hartshorne, ''Man's Vision of God and the Logic of Theism'' (1964) p. 348 ISBN 0-208-00498-X.
[34] for extended quote, see Franklin's autobiography in Benjamin Franklin: Autobiography, Poor Richard, and Later Writings, page 619 (The Library of America, copyright 1997 by Library Classics of the United States) with older sources in the public domain
Bibliography
Today, the most accessible statement of Deism is Thomas Paine's book The Age of Reason (1795). It is short, readable, and witty. It is still in print and is also downloadable in electronic format from various Web sites.
The best recent study of English Deism is:
★ ''The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750'' by James A. Herrick (University of South Carolina Press, 1997)
Important discussions of Deism can be found in:
★ ''English Deism: Its Roots and Its Fruits'' by John Orr (1934)
★ ''European Thought in the Eighteenth Century'' by Paul Hazard (1946, English translation 1954)
★ ''A History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century'' by Sir Leslie Stephen, 2 volumes (1876, 3rd ed. 1902)
★ ''A History of Freethought: Ancient and modern, to the period of the French revolution'' by John Mackinnon Robertson (1915)
Other studies of Deism include:
★ ''Early Deism in France: From the so-called 'deistes' of Lyon (1564) to Voltaire's 'Lettres philosophiques' (1734)'' by C. J. Betts (Martinus Nijhoff, 1984)
★ ''The Seventeenth Century Background: Studies on the Thought of the Age in Relation to Poetry and Religion'' by Basil Willey (1934)
★ ''The Eighteenth Century Background: Studies on the Idea of Nature in the Thought of the Period'' by Basil Willey (1940)
★ ''Simon Tyssot de Patot and the Seventeenth-Century Background of Critical Deism'' by David Rice McKee (Johns Hopkins Press, 1941)
★ ''The Historical Argument for the Resurrection of Jesus During the Deist Controversy'' by William Lane Craig (Edwin Mellen, 1985)
Anthologies of Deist writings include:
★ ''Deism: An Anthology'' by Peter Gay (Van Nostrand, 1968)
★ ''Deism and Natural Religion: A Source Book'' by E. Graham Waring (Frederick Ungar, 1967)
External links
Informational Links
★ The Origins of English Rationalism
★ Deism - ''Dictionary of the History of Ideas''
★ English Deism - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
★ French Deism - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
★ Deism - ReligiousTolerance.org
★ Deism - ''Catholic Encyclopedia'' (1908)
★ The Rise and Fall of English Deism
Early History of Deism
★ An Account of the Growth of Deism in England by William Stephens, London: Printed for the Author, MDCXCVI, at the DCL.
Works by Thomas Paine
★ collection of essays
★ ''The Age of Reason'' at Project Gutenberg
Deism Advocacy on the Web
★ Spiritual Deism [9]
★ Deism and Reason
★ Positive Deism
★ Dynamic Deism
★ World Union of Deists
★ Deism and Panendeism information
★ American/Unitarian Conference
★ Temple of Reason
★ The Deist Alliance
★ Modern Deism
★ To Nature's God
★ Online Deist book and site
★ Deist Information
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
