The 'Crown Proceedings Act 1947' (1947 c. 44) is an
Act of Parliament passed by the
Parliament of the United Kingdom that allowed, for the first time,
civil actions against
the Crown to be brought in the same way as against any other party. The Act also reasserted the
common law doctrine of
Crown privilege but by making it, for the first time,
justiciable paved the way for the development of the modern law of
Public Interest Immunity.
The Act received the
Royal assent on 31 July 1947 but did not fully come into force until 1 January 1948.
[1] It remains substantially in force in the UK.
Background
Before the Act, the Crown could not be
sued in
contract. However, as it was seen to be desirable that Crown contractors could obtain redress, they would otherwise be inhibited from taking on such work, so a
petition of right came to be used in such situations, especially after the
Petitions of Right Act 1860 simplified the process.
[2]
Before the petition could be heard by the courts, it had to be endorsed with the words ''
fiat justitia'' on the advice of the
Home Secretary and
Attorney-General.
Simlarly, the Crown could not be sued in
tort. The usual remedy was for the complainant to sue the public servant responsible for the injury. A famous example was the case of ''
Entick v. Carrington''. The Crown usually indemnified the servant against any
damages.
Henry Brougham called for equality between Crown and subjects in a
House of Commons motion in
1828 but it was to be a further century before the proposal was realised.
[3]
The Act
Section 1 of the Act allows claims, for which a petition of right would previously have been demanded, to be brought in the courts directly as against any other defendant. However, a petition and ''fiat'' still appear to be necessary for personal claims against the
monarch.
Section 2 renders the Crown liable as though it were a
natural person for:
★
Torts committed by its
servants and agents;
★
Common law duties of an employer to its servants and agents; and
★
Common law duties as an owner or occupier of property.
S.2(2) provides that the Crown is liable for
breach of statutory duty so long as the statute binds both the Crown and private persons.
Section 28 gave the courts, for the first time, the power to order
disclosure of documents by the Crown and require the Crown to answer
requests for further information. This new power is subject to important qualifications in s.28(2) including the proviso that the Crown can resist disclosure where this could be “injurious to the public interest”. This reasserted the traditional doctrine of Crown privilege but also made the issue justiciable, ultimately giving rise to the doctrine of
Public Interest Immunity.
References
1. SI1947/2527, art.1
2. Bradley & Ewing (2003) ''pp''700-701
3.
Bibliography
★
----
★
Constitutional and Administrative Law, Bradley, A.W. & Ewing, K.D., , , Pearson, 2003, ISBN 0582438071