The was a contest in
China just prior to the ''
Nanking Massacre''.
Newspaper coverage
In
1937, the ''
Osaka Mainichi Shimbun'' and the ''
Tokyo Nichi Nichi Shimbun'' covered a "contest" between two
Japanese officers, Toshiaki Mukai and Tsuyoshi Noda, in which the two men vied to be the first to kill 100 people with a sword. The competition took place en route to
Nanking, directly prior to the infamous "
Nanking Massacre" and was covered in four articles, from November 29 to December 13
[1], the two last being translated in the ''Japan Advertiser''.
Both officers supposedly surpassed their goal during the heat of battle, making it impossible to determine which officer had actually won the contest. Therefore, they decided to begin another contest, with the aim being 150 kills.
[2] The ''Nichi Nichi'' headline pertaining to the event read "'Incredible Record' [in the Contest to] Behead 100 People—Mukai 106 – 105 Noda—Both 2nd Lieutenants Go Into Extra Innings".
The news coverage of the event found its way into the documents of the
International Military Tribunal for the Far East. Soon after, the two soldiers were
extradited to China, and on
January 28,
1948, both soldiers were executed at
Yuhuatai execution chamber by the Chinese government following trials by a Nanking military court for atrocities committed during the
Battle of Nanking and the subsequent massacre.
Discussion by historians
In Japan, the contest was lost to the obscurity of history until 1967, when Tomio Hora, a professor of history at
Waseda University, published a 118-page document pertaining to the events of Nanking. The story was unreported by the Japanese press until 1971, when Japanese historian
Katsuichi Honda brought the issue to the attention of the public with a series of articles published in the ''
Mainichi Shimbun''—the modern-day descendant of the ''Tokyo Nichi Nichi Shimbun''. In Japan, the articles sparked ferocious debate about the Nanking Massacre, with the veracity of the killing contest a particularly contentious point of debate. Honda published a book about Nanking and the contest in 1981.
More recent events
Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi, who, in 2000, undertook one of the most comprehensive studies of the incident ever conducted, reached the conclusion that "the killing contest itself was a fabricated story", but served as a positive influence in Japanese culture, making the Japanese more aware of some of the wartime atrocities that had actually been conducted by the
Imperial Japanese Army.
In April of 2003, the families of Toshiaki Mukai and Tsuyoshi Noda filed a defamation suit in a
Tokyo District Court against Katsuichi Honda and the ''Mainichi Shimbun'', requesting ¥36,000,000 in compensation. On
August 23,
2005, the court, presided over by Judge Akio Doi, ruled against the plaintiffs, saying that the
statute of limitations for the defamation claims had already expired. The judge further found that the allegations of defamation were difficult to prove, in light of the numerous incriminating comments allegedly made by the soldiers themselves.
References
1. http://rene.malenfant.googlepages.com/hyakuningirikyousou
2. http://search.japantimes.co.jp/member/member.html?eo20031124hs.htm
Further reading
★
My Twenty-five Years in China, , John B., Powell, The Macmillan Company, 1945,
★
The Nanking 100-Man Killing Contest Debate: War Guilt Amid Fabricated Illusions, 1971 – 75, , Bob Tadashi, Wakabayashi, The Journal of Japanese Studies, Summer 2000
External links
★
English translation of all articles pertaining to the event
★
Full text of all articles pertaining to the event
★
Decision of the Tokyo District Court (full text)
★
Mochizuki's Memories "Watashino Shinajihen" (私の支那事変), ''one of the exhibits in evidence at the Tokyo District Court, which revealed Noda and Mukai beheaded Chinese farmers with their swords during the killing contest.''