Discover

'Classical Chinese' or 'Literary Chinese' is a traditional style of written Chinese based on the grammar and vocabulary of ancient Chinese, making it different from any modern spoken form of Chinese. However, the distinction between Literary Classical and Literary Vernacular Chinese is blurry. Classical Chinese was once used for almost all formal correspondence before and during the beginning of the 20th century, not only in China but also (during various different periods) in Korea, Japan, and Vietnam. Among Chinese speakers, Classical Chinese has been largely replaced by Vernacular Chinese (白話, ''báihuà''), a style of writing that is similar to modern spoken Mandarin Chinese, while speakers of non-Chinese languages have largely abandoned Classical Chinese in favor of local vernaculars.
Literary Chinese is known as Hanmun (漢文, "Han writing") in Korean; as Kanbun (漢文, "Han writing") in Japanese; and as Chữ nho (字儒, "scholarly letters") in Vietnamese.

Contents

Definitions

Pronunciation

Grammar and lexicon

Teaching and use

See also

References

Definitions

While the terms Classical Chinese and Literary Chinese are commonly used interchangeably, this might not be strictly accurate. Sinologists generally agree that they are in fact different things.^[1] By most academic definitions, Classical Chinese (古文, Pinyin ''Gǔwén'', "Ancient Writing"; or more literally 古典漢語 ''Gǔdiǎn Hànyǔ'' "Classical Chinese") refers to the written language of China from the Zhou Dynasty, and especially the Spring and Autumn Period, through to the end of the Han Dynasty. Classical Chinese is therefore the language used in many of China's most influential books, such as the Analects of Confucius, the Mencius and the Daodejing. (The language of even older texts, such as the ''Shijing'', is sometimes called Old Chinese.)
Literary Chinese (文言文, Wényánwén, "Literary Writing", or more colloquially just 文言 Wényán) is the form of written Chinese used from the end of the Han Dynasty to the early 20th century when it was replaced by vernacular written Chinese (Baihua). Literary Chinese diverged more and more from Classical Chinese as the dialects of China became more and more disparate and as the Classical written language became less and less representative of the spoken language. At the same time, Literary Chinese was based largely upon the Classical language, and writers frequently borrowed Classical language into their Literary writings. Literary Chinese therefore shows a great deal of similarity to Classical Chinese, even though the similarity decreased over the centuries.
This situation, usage of Literary Chinese throughout the Chinese cultural sphere despite the existence of disparate regional vernaculars, can be compared to the coexistence of the universal Latin language and the more local Latin-derived Romance languages in Europe, as well as the position of Classical Arabic relative to the various regional vernaculars in Arab lands. The Romance languages continued to evolve, influencing Latin texts of the same period, so that by the Middle Ages, Latin included many usages that would have baffled the Romans. The coexistence of Classical Chinese and the native languages of Korea, Japan, and Vietnam can be compared to the use of Latin in countries that natively speak non-Latin-derived Germanic languages or Slavic languages, or to the position of Arabic in Persia and India.

Pronunciation

Chinese characters are not alphabetic and do not reflect sound changes, and the tentative reconstruction of Old Chinese is an endeavor only a few centuries old. As a result, Classical Chinese is not read with a reconstruction of Old Chinese pronunciation; instead, it is either read with the pronunciations of different varieties of Chinese, such as modern standard Chinese (Mandarin) or regional varieties such as Cantonese; or, in some varieties of Chinese (e.g. Southern Min), with a special set of pronunciation used for Classical Chinese or vocabulary and usage borrowed from Classical Chinese usage. (In practice, all varieties of Chinese combine these two extremes; Mandarin and Cantonese, for example, also have words that are pronounced one way in colloquial usage and another way when used in Classical Chinese or in specialized terms coming from Classical Chinese, though the system is not as extensive as that of Southern Min.)
Korean, Japanese, or Vietnamese readers of Classical Chinese use systems of pronunciation specific to their own languages. For example, Japanese speakers use ''On'yomi'' and (more rarely) ''Kun'yomi'', which are the ways kanji, or Chinese characters, are read when they are used to write in Japanese. Kunten, a system that aids Japanese speakers with Classical Chinese word order, was also used.
Since the pronunciation of all modern varieties of Chinese are different from Old Chinese or other forms of historical Chinese (such as Middle Chinese), characters which once rhymed in poetry may no longer do so (e.g. rhyming occurring sometimes in Min, Cantonese and rarely in Mandarin), or vice versa. Poetry and other rhyme-based writing thus becomes less coherent than the original reading must have been. However, some modern Chinese dialects have certain phonological characteristics that are closer to the older pronunciations than others, as shown by the preservation of certain rhyme structures. Some believe ''wenyan'' literature, especially poetry, sounds better when read in certain dialects believed to be closer to older pronunciations, such as Cantonese or Southern Min.
Another phenomenon that is common in reading Classical Chinese is homophony, or words that sound the same. More than 2500 years of sound change separates Classical Chinese from any modern language or dialect, so when reading Classical Chinese in any modern variety of Chinese (especially Mandarin) or in Japanese, Korean, or Vietnamese, many characters which originally had different pronunciations have become homonyms. There is a famous Classical Chinese essay written in the early 20th-century by linguist Y. R. Chao called the Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den which was written to show how Classical Chinese was an impractical language for speakers of modern Chinese because Classical Chinese when spoken aloud is largely incomprehensible. However it is perfectly comprehensible when read silently, but contains only words that are now pronounced ''shī, shí, shǐ'' and ''shì'' in Standard Mandarin (the accents indicate the four tones). In addition, literary Chinese, by its very nature as a ''written'' language employing a logographic writing system, can often get away with the use of homophones that even in oral Old Chinese would not have been distinguishable in any way.
The situation is analogous with some English words that sound the same, such as "meet" and "meat". These two words were pronounced and respectively during the time of Chaucer, as evident by spelling. Today they sound the same, but are distinguished by spelling. English spelling is only a few centuries old and is a sound-based system that has kept pace with sound changes to an extent, so such examples are not very common; the Chinese writing system is, by contrast, several thousand years old and logographic, so such examples are more common and exist for a high proportion of characters.

Grammar and lexicon

''Wenyan'' is distinguished from ''baihua'' in its style that appears extremely concise and compact to modern Chinese speakers and to some extent the use of different lexical items (i.e., vocabulary). An essay in ''wenyan'', for example, might use half as many Chinese characters as in ''baihua'', even though the general sense of the writing remains the same.
In terms of conciseness and compactness, for example, ''wenyan'' rarely uses words composed of two Chinese characters; nearly all words are of one syllable only. This stands directly in contrast with modern Chinese dialects where two-syllable words are extremely common. This phenomenon exists, in part, because polysyllabic words evolved in Chinese to disambiguate homophones that result from sound changes. This is similar to phenomena in English like the ''pen''/''pin'' merger of the American South. Because the two sound alike, a certain degree of confusion can occur unless one adds qualifiers like "writing pen" and "stick pin". Similarly, Chinese has acquired many polysyllabic words in order to disambiguate monosyllabic words that sounded different in Old Chinese but identical today. Since ''wenyan'' is an imitation of Old Chinese, it has almost none of the two-syllable words present in modern Chinese languages.
''Wenyan'' has more pronouns compared to the modern vernacular. In particular, whereas Mandarin has one general character to refer to the first-person pronoun ("I"/"me"), Literary Chinese has several, many of which are used as part of honorific language, and several of which have different grammatical uses (first-person collective, first-person possessive, etc.).
For syntax, ''wenyan'' is always ready to drop subjects, verbs, objects, etc. when their meaning is understood or readily inferred. Also, parts of speech can change themselves easily: nouns used as verbs, adjective used as nouns, etc. There is no copula in ''wenyan''; the copula 是 (''shì'') in modern Chinese was originally a near demonstrative ("this", written 這 (''zhè'') in modern Chinese) in Old Chinese.
In addition to grammar and vocabulary differences, ''wenyan'' can be distinguished by literary and cultural differences: an effort to maintain parallelism and rhythm, even in prose works, and its extensive use of literary and cultural allusions, thereby also contribute to brevity.

Teaching and use

''Wenyan'' was the only form used in Chinese literary works until the May Fourth Movement, and was also heavily used in Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Ironically, Classical Chinese was used to write the Hunmin Jeongeum in which the modern Korean alphabet (Hangul) was promulgated and the essay by Hu Shi in which he argued against using Classical Chinese and in favor of baihua. Exceptions to the use of ''wenyan'' were vernacular novels such as ''The Dream of the Red Chamber'', which was considered low class at the time.
Today, pure ''wenyan'' is occasionally used in formal or ceremonial occasions. The ''National Anthem of the Republic of China'', for example, is in ''wenyan''. In practice there is a socially accepted continuum between ''baihua'' and ''wenyan''. For example, most notices and formal letters are written with a number of stock ''wenyan'' expressions (e.g. salutation, closing). Personal letters, on the other hand, are mostly written in ''baihua'', but with some ''wenyan'' phrases sometimes, depending on the subject matter, the writer's level of education, etc. Letters (and/or essays) written completely in ''wenyan'' today may be considered quaint, old-fashioned, or even pretentious by some, but may seem impressive to others.
Most Chinese people with at least a middle school education are able to read basic ''wenyan'', because the ability to read (but not write) ''wenyan'' is part of the Chinese middle school and high school curricula and is part of the college entrance examination. ''Wenyan'' is taught primarily by presenting a classical Chinese work and including a ''baihua'' gloss that explains the meaning of phrases. Tests on classical Chinese are often essentially translation exercises that ask the student to express the meaning of a paragraph in ''baihua'', using multiple choice.
In addition, many works of literature in ''wenyan'' (such as Tang poetry) have major cultural influences. However, even with knowledge of grammar and vocabulary, ''wenyan'' can be difficult to understand by native speakers of Chinese, because of its heavy use of literary references and allusions as well as its extremely abbreviated style.

See also

★ Chinese language

★ Sino-Japanese

★ Sino-Korean

★ Sino-Vietnamese

References

1. Chinese, Jerry Norman, , , Cambridge University Press, 1988,