 | Anonymous NYC 3/15 Scientology Protest The Church of Scientology on 46th Street in Times Square was visited by Anonymous on 3/15. New York State law prohibits wearing masks in public demonstrations. New York Penal Law § 240.35(4) "New York's anti-mask law criminalizes the wearing of masks or disguises by three or more persons in a public place unless done in connection with a "masquerade party or like entertainment," after obtaining a permit to wear masks from the police or other appropriate authorities... Under the current law, wearing a bandana tied around one's face falls within the scope of the mask prohibition." http://www.nlgnyc.org/pdf/MaskMemo.pdf However, cops did not ask people wearing bandannas, or dust masks to remove them, only full masks, and masks that covered eyes. |
 | New York Scientology Raid Feb 10 2008 Part 1 of 2 On Feb 10th, 2008 Anonymous protested the main COS facilities in New York City. This group was the first wave of backup, leaving Bryant Park at 10:45am, after the main group. This group got pegged early by a Scientology spy, and you will see that spy exposed in the video. There are more Scientology spies exposed in part 2. The protest was held from about 10:30am to 3:00pm on Feb 10th 2008, what would have been the birthday of Lisa Mcpherson, who died while being held in a Scientology owned building. Apparently a "mask law" in the state of New York actually exists. I looked it up and got this: New York Penal Law § 240.35 Section 4: "Being masked or in any manner disguised by unusual or unnatural attire or facial alteration, loiters, remains or congregates in a public place with other persons so masked or disguised, or knowingly permits or aids persons so masked or disguised to congregate in a public place; except that such conduct is not unlawful when it occurs in connection with a masquerade party or like entertainment if, when such entertainment is held in a city which has promulgated regulations in connection with such affairs, permission is first obtained from the police or other appropriate authorities; " I edited this footage for a New York friend of mine (and found the CO$ spies by watching this video over and over). Obviously not every single person taking photos is a CO$Spy, but a little paranoia can be a healthy thing. |
 | Operation Party Hard: For Freedom! 3/15/08 The Church of Scientology on 46th Street in Times Square was visited by Anonymous on 3/15. New York State law prohibits wearing masks in public demonstrations. New York Penal Law § 240.35(4) "New York's anti-mask law criminalizes the wearing of masks or disguises by three or more persons in a public place unless done in connection with a "masquerade party or like entertainment," after obtaining a permit to wear masks from the police or other appropriate authorities... Under the current law, wearing a bandana tied around one's face falls within the scope of the mask prohibition." http://www.nlgnyc.org/pdf/MaskMemo.pdf However, cops did not ask people wearing bandannas, or dust masks to remove them, only full masks, and masks that covered eyes. Also, it's a little unclear on why the cop takes a sign away in the video. There is apparently a law that prohibits wooden signs. I don't know the specific law. The cop was a little agitated because the person holding the sign apparently didn't hear him, so he grabbed the sign. It's not on tape, but the officer later gave the sign back, after removing the piece of wood. Nothing inappropriate occurred, and overall the NYPD was excellent, although confused by some of the songs. |
 | Tulane: Politics and Government in Latin America, Part 1 Tulane University Presidential Symposium Series "Democracy Interrupted: Public (Mis)Trust in the Modern Latin American State" - March 31, 2005 The Presidential Symposium Steering Committee of the Tulane University Stone Center for Latin American Studies has gathered analysts and observers of Latin America from a variety of backgrounds to address the relationship between the decline in public trust of the state with the dual processes of political liberalization (democratization) and neoliberal economic reform. Speakers: Nancy Birdsall, president of the Center for Global Development, and former senior associate and director of the Economic Reform Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, executive vice-president of the Inter-American Development Bank, and director of the Policy Research Department at the World Bank. Arturo Valenzuela, director of the Center for Latin American Studies at Georgetown University and special assistant to the President and senior director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the National Security Council in the second Clinton Administration. During Clinton's first term he was deputy assistant secretary for Inter-American Affairs in the Department of State. Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, director of the department of Penal Law and Criminology at the National University of Buenos Aires and Minister of the Supreme Court of Argentina. |
 | Tulane: Politics and Government in Latin America, Part 2 Tulane University Presidential Symposium Series "Democracy Interrupted: Public (Mis)Trust in the Modern Latin American State" - March 31, 2005 The Presidential Symposium Steering Committee of the Tulane University Stone Center for Latin American Studies has gathered analysts and observers of Latin America from a variety of backgrounds to address the relationship between the decline in public trust of the state with the dual processes of political liberalization (democratization) and neoliberal economic reform. Speakers: Nancy Birdsall, president of the Center for Global Development, and former senior associate and director of the Economic Reform Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, executive vice-president of the Inter-American Development Bank, and director of the Policy Research Department at the World Bank. Arturo Valenzuela, director of the Center for Latin American Studies at Georgetown University and special assistant to the President and senior director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the National Security Council in the second Clinton Administration. During Clinton's first term he was deputy assistant secretary for Inter-American Affairs in the Department of State. Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, director of the department of Penal Law and Criminology at the National University of Buenos Aires and Minister of the Supreme Court of Argentina. |
 | WP Penal Code Forum - Sylvia Lim 1 In Nov 2006, the government floated a draft Penal Code Amendment Bill and called for public comment. The Penal Code reflects our rights and responsibilities living in Singapore. Despite the tremendous significance of the Penal Code in guiding the way Singaporeans order their daily lives, the government has given little explanation for the proposals so far. In line with the Workers' Party's concern with justice and the rule of law since the Party's foundation in 1957, the Party held a public forum on the topic: "Amendments to the Penal Code - Why We Should Be Concerned" |
 | West Bank penal system 'failing' - 24 Jun 08 Germany is hosting a meeting of more than 40 countries to try to raise millions of dollars to bolster Palestinian law and order. Barbara Serra looks at why the help is needed. |
 | American Capital Punish. Law in the Shadow of Lynching - 4/6 Dr. David Garland's lecture delivered at Eastern Kentucky University - College of Justice and Safety in March 2007. Professor David W. Garland is widely considered one of the world's leading sociologists of crime and punishment. Garland, who received his law degree with First Class Honors and a Ph.D. in Socio-Legal Studies from the University of Edinburgh as well as a Masters in Criminology from the University of Sheffield, is noted for his distinctive sociological approach to the study of punishment and crime control, as well as for his work on the history of criminological ideas. He played a leading role in developing the sociology of punishment and was the founding editor of the interdisciplinary journal Punishment & Society. He is the author of several prize-winning studies, including Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory, which won distinguished book awards from the American Sociological Association and the Society for the Study of Social Problems, and Punishment and Welfare: The History of Penal Strategies which won the International Society of Criminology's prize for best study over a five-year period. His most recent book is The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, was published by University of Chicago Press in February 2001 and has already been translated into Italian, Spanish, and Chinese. The Culture of Control charts contemporary trends in penal and social control, arguing that the crime policies which emerged in the US and the UK after 1975 are political and cultural adaptations to the new risks and problems created by 'late modern' ways of life. |
 | Law student on Imran Khan's treatment by IJT Thousands of students at University of the Punjab protested against Jamiat and its role in getting Imran Khan arrested on Thursday. This, man, a student of law himself, tells us why the students in general have gone against IJT and its activities. TRANSLATION: First Person: "Imran Khan was our guest and guests should never be treated like this. Whoever he was, whatever decision IJT had taken to keep politics out of the University's campus, still, we students are apolitical and everyone that has gathered here in protest is not supporting any political party. It is not a political movement, and the cause to fight for democracy is one for which people stood united and these guys from IJT have tried to break that unity. Its totally a very shameful act. Especially we being students of law, why are we studying the PPC (Pakistan Penal Code). We are studying the constitution for its restoration, improvement and to stand for the rule of law and for that we are with the Chief Justice, we are with anyone who is fighting for saving the constituion." Second Person: "Just as my brother has said, we are law students and we cannot see IJT going after Imran Khan who is fighting for the cause of free-judiciary in Paksitan. Yesterday, the IJT has only played to its own political interests and has tried to politicize a neutral movement." First Person, again: "Students have been beated by the IJT workers and we still are being threatened by them" |
 | POLICE CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW Prosecutors must disclose obviously exculpatory evidence even absent a request from the defendant, and when Guyot interfered with a court order in an attempt to prevent the court ordered penal liability exam from potentially exonerating Pinkerton, and to suppress the question of Pinkertons liability from a court ordered mental examination is equivalent to the suppression of evidence, along with suppressing exculpatory evidence found on Pinkertons website, are grounds that disqualify him for immunity. See Brady v. Maryland373 U.S. at 87 Prosecutor Guyot and members of the County of Kauai Prosecutors Office have a professional responsibility to divulge the evidence favorable to the Plaintiff, when they learned from Pinkerton's website and failed to allow that information to negate Pinkerton's guilt, regardless if the evidence implicated several Kauai Police Officers. Once again, no sanctions were ever brought against the Prosecutors Office or Guyot for with violating Rule 3.8(b) of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 3.8. of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct: Performing the duty of the public prosecutor or other government lawyer. A public prosecutor or other government lawyer shall: (a) not institute or cause to be instituted criminal charges when [the prosecutor or government lawyer] knows or it is obvious that the charges are not supported by probable cause; and b) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal. [emphasis added]" [Pages 9,10,11 of http://www.kpinkerton.com/08-00222/11... ] Kauai Police Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion of Koloa, my neighbor of three blocks away, has repeatedly filed false charges that neither he nor other corrupt officers can prove. I recorded the mediation in which Officer Asuncion's' verbal statement discredits his first two investigations and most importantly his Temporary Restraining Order against me. The prosecution has reviewed this audio file and upon request of Kauai prosecutor Marc E. Guyot, Judge Trudy Senda issued my a Supreme Court Rule 5.1 When Officer Gilbert Asuncion enlisted the help of Sgt. Richard Rosa, Sgt Nelson Agni, Officer Okamoto and Officer Gabriel to cover up the crimes and police misconduct on behalf of Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion at a SCHOOL FUNCTION on SCHOOL PROPERTY, this act became "CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS" and "CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE CIVIL RIGHTS". Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion, 5/10/1970. I wish this video to help him to see that he is not above the LAW and he will be held responsible for his crimes. Sgt Richard Rosa: You are a liar as my phone records show. See you in court. Police Officers Okamoto and Gabriel: You are not at liberty to conspire against me either. You are not permitted to threaten to shoot ANYBODYS dogs, let alone mine. Unless you have a warrant or in "HOT PURSUIT", you cannot threaten to breach someone's property in order to unlawfully arrest someone at 02:30 am in order to shelter a fellow officer from liability for the crimes he committed against me while at a school function. I ask this question for the Prosecution: Why offer me a Global Plea Offer and then indict me because I refuse to sign and relinquish all my Constitutional Rights. Will these abuses of power never end? Why should I submit to your tyranny when all the proof I have shows the KPD officers implicated in my cases are the real criminals? It is for that reason alone that I created the video Stand My Ground can be found at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO2-AVpJVrI The evidence collection posted at http://www.kpinkerton.com reaches beyond the 12 jurors sitting on my case. In closing I must give all glory to JAH! Let God's true name be sanctified. Without Jehovah's guidance this would not be possible. |
 | Human Rights 11/20 Article 11. (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence. (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed. Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. Article 13. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. Article 14. (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. Article 15. (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality. Article 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. Article 17. (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. Article 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Article 20. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association. |
 | WP Penal Code Forum - Sylvia Lim 2 In Nov 2006, the government floated a draft Penal Code Amendment Bill and called for public comment. The Penal Code reflects our rights and responsibilities living in Singapore. Despite the tremendous significance of the Penal Code in guiding the way Singaporeans order their daily lives, the government has given little explanation for the proposals so far. In line with the Workers' Party's concern with justice and the rule of law since the Party's foundation in 1957, the Party held a public forum on the topic: "Amendments to the Penal Code - Why We Should Be Concerned" |
العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español
