
Radar topography reveals the 180 kilometer (112 mile) wide ring of the crater (image courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
'Chicxulub Crater' (
IPA: ) (''cheek-shoo-LOOB'') is an ancient
impact crater buried underneath the
Yucatán Peninsula, with its center located approximately underneath the town of
Chicxulub,
Yucatán,
Mexico.
Investigations suggest that this impact structure is dated from the late
Cretaceous Period, about 65
million years ago. Thus the meteorite associated with the crater is
implicated in causing the extinction of the
dinosaurs as suggested by the
K-T boundary.
Impact specifics
The
meteorite's estimated size was about 10 km (6 mi) in diameter, releasing an estimated 500
zettajoules (5.0×10
23 joules) of energy, approximately 100
teratons of
TNT (10
14 tons),
[1] on impact. By contrast, the most powerful man-made explosive device ever detonated, the
Tsar Bomba or Emperor Bomb, had a
yield of only 50
megatons, which would make this impact 2,000,000 times more powerful.
The impact would have caused some of the largest
megatsunamis in Earth's history. These would have spread in all directions, hitting the Caribbean island of
Cuba especially hard. A cloud of dust, ash and steam would spread itself from the crater. The pieces of the meteorite would have rained all over Earth, igniting global wildfires. The
shock waves would have continued hundreds of kilometers into the planet, causing global
earthquakes and
volcanic eruptions. The emission of dust and particles covered the entire surface of the earth for several years, possibly a decade, creating a harsh environment. (Pope, ''et al.'', 1997)
Extinction of the dinosaurs
This timing is in good agreement with the theory postulated by the late
physicist Luis Alvarez and his son,
geologist Walter Alvarez, for the extinction of the
dinosaurs. The Alvarezes, at the time both faculty members at the
University of California, Berkeley, postulated that the extinction of the dinosaurs, roughly contemporaneous with the
K-T boundary, could have been caused by the impact of just such a large meteorite. This theory is now widely, though not universally, accepted by the
scientific community.
[2]
The main evidence is a widespread, thin layer of clay present in this geological boundary across the world. In the late
1970s, the Alvarezes and colleagues reported
[3] that it contained an abnormally high concentration of
iridium – 6 parts per billion by weight or more compared to 0.4
[4] for the Earth's crust as a whole. Meteorites can contain around 470 parts per billion
[5] of this element. It was hypothesised that the iridium was spread into the atmosphere when the meteorite was vapourised and settled across the Earth's surface amongst other material thrown up by the impact, producing the relatively iridium-rich layer of clay.
[6]
Discovery
Clues in Haitian rock
In early
1990, Alan R. Hildebrand, a graduate student at the
University of Arizona, visited a small mountain village named Beloc in
Haiti. He was investigating certain K-T deposits that include thick, jumbled deposits of coarse rock fragments, which were apparently scoured up from one location and deposited elsewhere by a kilometers-high
tsunami that most likely resulted from an Earth impact. Such deposits occur in many locations but seem to be concentrated in the
Caribbean Basin.
Hildebrand found a greenish brown coloured clay with an excess of
iridium and containing
shocked quartz grains and small beads of weathered
glass that appeared to be
tektites. He and his faculty adviser, William V. Boynton, published the results of the research in the scientific press
[7], suggesting that the deposits were the result of an Earth impact and that the impact could not have been more than 1,000 kilometers (620 mi) away.
No crater was known to exist in the Caribbean basin. However Hildebrand and Boynton also reported their findings to an international geological conference, sparking substantial interest. Evidence pointed to possible crater sites off the north coast of
Colombia or near the western tip of
Cuba. Then Carlos Byars, a reporter for the
Houston Chronicle, contacted Hildebrand and told him that a geophysicist named Glen Penfield had discovered what might be the impact crater in
1978, buried under the northern
Yucatán Peninsula.
Discovery of "arc"
In that year, Penfield had been working for
Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX, the Mexican state-owned oil company) as a staff member for an airborne magnetic survey of the Yucatán Peninsula. When Penfield examined the survey data, he found a huge underground "arc", with its ends pointing south, in the Caribbean off the Yucatan that was inconsistent with the region's geology.
Penfield then obtained a gravity map of the Yucatan that had been made in the
1960s. He found another arc, but this one was on the Yucatan itself, and its ends pointed north. He matched up the two maps and found that the two arcs joined up in a circle, 180 kilometers (112 miles) wide, with its center at the village of
Puerto Chicxulub.
Although PEMEX would not allow him to release specific data, the company did allow him and PEMEX official Antonio Camargo to present their results at a geological conference in
1981. The conference was under-attended in that year, ironically because most geologists were attending a workshop on Earth impacts, and their report attracted very little attention, though it did get back to Byars.
Penfield knew that PEMEX had drilled exploratory wells in the region in
1951. One of the wells had bored into a thick layer of
andesite about 1.3 kilometers (4,200 ft) down. Such a structure could have resulted from the intense heat and pressures of an Earth impact, but at the time of the borings it had been written off as a "
volcanic dome", even though such a feature was out of place in the geology of the region.
Correlation of data
After Hildebrand got in touch with Penfield, the two men were able to locate two separate samples from the wells drilled by PEMEX in
1951. Analysis of the samples clearly showed
shock-metamorphic materials. Studies by other geologists of the debris found in Haiti at Beloc also showed it to be clearly the result of an impact.
Satellite surveys
In
1996, a team of California researchers, including
Kevin O. Pope, Adriana Ocampo, and Charles Duller, conducted a survey of satellite images of the region. They found that there was a ring of
sinkholes centered on Puerto Chicxulub that matched the ring Penfield had found in his data. The sinkholes were likely caused by
subsidence of the crater's wall. (Pope, ''et al.'', 1996)
Further studies have reinforced the consensus. Indeed, some evidence has accumulated that the actual crater is 300 kilometers (186 miles) wide, and the 180 kilometer ring is just an inner wall. (Sharpton & Marin, 1997)
Multiple impact theory
In recent years, several other craters of around the same age as Chicxulub have been discovered, all between latitudes 20°N and 70°N. Examples include the
Silverpit crater in the
North Sea, and the
Boltysh crater in
Ukraine, both much smaller than Chicxulub but likely to have been caused by objects many tens of metres across striking the Earth. This has led to the hypothesis that the Chicxulub impact may have been only one of several impacts that happened all at the same time. Another possible crater thought to have been formed at the same time is the
Shiva crater, though the structure's status as a crater is contested.
The collision of
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter in
1994 proved that gravitational interactions can fragment a comet, giving rise to many impacts over a period of a few days if the comet should collide with a planet. Comets frequently undergo gravitational interactions with the gas giants, and similar disruptions and collisions are very likely to have occurred in the past. This scenario may have occurred on Earth 65 million years ago.
In late
2006, Ken MacLeod, a
geology professor from the
University of Missouri–Columbia, completed an analysis of
sediment below the ocean's surface bolstering the single-impact theory. MacLeod conducted his analysis approximately 4,500 kilometers (2,800 mi) from the Chicxulub Crater to control for possible changes in soil composition at the impact site while still close enough to be affected by the impact. The analysis revealed there was only one layer of impact debris in the sediment, indicating only one impact. Reuters quoted Multiple Impact proponent
Gerta Keller as saying, "Unfortunately, these claims are rather hyper-inflated and do not withstand close examination."
[8]
Possible origin of asteroid
On
September 5,
2007 a report was issued that stated a possible origin of the asteroid that caused the Chicxulub Crater formation. A possible asteroid collision event, believed to have occurred 160 million years ago in the asteroid belt, that also resulted in the formation of the asteroid known as
298 Baptistina, might have sent the "Chicxulub asteroid" on a path which eventually reached the Earth, from a collision that broke up a much larger body believed to be about 170 km (105 miles) across, with the impacting body being of a possible 60 km (37 miles) across size.
[1]
See also
★
Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event
★
Permian-Triassic extinction event
★
Wilkes Land crater
References
1. The Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary cocktail: Chicxulub impact triggers margin collapse and extensive sediment gravity flows, , Timothy J., Bralower, , 1998
2. The Chicxlub debate, Princeton University website
3.
4. webelements.com, Geological abundance of iridium
5. QIV.inc periodic table
6. Asteroid Rained Glass Over Entire Earth, Scientists Say, National Geographic News, 15 May 2005
7. Chicxulub Crater; a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, from Google Scholar
8. http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/12/01/asteroid.dinosaurs.reut/index.html
★
Energy, volatile production, and climatic effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary impact, Pope KO, Baines KH, Ocampo AC, Ivanov BA, , , Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997
★
Surface expression of the Chicxulub crater, Pope KO, Ocampo AC, Kinsland GL, Smith R, , , Geology, 1996
★
Significación paleogeográfica de la brecha basal del LÃmite K/T en Loma Dos Hermanas (Loma del Capiro), en Santa Clara, provincia de Villa Clara. I Convención Cubana de Ciencias de la Tierra., Rojas-Consuegra, R., M. A. Iturralde-Vinent, C. DÃaz-Otero y D. GarcÃa-Delgado, , , GEOCIENCIAS, 2005
★
The Cretaceous-Tertiary impact crater and the cosmic projectile that produced it, Sharpton VL, Marin LE, , , Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1997
★
Single Massive Asteroid Wiped Out Dinosaurs Reuters, December 1, 2006
★
The Chixulub Debate
External links
★
Chicxulub
★
''Mystery of the Chicxulub Crater'' by Robert Roy Britt
★
Chicxulub impact predates the K-T boundary mass extinction
★
Satellite image of the region (from Google Maps)
★
NASA JPL: "A 'Smoking Gun' for Dinosaur Extinction",
March 6,
2003
★
Chicxulub, Crater of Doom
★
San Francisco Chronicle: "Scientists implicate huge asteroid collision in death of dinosaurs"