
The plot of a Cauchy sequence shown in blue, as versus If the space containing the sequence is complete, the "ultimate destination" of this sequence, that is, the limit, exists.

A sequence that is not Cauchy. The elements of the sequence fail to get close to each other as the sequence progresses.
In
mathematics, a 'Cauchy sequence', named after
Augustin Cauchy, is a
sequence whose elements become ''close to each other'' as the sequence progresses. To be more precise, by dropping enough ( but still only a finite number of) terms from the start of the sequence, it is possible to make the maximum of the
distances from any of the remaining elements to any other such element smaller than any preassigned positive value.
In other words, suppose a pre-assigned positive real value
is chosen.
However small
is, starting from a Cauchy sequence and eliminating terms one by one from the start, after a finite number of steps, any pair chosen from the remaining terms will be within distance
of each other.
Because Cauchy sequences require the notion of distance, they can only be defined in a
metric space. Their utility lies in the fact that in a
complete metric space ( one where all such sequences are known to
converge to a limit), they give a criterion for convergence which depends only on the terms of the sequence itself. This is often exploited in algorithms, both theoretical and applied, where an iterative process can be shown relatively easily to produce a Cauchy sequence, consisting of the iterates.
The notions above are not as unfamiliar as might at first appear. The customary acceptance of the fact that any real number ''x'' has a decimal expansion is an implicit acknowledgment that a particular Cauchy sequence of rational numbers (whose terms are the successive truncations of the decimal expansion of ''x'') has the real limit ''x''. In some cases it may be difficult to describe ''x'' independently of such a limiting process involving rational numbers.
Generalizations of Cauchy sequences in more abstract
uniform spaces exist in the form of
Cauchy filter and
Cauchy net.
Cauchy sequence of real numbers
A sequence
:
of real numbers is called 'Cauchy', if for every
positive real number ''ε'' > 0 there is a positive
integer ''N'' such that for all integers ''m'',''n'' > ''N''
:
where the vertical bars denote the
absolute value.
In a similar way one can define Cauchy sequences of complex numbers.
Cauchy sequence in a metric space
To define Cauchy sequences in any metric space, the absolute value
is replaced by the ''distance''
between
and
.
Formally, given a
metric space (''M'', ''d''), a sequence
:
is Cauchy, if for every positive
real number ''ε'' > 0 there is an
integer ''N'' such that for all integers ''m'',''n'' > ''N'', the distance
:
is less than ''ε''. Roughly speaking, the terms of the sequence are getting closer and closer together in a way that suggests that the sequence ought to have a
limit in ''M''. Nonetheless, such a limit does not always exist.
Completeness
A metric space ''X'' in which every Cauchy sequence has a limit (in ''X'') is called
complete.
Examples
The
real numbers are complete, and one of the standard
constructions of the real numbers involves Cauchy sequences of
rational numbers.
A rather different type of example is afforded by a metric space ''X'' which has the
discrete metric ( where any two distinct points are at distance ''1'' from each other). Any Cauchy sequence of elements of ''X'' must be constant beyond some fixed point, and converges to the eventually repeating term.
Counter-example: rational numbers
The
rational numbers 'Q' are not complete (for the usual distance):
There are sequences of rationals that converge (in 'R') to
irrational numbers; these are Cauchy sequences having no limit in 'Q'. In fact,if a real number ''x'' is irrational, then the sequence (''x''
''n''), whose ''n''-th term is the truncation to ''n''
decimal places of the decimal expansion of ''x'', gives Cauchy sequence
of rational numbers with irrational limit ''x''. Irrational numbers
certainly exist, for example:
★ The sequence defined by ''x
0 = 1'', ''x
n+1'' = (''x
n'' + 2/''x
n'')/2 consists of rational numbers (1, 3/2, 17/12,...), which is clear from the definition; however it converges to the
irrational square root of two, see
Babylonian method of computing square root.
★ The sequence
of ratios of consecutive
Fibonacci numbers which, if it converges at all, converges to a limit
satisfying
, and no rational number has this property. If one considers this as a sequence of real numbers, however, it converges to the real number
, the
Golden ratio, which is irrational.
★ The values of the exponential, sine and cosine functions, exp(''x''), sin(''x''), cos(''x''), are known to be irrational for any rational value of ''x''≠0, but each can be defined as the limit of a rational Cauchy sequence, using, for instance, the
Maclaurin series.
Other properties
Every convergent sequence (with limit ''s'', say) is a Cauchy sequence, since, given any real number ''r'' > 0, beyond some fixed point, every term of sequence is within distance ''r''/2 of ''s'', so any two terms of the sequence are within distance ''r'' of each other. Every Cauchy sequence of real (or complex) numbers is
bounded ( since for some ''N'', all terms of the sequence from the ''N''-th onwards
are within distance ''1'' of each other, and if ''M'' is the largest absolute value of the terms up to and including the ''N''-th, then no term of the sequence has absolute value greater than ''M''+''1''). In any metric space, a Cauchy sequence which has a convergent subsequence with limit ''s'' is itself convergent (with the same limit), since, given any real number ''r'' > 0, beyond some fixed point in the original sequence, every term of the subsequence is within distance ''r''/''2'' of ''s'', and any two terms of the original sequence are within distance ''r''/''2'' of each other, so every term of the original sequence is within distance ''r'' of ''s''. These last two properties, together with a lemma used in the proof of the
Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, yield one standard proof of the completeness of the real numbers, closely related to both the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem and the
Heine–Borel theorem. The lemma in question states that every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Given this fact, every Cauchy sequence of real numbers is bounded, hence has a convergent subsequence, hence is itself convergent. It should be noted, though, that this proof of the completeness of the real numbers implicitly makes use of the
least upper bound axiom. The alternative approach, mentioned above, of ''constructing'' the real numbers as the of the rational numbers, makes the completeness of the real numbers tautological.
One of the standard illustrations of the advantage of being able to work with Cauchy sequences and make use of completeness is provided by consideration of the summation of an
infinite series of real numbers
(or, more generally, of elements of any complete normed linear space, or
Banach space). Such a series
is considered to be convergent if and only if the sequence of
partial sums
is convergent, where
. It is a routine matter
to determine whether the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy or not,
since for positive integers ''p'' > ''q'' ,
:::::::
.
If
is a
uniformly continuous map between the metric spaces ''M'' and ''N'' and (''x''
''n'') is a Cauchy sequence in ''M'', then
is a Cauchy sequence in ''N''. If
and
are two Cauchy sequences in the rational, real or complex numbers, then the sum
and the product
are also Cauchy sequences.
Generalizations
Cauchy sequences in topological vector spaces
There is also a concept of Cauchy sequence for a
topological vector space : Pick a
local base for
about 0; then (
) is a Cauchy sequence if for all members
of
, there is some number
such that whenever
is an element of
. If the topology of
is compatible with a
translation-invariant metric , the two definitions agree.
Cauchy sequences in groups
There is also a concept of Cauchy sequence in a group
:
Let
be a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups of
of finite
index.
Then a sequence
in
is said to be Cauchy (w.r.t.
)
if and only if for any
there is
such that
.
The set
of such Cauchy sequences forms a group (for the componentwise product), and the set
of null sequences (s.th.
) is a normal subgroup of
. The
factor group is called the completion of
with respect to
.
One can then show that this completion is isomorphic to the
inverse limit of the sequence
.
An example of this construction, familiar in
number theory
and
algebraic geometry is the construction of the ''p-adic completion'' of the integers with respect to a prime ''p.'' In this case, ''G'' is the integers under addition, and ''H''
''r'' is the additive subgroup consisting of integer multiples of ''p''
''r''.
If
is a
cofinal sequence (i.e., any normal subgroup of finite index contains some
), then this completion is
canonical in the sense that it is isomorphic to the inverse limit of
, where
varies over ''all'' normal subgroups of finite
index.
For further details, see ch. I.10 in Lang's "Algebra".
In constructive mathematics
In
constructive mathematics, Cauchy sequences often must be given with a ''modulus of Cauchy convergence'' to be useful. If
is a Cauchy sequence in the set
, then a modulus of Cauchy convergence for the sequence is a
function from the set of
natural numbers to itself, such that
.
Clearly, any sequence with a modulus of Cauchy convergence is a Cauchy sequence. The converse (that every Cauchy sequence has a modulus) follows from the
well-ordering property of the natural numbers (let
be the smallest possible
in the definition of Cauchy sequence, taking
to be
). However, this well-ordering property does not hold in constructive mathematics (it is equivalent to the principle of
excluded middle). On the other hand, this converse also follows (directly) from the principle of
dependent choice (in fact, it will follow from the weaker AC
00), which is generally accepted by constructive mathematicians. Thus, moduli of Cauchy convergence are needed directly only by constructive mathematicians who (like
Fred Richman) do not wish to use any form of choice.
That said, using a modulus of Cauchy convergence can simplify both definitions and theorems in constructive analysis. Perhaps even more useful are ''regular Cauchy sequences'', sequences with a given modulus of Cauchy convergence (usually
or
). Any Cauchy sequence with a modulus of Cauchy convergence is equivalent (in the sense used to form the
completion of a metric space) to a regular Cauchy sequence; this can be proved without using any form of the axiom of choice. Regular Cauchy sequences were used by
Errett Bishop in his
Foundations of Constructive Analysis, but they have also been used by
Douglas Bridges in a non-constructive textbook (ISBN 978-0-387-98239-7). However, Bridges also works on mathematical constructivism; the concept has not spread far outside of that milieu.
References
★
Commutative Algebra, Bourbaki, Nicolas, , , Addison-Wesley, 1972, ISBN 0-201-00644-8
★
Algebra, Lang, Serge, , , Addison-Wesley, 1997, ISBN 978-0-201-55540-0
★
Calculus, , Michael, Spivak, Publish or Perish, 1994, ISBN 0-914098-89-6
★
Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction, Troelstra, A. S. and D. van Dalen, , , , , (for uses in constructive mathematics)