A 'by-election' or 'bye-election' is a special
election held to fill a political office that has become vacant between
general elections. Usually this occurs when the incumbent has died or
resigned, but it may also occur when the incumbent becomes ineligible to continue in office, for example because of a
recall or a sufficiently serious criminal conviction. Historically, members of some parliaments were required to seek re-election upon being appointed to a
ministerial post. The subsequent by-elections were termed 'ministerial by-elections'.
By-elections in single member constituencies
By-elections are held in most nations that elect their parliaments through single-member
constituencies, whether
with or
without a
runoff round. This includes most
Commonwealth countries, such as the
United Kingdom and
Canada, as well as
France. In the
United States they are called 'special elections', and are held when a seat in
Congress or some
state legislatures is vacant.
By-elections in multi-member constituencies
When one seat in a
proportional representation constituency becomes vacant, the consequences vary. For example, a by-election may be held to fill just the vacancy or all the seats in the constituency become up for grabs in the by-election held.
Scotland and
New Zealand still hold by-elections, despite having adopted the
additional member system, in which members are also chosen by
party lists. The
Republic of Ireland holds by-elections despite electing members in multi-member constituencies by the
single transferable vote.
Alternatives to holding a by-election include recounting the original votes while disregarding the candidate who has withdrawn as in
Tasmania, keeping the seat vacant until the next
general election or nominating another candidate with the same affiliation as the one whose seat has become vacant - typically the next candidate on the party list under systems where one has been drawn up.
Consequences of by-elections
The vast majority of by-elections are unimportant and
voter turnouts are seldom comparable with general elections. The governing party normally has a solid cushion so that losing a handful of seats would not affect their position. Because by-elections usually have little influence on the general governance, voters feel freer to elect smaller fringe parties. Parties on both the far
right-wing and the far
left-wing tend to do better in by-elections than in
general elections.
However, by-elections can become crucial when the ruling party has only a small
margin. In
parliamentary systems, party discipline is strong enough so that the one common scenario for a
vote of no confidence to occur is after the governing party loses enough by-elections to become a
minority government. A recent UK example is the
Labour government of
James Callaghan 1976-79.
By-elections can also be important if a minority party needs to gain one or more seats in order to gain
official party status or the
balance of power in a minority or coalition situation. For example,
Andrea Horwath's win in an
Ontario provincial by-election in 2004 allowed the
Ontario NDP to regain official party status with important results in terms of parliamentary privileges and funding.
By-elections may occur singly, or in small bunches, especially if the authority responsible for calling them has discretion over the timing and can procrastinate. They are sometimes bunched to save money as holding multiple by-elections is likely to cost more than holding a by-election to fill the vacancies all at once. In
Canada, in
1978, 15 by-elections were held on a single date, restoring the House of Commons to 264 members. The media called it a "mini-election", a test of the Liberal government's popularity with a general election due in less than a year. The 15 districts stretched from Newfoundland to British Columbia, and produced some unexpected results, for example, an NDP candidate winning in Newfoundland for the first time.
Party leaders and media commentators often point to by-election victories as important signals, but very often by-elections hinge far more on local issues and the charisma of the candidates (especially under single-seat constituency systems) than on national issues or how the voters feel about the governing party. Nonetheless it can be shown historically that a main
opposition party which performs consistently poorly in by-elections is unlikely to be a serious contender for power at the subsequent
general election.
By-election strategy
This is a strategy that may be adopted by smaller parties in elections where there is a dominant party that has been in power for a long time, and that voters do not want the dominant party to lose power in any surprising fashion. The strategy is made simply by the smaller parties contesting less than half of the total number of seats in the parliament. This is to create a by-election feeling amongst the voters, who may feel assured to cast their opposing vote to have more opposition voices in parliament. An example of this is in the Singapore elections.
See also
★
List of democracy and elections-related topics
★ Lists of by-elections and special elections by jurisdiction
★
★ Canada:
List of federal by-elections in Canada
★
★ Ireland:
List of Irish by-elections
★
★ New Zealand:
New Zealand by-elections
★
★ Scotland:
List of Scottish Parliamentary by-elections
★
★ United Kingdom:
List of United Kingdom by-elections
★
★
★
United Kingdom by-election records
★
★ United States:
Special elections to the United States House of Representatives
★
★ Wales:
List of Welsh Assembly by-elections
External links
★
Electing Local Authorities - article from the
ACE Project
العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español
